cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 653 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
ANTARA BEZITSRECHT DAN EIGENDOMRECHT: Kajian Tentang Hak Atas Tanah Oleh Penduduk Harto Juwono
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 2, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.2.1.2013.131-150

Abstract

Nowadays, land ownership's issues become complicated and often result in conflict to nation, either individually or groups (mass). Lack of clarity of the status of the land requires a historical approach to the study of the legal regulation of land that changed following regime, which resulted in changes to the rights and status of land ownership. Results of this study concluded that the problems came out from an incomprehensive notice from the regulator/government, in order to clarify which regime used by now. Most of the people are sticking with the understanding of property rights (bezitzrecht) or tenure (beschikkingsrecht) of land, which is different from the concept of land title rights (eigendom). Therefore, the Government is expected to socialize the concept of land title rights (eigendom) and other present land rights so the conflicts will decrease or subside. Keyword: property rights (bezitzrecht), land title rights (eigendom), regulation history
ASEAN REGIONAL ARBITRATION BOARD: AN ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE ASEAN REGION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY Dian Maris Rahmah; Tri Handayani
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.3.2019.333-352

Abstract

Transactions among ASEAN member countries are increasingly open with the release of the ASEAN Economic Community (MEA). Entrepreneurs in ASEAN countries are expected to make more transactions with their business partners in the Southeast Asian region. Increasing business relations in the ASEAN region will in part affect the increase in disputes among ASEAN entrepreneurs. This study aims to provide an idea regarding the establishment of the ASEAN Regional Arbitration Agency as an effort to overcome the issue of the execution of arbitration decisions by utilizing regional unification. This research is descriptive analytical using a normative juridical approach. The results of the study show that ASEAN should be a place for resolving international commercial disputes, especially on business transactions carried out in the ASEAN member countries, if ASEAN has a regional arbitration forum, the procedure for resolving business disputes in this region will be simpler, more effective and easier. Legal system barriers can also be overcome if there are procedures that are jointly recognized.
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN ELECTRONICS JUSTICE SYSTEM (E-COURT) Siska Naomi Panggabean
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.1.2021.1-30

Abstract

The emergence of e-Court as a modernization on trials enabled the judicial process to run online. The application allowed users, including Persons with Disabilities (PwD). Since the online system is essentially similar to the on-site one, the judicial process should consider reasonable accommodation. Moreover, considering Government Regulation Number 39 of 2020 concerning Reasonable Accommodations for Person with Disabilities (Regulation of Reasonable Accommodation in Judicial Process), the types of accommodations to enable PwD to use the online system must be clear. How the reasonable accommodations provided in e-Court is the issue of this research. The method of research used to elaborate on this issue is the normative juridical method. Patterns of problem approach are statute approach and conceptual approach. Meanwhile, the Analytical Descriptive method is used to construct the data. In this writing, automated online web accessibility tests showed that the medium percentage of the e-Court's accessibility is used to bolder the analysis. This writing elaborated the accessibility of e-Court and the components of the information within which needed to be enhanced for providing reasonable accommodation for Persons with Disabilities, mainly in the form of service. It also touched on the Standard of Judicial Process involving Persons with Disabilities and the provision of the Companion and/ or the Translator for Persons with Disabilities during the trial process linked with the personal assessment and the participation of society.
BUKTI ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI YANG SAH DALAM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA Ramiyanto Ramiyanto
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 6, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.463-484

Abstract

The Criminal Procedure Code as a general criminal procedure does not recognize electronic evidence as one of the admissible types of evidence. In practice, electronic evidence is also used as an admissible evidence to prove the criminal offenses in court. From the results of the discussion it can be concluded that electronic evidence in criminal procedure law is a dependent evidence and an independent evidence (substitution of letter proof if it meets the principle of functional equivalent approach and expansion of evidence) as specified in several special laws and instruments issued by the Supreme Court. The electronic evidence is not regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code as a lex generalis, however, to achieve material truth it can also be used as a valid evidence for the provision of all types of criminal offenses in court. It is based on recognition in the practice of criminal justice, some special laws, and instruments issued by the Supreme Court.Keywords: electronic evidence, admissible evidence, criminal procedure code, proof
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KURATOR BERDASARKAN PRINSIP INDEPENDENSI MENURUT HUKUM KEPAILITAN Sriti Hesti Astiti
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 5, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.5.2.2016.277-298

Abstract

This article aimed to criticize the juridical basis of the scope of crime mentioned on Law Number 37 of 2004, focuses on the criminal responsibility of a Curator based on independence principle of Bankruptcy Law. Essentially, bankruptcy is a part of Civil Law. However, some bankruptcy cases eventually evolve into criminal matters when a Bankruptcy Curator who is responsible for handling and administering bankruptcy case is positioned as Defendant charged with conducting criminal acts. As stated in Article 234 verse (2) of Law Number 37 of 2004, a Curator who is proven not independent during bankruptcy court may be charged with Criminal Law.Keywords: Curator, Bankruptcy, Principle of Independency, Criminal Responsibility
FREEDOM & IMPARTIAL OF JUDICIARY : ANTARA “ PERADILAN BEBAS” & “PERS YANG BEBAS Indriyanto Seno Adji
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.31-50

Abstract

Press of independence adopted by Law No. 40 of 1999 on the Press is an accentuation of the Libertarian Press system which requires the existence of a absolute total "freedom of pers" by putting all the legal consequences on the substance of its news through judicial institutions, without calls for criminalization forms of the press with all the reason and limitedly direction purpose. Absolute Privilege Right of the Press have signs that provide a limitation on -moral hazard- based on Interest of justice or national security or for the prevention of disorder or crime that can be issued by the judiciary as a form of Sub Judice Rule criteria or Disobeying a Court Order from Contempt of Court institutions. a proclamation which is a form of freedom of expression with the news that "prejudicial", even the news substance pose a "misleading conclusion and opinion" as well as has provided an opinion and conclusions that are misleading or incorrect and negative impact on the course of judicial proceedings and other parties broadly (as recognition of the Press Libertarian System) may be faced with a sense of responsibility of the press itself, either ethic norms and laws.Keywords : Judicial, Pers, Freedom
KRIMINALISASI HAKIM DAN EKSISTENSI PRINSIP JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE DALAM BINGKAI NEGARA HUKUM Muh Risnain
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 2, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.2.3.2013.325-336

Abstract

Legal policy throught criminalization of judge by the law are abuse of judicial indpence and threat of rule of law principle while regulate by the constitution. And it is shown that quo vadis of criminalization policy when drafting the law. To solve this problem, there are two step, firstly, House of representative and President as state organs who have authority to arrange the law must pay attention principle of judicial indepence and rule of law, second, reorientation of criminal policy. Keywords: Criminalization, Judicial Independence and Rule of Law.
Illegal Fishing sebagai Kejahatan Korporasi Suatu terobosan Hukum pidana dalam mengadili kejahatan Moch Iqbal
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 1, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.1.3.2012.417-434

Abstract

Coverage, insight and understanding of illegal fishing are understood and adhered to in Indonesian positive law is stealing fish and have a big impact on the economy of the country. Therefore, the essence of regulation and prosecution of illegal fishing in Indonesia should be understood in the prosecution of large-scale illegal fishing, which is generally carried out by foreign fleets, foreign vessels are illegal, which has also resulted in harming the country's economy (Indonesia) trillions of dollars each year. With the model and the type of large-scale theft and harm the national economy, the handling of the regulations should be directed at / to overcome the evils of large-scale and complicated (sophisticated), which belong to the type of crime white collar crime or corporate crime. Know and understand the ins and outs as well as the existence of corporate crime, for law enforcement is a necessity in this modern era, this paper therefore focuses on two keywords (key word) illegal fishing and corporate crime. Knowing and understanding the concepts and regulations surrounding corporate crime and illegal fishing be an important contribution in the process of law enforcement. With the understanding of illegal fishing and corporate crime will be a strong foundation for any legal practitioner, especially of law enforcement in the event proceeds and determine the type and classification of appropriate criminal and law enforcement especially true for judges to dare and did not hesitate to impose sanctions on each involved in illegal fishing or corporate offenders. With a firm and clear sentences, and certainly, the law enforcement officers not only enforce the law and justice but also has saved the country's economy, by preventing potential loss of national wealth, as the implementation of the function of law as an instrument of social engineering. Keyword: Illegal Fishing, Crime Corporation, Breaktrhough of criminal Law
TAFSIR INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI / INTERPRETATION OF JUDICIAL POWER INDEPENDENCE IN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISIONS Muh Ridha Hakim
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.279-296

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji mengenai independensi kekuasaan kehakiman yang ditinjau dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Independensi kekuasaan kehakiman merupakan keharusan dalam sebuah negara hukum (rechtstaat). Negara  hukum baik dalam konsep Rule of Law ataupun Rechtstaat, menempatkan peradilan yang bebas dan tidak  memihak  (independence and impartiality of judiciary) sebagai salah satu cirinya. Akan tetapi, kemerdekaan tersebut bukanlah tanpa batasan sehingga dapat diterjemahkan dengan seluas-luasnya. Sering kali dalam praktiknya independensi didalilkan untuk berlindung atas suatu perbuatan yang tidak dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Oleh karenanya, perlu dilakukan penggalian makna independensi kekuasaan kehakiman sebagaimana amanat Pasal 24 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Pasal 24 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 menyatakan bahwa “kekuasaan kehakiman merupakan kekuasaan yang merdeka untuk menyelenggarakan peradilan guna menegakkan hukum dan keadilan”. Oleh karenanya, pertimbangan dari Mahkamah Konstitusi terkait putusan-putusan yang menjadikan Pasal 24 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 sebagai batu uji dalam pengujian undang-undang layak untuk dikaji dan diangkat menjadi tafsiran mengenai makna independensi kekuasaan kehakiman. Tulisan ini menggali pandangan hakim dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang memuat pertimbangan mengenai independensi kekuasaan kehakiman. Penulisan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Tulisan ini menggunakan data sekunder dengan bahan hukum primernya adalah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Data dianalisis menggunakan metode kualitatif.This article examines the independence of judiciary by reviewing the Constitutional Court Decisions. Independence of judiciary is an absolute fact in a state of law (rechtstaat). A state of law, in the concept of Rule of Law or Rechtstaat, lists independence and impartiality of judiciary as one of its characteristics. However,  independence is not as free as everybody can freely interpret the law. Often, in practice, independence is postulated so as to provide protection from an act that cannot be accounted for. Therefore, it is necessary to delve into the meaning of judicial power independency as mandated by Article 24 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Article 24 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution states that “judicial power is an independent power to administer judicial proceedings to enforce the law and justice”. For that reason, it is reasonable that the Constitutional Court’s reasoning in relation to the decisions that render Article 24 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution a touchstone in the judicial review of the laws be investigated and regarded as an interpretation of the meaning of judicial power independence. This paper studies the views of the judges in the Constitutional Court decisions that contain the court’s reasoning regarding the judicial power independence. This paper was written by employing a juridical-normative method through a conceptual approach and a case approach. This paper uses secondary data with the Constitutional Court Decisions as the primary legal materials. The data were analyzed using a qualitative method.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM QANUN ACEH NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2013 TENTANG BENDERA DAN LAMBANG ACEH / LEGAL CERTAINTY OF QANUN ACEH NUMBER 3 YEAR 2013 ON ACEH FLAG AND SYMBOL nfn Arabiyani
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.195-212

Abstract

UUD Tahun 1945 Pasal 18B ayat (1) memberikan legitimasi terhadap Qanun Aceh Nomor 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh yang merupakan hasil kesepakatan Pemerintah Indonesia dengan GAM. Hal ini kemudian dituangkan ke dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh. Permasalahannya ialah bahwa materi Qanun tersebut dianggap bertentangan dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 77 Tahun 2007. Pemerintah Pusat menghendaki perbaiki terhadap beberapa materi Qanun tersebut, namun pihak Pemerintah Aceh hal dianggap menyalahi MoU Helsinki. Hasil penelitian sebagai berikut: Pertama, menemukan landasan pemikiran lahirnya Qanun Aceh Nomor 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh terdiri dari Pasal 18B UUD Tahun 1945 serta perumusan Pasal 246 dan Pasal 247 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006. Kedua, bahwa akibat hukum dari adanya Pasal 246 dan Pasal 247 berlaku dan sah untuk diterapkan melalui pembentukannya Qanun Aceh. Ketiga, konsekuensi yuridis adanya Qanun Aceh Nomor 3 Tahun 2013 berlaku secara yuridis dan dapat ditindaklanjuti oleh Pemerintah Aceh karena sudah diundangkan dalam lembaran daerah. Disarankan pihak kalangan akademis, pemangku jabatan yakni Pemerintah Aceh, DPRA dan Pemerintah Pusat untuk memperjelas dan memberi kepastian kepada rakyat Aceh supaya tidak Qanun Aceh Nomor 3 Tahun 2013 tidak dijadikan komoditas politik pada saat-saat tertentu. Kemudian dengan diterbitkannya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 77 Tahun 2007 perlu ditinjau ulang terkait pemaknaan terhadap bendera dan Lambang Aceh.The 1945 Constitution Article 18B paragraph (1) gives legitimacy to the Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on Aceh Flag and Symbol which is the result of the Government of Indonesia's and GAM agreement. This is then poured into Law Number 11 Year 2006 regarding Aceh Government. The problem is that the Qanun material is considered to be contradictory to Government Regulation Number 77 of 2007. The central government wants to improve on some of the Qanun material, but the Government of Aceh is considered to have violated the Helsinki MoU. The results of the research are as follows: First, find the foundation of the thought of the birth of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the Flag and the Symbol of Aceh consists of Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution and the formulation of Article 246 and Article 247 of Law Number 11 Year 2006. Second, the existence of Article 246 and Article 247 is valid and valid to be implemented through the establishment of Aceh Qanun. Thirdly, the juridical consequences of the Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 are valid in a juridical manner and can be acted upon by the Government of Aceh as already enacted in the local gazette. It is suggested by the academic community, the government officials of Aceh, DPRA and the Central Government clarify and give assurance to the people of Aceh so that Qanun Aceh No. 3 of 2013 is not used as a political commodity at certain times. Then with the issuance of Government Regulation No. 77 of 2007, the meaning of the flag and the symbol of Aceh need to be reviewed.

Page 14 of 66 | Total Record : 653

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 3 (2025) Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue