cover
Contact Name
Narita Adityaningrum
Contact Email
narita.a@trisakti.ac.id
Phone
+6281528282851
Journal Mail Official
reformasihukum@trisakti.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Kyai Tapa No 1, Grogol Jakarta Barat
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Published by Universitas Trisakti
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2657182X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25105/refor
Core Subject : Social,
The scope of this journal is in the field of legal science for case studies in Indonesia and also other regions of the world. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti comes from a half of the results of the sudents undergraduate thesis of the Faculty of Law Trisakti University, in subjects : Business Law International Law Labour Law Family Law Land Law Constitutional Law Criminal Law Etc
Articles 1,070 Documents
PERLINDUNGAN KESEHATAN ANAK DARI BAHAYA COVID-19 MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG KESEJAHTERAAN ANAK Emir Dhia Isad; Wahyuni Retnowulandari
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14115

Abstract

Children's rights to life and health are among the many things that the Covid-19 epidemic puts at jeopardy. Therefore, for children to thrive, effective cooperation from all sides is required. Particularly, Kramat Jati District, East Jakarta youngsters were included in the data area that the writers used as a sample. Formulation of the issue: How are parents, society, and the government working to protect children's health from the risks of Covid-19? In addition, are the efforts being made in line with the requirements of Law No. 4 of 1979 for Child Welfare? Descriptive, normative legal research is the approach used in this study. descriptive in character, qualitatively investigated, and deductive conclusions reached. The findings of the study, the analysis, and the conclusions demonstrate that the Covid-19 pandemic has negatively impacted children's growth and development in the medical field. It cannot be said that the community's role in child welfare, particularly in the health sector, or government policies related to upholding children's health rights during the Covid-19 Pandemic, which did not reach the layers public, are appropriate given that the majority of parents in the Kramat Jati District have been unable to fulfill their obligations to care for their children.
PRAKTEK DISKRIMINASI TELKOM GROUP TERHADAP NETFLIX BERDASARKAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA Alma Syafitri; Sharda Abrianti
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14116

Abstract

A competition is necessary to motivate business actors and boost the nation's economy. It will, however, have a negative effect if it is carried out by discriminating against some business actors in comparison to all current business actors. In accordance with business competition law, this article investigates instances of discriminatory activities by TELKOM Group against the provision of Netflix internet access services. The issue is whether the criteria for discriminatory activities used by TELKOM Group against Netflix in the Decision on Case Number 08/KPPU-I/2020 can be met, and how can KPPU approach the investigation of suspected discriminatory acts from a legal standpoint. The research method makes use of secondary data, normative analysis of KPPU Decision No. 08/KPPU-I/2020, library research, and data collection methodologies. and qualitative data analysis is used, and deductive reasoning is employed in the conclusion-drawing process. The findings of the study, along with the discussion and conclusion, demonstrate that the TELKOM Group violated the terms of Article 19 letter d of Law No. 5 of 1999 by engaging in discriminatory activities in relation to the blocking of Internet access services for Netflix. KPPU employs the Rule of Reason approach while deciding matters.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS TANAH HAK MILIK Jennyola Savira; Dyah Setyorini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14117

Abstract

One of the features of a mortgage is that its execution is simple and certain. This is governed by Article 20 of Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights on Land and Objects Related to Land (hereinafter referred to as the Mortgage Law or UUHT), which includes three different execution methods: execution based on Article 6 of the Mortgage Act (parate executing), execution based on executorial title, and underhanded execution. However, issues frequently develop during installation. If the debtor fails to complete his responsibilities after receiving three warning letters from the creditor, the obligations must be fulfilled right away as specified in the contract. so that creditors may execute in accordance with Article On the auction's rules, 6 UUHT. The Mortgage Law's Article 11 paragraph (2) letter e, which was made clear in the Power of Attorney for Imposing Mortgage Rights (SKMHT) and Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights (APHT), reiterates the creditor's rights.
ANALISIS KEABSAHAN JUAL BELI TANAH BERDASARKAN KWITANSI DI KOTA DEPOK Raden Devina Maulina; Irene Eka Sihombing
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14119

Abstract

According to customary law, purchasing and selling land is an act of transferring rights that are monetary, tangible, and clear in character. The sale and purchase of land by Agus Ariyanto and Sunaryo was not made a deed before the PPAT; rather, it was only proved by a receipt and a statement of sale and purchase in the case of District Court Decision No. 87/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Dpk. However, there are still purchasing and selling practices in people's lives that do not fulfill the clear nature. creation of the issue;  Are legal considerations and the judge's ruling in case number 87/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Dpk about purchasing and selling real estate using just receipt evidence in accordance with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. The research method is descriptive normative legal research. The data used are secondary data with primary data and analyzed qualitatively and drawing conclusions with deductive logic. Research results, discussion and conclusions; the sale and purchase of land carried out by Agus Ariyanto (Buyer) and Sunaryo (Seller) can be said to be valid according to the provisions of the Civil Code and fulfills material requirements. 37 of 1998 concerning Regulations for the Position of Officials Making Land Deeds.
TANGGUNG JAWAB WALI AMANAT DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMEGANG OBLIGASI BANK GLOBAL INTERNASIONAL Ota Devy Purnawati; Sharda Abrianti
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14120

Abstract

PT Bank Global Internasional Tbk named PT Bank Niaga Tbk as Trustee in the issuance of Subordinated Bonds. The Trustee is the representative of the bondholders in and out of court. The trustee's obligations have been outlined in the Trustee Agreement, Article 51, paragraph 2, of the Capital Market Law, as well as the BAPEPAM Decree. The problem is formulated as to what PT Bank Niaga Tbk's legal obligations are in managing the subordinated bonds of PT Bank Global Internasional Tbk and how the Pension Fund of PT Krakatau Steel is legally protected as the owner of the subordinated bonds of PT Bank Global Internasional Tbk. Standardized research techniques and a literature review Qualitative research methods are generated from secondary data, as are normative research methods and literature study procedures. The findings of the study, discussion, and conclusion that PT Bank Niaga Tbk, as the Trustee, violated the Trusteeship Agreement, UUPM, and BAPEPAM Decisions in carrying out its responsibilities, leading to the non-fulfillment of the bondholders' rights and also to losses for the bondholders-in this case, PT Krakatau Steel Pension Fund-as a result of the non-fulfillment of rights and consequences of losses suffered.
TANGGUNG JAWAB PENGANGKUT TERHADAP PENUMPANG AKIBAT TENGGELAMNYA KAPAL KMP BILI TAHUN 2021 Ghani Al Farozi Sitompul; Elfrida Ratnawati
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14121

Abstract

18 persons received minor injuries as a result of the KMP Bili ship's sinking in West Kalimantan, while 83 cars went down. According to Government Regulation Number 20 of 2010 concerning Water Transportation, what is PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry's obligation for the sinking of the KMP Bili Ship in West Kalimantan in 2021, and how should PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry be made whole for the KMP Bili Ship's passengers? This kind of study employs a normative legal research approach that is analytically descriptive in nature and based on primary and secondary data. Data is gathered via literary data, which is then evaluated using qualitative techniques to reach deductive conclusions. The findings of the study demonstrate that (1) PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry is accountable for the passengers required by Government Regulation Number 10 of 2010 regarding water transportation, Article 180-181, Paragraphs 1-2. (2) Due to a contradiction with the transportation agreement, which specifies the type of obligation the carrier must bear, PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry does not compensate passengers or PT Jasa Raharja Putera.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS SURAT PERINTAH PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN BERUPA PENERBITAN KETERANGAN LUNAS BANK INDONESIA Rachma Aulia Putri Yusuf Darmawan; Abdul Ficar Hadjar
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14122

Abstract

In Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Provisions No. 30 of 2002 Concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, Article 40 of Law No. 19 of 2019 regulates certainty regarding the KPK. The most recent KPK law gives the KPK permission to stop investigations, in contrast to earlier requirements. Definition of the issue: The KPK has the authority to issue an investigation termination (SP3) on cases of criminal acts of corruption in the form of Publication of a Certificate of Settlement (SKL) to the Bank Indonesia and Issuance of a Certificate of Payment (SKL) Against Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance Obligors (BLBI). in accordance with Law No. 19 of 2019 on the Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (KPK), Liquidity Assistance Obligor (BLBI). Legal-normative research methodology is employed. Qualitative data analysis methodologies. Concluding things using the deductive approach. Research findings, analysis, and conclusions In order to establish legal clarity and reduce abuse of power, it is important that the Corruption Eradication Commission be granted the authority to create an Investigation Termination Letter (SP3). Additionally, the approval of SP3 for the Corruption Eradication Commission appears to be ineffectual, particularly because it restricts and obstructs the space available for the Commission in the Corruption Eradication application.
PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN KEKERASAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA Kelvin Leo Putra; Azmi Syah Putra
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14124

Abstract

The stealing offense is a group offence. People must be more cautious due to the increase in theft-related criminal cases in Indonesia. In DKI Jakarta, there were 1,279 cases of theft without violence in 2019 and 266 cases of theft with violence, according to research by the Central Statistics Agency. In 2020, there was an increase in cases of theft without violence, reaching 1,950 cases, and a decrease in cases of theft with violence, reaching 184 cases. The formulation of the issue is how the judge should apply Article 368 Paragraph 1 and Article 55 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code given the facts and components of the defendant's activities. The nature of normative legal study, its analytical descriptive, and the data analysis is qualitative, in the research. How to use deductive reasoning to arrive to conclusions. Results of the study, discussion, and conclusions The defendant should have been punished under Article 365 Paragraph 1 Jo Paragraph 2 to 1 and 2 of the Criminal Code, which deals with theft that is preceded by threats of violence to facilitate theft, committed on a public highway, and committed jointly, i.e. by two people or more.
Front and Back Front Cover
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14155

Abstract

Front and Back
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENANGKAPAN IKAN TANPA SIPI DAN MENGGUNAKAN JARING TRAWL Ernawaty Putri Elisabet Siburian; Dyah Setyorini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i6.15002

Abstract

Every fishing activity in the water area of ​​the Republic of Indonesia must have a permit and meet the requirements for the use of fishing nets as regulated in the Regulations. This research discusses Fishing without SIPI. This research is normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using secondary data obtained through library research. The data is analyzed qualitatively and the conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. The conclusion from this research is the fishing by Sugianto did not use SIPI and violated article 27 paragraph (1) Law Number 45/2009 from Law Number 31/2004 concerning fishery and Sugianto also using nets in the form of Trawls Nets. On the other hand the actions he did categorized as Illegal Fishing.

Page 55 of 107 | Total Record : 1070


Filter by Year

2019 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 7 No 4 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 3 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 2 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 4 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti More Issue