cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rizky Saputra
Contact Email
rizkysaputra@graha-kirana.com
Phone
+6282257366060
Journal Mail Official
jurnallexlectio@graha-kirana.com
Editorial Address
https://jurnalgrahakirana.ac.id/index.php/JLL/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Lex Lectio Law Journal
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Graha Kirana
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30253276     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Artikel ilmiah yang dipublikasikan pada Lex Lectio Law Journal memiliki fokus dan ruang lingkup penelitian yang antara lain dapat mencakup hukum perdata, hukum administrasi negara, hukum konstitusi, hukum bisnis, hukum ekonomi, hukum pidana, hukum Islam, hukum internasional, filsafat hukum, hukum adat, hukum dan teknologi, hukum dan masyarakat, hukum agraria / pertanahan, hukum lingkungan dan sumber daya alam, hukum kelautan (maritim).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 3 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 4, No 2 (2025)" : 3 Documents clear
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TRADE RELATED INVESTMENT MEASURES IN LAW OF REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 25 OF 2007 CONCERNING INVESTMENT Purba, Selviana
Lex Lectio Law Journal Vol 4, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Graha Kirana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61715/jll.v4i2.124

Abstract

This paper examines the implementation of the Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMS) within the legal framework of the Republic of Indonesia, particularly through Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment. As a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) since 1995, Indonesia is required to harmonize its investment policies with international trade principles, especially the National Treatment and the Prohibition of Quantitative Restrictions as reflected in GATT 1994. Although Indonesia received special and differential treatment that allowed a longer transition period, the alignment of domestic investment laws with TRIMS obligations remains essential to ensure fair competition and prevent trade-distorting investment measures. This paper analyzes how Indonesia incorporates TRIMS principles into its national investment regulations, with particular attention to Article 18 of the Investment Law, which provides various investment facilities but potentially raises issues related to performance requirements. The study concludes that while Indonesia has made significant progress in integrating TRIMS-compatible rules, several provisions—especially those linking incentives to the use of domestic goods—may still pose risks of inconsistency with WTO commitments.
DILEMA KRIMINALISASI KEBEBASAN BEREKSPRESI DALAM PENGATURAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK PASCA REVISI KEDUA UU ITE Windani, Sri
Lex Lectio Law Journal Vol 4, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Graha Kirana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61715/jll.v4i2.125

Abstract

AbstractThe development of digital criminal law in Indonesia has entered a new phase with the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law). This amendment reconstructs the defamation offense previously governed by Article 27 paragraph (3) into Article 27A, shifting the paradigm from insult to attack on honor. This study aims to analyze the shift in the legal construction of defamation offenses following the second revision of the ITE Law and to evaluate its implications for criminal liability and the protection of freedom of expression. The research method employed is normative juridical with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results indicate that Article 27A clarifies the objective element of accusing a specific act and alters the status of the offense to an absolute complaint offense (absolute klachtdelicten), which theoretically limits victim subjectivity and prevents the criminalization of criticism not based on facts. Furthermore, the reduction of criminal sanctions to a maximum of two years implies that detention cannot be imposed during the investigation process. However, this study finds that the protection of freedom of expression still faces challenges at the implementation level, particularly regarding the burden of proof in the public interest exception clause, which potentially triggers a chilling effect in the digital sphere. AbstrakPerkembangan hukum pidana digital di Indonesia memasuki babak baru dengan disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE). Perubahan ini merekonstruksi delik pencemaran nama baik yang sebelumnya diatur dalam Pasal 27 ayat (3) menjadi Pasal 27A, yang mengubah paradigma dari delik penghinaan menjadi penyerangan kehormatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pergeseran konstruksi hukum delik pencemaran nama baik pasca revisi kedua UU ITE serta mengevaluasi implikasinya terhadap pertanggungjawaban pidana dan perlindungan kebebasan berekspresi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 27A mempertegas unsur objektif menuduhkan suatu hal dan mengubah status delik menjadi aduan mutlak (absolute klachtdelicten), yang secara teoretis membatasi subjektivitas korban dan mencegah kriminalisasi atas kritik yang tidak berdasar fakta. Selain itu, penurunan sanksi pidana menjadi maksimal dua tahun berimplikasi pada tidak dapat dilakukannya penahanan selama proses penyidikan. Namun, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa perlindungan kebebasan berekspresi masih menghadapi tantangan pada tataran implementasi, khususnya terkait beban pembuktian pada klausul pengecualian kepentingan umum yang berpotensi memicu chilling effect di ruang digital.
REKONSTRUKSI PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PERTANAHAN DI INDONESIA Zulfikar, Zulfikar; Ayu, Rizky
Lex Lectio Law Journal Vol 4, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Graha Kirana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61715/jll.v4i2.127

Abstract

The increasing number of criminal acts in the land sector, such as land grabbing, falsification of land documents, and abuse of authority by land officials, demonstrates systemic weaknesses in Indonesia’s land law and its enforcement, resulting in legal uncertainty and a sense of injustice for lawful land right holders. This study aims to analyze: first, the regulation and implementation of criminal liability for land-related offences in Indonesian positive law and their relevance to legal certainty; second, the factors that hinder the optimal enforcement of criminal liability in handling land crimes; and third, the ideal reconstruction of criminal liability that can more effectively ensure equitable legal certainty. The research employs a normative legal method with a descriptive-analytical character, using statute and case approaches to examine the Basic Agrarian Law, the Criminal Code/Law No. 1 of 2023, sectoral land regulations, and court decisions on land-related criminal cases. The findings reveal that although the normative basis for criminal liability and the instrument of legal certainty through land registration are formally available, their implementation is constrained by fragmented and insufficiently specific offence formulations, limited capacity and weak coordination between law enforcement agencies and land administration bodies, as well as a strong culture of informal dispute settlement that neglects effective restoration of victims’ rights. This article proposes a reconstruction of criminal liability that emphasizes the establishment of a specific category of land-related offences, strengthening the capacity and guidelines for law enforcement, and integrating criminal judgments with administrative measures and a digital land information system as prerequisites for realizing equitable legal certainty for land right holders in Indonesia.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 3

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 2 (2025) Vol 4, No 1 (2025) Vol 3, No 2 (2024) Vol 3, No 1 (2024) Vol 2, No 2 (2023) Vol 2, No 1 (2023) Vol 1, No 2 (2022) Vol 1, No 1 (2022)