cover
Contact Name
Sardjana Orba Manullang
Contact Email
somanullang@unkris.ac.id
Phone
+6281380287222
Journal Mail Official
okisumiyanto@unkris.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Kampus UNKRIS, Jatiwaringin, Pondok Gede, Bekasi
Location
Kota bekasi,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Justice Voice
ISSN : 2715243X     EISSN : 29626226     DOI : 10.37893/jv
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Jurnal Justice Voice diterbitkan oleh Prodi Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Krisnadwipayana. Naskah jurnal memuat beberapa kajian dan review dari disiplin ilmu hukum, termasuk hukum pidana, hukum perdata atau hukum bisnis, dan hukum tata negara. Selain itu, jurnal tersebut juga memuat beberapa kajian hukum dalam arti yang lebih luas. Jurnal ini terbit secara berkala dua kali setiap tahun, yaitu pada bulan Juni dan Desember. Artikel yang telah disetujui dan siap diterbitkan akan dipublikasikan secara berkala di laman OJS yang dapat diunduh secara gratis.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 53 Documents
Unlawful Acts by Contract Manufacturing Companies Arising from the Use of Hazardous Substances in Indonesia’s Cosmetics Industry Tsalatsavira Anastasia Rachmania Hernanda; Dessy Maeyangsari
Justice Voice Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Justice Voice (article in press)
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v5i2.1464

Abstract

This study aims to analyze whether the use of hazardous substances by contract manufacturers in cosmetic production satisfies the elements of an unlawful act and to examine the resulting civil liability. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal issues are analyzed prescriptively based on the theory of unlawful acts and the theory of legal liability. The findings demonstrate that the use of hazardous substances satisfies all elements of an unlawful act as stipulated in Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code, namely the existence of an act, unlawfulness, fault, damage, and a causal relationship. Such conduct also contravenes Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health, Government Regulation Number 28 of 2024, and regulations issued by the Indonesian Food and Drug Authority concerning cosmetic safety and quality. Accordingly, contract manufacturers may be held civilly liable to provide compensation for material and immaterial damages and to restore the injured parties to their prior condition. Contractual clauses limiting liability do not exempt contract manufacturers from civil liability where the damage arises from their fault or violation of the law.
Legal Protection for Consumers Against the Loss of Insured Goods in E-Commerce Transactions Yehezkiel Putra Pratama; Aldira Mara Ditta C.P.
Justice Voice Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Justice Voice (article in press)
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v5i2.1525

Abstract

The high volume of e-commerce activity in Indonesia has increased the risk of goods being lost during delivery, including goods covered by insurance. This study aims to analyze the forms of legal protection available to consumers for the loss of insured goods in e-commerce transactions and to construct a framework for the allocation of legal responsibility among sellers, Electronic Commerce System Operators (Penyelenggara Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik, PPMSE/marketplaces), delivery service providers, and insurance companies. The novelty of this study lies in developing a model for allocating responsibility among multiple parties that distinguishes the sources, conditions, and limits of each party’s responsibility while clarifying the distinction between legal liability and the transfer of economic risk through insurance (risk transfer). This study employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials are analyzed through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation, together with legal argumentation, to establish the interrelationship among consumer protection, electronic commerce, carriage of goods, contracts, and insurance. The findings demonstrate that consumer protection is available through both preventive and remedial mechanisms. Sellers remain subject to obligations arising from the contractual relationship of sale and purchase and the Indonesian Consumer Protection Law (UUPK); PPMSEs are responsible within the scope of their obligations relating to the operation of electronic systems and electronic commerce; delivery service providers are responsible in accordance with the contractual relationship governing the carriage of goods and any fault in the performance of their services; and insurance companies are required to honor claims provided that the insured risk falls within the scope of coverage and the policy requirements are satisfied. The existence of insurance does not necessarily eliminate the legal liability of other parties but instead transfers certain economic risks in accordance with the terms of the insurance policy.
The Use of Special Terminals for the Interests of Other Parties: An Analysis of the Authority and Discretion of the Harbormaster and Port Authority Office (KSOP) from the Perspective of Legal Certainty Asmaru Amru; Sadino Sadino; Suartini Suartini
Justice Voice Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Justice Voice (article in press)
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v5i2.1532

Abstract

In principle, a Special Terminal (Terminal Khusus, Tersus) is established to support the business activities of its owner and is not intended to serve the public interest. In practice, however, limitations in the capacity and facilities of public ports have resulted in Tersus facilities frequently being used for the loading and unloading of goods belonging to other parties through an authorization mechanism. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing the use of Tersus facilities by other parties, the practical needs underlying such use, and the authorization mechanism and authority of the Harbormaster and Port Authority Office (Kantor Kesyahbandaran dan Otoritas Pelabuhan, KSOP) in granting approval. This study employs normative legal research using statutory and legal-theoretical approaches, drawing on legal positivism, the theory of authority, administrative law theory, and the theory of legal certainty. The findings demonstrate that Law Number 17 of 2008, Government Regulation Number 61 of 2009, and Minister of Transportation Regulation Number PM 52 of 2021 provide a legal basis for the use of Tersus facilities by other parties but do not comprehensively regulate the parameters, procedures, and criteria for granting authorization. This regulatory gap leaves considerable scope for administrative discretion by the KSOP, potentially creating legal uncertainty and disparities in policy implementation. Accordingly, regulatory harmonization, clearer technical guidelines, and simplified authorization mechanisms are required to enhance legal certainty and the effectiveness of public services and to support the efficient operation of national logistics.