cover
Contact Name
Aditya Kesuma
Contact Email
adityakesuma34@gmail.com
Phone
+6285668953834
Journal Mail Official
info@iaml.or.id
Editorial Address
Street Sempurna No. A3, Sudirejo I Village, Medan Kota District, Medan City, North Sumatra Province, Indonesia
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML)
ISSN : 28291654     EISSN : 2829517X     DOI : 10.59712
International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML) is an open access and peer-reviewed journal that aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research in multiple governance policies and civil rights law, particularly in developing and emerging countries. These may include but are not limited to various fields such as: civil law, criminal law, constitutional and administrative law, customary institution law, religious jurisprudence law, international regime law, legal pluralism governance, health law, economic law and some of the health and economic another section related to contemporary issues in legal, healt and economic scholarship.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 122 Documents
The Urgency Of The Establishment Of A World Mediation Body At The United Nations (PBB) Sabela Gayo
International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML)
Publisher : International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59712/iaml.v5i2.161

Abstract

The dynamics of contemporary international conflicts point to the significant limitations of the United Nations mediation mechanism sourced from a Security Council structure with a veto system. This study analyzes the urgency of the establishment of a World mediation body as an institutional solution to the structural paralysis of the United Nations in carrying out the conflict mediation function for the period 2021-2025. Using normative legal research methods with an analysis of Law No. 37 of 1999, Law No. 24 of 2000, and Law No. 1 of 1982, the study found that the politicization of the mediation process by permanent members of the Security Council has reduced the credibility and effectiveness of the United Nations in resolving the Gaza conflict, Ukraine, and other humanitarian crises. The creation of a World mediation body is supported by the theory of institutional liberalism and empirical evidence of the success of neutral and professional international mediation. Optimal institutional design includes a representative membership structure, responsive operational procedures, diversified financing, and a comprehensive legal mandate independent of the Security Council. The implications of the establishment of this body include the diversification of dispute resolution channels, the strengthening of the role of the General Assembly, and the democratization of global governance through an inclusive redistribution of power, in line with the principles of Indonesia's active free foreign policy and commitment to World Peace.
Pretrial After the Enactment of Law Number 20 of 2025 on Criminal Procedure Code (KUHP) Guntur Rambey
International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML)
Publisher : International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59712/iaml.v5i2.162

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP) brings fundamental changes to the institution of pretrial examination (praperadilan), which was previously regulated in a limited manner under Law Number 8 of 1981 and had long been criticized as a weak, formal-administrative mechanism for protecting human rights. This study aims, first, to analyze the regulation and expansion of the scope of praperadilan under the new KUHAP compared to the old one; and second, to examine the juridical implications of this institutional transformation for the protection of the constitutional rights of suspects, defendants, victims, and other interested parties within the integrated criminal justice system. This research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach, examining primary legal materials in the form of both laws together with relevant secondary legal materials from prior studies. The findings indicate that the new KUHAP expands the object of praperadilan from three to six categories, broadens the scope of eligible applicants to include victims and reporters, and strengthens remedial mechanisms through the exclusionary rule principle. Nevertheless, this expansion also raises risks of abuse of rights through tactical delay as well as institutional implementation challenges that demand stronger implementing regulations, improved capacity of law enforcement officers, and consistent application of due process of law to ensure that the judicial control function of praperadilan operates effectively and fairly.

Page 13 of 13 | Total Record : 122