cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 653 Documents
 62   63   64   65   66 
Ensuring Justice in Child Support After Divorce: A Jurimetric Review of at Religious Court of Demak Decision nafhani, ahmad; Suriyani, Irma; Luthfan, Gusti Fadhil Fithrian; Atik Dina Nasikhah
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 14 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.14.3.2025.531-548

Abstract

Child support is a fundamental right ensuring a child's welfare even after the parents' divorce. In Indonesia, the father is legally obligated to provide both retroactive child support (madhiyah) and prospective child support. However, in practice, the enforcement of these obligations remains inconsistent, and the absence of objective instruments in determining the amount of support creates disparities and weakens the protection of children's rights. This study aims to analyze how judges at the Court of Demak interpret and apply the law regarding retroactive and prospective child support). Using a normative juridical method supported by jurimetric analysis, this research finds that the Religious Court of Demak’s decision concretely guarantees both types of child support through measurable instruments. Retroactive maintenance is determined using a historical audit model based on proven expenses, while prospective maintenance applies a dynamic projection model adjusted to inflation. The decision demonstrates a progressive judicial effort to ensure objective justice, accountability, and long-term legal protection for children within Indonesia’s family law system.
The Potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence Based on Applications in Judicial Supervision in An Efforts to Reduce Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism Irawan, Adeng Septi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 14 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.14.3.2025.599-628

Abstract

Time has become more advanced and artificial intelligence technology AI (Artificial Intelligence) is developing rapidly. Electronic court-based court technology (e-Court) is starting to become commonplace in the Supreme Court Jurisdiction. However, in practice, the behavior of corruption, collusion, and nepotism still occurs recently in the Supreme CourtJurisdiction, ranging from cases of bribery of judges in handling cases, arrogant behavior of judges in trials, to the behavior of judges or employees committingethical and legal violations. It seems like an endless stream of incidents that should not exist, due to technological advances, are instead emerging. This research aims to provide new ideas regarding the potential of Generative. Application-based AI (Artificial Intelligence) in the context of Judicial Supervision to reduce corruption, collusion, and nepotism behavior. This study applies a library research approach study (Literature Study) with an analytical prescriptive method (analytical method using legal materials and information and communication technology materials to produce appropriate recommendations in application-based decision making) and application-based legal hermeneutics (interpretation). The results of this research data indicate that there is a fairly large anomaly, where advances in information and communication technology have not been able to suppress the behavior of corruption, collusion, and nepotism in the judiciary. This problem emerged the idea of ​​using application-based Generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) in judicial supervision management. Generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) is a type of AI that can create new content and ideas.
Implications of The Revision of The Wantimpres Laws on The Government System in Indonesia Silvanti, Amelia; Amancik; Dinata, Ari Wirya
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 14 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.14.3.2025.651-676

Abstract

The revision of Law Number 19 of 2006 concerning Wantimpres is one example of a legal product that was born during the lame-duck session and enacted through fast-track legislation. The amendment article contained in the laws a quo raises legal debates and affects the system of government in Indonesia. The main problem discussed in this study is the position of the Presidential Advisory Council following the revision of the Presidential Advisory Laws within the Indonesian government system. Moreover, how effective is the position in comparison with the Indonesian Presidential Advisory Institute and the French Conseil d'Etat? The research method is normative legal research, using both a regulatory and a comparative approach. The results of this study are as follows: (1) The Article on the amendment of the law a quo raises various polemics in the Indonesian government system, especially changes in the position and membership structure of the Wantimpres. (2) Between the Advisory Council of the President of Indonesia and the Conseil d'Etat of France, in terms of position and membership structure, the Conseil d'Etat is much more effective in fulfilling its responsibilities as a council of state. These figures are based on the position and structure of the Conseil d'Etat. As a suggestion in this study, the amendment of the Presidential Advisory Law should refer to its effectiveness as an advisory institution to the president.

Page 66 of 66 | Total Record : 653

 62   63   64   65   66 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 3 (2025) Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1 No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue