cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
cle.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
cle.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sekaran, Gunung Pati, Semarang City, Central Java 50229
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27218368     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
The journal also supported and supervised by Law Clinics at Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang, such as Anti-Corruption Law Clinic, Women and Gender Law Clinic, Human Rights Clinic, Employment Law Clinic, Land Law Clinic, Statutory Law Clinic, Environmental Law Clinic, and some Research Centers.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): September" : 5 Documents clear
Asian Values Discourses and Its Impact on Freedom of Expression in Social Media Syahwal; Raihan Muhammad
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/iccle.v7i3.26869

Abstract

This study originates from the discourse on social media regarding a set of Asian cultural values that often conflict with universal human rights principles. These values, recognized in human rights studies as Asian values, are seen in various studies as intertwined with threats to human rights. Therefore, this study aims to uncover the forms of discourse surrounding Asian values on social media and their potential impact on freedom of expression. Based on these issues, this research employs a non-doctrinal method, which examines law within various  extra-legal  contexts, to  explore  the  discourse of Asian values emerging on social media—especially on the 'X' platform—and its relationship with political and religious expression on social media. The study reveals that the tendency of Asian values to support authoritarianism also extends to social media. Various expressions are then labeled as uncivil and contrary to Indonesian culture. This situation leads Asian values to act as a trigger for the shrinking of civil space on social media.
Interpretation, Inclusiveness, and Ambiguity: A Critique of Rule Design in Modern Legal System Muhamad Pelengkahu
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/iccle.v7i3.35150

Abstract

This paper analyzes three critical concerns in the formulation of contemporary legal regulations: the propensity for over- or under-inclusiveness, ambiguity in application, and interpretive difficulties. This study utilizes a normative-doctrinal legal methodology within an interdisciplinary framework, incorporating jurisprudence, legal linguistics, and regulatory theory, to argue that rules function not solely as normative instruments but as socio-linguistic constructs shaped by power dynamics and interpretive communities. The intrinsic abstraction and prescriptive characteristics of legal language led to ambiguity and practical uncertainty. This paper challenges the formalistic assumptions inherent in traditional rule-making through a conceptual examination of the difference between rules and standards and a multidimensional exploration of rule typologies, including legal status, language structure, and normative power. The research moreover suggests strategic methods to enhance regulatory efficacy and flexibility, including the formation of interpretative communities and the implementation of goal-oriented regulatory frameworks. The findings seek to enhance the development of regulatory systems that are contextually adaptive and normatively consistent, providing insights for improved legal rule formulation in evolving social contexts.
A Legal Review of Roasting Actions by Comedians from the Perspective of Positive Law on Reputation Protection in Indonesia Joshua Evandeo Irawan; Annabella Marcella Geraldine Kandou; Andrew Johnathan Setia; Sari Mandiana
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/iccle.v7i3.35846

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications of roasting in stand-up comedy from the perspective of Indonesian positive law, particularly in relation to the protection of reputation, dignity, and honor. Roasting, as a comedic technique involving satirical criticism often directed at public figures, raises legal concerns when it potentially infringes upon the personal rights of those being criticized. This research employs a normative-dogmatic legal method using legislative and conceptual approaches to analyze the applicable legal framework, including the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE), and the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP). The analysis is grounded in legal protection theory and the principle of legal utility, emphasizing that while freedom of expression constitutes a fundamental human right, it must be balanced against the rights to privacy and reputation. The findings indicate that defamation under Indonesian law constitutes a complaint-based offense, whereby legal proceedings may only be initiated upon a report by the injured party. Consequently, roasting conducted with the explicit consent of the subject, supported by a prior agreement regarding content and delivery, does not constitute an element of a criminal offense. This study proposes the use of written contracts between comedians and their subjects as a preventive legal mechanism to ensure legal certainty and minimize potential disputes. Ultimately, the study concludes that roasting, when appropriately regulated and based on mutual consent, can coexist with legal norms safeguarding individual dignity, thereby harmonizing freedom of expression with the right to reputation.
Utilitarian Justice in the Decision of the Land Exchange Agreement: A Case Study of Decision Number 241/Pdt.G/2016/Pn.Smn Reviewed from the Post-Positivism Paradigm Muhammad Syahri Ramadhan; Yuli Prasetyo Adhi; Rahayu Fery Anitasari
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/iccle.v7i3.38180

Abstract

The Sleman District Court Decision Number 241/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Smn, which recognizes the validity of non-formal land exchange agreements, constitutes a significant case for understanding the realization of substantive justice beyond a positivistic legal framework. This study analyzes the decision using Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarianism approach within the post-positivist paradigm developed by Guba and Lincoln. Employing a normative legal research method with a case-based analytical approach, this research demonstrates that the judges did not merely assess the formal legality of the agreement but also took into account social consequences, practical benefits, and empirical realities existing within the community. Utilitarianism is applied to evaluate the extent to which the decision maximizes overall happiness and minimizes suffering for the disputing parties as well as society at large. Furthermore, post-positivism provides an epistemological framework that conceptualizes law as a contextual, non-final, and socially constructed phenomenon open to reinterpretation. The findings suggest that this combined approach yields a more responsive, flexible, and socially meaningful form of justice, while also generating significant methodological implications for research on non-formal agreements, particularly through the use of qualitative methods, data triangulation, and hermeneutical interpretation.
From Campus to the Public Arena: Institutional Educational as the Vanguard of Anti-Corruption Efforts Ananda Chrisna D. Panjaitan; Torang Fadly Panjaitan; Clarissa Aurelia Leowinata
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijicle.v7i3.35316

Abstract

Corruption remains a persistent and systemic problem in Indonesia, underscoring the urgency of preventive strategies that extend beyond law enforcement to the education sector. Law faculties play a strategic role in cultivating integrity and ethical awareness among students as future legal professionals. Nevertheless, the integration of anti-corruption values within legal education has yet to be implemented in a comprehensive and systematic manner. This article examines the integration of anti-corruption education in law higher education institutions and identifies the principal obstacles to its effective implementation. This study adopts normative juridical research supported by conceptual and sociological perspectives, drawing on secondary legal materials to analyse the regulatory framework, theoretical foundations, and practical implementation of anti-corruption education within the academic environment. The findings demonstrate that the main challenges in anti-corruption education include weak curricular integration, the absence of consistent ethical role models among educators, a permissive academic culture, and limited institutional cooperation with law enforcement and anti-corruption agencies. To address these issues, the study proposes a comprehensive strategy encompassing the strengthening of an integrity-based curriculum, the institutionalisation of transparent and accountable academic governance, the development of ethical leadership among lecturers, and structured collaboration with anti-corruption institutions. The article concludes that law faculties can function as the vanguard of corruption prevention by systematically embedding integrity values within legal education, thereby contributing to the formation of a generation capable of promoting a clean, accountable, and just public order in Indonesia.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5