cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Hendra Kartika
Contact Email
journal_jrsme@teachers.org
Phone
+6282218560919
Journal Mail Official
edupedia.publisher@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Blok Selasa RT 004 RW 005 Ds. Trajaya Kec. Palasah, Kab. Majalengka, Provinsi Jawa Barat, 45475
Location
Kab. majalengka,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Research in Science and Mathematics Education
Published by Edupedia Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29625521     DOI : https://doi.org/10.56855/jrsme.v1i1.11
Core Subject : Science, Education,
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Education Mathematics Physics
Journal of Research in Science and Mathematics Education (J-RSME) is a journal to publish works in the form of research results, theoretical studies and review results that are original and have a novelty as a contribution to science in the scope of mathematics education, physics education, chemistry education, biology education and also includes research results in the field of mathematics, physics, chemistry and biology.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 2 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): December" : 2 Documents clear
An Online Survey of Science Educators’ Challenges of Implementing Digital Pedagogy in Public Universities in Kogi State, Nigeria Ajayi, Victor Oluwatosin; Ameh, Rachael Folake; Penda, Bibiana Mwuese; Uyeh, Daniel Terkula
Journal of Research in Science and Mathematics Education Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): December
Publisher : EDUPEDIA PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56855/jrsme.v4i3.1687

Abstract

Purpose: This study explored the perceived challenges faced by science educators in implementing Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) in pedagogical practices at public universities in Kogi State, Nigeria. Methodology: The study employed an exploratory approach using data from 52 science educators across four public universities. There was no sampling since the population was manageable. The study adopted a descriptive survey research design. An online Google form survey questionnaire titled Challenges of Implementing Intelligent Tutoring System Questionnaire (CIITSQ) was used for data collection. CIITSQ was trial tested, yielding a reliability value of 0.88 using Cronbach’s alpha. The CIITSQ contained 22 items. Two research questions and two null hypotheses guided the study. The research questions were answered using mean and standard deviation scores, while the null hypotheses were tested using t-test statistics. Findings: The study revealed inadequate technological infrastructure, financial constraints, lack of skilled personnel and training and ethical and social concerns as major barriers to the effective Implementation of ITS in pedagogical practices. The study also revealed that measures to address the challenges of implementing ITS in pedagogical practices involve a multifaceted approach, focusing on educators’ training, investment in technological infrastructure, curriculum development, institutional support, and addressing attitudinal and ethical concerns. Significance: The findings suggest that to harness the benefits of ITS in pedagogical practices successfully, a balanced approach is required, emphasizing strategic investments in robust AI-ITS and other ICT infrastructure, comprehensive training programs for educators, and the development of ethical guidelines and regulatory frameworks tailored to the local context.
Conceptual Rigor of AI-Generated Mathematical Explanations: The Case of Vector Functions Listiawati, Enny; Kartika, Hendra; Arslan, Cigdem
Journal of Research in Science and Mathematics Education Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): December
Publisher : EDUPEDIA PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56855/jrsme.v4i3.1862

Abstract

Purpose: The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence has reshaped discussions in mathematics education, particularly regarding the capacity of advanced systems such as ChatGPT and Gemini to support conceptual rigor. This study aims to investigate how these generative AI tools define and explain vector functions, including the procedures for differentiating and integrating them, in order to evaluate their conceptual rigor of ai-generated mathematical explanations and pedagogical potential. Methodology: Employing a qualitative case study design, the research analyzed responses generated by ChatGPT and Gemini to a structured mathematical prompt on vector functions. The explanations were compared with authoritative calculus textbooks using qualitative content analysis and a standardized scoring rubric. Findings: Findings reveal that both systems provide broadly accurate introductory descriptions of vector functions, highlighting their component-wise structure. However, notable gaps emerge in mathematical precision, particularly in specifying domains, ranges, and the formal conditions underlying differentiability and integrability. ChatGPT tends to include intuitive geometric interpretations, whereas Gemini provides concise procedural explanations, yet both models lack the rigorous logical framing found in standard mathematical texts. Despite these limitations, the systems demonstrate consistent procedural accuracy in describing differentiation and integration of vector-valued functions. Significance: The results underscore the educational potential of generative AI while highlighting the need for teachers to critically evaluate AI-generated mathematical content, particularly when these tools are used to support students’ conceptual learning in mathematics. These findings also highlight important implications for AI literacy, instructional design, and future research in mathematics education.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): December Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): August Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): April Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): December Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): August Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): April Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): December Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): August Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): April Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): December Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): August More Issue