cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Maman Suparman
Contact Email
jhdjournal@gmail.com
Phone
+6281294652477
Journal Mail Official
profgayuslumbuunstih@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Raya Lenteng Agung Barat RT.06 / RW.01, Jagakarsa, RT.6/RW.1, Srengseng Sawah, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12630 Nama Panjang Institusi : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun Link Institusi : http://www.stih-pgl.ac.id/ Link OJS https://journal.stih-pgl.ac.id/ojs-stih/index.php/jhd email: jhdjournal@gmail.com
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun
ISSN : 14119765     EISSN : 3021825X     DOI : 10.61234
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Social,
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) adalah Jurnal ilmiah dengan fokus dan skop ilmu hukum, hukum pidana, hukum perdata, politik dan demokrasi, hukum bisnis dan hukum lingkungan. Diterbitkan oleh Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Prof Gayus Lumbuun. Jurnal ini diterbitkan empat kali dalam satu tahun yaitu pada bulan Mei, Agustus, November, dan Februari. Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) melakukan proses peer review secara tertutup pada naskah yang diterima. P-ISSN 14119765 E-ISSN 3021825X
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 58 Documents
 2   3   4   5   6 
Tinjauan Hukum tentang Hak Paten Sebagai Hak Kebendaan yang Dijadikan Jaminan Kredit Aloysius Simon Mooi; RD. Yudi Anton Rikmadani
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v26i1.103

Abstract

This research examines the legal status of patents as property rights that can be used as collateral for credit within the framework of civil law and intellectual property law in Indonesia. The method employed is normative juridical research with a library research approach, relying on primary legal materials in the form of legislation (Law No. 13 of 2016 on Patents and Law No. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Security), secondary legal materials such as literature and expert opinions, and tertiary legal materials such as legal dictionaries and encyclopedias. The findings indicate that patents are part of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), which are intangible in nature but possess significant economic value. Patents grant exclusive rights to their holders to exploit their inventions, whether through production, distribution, or licensing. In the context of property law, patents can be classified as intangible movable property characterized by absolute rights, the right to follow (droit de suite), and the principle of priority. These characteristics enable patents to be used as collateral, either through pledge, fiduciary security, or licensing mechanisms, while taking into account their limited duration. Thus, patents serve not only as a legal protection instrument for intellectual works but also as a strategic economic asset that can support business activities and industrial financing. Therefore, stronger regulations and clearer policies are needed to optimize the use of patents as credit collateral within Indonesia’s legal system.
Implementasi Imunitas Advokat dalam Pendampingan Justice Collaborator pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Naning Widhiharti; Hartanto; Parbuntian Sinaga
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v25i2.126

Abstract

As criminal offenses become increasingly complex, the Justice Collaborator process is becoming more and more important in identifying the perpetrators. As part of this system, attorneys play a crucial role in protecting Justice Collaborators’ rights to due process of law, a fair trial, and the protection of human rights. In reality, law enforcement practices still show criminalization and criminal reports against Advocates who carry out their professional duties, thus creating uncertainty about the limits of the application of Advocate immunity rights. This study aims to analyze the position and implementation of Advocate immunity rights in the assistance of Justice Collaborators in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. Based on an interview with Prof. Dr. T. Gayus Lumbuun, S.H., M.H., as well as supporting primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources, this study employs a normative legal methodology that combines statutory, conceptual, historical, and case-based approaches. The findings of this study indicate that attorneys are entitled to legal immunity under Article 16 of Law No. 18 of 2003 on Attorneys, which was expanded through Constitutional Court Judicial Review Decision No. 26/PUU-XI/2013. However, this immunity applies only if the attorney practices their profession in good faith and does not commit a criminal offense. Dr. Frederich Yunadi, Moh. Citing Richard Eliezer, Yagari Bhastara Guntur (Gerry), and others, the Justice Collaborator process and the protection of attorneys do not yet have an integrated regulatory framework. This study also proposes a new legal concept of Functional Immunity for Advocates in the Assistance of Justice Collaborators as a new legal construct and recommends harmonization of the Advocates Law and the Witness and Victim Protection Law, in accordance with Constitutional Court Decision Number 126/PUU-XXIV/2026, which encourages the revision of the Advocates Law to strengthen legal certainty, the independence of the advocate profession, and the effectiveness of the criminal justice system.
Kepastian Hukum terhadap Hak Milik Atas Tanah yang Terdampak Bencana Alam di Indonesia Pandji Pratama
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v25i2.127

Abstract

This study aims to analyze legal certainty regarding land ownership rights affected by natural disasters. This issue is significant because the existing regulatory framework in Indonesia has not yet optimally provided legal certainty for holders of land rights whose properties are impacted by disasters. This study employs a normative juridical method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary legal materials in the form of legislation, secondary legal materials comprising academic literature and scientific journal articles, and tertiary legal materials. The findings reveal two main conclusions. First, land ownership rights under Indonesian agrarian law constitute rights that are hereditary, strongest, and fullest in nature as stipulated in Article 20 of the Basic Agrarian Law, yet may be extinguished by operation of law upon the destruction of the land. Second, legal certainty regarding land ownership rights affected by natural disasters has not been optimally realized, either at the normative or empirical level. At the normative level, ambiguities remain in the definition of destroyed land, disharmony persists between disaster law and agrarian law, and no adequate provisions exist governing compensation for the extinguishment of ownership rights due to natural disasters. At the empirical level, the implementation of rights recovery in the field continues to be hampered by limited technical capacity and inconsistent policies. This study recommends regulatory harmonization and the establishment of clear mechanisms for compensation to holders of land ownership rights affected by natural disasters.
Mengenal Peluang Karir Bagi Lulusan Hukum melalui Sosialisasi Profesi Hukum di Indonesia Lewiandy Lewiandy; Vernice Kevlyn Kam; Nicholas Aaron Liong; Keira Ayasha Yulianto
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v26i1.128

Abstract

High school students tend to misinterpret information regarding law and the diversity of the legal profession, which highlights a crucial problem in the development of legal awareness among the younger generation. The current formal education has yet to provide a full, comprehensive description of the roles of law enforcers and career prospects in the legal field. This issue is important, as high school is a crucial stage that directly influences future academic and professional orientation. In this event, the organizers conducted an offline session on "Introduction to legal professions and functions of law enforcement officers" aimed to enhance legal awareness and legal literacy among students through a socialization that focuses on basic legal concepts, professional legal ethics, roles and functions of law enforcement officers, and the growing relevance of modern professions due to technological advancements. The results of this program show an increase in the students' legal awareness and understanding of the law's different professions. This initiative is expected to shape the young generations to develop an interest in law and, most importantly, become legally literate.
Efektivitas Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan (Musrenbang) dalam Mewujudkan Demokrasi Partisipatif di Desa Waiara Kabupaten Sikka Akmal Aminudin; Florentino G.G. Rande; Maria Regina S. Efendi; Fitiyani Binti Zein Al – Husein; Intan Nur Aini; Santi Mardia Sidin; Cici Mariani; Maryono Maryono; Basilius Ile Atan Maran
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v26i1.129

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the extent to which the Development Planning Deliberation (Musrenbang) is effective in supporting the implementation of participatory democracy in Waiara Village, Sikka Regency. Musrenbang serves as a crucial tool in development planning, fostering collaboration between the government and the community to jointly formulate development plans. The study employs a qualitative approach with a case study design, conducted between April and May 2026. Data collection involved in-depth interviews with the village head, Village Consultative Body (BPD) members, community leaders, youth representatives, and local residents, supplemented by direct observation and document analysis. The findings indicate that the implementation of Musrenbang in Waiara Village is effective in fostering participatory democracy. This is evidenced by the active efforts of the BPD to gather aspirations down to the neighborhood (RT) and hamlet levels, the inclusive participation of diverse sectors, high community attendance and enthusiasm, the freedom to express opinions without pressure, and the collaborative determination of priorities during the deliberation forum. The outcomes of the Musrenbang generally align with the community's actual needs, reflecting aspirations gathered directly from the field. The primary challenge encountered is the limited Village Budget (APBDes), which prevents the realization of all community proposals; conversely, there are virtually no obstacles regarding community participation itself. The study concludes that the Musrenbang in Waiara Village has evolved beyond a mere administrative procedure into a vital vehicle for participatory democracy, although communication mechanisms regarding the follow-up on unaccommodated proposals require strengthening to sustain community trust and enthusiasm for participation.
Perlindungan Hukum Aset Milik Pihak Ketiga Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Putusan Kasasi Mari Nomor: 1665 K/Pdt/2020) Rd.Yudi Anton Rikmadani; Tambos Athur Sidauruk; Ismail Ismail; Gradios Nyoman Tio Rae
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v26i1.130

Abstract

Legal protection of property owned by a third party in cases of corruption creates a conflict between the state's interest in recovering losses from acts of corruption and the property rights of innocent third parties. This research aims to examine and evaluate the legal process related to the confiscation and taking of goods obtained through crime in the context of corruption. The method used in this study is a normative approach, where law is seen as a structured system of norms. The findings of this study reveal that there is a gap between ideal conditions in the legal protection of third parties and real implementation in handling cases of corruption, which indicates the need for a legal policy conclusion that can link efforts to eradicate corruption with the protection of the rights of third parties who act in good faith. This research is expected to produce regulations through parliament by clarifying and emphasizing the regulation regarding the legal protection of assets owned by third parties in cases of corruption, and as law enforcement officials are obliged to apply the principles of prudence and due process of law in the act of confiscation and prosecution of asset confiscation by conducting strict verification of ownership status and causal relationships between assets and corruption crimes and the panel of judges need to prepare legal considerations that are argumentative, consistent, and oriented towards the protection of the rights of third parties in good faith by explicitly examining the ownership status and the relationship of assets with corruption crimes, so that the resulting verdict can balance the interests of corruption eradication with legal certainty and a sense of justice.
Legalitas Penggunaan Kekuatan Bersenjata Amerika Serikat dan Israel terhadap Iran dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional: Analisis Jus Ad Bellum, Hak Bela Diri dan Hukum Humaniter Internasional Iwan Saputra
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v26i1.131

Abstract

The use of armed force by the United States and Israel against the Islamic Republic of Iran raises fundamental questions under international law, particularly concerning the boundaries between the prohibition of the use of force and the right of self-defence. The issue has become increasingly complex as the United States has invoked its inherent right of self-defence under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, while Iran considers such actions to constitute violations of its sovereignty and territorial integrity. This study aims to analyze the legality of the use of armed force against Iran from the perspectives of jus ad bellum and jus in bello. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, case, conceptual, and historical approaches. The primary legal materials consist of the Charter of the United Nations, the 1949 Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocol I of 1977, the 1998 Rome Statute, and judgments of the International Court of Justice, particularly Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) and Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America). The study finds that the use of force against Iran must, in principle, be examined under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which establishes the prohibition of the use of force against other states. The invocation of self-defence under Article 51 does not automatically render the use of force lawful, as the existence of an armed attack and the requirements of necessity and proportionality must be established. Furthermore, even where the use of force may be justified under jus ad bellum, the conduct of military operations remains subject to international humanitarian law, particularly the principles of distinction, proportionality, and precautions in attack. This study concludes that the legality of the conflict must be assessed at two distinct levels: the legality of resorting to force and the legality of the manner in which force is conducted.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Penggunaan Klausula Baku dalam Perjanjian Asuransi Kredit Berdasarkan Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen M. Alfri Wibowo; Iwan Saputra
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v26i1.132

Abstract

The rapid expansion of Indonesia's credit insurance sector, driven by the rising demand for bank credit facilities, has been accompanied by a structural problem: the widespread use of standard clauses that disadvantage consumers. This article examines two central issues, namely the substance and scope of the prohibition on standard clauses under Article 18 of Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection within credit insurance agreements, and the effectiveness of the legal protection it affords in practice. The study applies a normative legal method combining statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, with legal materials analysed qualitatively and descriptively. The findings show that, normatively, Article 18 constructs a comprehensive prohibitory system through a substantive dimension comprising seven categories of prohibited clauses and a formal dimension concerning the legibility of clauses, backed by a firm sanction of automatic nullity. In practice, however, the provision's effectiveness remains severely constrained by a persistent gap between the ideal legal order and everyday reality, produced by three mutually reinforcing factors: the still-reactive supervisory posture of the Financial Services Authority, dispute-resolution mechanisms that remain poorly accessible to consumers, and low public legal and financial literacy. The article recommends simultaneous strengthening on three fronts: normative reinforcement through the introduction of a general substantive-fairness test into consumer protection legislation, institutional reinforcement through a shift toward proactive supervision, and legal-culture reinforcement through systematic consumer empowerment.

Page 6 of 6 | Total Record : 58

 2   3   4   5   6 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Vol 25 No 1 (2025): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Vol 24 No 4 (2024): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Vol 24 No 3 (2024): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Vol 24 No 2 (2024): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Vol 24 No 1 (2024): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Vol 23 No 4 (2023): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Vol 23 No 3 (2023): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Vol 23 No 2 (2023): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Vol 23 No 1 (2023): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) More Issue