cover
Contact Name
Reza Muamar Zaki
Contact Email
info@polteksci.ac.id
Phone
+6287743788687
Journal Mail Official
support@jolastic.id
Editorial Address
Desa Penambangan, Sedong, Cirebon, Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Law and Social Politics
ISSN : 29886740     EISSN : 29886740     DOI : 10.59261
The Journal Of Law and Social Politic provides a means for ongoing discussion of relevant issues that fall within the focus and scope of the journal that can be examined empirically. The Journal Of Law and Social Politic will publish scientific articles in the fields of education, including education, economics, history education, geography education, Pancasila and citizenship education and other fields of social science education that have not been listed. Published articles are articles from critical and comprehensive research, scientific studies or studies on important and current issues, or reviews of scientific books.
Articles 212 Documents
Analisis Yuridis Penggunaan dan Pemanfaatan Tanah Kas Kalurahan Tanpa Perizinan di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dalam Perspektif Kenotariatan Ailsa Damodara; Almira Rahma Aulia
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i5.309

Abstract

Latar belakang: Tanah Kas Kalurahan di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta berada dalam rezim pertanahan khusus, sedangkan Pemerintah Kalurahan menjalankan fungsi pengelolaan berdasarkan hak Anggaduh. Penggunaan tanpa izin dapat menimbulkan akibat yang berbeda dalam hukum administrasi, perdata, pidana, dan kenotariatan, khususnya setelah berlakunya Pergub DIY Nomor 24 Tahun 2024. Tujuan: Penelitian ini menganalisis kerangka perizinan penggunaan dan pemanfaatan Tanah Kas Kalurahan, membedakan akibat hukum penggunaan tanpa izin, serta memperjelas peran dan batas kewenangan Notaris dalam hubungan hukum yang melibatkan tanah tersebut. Metode: Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, historis, dan kasus. Bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan serta putusan terpilih, sedangkan bahan sekunder berupa buku dan artikel ilmiah. Analisis dilakukan melalui interpretasi gramatikal dan sistematis, harmonisasi norma, serta pembacaan ratio decidendi. Hasil: Penggunaan tanpa izin terutama menimbulkan konsekuensi administratif berupa penghentian kegiatan dan/atau pembongkaran. Akibat perdata harus ditentukan secara kasuistis dengan menilai kewenangan para pihak, objek dan causa yang halal, serta kedudukan izin dalam hubungan hukum. Pertanggungjawaban pidana hanya timbul apabila unsur delik tertentu terbukti. Akta autentik tidak menggantikan izin administratif dan tidak memperbaiki cacat materiil perbuatan hukum. Kesimpulan: Dalam perspektif kenotariatan, prinsip kehati-hatian mengharuskan Notaris memeriksa status tanah, kewenangan para pihak, peruntukan, dan kelengkapan izin sebelum hubungan hukum dituangkan dalam akta autentik.
The Principle of Divinity in Indonesia's National Legal Order: Legitimation, Interpretation, and Control Ongen Michel Timisela; Marthinus Johanes Saptenno; Renny Heronia Nendissa
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i5.310

Abstract

Background: The Principle of Divinity, rooted in the first precept of Pancasila and Article 29 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, is a constitutional value that should guide the formation, interpretation, and review of law. Its practical translation remains uneven, particularly in matters concerning freedom of religion and belief. Objective: This study examines three interrelated functions of the Principle of Divinity—legitimation, interpretation, and control—and their implications for legal certainty and substantive justice. Methods: This normative-doctrinal study employs statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials comprise constitutional provisions, legislation, and selected decisions of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Indonesia. Reports published by the SETARA Institute are used solely as secondary contextual sources, rather than as empirical data collected by the authors. Results: The analysis shows that the three functions operate sequentially but are translated into legal norms and practice inconsistently. Legitimation may be undermined when implementing regulations impose disproportionate barriers; interpretation varies across judicial decisions; and judicial control remains selective. The analysis of regulations and judicial decisions supports the identification of inconsistencies in value translation and the development of a six-stage harmonization model. SETARA Institute monitoring indicates persistent violations of freedom of religion or belief; however, the reported figures are treated as contextual indicators rather than as evidence of causation. Conclusion: The central problem lies in the inconsistent translation of the Principle of Divinity from philosophical and constitutional values into legislation, institutional interpretation, judicial control, and legal practice. Continuous harmonization is necessary to align constitutional values concerning religion with the principles of equality, human dignity, and the protection of rights.