cover
Contact Name
Reza Akbar
Contact Email
rezaakbaraplus@gmail.com
Phone
+6281254504942
Journal Mail Official
glorespublication@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Tabrani Desa Saing Rambi Komplek Adenia 4A, Sambas Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia, Kode Pos 79460. Email: glorespublication@gmail.com / admin@glorespublication.org
Location
Kab. sambas,
Kalimantan barat
INDONESIA
Sosiosaintika : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29865697     DOI : https://doi.org/10.59996
Sosiosaintika focuses on the subject of social sciences. The scope of articles published by Sosiosaintika includes studies in the fields of law, Anthropology, Sociology, Communication Studies, Economics, Education, Geography, History, Political Science, Social Psychology, and other social sciences.
Articles 43 Documents
Hubungan Kewenangan antara Kepala Daerah dengan DPRD dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Daerah Perspektif Siyāsah Syar’iyyah Noranisa
Sosiosaintika Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): SOSIOSAINTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : CV Global Research Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59996/sosiosaintika.v4i1.1023

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship of authority between Regional Heads and Regional People’s Representative Councils (DPRD) within the framework of regional governance and to analyze it from the perspective of Siyāsah Syar’iyyah. This research applies a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and Islamic law approaches. The results of the study show that, normatively, the relationship between Regional Heads and DPRD is a partnership based on the principle of checks and balances, in which the DPRD carries out legislative, budgeting, and supervisory functions, while the Regional Head performs executive functions. However, in practice, this relationship is often influenced by political conflicts, institutional disharmony, and abuse of authority, which hinder the implementation of regional governance. From the perspective of siyāsah syar’iyyah, such a relationship should be based on the principles of deliberation (shura), justice, trustworthiness (amānah), and supervision (ḥisbah) in order to realize public welfare. Therefore, strengthening integrity, political ethics, and commitment to the values of justice and public benefit is essential in the administration of regional government to achieve good governance.
Analisis Kebijakan Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) Perspektif Siyāsah Dustūriyyah Hasiah, Hasiah
Sosiosaintika Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): SOSIOSAINTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : CV Global Research Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59996/sosiosaintika.v4i1.1013

Abstract

The Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG) is a strategic policy implemented by the Indonesian government aimed at improving the nutritional quality of society, particularly for vulnerable groups such as school children, toddlers, and pregnant and breastfeeding women. This study analyzes the MBG program from the perspective of siyāsah dustūriyyahusing a qualitative normative method through literature review of Islamic legal theory and public policy sources. The findings indicate that the MBG program has strong legal legitimacy and is aligned with the principles of maslahah and maqasid al-sharia, particularly in preserving life (hifz al-nafs) and lineage (hifz al-nasl). However, its implementation still faces several challenges, including targeting inaccuracy, distribution inequality, and weak supervision, which may lead to potential mafsadat. Therefore, strengthening governance, transparency, and accountability is essential to ensure that the program operates effectively in accordance with the principles of siyāsah dustūriyyah.
Harmonisasi Moderasi Beragama antara Hukum Islam dan Hak Asasi Manusia: Pendekatan Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah di Negara Plural Haswin, Ferry Harry
Sosiosaintika Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): SOSIOSAINTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : CV Global Research Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59996/sosiosaintika.v4i1.1028

Abstract

The relationship between Islamic law and human rights has often been perceived as dichotomous, particularly in the context of religious freedom and plural societies. This study aims to analyze the harmonization of religious moderation between Islamic law and human rights through the approach of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. This research employs a qualitative method with normative and conceptual approaches through an examination of classical Islamic legal principles and the framework of modern human rights. The findings indicate that the apparent tension between Islamic law and human rights does not constitute an absolute contradiction, but is largely influenced by rigid textual interpretations and incompatibility with social contexts. The framework of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah offers a mediative paradigm by placing public welfare (maṣlaḥah) and the protection of fundamental human rights as top priorities. This study proposes a conceptual model of harmonization based on reinterpretation, contextualization, and value integration that is relevant to be implemented in plural states such as Indonesia. The novelty of this research lies in its integrative approach that bridges normative Islamic jurisprudence with universal human rights principles through a moderation framework based on maqāṣid.