cover
Contact Name
Risqi Maydia Putri
Contact Email
admin@jfpublisher.com
Phone
+6281358580584
Journal Mail Official
admin@jfpublisher.com
Editorial Address
GRAHA INDAH E-11 Gayung Kebonsari, Gayungan, Surabaya, East Java. 60235
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Yuris: Journal of Court and Justice
Published by JF Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28097572     DOI : https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj
Core Subject : Social,
In 2022, YURIS (Journal of Court and Justice) giving opportunities for legal researcher to publish scientific article The editorial team of YURIS seek publication on the paper which related to the contribution of law theory and enforcement and to consider them carefully for external review. By following the standard and procedures which published four times a year. It goes by the review process from expert and external reviewer.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 Issue 3 (2025)" : 5 Documents clear
INSURANCE COMPANIES' LEGAL OBLIGATIONS FOR ACTS OF DEFAULT RELATED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION Siregar, Dahris
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice Vol. 4 Issue 3 (2025)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v4i3.743

Abstract

A company that can handle all the risks that its clients face is the insurance business. Once the parties have achieved their respective goals, the insurance agreement can be successfully executed. One of the defaulting parties causes the agreement not to be effectively executed. However, what if the insurance provider defaults and violates the contract with the policyholder. The problem of this research is how to hold insurance companies legally accountable for their defaults and the types of settlements reached in the event of a dispute. Finding out how policyholders are legally protected against insurance company defaults is the aim of this study. This study uses a normative juridical approach. Based on the results of the study, the insurance company's default is legally responsible for fulfilling its obligations to policyholders who suffer losses in terms of filing claims, where the obligation of the insurance policyholder's customer is to pay premiums and the policyholder's customer's right is to receive compensation in the event of a claim. There are two ways to settle an insurance dispute: in court and out of court. Through the court, if the insurance dispute does not find a common ground between the insurer and the insured, out-of-court dispute resolution can be pursued through the BMAI dispute resolution institution through mediation, adjudication, and arbitration. Legal protection for policyholder customers by having authentic evidence, namely the policy.
THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT POLICY IN ADMINISTERING HOUSING AND SETTLEMENT AREAS IN BULELENG REGENCY Suastawan, Nyoman Adi; Styawati, Ni Komang Arini; Rideng, I Wayan
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice Vol. 4 Issue 3 (2025)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v4i3.790

Abstract

The regulation and policy framework established by the Buleleng Regency Government concerning the administration of housing and settlement areas demonstrates a strategic legal approach to spatial development. This research examines the normative design and practical enforcement of housing governance in Buleleng Regency, with particular attention to the legal effectiveness of Regent Regulation No. 40 of 2023 as the implementing instrument of Regional Regulation No. 12 of 2022 on the Administration of Housing and Settlement Areas. Employing an empirical legal research method, the study investigates the gap between written law (law in books) and actual practice (law in action) using a juridical-analytical approach. Primary data were collected through interviews and subsequently analyzed qualitatively in conjunction with legal theories, academic literature, and statutory regulations. The findings indicate that the provision on the minimum access road width, as stipulated in the Regent Regulation, has been relatively effective in practice. However, a significant number of developers continue to carry out housing development outside of the designated residential zones. One of the main implementation challenges lies in the fact that many plots located within housing and settlement zones do not meet the required road width standard, thereby complicating compliance with the regulation.
PROBLEMS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPLETE SYSTEMATIC LAND REGISTRATION (PTSL) IN JOMBANG REGENCY Permanasari, Lolita; Ngaisah, Siti
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice Vol. 4 Issue 3 (2025)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v4i3.782

Abstract

Land registration is a critical government activity aimed at recording and maintaining physical and juridical data for land parcels, ensuring legal certainty for land rights holders. In Jombang Regency, despite 76.7% of 592,744 land parcels being titled, 100% titling has not been achieved. The government introduced the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program, facilitated by Ministerial Regulations, to accelerate this process and provide legal certainty. However, the implementation of PTSL in Jombang Regency faces significant challenges, making it an important area for study. This research aims to analyze the implementation of the PTSL program in Jombang Regency, focusing on the challenges faced and the obstacles affecting its effectiveness in achieving legal certainty and reducing land disputes. This research uses an empirical juridical approach with a sociological juridical focus, drawing on primary data from interviews with the Jombang Regency Land Office and secondary data from laws and regulations related to land registration and PTSL, including Law No. 5/1960 and various government and ministerial regulations. This research revealed several technical constraints impacting PTSL implementation in Jombang Regency. These include a lack of human resources, limited timeframes for completion, insufficient public awareness regarding administrative requirements, and challenges in socialization and counseling. Further obstacles involve difficulties in retrieving and collecting juridical data, issues with physical data measurement due to terrain, and problems with certificate submission. Additionally, legal issues, particularly those related to inheritance and lost proof of ownership (Letter C), significantly impede the process.
REFORMULATION OF INDONESIAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TERM PERIOD RULES TO REALIZE LEGAL CERTAINTY AND JUSTICE Banuoka, I Gede Adhi Maha Krisna; Yusa, I Gede
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice Vol. 4 Issue 3 (2025)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v4i3.817

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine and analyze the legal regulations regarding the term of office of the Indonesian House of Representatives and to examine and analyze the reformulation of the rules regarding the term of office of the Indonesian House of Representatives in realizing justice and legal certainty. This research is expected to provide benefits in the form of a legal understanding of the importance of clear regulations related to the limitation of the term of office of the House of Representatives and to contribute ideas in the field of Legal Science. The ambiguity of norms underlies this paper using normative legal research methods through a statutory approach and a comparative approach analyzed using descriptive, argumentative, and evaluative techniques. The results of the study indicate that Article 76 paragraph (4) of the MD3 Law stipulates that “The term of office of DPR members is 5 (five) years and ends when the new DPR members take the oath/promise.” From this article, it can be interpreted that although the term of office of the DPR has been clearly regulated for 5 years, the limit on how many times a person can be elected to the DPR is not expressly regulated so that it is necessaryReformulated to be “The term of office of DPR members is 5 (five) years and ends when the new DPR member takes the oath/promise and is only for two terms of office.” Or further regulated in paragraph (5) that “Each DPR member is limited to 2 terms of office.”In order to provide legal certainty, there are term limits for all high state institutions, thereby guaranteeing justice in fulfilling the constitutional rights of the people as a democratic nation.
IMPLEMENTATION OF LAND TITLE CERTIFICATE REVOCATION AS A FOLLOW-UP TO COURT DECISIONS: A CASE STUDY OF MADIUN DISTRICT COURT DECISION NUMBER 30/PDT.G/2020/PN.MAD Cahyadi, Agus
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice Vol. 4 Issue 3 (2025)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v4i3.844

Abstract

The Land Title Certificate constitutes a legal instrument in the field of land administration, issued by the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning as the formal outcome of land registration processes. While the issuance of a Land Title Certificate provides legal certainty to the holder, it does not completely preclude the emergence of future disputes. One such case involved a Request for the Revocation of Ownership Certificate No. 01/Kel. Taman, which was grounded in Madiun District Court Decision No. 30/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mad, a ruling that had obtained permanent legal force. The revocation request was subsequently submitted to the Madiun City Land Office for further action. The procedure implemented by the Madiun City Land Office adhered to the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency No. 21 of 2020 concerning the Handling and Resolution of Land Cases. This research adopts a normative juridical approach with a statutory perspective to examine two core issues: the legal framework governing the revocation of land rights and the implementation of the Madiun District Court’s final and binding decision. The results demonstrate that the legal basis for revoking land title certificates is stipulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency No. 21 of 2020 on the Handling and Resolution of Land Cases.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5