cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mira Lestira Hariani
Contact Email
mira.hariani0103@gmail.com
Phone
+6287718070807
Journal Mail Official
tekniksipil.jki@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Program Studi Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Jln. Pemuda No. 32, Cirebon, Jawa Barat 45132
Location
Kota cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur : Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan
Published by Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
ISSN : 28283759     EISSN : 2828156X     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jki.v11i1
Core Subject : Engineering,
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Transportation
Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur (JKI) merupakan kelanjutan dari Jurnal Konstruksi yang diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Swadaya Gunung Djati Cirebon, Indonesia dengan p-issn 2085-8744. Tujuan penerbitan Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur (JKI) adalah: (1) untuk menjadi wadah publikasi artikel ilmiah nasional di bidang teknik sipil serta (2) menerbitkan dan menyebarluaskan hasil penelitian civitas akademika di bidang teknik sipil ke level nasional. Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur (JKI) mengakomodasi pemaparan informasi ilmiah dalam bentuk artikel penelitian, artikel teknis, artikel konseptual, ataupun artikel laporan studi kasus yang sesuai dengan fokus dan ruang lingkup Jurnal ini. Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur (JKI) menerbitkan dua edisi per-tahun pada bulan April dan Oktober. Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur (JKI) memuat artikel terkait: ilmu rekayasa struktur dan material, ilmu pondasi dan tanah pendukung, ilmu rekayasa hydro dan bangunan air, ilmu rekayasa transportasi dan perancangan jalan, ilmu manajemen konstruksi, serta ilmu pengukuran dan pemetaan.
Arjuna Subject : Teknik (semua kategori) - Teknik Sipil dan Struktur
Articles 272 Documents
 24   25   26   27   28 
Analisis Daya Dukung dan Penurunan Fondasi Bored Pile Berdasarkan N-SPT, Plaxis 2D, dan Pengujian Lapangan Pada Proyek Makassar New Port Adhetea Anggun Gitario Ajitama; Muhamad Yusa; Gunawan Wibisono
Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur : Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan Vol 14 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Vol 14 No.2 : October 2026
Publisher : Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33603/jki.v14i2.12843

Abstract

Pile foundations in reclaimed areas require an evaluation of bearing capacity and settlement through analytical, numerical, and field-testing approaches. This study aims to compare the shaft resistance, end bearing resistance, and ultimate capacity of bored piles using the Meyerhof, Reese & Wright, and Luciano Decourt methods; analyze settlement using the Fellenius, Vesic, and PLAXIS 2D methods; and evaluate their agreement with PDA/CAPWAP and Static Loading Test (SLT) results. The research data were obtained from BH-02, including N-SPT values, soil parameters, foundation geometry, loading conditions, and field test results. The analyzed bored pile has a diameter of 1.20 m and a length of 29.2 m. The results show that the highest end bearing resistance was 692 tons based on the Luciano Decourt method, while the lowest was 276 tons based on the Meyerhof method. The ultimate capacities obtained using Meyerhof, Luciano Decourt, and Reese & Wright were 1,023, 1,323, and 2,166 tons, respectively, while the PDA/CAPWAP result was 1,189.98 tons. The SLT result of 1,911 tons was used as the reference ultimate capacity. Reese & Wright produced the capacity closest to the SLT result. Fellenius yielded a settlement of 14.22 mm, closest to the SLT value of 13.40 mm, while Vesic and PLAXIS 2D yielded 23.47 mm and 23.70 mm, respectively. The results indicate that the closest analytical method varies depending on the field test used as the reference.
Analisis Percepatan Waktu Proyek Menggunakan Metode Fast Track Pada Pembangunan Kantor Kejaksaan Negeri Sigi Vendy Pateh; Daisy Pangemanan
Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur : Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan Vol 14 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Vol 14 No.2 : October 2026
Publisher : Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33603/jki.v14i2.12856

Abstract

Construction projects are subject to time constraints and involve interdependent activities, making schedule control essential to achieve the planned completion target. This study aims to determine the schedule lag of the Sigi District Attorney’s Office construction project, evaluate the change in project duration after applying the Fast Track method, and analyze its effect on project activities. A quantitative case study approach was applied using project contract documents, the planned time schedule, weekly progress reports, activity durations, and predecessor relationships. The Critical Path Method (CPM) was first used to identify critical activities, while Microsoft Project was employed to model the existing schedule and analyze changes in activity relationships. The analysis showed that, by week 35, the actual cumulative progress reached 96.40%, compared with 99.96% planned progress, resulting in a 3.56% deviation equivalent to a schedule lag of 28 days on the planned S-curve. The 250-day contractual duration covers physical construction work that was completed within 245 days, and this 245-day existing physical schedule was used as the basis for the CPM and Fast Track analysis. Fast Track was then applied through overlapping critical activities in two stages, after two of the three existing critical relationships were found to already exceed 50% overlap and were therefore excluded from further acceleration. The results showed that the physical work duration was reduced from 245 days to 224 days, representing a reduction of 21 days or 8.57% relative to the 245-day existing schedule. In the scheduling model, the acceleration scenario was formulated without additional labor, equipment, or overtime work. However, the number of critical activities increased from four to eleven, indicating the need for more intensive coordination of labor, equipment, and materials. The results demonstrate that Fast Track can be an effective alternative for recovering schedule delays in government building projects.

Page 28 of 28 | Total Record : 272

 24   25   26   27   28 

Filter by Year

2015 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Vol 14 No.2 : October 2026 Vol 14 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Vol 14 No.1 : April 2026 Vol 13 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Vol 13 No.3 Desember 2025 Special Edition: E Vol 13 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Vol 13 No.2 : Oktober 2025 Vol 13 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Vol 13 No.1 : April 2025 Vol 12 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Vol 12 No.2 : Oktober 2024 Vol 12 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Vol 12 No.1 : April 2024 Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Vol XI No.2 : Oktober 2023 Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Vol XI No.1 : April 2023 Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Volume X No 2 : Oktober 2022 Jurnal Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Volume X No 1 : April 2022 Vol 9 No 2 (2020): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (APRIL 2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (JANUARI 2020) Vol 8 No 3 (2019): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (SEPTEMBER 2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (APRIL 2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (JANUARI 2019) Vol 7 No 5 (2018): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (SEPTEMBER 2018) Vol 7 No 4 (2018): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (APRIL 2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (APRIL 2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (JANUARI 2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (JANUARI 2018) Vol 6 No 7 (2017): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (AGUSTUS 2017) Vol 6 No 6 (2017): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (APRIL 2017) Vol 6 No 5 (2017): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (APRIL 2017) Vol 6 No 4 (2017): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (APRIL 2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (JANUARI 2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (JANUARI 2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (JANUARI 2017) Vol 5 No 6 (2016): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (AGUSTUS 2016) Vol 5 No 5 (2016): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (AGUSTUS 2016) Vol 5 No 4 (2016): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (APRIL 2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (APRIL 2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (JANUARI 2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI (JANUARI 2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015): JURNAL KONSTRUKSI More Issue