cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Geofani Milthree Saragih
Contact Email
geofanimilthree@gmail.com
Phone
+6282274278234
Journal Mail Official
milthreelawjournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl Petojo Barat IV No.15B, RT.6/RW.4, Petojo Utara, Gambir, Jakarta Pusat, 10130
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Milthree Law Journal
Published by PT Adikara Cipta Aksa
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30635926     DOI : https://doi.org/10.70565/mlj
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Milthree Law Journal adalah media jurnal yang menampung manuskrip yang membahas berbagai aspek hukum terkait perkembangan hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal ini mencakup berbagai bidang hukum, termasuk hukum pidana, hukum perdata, hukum bisnis, hukum administrasi negara, hukum tata negara, hukum internasional, dan aspek hukum lainnya. Selain menerima manuskrip yang merupakan penelitian pustaka, jurnal ini juga terbuka untuk manuskrip hasil studi lapangan, seperti kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat. Milthree Law Journal berfungsi sebagai platform komprehensif bagi peneliti dan praktisi hukum untuk menerbitkan temuan mereka dan berkontribusi pada pengembangan pengetahuan hukum di Indonesia.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): November" : 5 Documents clear
BUMN Sebagai Penerima Hak Monopoli Berdasarkan Pasal 86M UU BUMN, dan Implikasi Yuridis Terhadap Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia Veronica Tampubolon
Milthree Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): November
Publisher : PT. Adikara Cipta Aksa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70565/mlj.v2i3.95

Abstract

Transformasi pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2003 sebagaimana diubah terakhir oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2025 (UU BUMN), menghadirkan perubahan mendasar dalam struktur kelembagaan dan strategi ekonomi nasional, salah satunya melalui pengaturan hak monopoli dalam Pasal 86M UU BUMN. Ketentuan ini memberikan kewenangan kepada Presiden untuk memberikan hak monopoli kepada BUMN atau anak usahanya dalam sektor-sektor strategis, yang berpotensi memengaruhi dinamika persaingan usaha di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dasar yuridis pemberian hak monopoli oleh Presiden kepada BUMN, jika pemberian hak monopoli dapat diperluas kepada anak usaha BUMN, serta mengkaji implikasinya terhadap prinsip persaingan usaha yang sehat dan pemberian kesempatan berusaha yang sama bagi setiap pelaku usaha di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, serta studi komparatif terhadap rezim persaingan usaha nasional dan praktik internasional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 86M UU BUMN dapat menjadi instrumen strategis negara untuk menjaga kepentingan ekonomi nasional, namun berpotensi menimbulkan distorsi pasar apabila tidak diatur dengan batasan dan mekanisme pengawasan yang ketat. Ketiadaan parameter yang jelas mengenai “hajat hidup orang banyak”, “cabang produksi penting”, dan “pertimbangan Presiden” menimbulkan ruang multisinterpretasi yang dapat mengganggu kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya harmonisasi antara UU BUMN dengan UU Persaingan Usaha serta perlunya pedoman teknis untuk memastikan bahwa pemberian monopoli tetap berada dalam kerangka konstitusional Pasal 33 UUD 1945, dan tidak mengganggu iklim usaha yang baik juga persaingan usaha yang sehat di Indonesia.
The Responsibility of Heirs in Settling Replacement Money Claims for State Losses: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Malaysia Kontesa, Emelia; Zico Junius Fernando
Milthree Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): November
Publisher : PT. Adikara Cipta Aksa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70565/mlj.v2i3.106

Abstract

This article conducts a comparative analysis of the liability of heirs in Indonesia and Malaysia with respect to the settlement of replacement money (uang pengganti) arising from corruption cases. Both legal systems emphasize the principles of justice, individual rights protection, and the separation of responsibilities, thereby affirming that heirs are not personally liable for the corruptor’s actions. The liability of heirs is generally limited to the value of the estate actually inherited, and both jurisdictions recognize the right of heirs to renounce inheritance in order to avoid obligations linked to illicit assets. In Indonesia, the Anti-Corruption Law provides mechanisms for the confiscation of inherited property to recover state losses, although the legal framework remains general and lacks detailed regulation on the scope of heirs’ liability. Malaysia, under the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 and related statutes, similarly authorizes the seizure of inherited assets connected to corruption, while safeguarding heirs who neither control nor benefit from such assets. The findings highlight that, despite differences in regulatory clarity, both Indonesia and Malaysia adopt a balanced approach that allows the state to pursue restitution while protecting heirs’ rights through the option of inheritance rejection.
Lawyers as Guardians of Justice (officer of the court) : A Normative and Practical Review of the Indonesian Legal System Saepudin, Acep
Milthree Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): November
Publisher : PT. Adikara Cipta Aksa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70565/mlj.v2i3.109

Abstract

This study discusses the existence and role of advocates as officers of the court in the Indonesian legal system. In law enforcement practice, advocates have a strategic position as part of law enforcement that serves to maintain a balance between the legal interests of the state, society, and those seeking justice. However, in reality, various problems are still found, such as professional ethical violations, commercialization of legal services, and weak commitment of advocates to the values of justice and judicial integrity. These conditions pose challenges for the legal profession to reaffirm its function as a profession that is free, independent, and responsible for upholding justice. This study uses a normative juridical method with a regulatory approach and conceptual analysis of the practice of the legal profession in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of lawyers as law enforcers and guardians of judicial morality, as well as to evaluate the application of the principle of officer of the court in maintaining the spirit of justice. The results of the study show that lawyers exist not only as litigants, but also as guardians of substantive justice, which is a key pillar of the Indonesian legal system
Tinjauan Hukum Jual Beli Chip Game Online (Higgs Domino) Menurut Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Maulana, Rivaldo Inka
Milthree Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): November
Publisher : PT. Adikara Cipta Aksa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70565/mlj.v2i3.12

Abstract

Since the development of the internet, its use has become a means of activity for its users to carry out various activities, one of the most visible examples is business activities carried out online where it contributes to efficiency, fast, easy, and practical. Juridically, the agreement gives the widest freedom to the community to enter into agreements containing anything as long as it does not violate public order and decency. This is based on the principle of freedom of contract contained in article 1338 of the Civil Code. The law does not prohibit anyone from entering into an agreement, including its application in an online sale and purchase agreement based on the terms and conditions of the law. Transact buying and selling online. The government in this case is expected to provide a balanced position to sellers and consumers who hold online buying and selling transactions. This paper conducts normative legal research methods with a normative juridical approach, which refers to legal norms contained in laws and regulations. The method used is Library Research (literature research) by using and collecting data or materials for papers / seminars, laws and regulations and writings or articles sourced from the internet and interview methods using sources as research carried out so that there are no vacancies or something lacking in conducting tests. In the agreement there is an unfulfilled aspect, namely the non-halal clause in article 1320 of the Civil Code, from the transaction this agreement has violated the non-halal clause and is linked to the principle of freedom of contract explained in article 1338 of the Civil Code regarding freedom of contract, resulting in layered articles on both parties. Based on the research conducted, the results of transactions carried out by contractors, and producers are invalid, because they violate the provisions of the treaty law and the principle of freedom of contract.
Batasan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Nelayan Kecil Yang Melakukan Penangkapan Ikan Dengan Menggunakan Bahan Peledak Syafira, Putri; Erdianto Effendi; Ferawati
Milthree Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): November
Publisher : PT. Adikara Cipta Aksa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70565/mlj.v2i3.39

Abstract

Penelitian ini menyoroti penerapan sanksi pidana bagi nelayan kecil yang menangkap ikan menggunakan bahan peledak di perairan Indonesia. Sebagai negara maritim, Indonesia memiliki kekayaan laut yang melimpah, yang menjadi sumber penghidupan nelayan lokal, khususnya nelayan kecil. Namun, beberapa nelayan kecil masih menggunakan bahan peledak dalam penangkapan ikan, karena metode ini dianggap murah, cepat, dan mudah. Praktik ini, selain melanggar hukum, merusak ekosistem laut dan mengancam keberlanjutan kesejahteraan nelayan kecil. Regulasi hukum dalam Pasal 100B Undang-Undang Perikanan memberikan sanksi pidana yang berbeda antara nelayan kecil dan skala besar, di mana nelayan kecil hanya dikenai sanksi alternatif, bukan kumulatif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah pertama, mengkaji aturan batasan sanksi pidana terhadap nelayan kecil yang menggunakan bahan peledak, dan kedua, merumuskan konsep sanksi yang lebih proporsional. Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif kualitatif, dengan sumber data sekunder, termasuk peraturan dan putusan pengadilan. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan dan analisis deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan inkonsistensi dalam penerapan sanksi pidana terhadap nelayan kecil, dengan putusan pengadilan yang seringkali tidak konsisten dalam menentukan kriteria nelayan kecil. Untuk mengatasi hal ini, diperlukan penafsiran tegas mengenai definisi nelayan kecil dan penerapan sanksi tambahan berupa tindakan restoratif. Konsep pidana kerja sosial dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP dinilai sebagai alternatif yang lebih produktif, sejalan dengan teori pemidanaan gabungan, karena dapat memperbaiki pelaku dan memulihkan kerusakan lingkungan

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Maret Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): November Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juli Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Maret Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): November Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juli Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Maret