cover
Contact Name
Nawiyanto
Contact Email
jsi.ppsi2018@gmail.com
Phone
+6281241011594
Journal Mail Official
jsi.ppsi2018@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Sekretariat: Program Studi Sejarah, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Indonesia, Gedung 3 Lantai III, Kampus UI, Depok, Jawa Barat. Kode Pos 16242.
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia
ISSN : 26211580     EISSN : 30324564     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia (JSI) accepts a variety of formats, including articles from scholarly forums, review essays, and special issues covering all fields and periods in Indonesian history, such as social, cultural, political, and economic history, with diverse approaches. Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia editors also accept book reviews.
Articles 53 Documents
Dari Revolusi Hijau ke Food Estate: Kapitalisme Pedesaan dan Warisan Dualisme Ekonomi dalam Sejarah Pembangunan Pertanian Indonesia Tirto Adhie Soerjo; Sari Oktafiana
Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia
Publisher : Perkumpulan Program Studi Sejarah Se-Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62924/jsi.v9i1.46151

Abstract

This article examines the long-term impacts of Indonesia's Green Revolution during the New Order era on the rural socio-economic structure, particularly in Java. Using a political-economic historical approach and data from the 1983 and 2023 Agricultural Censuses, the study argues that the Green Revolution did not merely modernize agriculture through technology and chemical inputs but also reshaped rural society through class differentiation, patronage relations, and agrarian commodification. The policy fostered a persistent economic dualism between large landowners and land-poor farmers. This historical trajectory continues in the present, especially under President Joko Widodo's Food Estate program and its anticipated expansion under President-elect Prabowo Subianto, both of which reproduce a top-down, capital-intensive, and exclusionary development model. The findings highlight that without structural agrarian reform and agricultural policy, Indonesia risks remaining trapped in agricultural involution, an intensification of labor without corresponding improvements in productivity or welfare, and recurring food security crises.
Peristiwa Malari 1974: Pergeseran Narasi dari Gerakan Moral ke Stigma Politik dalam Propaganda Orde Baru Ganda Febri Kurniawan; Alfira Apriyanti
Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia
Publisher : Perkumpulan Program Studi Sejarah Se-Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62924/jsi.v9i1.47825

Abstract

The Malari incident on January 15, 1974, was a pivotal moment in Indonesian political history, marking tensions between students, community groups, and the New Order government. This study aims to analyze the factors that triggered Malari, the dynamics of student action, and the government's response within the context of political stability and economic development. The research method used is historical, with an analytical approach to documents, newspaper archives, and secondary literature related to economic and political policies at the time. The results show that Malari was not simply a protest against foreign investment but also reflected a critique of corruption, social injustice, and the political control of the New Order. Furthermore, this event reveals patterns of interaction between student moral movements and the political stigma that the government constructs through propaganda. This study provides a new perspective in understanding Malari as a complex socio-political phenomenon, while also emphasizing the role of students as agents of change amidst the pressures of an authoritarian regime.
Sebelum Peristiwa Pemberontakan 1926: Perebutan Ruang Publik Sarekat Rakyat di Priangan, 1920-1926 Dharyanto Tito Wardani; A. Fadhilah Utami Ilmi Rifai
Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia
Publisher : Perkumpulan Program Studi Sejarah Se-Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62924/jsi.v9i1.49879

Abstract

In the periodization of the national movement in Indonesian history, indigenous intellectual resistance was carried out through modern organizations, one of which was the Sarekat Islam, which split, with the left faction forming the Sarekat Rakyat. This study aims to reconstruct and analyze the struggle for public space and the dynamics of ideological conflict within the Sarekat Islam organization, culminating in the formation of the Sarekat Rakyat in the Priangan region before the 1926 rebellion. The research method used is the historical method consisting of four stages of work: heuristics, criticism, interpretation, and historiography (explanation). The concepts and theories used are the concepts and theories of hegemony or power of Antonio Gramsci. The results of this study conclude that the history of the national movement through the modern Sarekat Islam organization experienced quite difficult developments. This difference began with the interests of each leader of the Sarekat Islam organization in their region, and there was always competition over the policies and strategic and political steps of the organization. The struggle for public space carried out by the Sarekat Rakyat in Priangan during 1920–1926 brought important changes to the political dynamics of society. Through public meetings (vergadering), propaganda, and various organizational activities, Sarekat Rakyat succeeded in transforming the public sphere into a vehicle for disseminating anti-colonial ideas and building popular political awareness. As a result, the public sphere, previously largely controlled by the colonial government and the Sarekat Islam group, became an arena for political contestation between Sarekat Rakyat, Sarekat Islam, the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI), and the Dutch East Indies government. This development strengthened Sarekat Rakyat's influence in Priangan but also triggered repressive measures by the colonial government, including surveillance, the disbandment of meetings, arrests of activists, and restrictions on political activity in the lead-up to the 1926 rebellion.