cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Wahyu Abdul Jafar
Contact Email
nusantarajournaloflawstudies@gmail.com
Phone
+6282182429320
Journal Mail Official
nusantarajournaloflawstudies@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Sukoharjo 58, Kec. Sekampung, 34382, East Lampung, Indonesia.
Location
Kab. lampung timur,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Nusantara: Journal Of Law Studies
Published by PT. Islamic Research Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29643384     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Nusantara: Journal Of Law Studies is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal published by Islamic Research Publisher, Indonesia. The journal publishes research articles, conceptual articles, and book reviews of Law Studies (Aim and Scope). The articles of this journal are published tri-annually; March, July, and Desember. Aim and Scope Aim: Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies emphasize the concept and research papers on Law Studies, In particular, papers which consider the following general topics are invited but limited to Law Studies Scope: This Journal specializes in studying the theory and practice of Law, and is intended to express original researches and current issues. This journal welcomes the contributions of scholars from related fields warmly that consider the following general topics; Law Studies Islamic Law
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 93 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
Calculating State Economic Losses Through GDP Indicators: Toward Severe Punishment Based on the Principle of Justice Ulil Amri; Amir Ilyas; M. Syukri Akub; Muhammad Mutawalli Mukhlis; Mohamed W. Abouyounes
Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i1.172

Abstract

Corruption causing state economic losses in Indonesia has become increasingly systemic and has generated substantial disparities in criminal sentencing over the last five years. These disparities are closely related to the absence of measurable sentencing standards and to inconsistent judicial interpretations of the calculation of state economic losses, despite the Constitutional Court’s requirement that such losses be concrete and quantifiable. This study aims to analyze state economic losses in corruption cases through the perspective of economic analysis of law and to formulate a justice-oriented framework for severe punishment based on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) indicators. This research employs a normative juridical method, drawing on statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were obtained from legislation, court decisions, legal doctrines, and relevant economic theories. The data were analyzed qualitatively using an economic analysis of law framework emphasizing proportionality, deterrence, efficiency, and protection of public welfare. The results of this study indicate that sentencing disparities primarily stem from the lack of standardized economic parameters for assessing the broader impact of corruption on national development and social welfare. The study finds that judicial consideration has generally focused only on direct financial losses, while indirect economic consequences, including opportunity costs, disruption of public services, decline in investment, and multiplier effects on economic growth, remain insufficiently addressed. The results further demonstrate that integrating explicit and implicit economic losses through GDP indicators provides a more objective and proportional basis for determining criminal sanctions. This study formulates a GDP-based sentencing matrix by measuring the ratio between total state economic losses and annual GDP as an indicator of macroeconomic harm. The study concludes that corruption causing extraordinary economic disruption justifies severe punishment, including life imprisonment and capital punishment, under the principle of justice. 
Integrating Sharia Economic Law and the Green Economy in Nature-Based Ecotourism for Local Community Development Hidayat Darussalam; Yosy Arisandy; Dmytro Dronik; Nataliia Bilak; Volodymyr Shalimov
Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i1.195

Abstract

This article aims to integrate the principles of Islamic economics and law with the green economy to manage nature-based ecotourism in Bengkulu Province, thereby generating economic benefits for surrounding communities while remaining within the framework of environmental conservation. The exploitative nature of nature-based tourism management in Bengkulu Province is evident in the utilization of protected forest and coastal areas, which often disregards the unique ecosystem capacity of Sumatra. The development of supporting infrastructure at strategic points, such as mountainous areas or coastal edges, is often carried out without in-depth environmental studies, leading to the degradation of native vegetation and increasing the risk of ecological disasters, such as landslides and abrasion. This study employs a qualitative case study approach to explore the integration of Sharia economic principles and the green economy within the development of ecotourism in Bengkulu Province. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentation involving relevant stakeholders. The findings demonstrate that this integration is firmly implemented in economic sustainability by allocating tourism profits to Islamic social finance instruments (Zakat, Infaq, and Alms/ZIS), which are managed transparently for village infrastructure development. Furthermore, the practical application of the green economy is manifested through the construction of eco-friendly facilities and integrated waste management systems that protect the biodiversity of the tropical rainforest, a unique identity of Bengkulu. Academically, this research contributes to the literature by bridging the gap between Sharia economic law and sustainability studies, particularly by positioning Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah as a normative foundation for environmental governance in ecotourism. It also enriches the discourse on Islamic social finance by demonstrating its practical role in supporting community-based development within a green economy paradigm.
The Mechanism of Administrative and Legal Support for Ukraine’s Reconstruction: A Constitutional and Legal Model Maryna Susak; Volodymyr Dikhtiievskyi; Petro Dikhtiievskyi; Oleh Bilous; Nataliia Kantor
Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i1.302

Abstract

This study examines the mechanisms of administrative and legal support for the reconstruction of Ukraine during martial law and the post-war recovery period, with a particular focus on developing an effective public administration framework to ensure sustainable national reconstruction. The research aims to identify the institutional, regulatory, and governance mechanisms required to coordinate reconstruction policies, strengthen legal certainty, and enhance administrative effectiveness in crisis and post-conflict contexts. The study employs a comparative legal approach to analyze the experiences of several countries that successfully implemented large-scale post-war reconstruction, including Germany, Poland, Croatia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Through comparative analysis, the research evaluates the relevance and adaptability of foreign administrative and legal practices to the Ukrainian context. The findings demonstrate that effective post-war reconstruction depends on establishing an integrated administrative and legal system grounded in the principles of the rule of law, transparency, accountability, decentralization, and digital governance. The study identifies key challenges in institutional coordination, financial supervision, anti-corruption controls, strategic planning, and cooperation among state authorities, local governments, international partners, and civil society organizations. Furthermore, the research proposes a comprehensive institutional and legal reconstruction model consisting of regulatory, organizational, procedural, financial, digital, supervisory, and international coordination elements. The scientific contribution of this study lies in formulating a multidimensional administrative and legal framework that provides both theoretical and practical guidance for strengthening public governance mechanisms in post-conflict reconstruction and sustainable state recovery.

Page 10 of 10 | Total Record : 93

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2022 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 01 (2025): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 02 (2024): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies