cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sardjana Orba Manullang
Contact Email
somanullang@unkris.ac.id
Phone
+6281380287222
Journal Mail Official
okisumiyanto@unkris.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Kampus UNKRIS, Jatiwaringin, Pondok Gede, Bekasi
Location
Kota bekasi,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Justice Voice
Published by Universitas Krisnadwipayana
ISSN : 2715243X     EISSN : 29626226     DOI : 10.37893/jv
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Justice Voice diterbitkan oleh Prodi Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Krisnadwipayana. Naskah jurnal memuat beberapa kajian dan review dari disiplin ilmu hukum, termasuk hukum pidana, hukum perdata atau hukum bisnis, dan hukum tata negara. Selain itu, jurnal tersebut juga memuat beberapa kajian hukum dalam arti yang lebih luas. Jurnal ini terbit secara berkala dua kali setiap tahun, yaitu pada bulan Juni dan Desember. Artikel yang telah disetujui dan siap diterbitkan akan dipublikasikan secara berkala di laman OJS yang dapat diunduh secara gratis.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 35 Documents
 1   2   3   4 
The Effectiveness of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Trademark Protection in Indonesia: Challenges and Solutions Ningsih, Novi Rahayu; Karim, Moh.
Justice Voice Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Justice Voice
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v4i1.1155

Abstract

This article examines the challenges and solutions in trademark dispute resolution in Indonesia, with a particular focus on the effectiveness of existing regulations and the implementation of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, such as mediation and arbitration. While Law No. 20 of 2016 provides legal protection for registered trademarks, law enforcement in the digital era faces numerous challenges, including trademark infringements occurring on e-commerce platforms. The article demonstrates that ADR can offer a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to litigation; however, a key challenge lies in the limited awareness among business actors about the benefits of ADR. Consequently, this article recommends enhancing education for business owners, strengthening regulations related to ADR, and improving the quality of mediators and arbitrators in the field of intellectual property law. Furthermore, the article emphasizes the need for integrating technology into the dispute resolution process to improve efficiency and accessibility.
State as Shareholder: Comparison Between Indonesia and Singapore Cesaria, Bunga Dita Rahma
Justice Voice Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Justice Voice
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v4i1.1159

Abstract

This article examines the role of the state as a shareholder under Indonesia’s reformed State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) Law, comparing it with the approach in Singapore. The aim is to provide a preliminary discussion on the corporate governance of Indonesian SOEs under the new legal framework, while addressing gaps in existing literature on SOE governance, particularly in Asia. Using a juridical normative method with a comparative approach, the research reveals key differences in the regulation of the state’s role as a shareholder in both countries. These differences are explored from the perspectives of the state’s economic motivations, the separation of its regulatory and shareholder functions, and its involvement in SOE investment and management decisions. The article argues that no single corporate governance model is inherently superior. As a result, the future success of Indonesian SOEs under the reformed law, in comparison to Singapore’s model, remains an open question for further study.
The Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Rehabilitation of Drug Offenders: A Case Study of Decision Number 7/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Tmt Apriliawan, Hendri; Wirogioto, Ali Johardi; Saefullah, Saefullah
Justice Voice Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Justice Voice
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v4i1.1165

Abstract

The restorative justice approach in the criminal justice system has emerged as an alternative in addressing drug abuse, focusing on rehabilitation rather than imprisonment. This study evaluates the implementation of restorative justice in Decision No. 7/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Tmt, examining the role of the legal system in determining whether drug abusers qualify for rehabilitation. A juridical-normative and juridical-sociological approach was employed to analyze regulations and judicial practices related to rehabilitation. The key findings indicate that rehabilitation is a more effective alternative to imprisonment, considering the integrated assessment conducted by the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) to determine the severity of addiction. However, the main challenges in implementing restorative justice include limited rehabilitation facilities, inconsistency in judicial decisions, and social stigma against drug users. This study concludes that harmonizing regulations and enhancing law enforcement officers’ understanding of restorative justice are essential to optimizing rehabilitation implementation in Indonesia’s legal system. With a more inclusive approach, the judiciary can adopt a more humane and effective method in handling drug abuse cases.
The Admissibility of Testimonium De Auditu in Criminal Evidence: An Analysis of Decision Number 1361/Pid.B/2022/PN.Sby Sinaga, Betrand
Justice Voice Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Justice Voice
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v4i1.1187

Abstract

This study examines the juridical acceptance of testimonium de auditu testimony in criminal proceedings, as reflected in Decision Number 1361/Pid.B/2022/PN.Sby. The research concludes that the flexibility of judges in interpreting legal norms in evidence-gathering serves to achieve substantive justice. While Article 185 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) requires direct firsthand experience for witnesses, the reality is that judges may still accept testimonium de auditu when supported by other relevant evidence that complements and strengthens the case’s narrative. This form of testimony has constitutional legitimacy as affirmed in Constitutional Court Decision Number 65/PUU-VIII/2010, which clarifies that indirect testimony is not automatically excluded, provided it is not the sole basis for a verdict and is corroborated by other evidence. This research supports the hypothesis that testimonium de auditu can be used as valid complementary evidence in certain cases, as long as it is within the boundaries of the legal system’s integrity and does not undermine the principles of fair trial and defendant rights. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the need for clearer guidelines in interpreting the admissibility of indirect testimony in Indonesian criminal procedure law.
The Impact of Age on Sentencing in Child Murder Cases: An Analysis of the Implementation of Juvenile Justice Law in Indonesia Hutapea, Frina Debora; Sharon, Grace
Justice Voice Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Justice Voice
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v4i1.1202

Abstract

This study examines the role of age in the imposition of criminal charges against children involved in murder, focusing on the application of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA Law). The research highlights the perceived inequality of justice experienced by the victim’s family, particularly in cases where perpetrators under the age of 14 are sentenced to rehabilitation instead of imprisonment. The aim of this study is to analyze the extent to which Indonesian legal provisions consider age in sentencing child murderers, as well as how restorative justice is applied in such cases, and whether it addresses or exacerbates the sense of justice. This research employs a normative juridical method with qualitative analysis, supported by statutory, conceptual, case law, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that while the SPPA Law offers special protection for children in conflict with the law, its application in cases of murder by young children presents a justice dilemma, particularly when the victim’s life is lost and the perpetrator does not receive proportionate criminal sanctions.

Page 4 of 4 | Total Record : 35

 1   2   3   4 

Filter by Year

2022 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Justice Voice Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Justice Voice Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Justice Voice Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Justice Voice Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Justice Voice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Justice Voice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Justice Voice