cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Cahaya Rosyidan
Contact Email
cahayarosyidan@trisakti.ac.id
Phone
+6281916319569
Journal Mail Official
jurnal_petro@trisakti.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jurusan Teknik Perminyakan Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi, Gedung D, Lt.4, Universitas Trisakti Jl. Kyai Tapa No. 1 Grogol, Jakarta 11440
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Petro : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan
Published by Universitas Trisakti
ISSN : 19070438     EISSN : 26147297     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25105/petro.v11i2.14060
Core Subject : Economy, Science, Engineering,
Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Energy Engineering
The PETRO Journal is all about the upstream oil and downstream oil and gas industry. Upstream studies focus on production technology, drilling technology, petrophysics, reservoir study, and eor study. Downstream technology focuses on the oil process, managing surface equipment, geothermal, and economic forecast.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Bumi dan Planet (semua kategori) - Geokimia danPetrologi
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 3 (2017): OKTOBER" : 5 Documents clear
EVALUASI RESERVOIR BATURAJA PADA LAPANGAN FALCON DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN SIMULASI RESERVOIR UNTUK MEMAKSIMALKAN PRODUKSI Gerdha Agreska Lubis; Maman Djumantara
PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2017): OKTOBER
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Perminyakan Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (552.292 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/petro.v6i3.4275

Abstract

Falcon Field begins with the discovery of the GG-1 wells are explored in August 1974. The program DST performed on one zone at Falcon Field in the Baturaja Formation producing 429 BOPD and 0.14 MMCFD. Then in 1978, Falcon Field was developed by constructing three wells on the platform GGA and in 1988 made eight more wells on the platform GGB. Falcon Field is thepeak production in 1978 amounted to 5670 BOPD. Currently Falcon Field still in production of 1000 BOPD and 451 MCFPD of four wells. Cumulative production in January 2014 at 10.57 and 9.08 MMCF MMBO, and Recovery Factor is currently at 19.2%. Based on the structure map and well log correlation, Baturaja in Falcon Fields has anticline structure with orientation North-South fault. The thickness of zone has 1000 ft (~300 m) with oil column around 100 ft.To conduct field production performance predictions in the future, needs to be done the reservoir simulation modeling where the results are expected to represent the true reservoir model. Grid made in this model has a cell size of 50 mx 50 m with a thickness of 3 ft, 53 layers, and a total of about 650000 cell active cell. In the early, the validation of model is carried out for the initialization by using the Black Oil Simulator model. Initialization is intended to build initial equilibrium of the total hydrocarbon reservoir with the volume control of hydrocarbon static model calculations.The alignment stages of model or History Matching is done to see if the reservoir model that has been created to represent the actual condition of the reservoir. From the simulation reservoir the number of OOIP is 55.07 MMSTB, while OOIP with the static model is 55.2 MMSTB with a difference of 0.2 %.For the development of the Falcon Fields in the Reservoir Baturaja, the study was performed under planned five scenarios, namely the first scenario (base case), the second scenario (base case with the addition of rework moving field), the third scenario (Base case with wellwork and infill), the fourth scenario (Modeling Drawdown), and the fifth scenario (Modeling Downhole Water Sink). Scenario production started in January 2014 until January 2037 for 23 years with the aim to provide maximum drainage. Falcon Field production forecasting results for the first scenario, the second scenario, the third scenario, the fourth scenario, and scenarios fifth consecutive MMSTB of 12.87, 14.66 MMSTB, 15.3 MMSTB, MMSTB 14.01, 14.17 MMSTB with consecutive RF 23:37%, 26.62% , 27.78%, 25.44%, and 25.73%.
EVALUASI MASALAH RANGKAIAN BHA LEPAS PADA PEMBORAN BERARAH DI SUMUR X LAPANGAN Y Kamaranggi Nugrasiswandono
PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2017): OKTOBER
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Perminyakan Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1098.373 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/petro.v6i3.4276

Abstract

Kegiatan operasi pemboran berarah merupakan salah satu cara untuk memaksimalkan pengurasan minyak. Kondisi geologi yang berbeda pada setiap formasi merupakan tantangan pada pemboran ini. Dengan adanya metode pemboran berarah ini diharapkan performa produksi lebih baik dibandingkan metode pada pemboran vertikal. Namun pada kenyataannya tidak selalu demikian, banyak masalah yang kerap sering terjadi pada pemboran berarah salah satunya adalah rangkaian bottom hole assembly lepas di dalam sumur. Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) adalah serangkaian kombinasi peralatan bawah permukaan yang dipasang pada rangkaian drill string sehingga diperoleh suatu performance yang baik dalam membentuk kemiringan dari lintasan lubang bor. Rangkaian BHA lepas pada operasi pemboran berarah menyebabkan proses pengoboran sumur terhenti. Masalah tersebut dapat disebabkan oleh berbagai macam faktor. Hal ini dapat diketahui dengan cara mengevaluasi apa penyebab dari rangkaian BHA lepas tersebut sesuai dengan metode perhitungan BHA. Selain mengevaluasi apakah penyebab dari rangkaian BHA tersebut lepas, drilling engineer harus dapat mengatasi masalah tersebut dengan cara mengangkat rangkain BHA yang tertinggal di dalam sumur sehingga kegiatan operasi pemboran dapat dilanjutkan lagi.
ANALISA PENYEBAB HILANG SIRKULASI LUMPUR PADA PEMBORAN SUMUR X LAPANGAN Y Pradiko Pradiko.Z.H; abdul hamid; puri wijayanti
PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2017): OKTOBER
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Perminyakan Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (566.044 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/petro.v6i3.4277

Abstract

Lost circulation is one of the major problems in the drilling operation which can lead to not obtaining cutting, stuck pipe, and blow out. Therefore, lost circulation must be addressed because it has a high risk can increase the cpst and time during the drilling process. In general, there are several techniques that can be used to overcome the loss of circulation, one which is the use LCM (lost circulating material).In this thesis will investigate the loss circulation of drilling mud in the X well. The spud process in X well was started in March 2nd 2013, and reached total depth at 8950 ftMD. Drilling process has breakhtrough Lidah, Kawengan, Wonocolo, Ngrayong, and Tuban Karbonat formation and lost circulation was happen in Tuban Karbonat formation. Mud that used in this job was oil base mud and changed to KCL polymer when drilling into production zone.The cause of lost circulation taht occurs in X well because of the formation which has pores large of particle size, so that the mud flow into the formation and pressure in the hole is greater than the formation pressure. The controlling method which is used to handle the problem is using LCM which is Calsium Carbonate (CaCO3) and do Blind Drilling.
EVALUASI PENANGGULANGAN TERJADINYA HILANG LUMPUR PADA PEMBORAN SUMUR “FAZ-32” LAPANGAN “FAZ” Farisah Asmarani; abdul hamid; listiana satyawati
PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2017): OKTOBER
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Perminyakan Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (597.032 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/petro.v6i3.4278

Abstract

“FAZ-32” well drilling on “FAZ” field is a development well which aims to increase the absorption point in Tuban formation. The problem occurs in drilling operations at “FAZ-32” well on “FAZ” field are the mud loss. Mud loss which happens on “FAZ-32” well that is occurs when penetrating Ngrayong Formation and Tuban Formation. Afterwards of drilling the “FAZ-32” well, stretch drill holes 12-1/4 lost circulation occurred at a depth of 7150 ft. Then in the stretch 8-1/2 mud loss occurred at a depth of 7536 ft, 7560 ft and 7641 ft. The problems in drilling wells “FAZ-32”, firstly, what is the cause of lost circulation. Secondly, whether the countermeasure of mud loss are appropriate or not.The methodology used to evaluate response of mud loss are collecting data (data of mud, data drilling, and data pump), make the calculations (mud hydrostatics pressure during loss, formation pressure, formation fracture pressure, equivalen circulating density (ECD) and bottom hole circulation pressure (BHCP), comparing Ph, Pf, BHCP and Pfr to determine the cause of mud loss and evaluating countermeasure of mud loss that has been done in field.Handling mud loss problem at “FAZ-32” well on “FAZ” field is well applied in some loss zone and has reached the desired target depth (productive zone).
PENANGGULANGAN LOST CIRCULATION DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE UNDER BALANCED DRILLING PADA SUMUR Y, BLOK Z Rizki Ananda Parulian; abdul hamid; Cahaya Rosyidan
PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2017): OKTOBER
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Perminyakan Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (611.158 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/petro.v6i3.4279

Abstract

Drilling operation is process for creating a hole before production operation. “CT” Well and “Y” Well is located at same area which is Z Block. Those wells are vertical offshore wells. “CT” Well had been drilled on 1971 before “Y” Well was drilled on 2009.While drilling “CT” Well occurred total loss circulation on 12 ¼” at 3928 ft and cured with injection of 375 bbl LCM (Loss Circulation Material) with concentration 300 ppb but the loss circulation still occurred. Then total loss circulation occurred again at depth 4343 ft and 4545 ft. It cured with the same method but it didn’t succeed at all. Thus, using blind drilling method is the only option to anticipate the loss. This operation took 17 days using those methods.Well “Y” on 12 ¼” was drilled conventionally. When it reached depth 2910 ft occurred total loss circulation. Based on “CT” Well, using Under Balanced Drilling Method is the best way to anticipate the total loss circulation. This method only took 8 days Keywords : Grid Model Reservoir, Single Porosity, Grid Cell.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 14 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025 Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): September 2025 Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Juni 2025 Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Maret 2025 Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024): Desember 2024 Vol. 13 No. 3 (2024): September 2024 Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): Juni 2024 Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Maret 2024 Vol. 12 No. 4 (2023): DESEMBER Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023): SEPTEMBER Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): JUNI Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): MARET Vol. 11 No. 4 (2022): DESEMBER Vol. 11 No. 3 (2022): SEPTEMBER Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): JUNI Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022): MARET Vol. 10 No. 4 (2021): DESEMBER Vol. 10 No. 3 (2021): SEPTEMBER Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): JUNI Vol. 10 No. 1 (2021): MARET Vol. 9 No. 4 (2020): DESEMBER Vol. 9 No. 3 (2020): SEPTEMBER Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020): JUNI Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020): MARET Vol. 8 No. 4 (2019): DESEMBER Vol. 8 No. 3 (2019): SEPTEMBER Vol. 8 No. 2 (2019): JUNI Vol. 8 No. 1 (2019): MARET Vol. 7 No. 4 (2018): DESEMBER (EDISI KHUSUS) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2018): Desember Vol. 7 No. 2 (2018): Agustus Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018): April Vol. 6 No. 4 (2017): DESEMBER Vol. 6 No. 3 (2017): OKTOBER Vol. 6 No. 2 (2017): Agustus Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017): April Vol. 5 No. 2 (2016): Agustus Vol. 5 No. 1 (2016): April Vol. 4 No. 4 (2015) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2015) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2015) More Issue