cover
Contact Name
Aji Mulyana
Contact Email
ajimulyana@ysci.or.id
Phone
+6285174149724
Journal Mail Official
admin@ysci.or.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Gunung Gede Number 23, RT 002 RW 003 Sawahgede Village, Cianjur District, West Java, Indonesia
Location
Kab. cianjur,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Intellectual Law Review (ILRE)
ISSN : 29879116     EISSN : 29876338     DOI : https://doi.org/10.59108/ilre.v1i2
Core Subject : Social,
Intellectual Law Review (ILRE) is an open access and peer-reviewed journal that aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research in multiple governance policies and civil rights law, particularly in developing and emerging countries. These may include but are not limited to various fields such as: civil law, criminal law, constitutional and administrative law, customary institution law, religious jurisprudence law, international regime law, legal pluralism governance, and another section related to contemporary issues in legal scholarship
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 2 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 3 No 2 (2025): October" : 2 Documents clear
Legal Accountability of Public Officials in Abuse of Authority: Corruption Cases in General Legal Administration Mulyadi, Dedi; Sabila, Amani; Nadiyana, Delis Nia; firmansyah, Alif; Aulia Budiman, Eva; Salma Wirahma, Nadiyah
Intellectual Law Review (ILRE) Vol 3 No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Yayasan Studi Cendekia Indonesia (YSCI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59108/ilre.v3i2.112

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the limits and forms of abuse of authority committed by the Deputy Minister of Law and Human Rights (Wamenkumham) in the management of General Legal Administration (AHU), as well as to examine the role of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in supervising and handling these actions. This study uses a qualitative method with a legal-normative approach to analyze legal norms and their application in administrative governance, supplemented by a case study method for in-depth analysis of the Deputy Minister's alleged abuse of authority, supported by an analysis of relevant laws and regulations. The findings of this study indicate that the Deputy Minister's authority is coordinative and delegative in nature; actions beyond these limits can be categorized as abuse of authority. The KPK has an important role in monitoring, coordinating, and enforcing the law against such abuse of authority to maintain accountability and integrity in public administration. This study concludes that the application of good governance principles is fundamental in preventing abuse of authority in the Ministry of Law and Human Rights.
The Role and Responsibility of the Government in Protecting the Rights of Electronic Certificate Holders in Accordance with the Principle of Legal Protection Asmorowati, Meiti
Intellectual Law Review (ILRE) Vol 3 No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Yayasan Studi Cendekia Indonesia (YSCI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59108/ilre.v3i2.114

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the role and responsibility of the government in providing legal protection for holders of electronic certificates (e-certificates), particularly in ensuring legal certainty and data security in accordance with the mandate of Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively and descriptively on secondary data covering primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that although a formal legal basis exists (ITE Law, Government Regulation No. 18/2021, and ATR/BPN Ministerial Regulation No. 3/2023) that provides a framework for preventive and repressive protection, its implementation still faces crucial problems. These problems include: (1) uneven infrastructure and human resource readiness, which risks violating the principles of legal certainty and equal protection; (2) a legal culture gap or public doubt regarding the validity of electronic documents; (3) inconsistency and fragmentation of implementing regulations, giving rise to multiple interpretations; and (4) a lack of clear norms regarding state accountability mechanisms, compensation, and restoration of rights in the event of system failure or data leaks.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2