cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Asy'ari
Contact Email
info@litpam.com
Phone
+6285338219596
Journal Mail Official
info@litpam.com
Editorial Address
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM), Sekarbela, Mataram, 83115
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education
Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29622131     DOI : 10.36312/ijece
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics Other
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education (IJECE) is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the development, implementation, assessment, and sustainability of essential competencies in the 21st-century education requirements such as: model and learning strategy; collaboration; communication; critical thinking skills; creative thinking skills; metacognition; scientific curiosity; innovative learning; information, media, and technology literacy; problem-solving; decision making; design thinking; computational thinking
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): June" : 6 Documents clear
Empowering EFL Writers: The Impact of Unlimited Time and Dictionary Use on Writing Accuracy Sharafi, Mohammad; Ayatollahi, Mohammad Ali
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/ijece.v4i1.1726

Abstract

Intermediate EFL learners often struggle with producing accurate and coherent writing, particularly in settings constrained by limited time and restricted access to language resources. While prior research has separately examined the effects of dictionary use or time flexibility, this study explores the combined impact of both. Through a quasi-experimental design, 50 male intermediate EFL learners were divided into control and experimental groups. The experimental group received unlimited time and access to both digital and print dictionaries during writing tasks, while the control group followed traditional time-bound instruction without resource access. Results showed a significant improvement in the experimental group’s writing scores, which rose from a pre-test mean of 14.76 to a post-test mean of 16.72 (t(24) = -5.70, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.06). The control group’s post-test mean was 15.12, and between-group comparisons also revealed a statistically significant difference (t(48) = 3.121, p = 0.003, Cohen’s d = 0.88). Error analysis further supported the intervention’s effectiveness, with reductions exceeding 50% in key error categories such as verb tense (from 43 to 21), sentence structure (27 to 13), and spelling (28 to 12). These results affirm that integrating flexible time policies and dictionary access enhances learners’ ability to self-monitor, revise, and control their writing. The study advocates for instructional models that promote learner autonomy, highlighting the need for EFL curricula to support more adaptive, resource-enriched learning environments. This dual-intervention model offers a practical pathway to elevate writing proficiency and reduce persistent error patterns in EFL contexts.
Assessing Critical Thinking in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Review and Analysis Using the PRISMA Framework Azmi, Irham; Abdullah, Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee; Alwadood, Zuraida; Calaminos, Franklin P.
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/ijece.v4i1.1858

Abstract

Developing critical thinking skills is paramount in the realm of mathematics education in today's era. It's crucial to monitor learners' advancements in critical thinking, as such insights are valuable for enhancing educational methodologies. Recognizing this, the availability of tools for evaluating critical thinking abilities is vital for fostering students' proficiency in these skills. This research sets out to review existing literature on the assessment of critical thinking capabilities within the sphere of mathematics. A thorough analysis was conducted on relevant scholarly articles focusing on the evaluation of critical thinking in mathematics education. The study adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, which includes the steps of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. Literature from the SCOPUS database was meticulously reviewed, given its esteemed status in providing precise data for international research indexing. Data from the selected documents were visualized using VOSviewer software. Adhering to the PRISMA methodology, findings reveal the significance of critical thinking in the field of mathematics education and highlight various methods and tools that can assess these skills within mathematical contexts. Nonetheless, there remains a gap in consensus on the definition of critical thinking due to the diverse array of theories and perspectives, leading to variability in assessment standards, particularly in mathematics education. Thus, there is a pressing need to precisely define critical thinking within the mathematical domain and to develop accurate tools for its assessment.
Enhancing Biology Learning through 3D Models: A Study of Academic Performance in Nigerian Secondary Schools Babalola, Ebenezer Omolafe; Omolafe, Eyiyemi Veronica
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/ijece.v4i1.1862

Abstract

Despite the recognized importance of Biology in secondary education, students' performance in the subject remains persistently low, particularly in Nigeria, due to the continued reliance on abstract, text-based instructional methods. This study addresses this pedagogical gap by evaluating the impact of a 3-Dimensional Model of the Human Circulatory System (3-DMHCS) on students' academic performance. Grounded in constructivist and multimodal learning frameworks, the study utilized a quasi-experimental post-test non-randomized control group design involving 60 students (49 from public and 11 from private schools). Participants were assigned to either a control group receiving conventional instruction or an experimental group taught using the 3-DMHCS. The Biology Performance Test (BPT), validated and yielding a reliability coefficient of 0.86 (KR-20), was used for assessment. Quantitative results revealed that the experimental group achieved a higher mean post-test score (M = 13.36, SD = 3.44) compared to the control group (M = 11.42, SD = 2.87), with a statistically significant mean difference of 1.94 (t(58) = 2.83, p < 0.01). Additionally, over 53% of students in the experimental group scored within the high range (16–20), whereas none in the control group reached this threshold. Notably, no significant difference was observed between public and private school students’ performance in the experimental group (t(58) = -0.180, p = 0.86), indicating the model’s equitable effectiveness across institutional contexts. The study contributes novel evidence on how low-cost, tactile instructional models can bridge educational disparities and enhance students' grasp of complex biological systems. It advocates for integrating 3D instructional tools into mainstream science curricula and underscores the need for professional development to support such pedagogical innovations.
Charting the Future of Prompt Engineering: Critical Reflections on Methodology, Ethics, and Research Directions Verawati, Ni Nyoman Sri Putu; Yaqin, Lalu Nurul
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/ijece.v4i1.2908

Abstract

Prompt engineering has emerged as a transformative strategy for optimizing Large Language Models (LLMs), offering a cost-effective alternative to full model fine-tuning. In a recent bibliometric review, Fatawi et al. (2024) analyzed 437 Scopus-indexed publications from January 2022 to February 2024, using VOSviewer to identify key thematic clusters—including transformer architectures, deep learning innovations, and few-shot learning—and documenting a fivefold increase in related publications over the review period. Building on their macro-level mapping, this commentary extends the discussion by articulating the strategic and democratizing potential of prompt engineering while addressing critical gaps in methodology and ethical oversight. We critique the review’s reliance on a single English-language database, its exclusion of preprints and non-English sources, and its omission of qualitative insights into user practices and system impacts. In response, we offer concrete recommendations to guide future research: diversify data sources for bibliometric analysis, implement rigorous prompt audit frameworks, conduct longitudinal A/B testing in real-world environments, and adopt mixed-methods approaches to capture human-centered dynamics. We also explore emerging synergies—such as quantum-enhanced NLP and neuro-linguistic prompt design—as promising frontiers for advancing prompt optimization. By addressing these gaps, this commentary aims to ensure that prompt engineering evolves not only as a technical solution but as a responsible and inclusive foundation for next-generation AI development.
Examining the Strategic Role of Soft Skills and Their Implications for Supporting Resource Development: A Narrative Literature Review Pathan, Pathan; Prayogi, Saiful; Mansur, Mansur; Alaydrus, Kadir Alfan; Faisatullah, Moh
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/ijece.v4i1.3082

Abstract

This narrative literature review examines how soft skills function strategically within human-resource and educational contexts and explores their implications for designing support resources. The review draws on twenty peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025, selected through systematic screening of keywords such as soft skills, human resources, and educational resources. Through interpretative thematic analysis, the study identifies core competencies of soft skills: communication, collaboration, problem-solving, adaptability, leadership, empathy, time management, creativity, and metacognition. Findings highlight the strategic role of soft skills in recruitment, professional development, team dynamics, and organizational culture within education, as well as systemic implications for curriculum design, assessment practices, teacher preparation, and institutional policy. Major barriers include curricular inertia, limited facilitator capacity, measurement challenges, and equity gaps in learner engagement. The review recommends embedding explicit soft skills into educational program frameworks and investing in sustained educator training. Future research should undertake detailed, longitudinal analyses of student soft-skills development using robust quantitative measures alongside qualitative approaches to identify effective instructional strategies and contextual factors that drive sustainable skill acquisition.
Rethinking Matrix Instruction: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Students’ Problem-Solving Skills and Pedagogical Challenges Rasyidin, Rasyidin
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/ijece.v4i1.3399

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students’ problem-solving skills in the matrix topic and to identify instructional constraints that influence the learning process. A mixed-methods approach was employed: the quantitative phase involved an eight-session expository intervention (90 minutes per session) and an assessment consisting of 30 multiple-choice and 5 essay questions (scored 0–100), while the qualitative phase included open-ended interviews with the teacher responsible for matrix instruction. Quantitative findings revealed that most students remained at the basic mastery level, with an average score of 26.82 and a distribution dominated by the “Low” category. Only 3.88% of students reached the “Good” level, and a binomial test confirmed that this proportion was significantly lower than the reference threshold (p < 0.001), reinforcing the conclusion that student performance fell short of expected standards. These findings highlight the urgent need for early diagnosis of foundational algebra skills—such as row-column operations and linear equation manipulation—before introducing more complex matrix concepts. The qualitative analysis revealed that although the teacher still employed expository methods—lectures, question and answer, and open discussions—these strategies were insufficient for fostering deep problem-solving skills. Students often relied on mechanical procedures without conceptual understanding, struggled to connect algebraic notation to real-world contexts, and lost motivation when facing multi-step problems. The combined results suggest that instructional design should shift toward more contextual and concept-exploratory approaches. Strategic steps are recommended, including the adoption of structured problem-solving methods to improve learning outcomes in mathematics. Furthermore, curriculum development should allocate sufficient time and resources to matrix topics, provide professional development for teachers in designing innovative instruction, and ensure access to digital infrastructure that supports mathematical visualization.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): June Vol. 3 No. 2: December 2024 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): December Vol. 3 No. 1: June 2024 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): June Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December Vol. 2 No. 2: December 2023 Vol. 2 No. 1: June 2023 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): June Vol. 1 No. 2: December 2022 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): December Vol. 1 No. 1: June 2022 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): June More Issue