cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Salahudin
Contact Email
admin.pppj@suryabuanaconsulting.com
Phone
+6281358830722
Journal Mail Official
admin@suryabuanaconsulting.com
Editorial Address
Perumahan D'Soeta Residence No. 16, Babatan, Tegalgondo, Kec. Karangploso, Kabupaten Malang, Jawa Timur 65152
Location
Kab. malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
International Journal of Politics and Public Policy (IJPPP)
Published by CV. Surya Buana
ISSN : -     EISSN : 3063458X     DOI : 10.70214
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Social Sciences
International Journal of Politics and Public Policy (IJPPP) is a scientific journal that is intended to be developed into a reputable national and international journal. IJPPP focuses on publications in the field of politics and public policy. IJPPP view political studies as a study that influences many aspects of social and state life that is not limited to a particular region, but has a broad influence at the global level in all affairs, especially in the context of international policy. Meanwhile, public policy is a product of the political process related to aggregation, articulation, and decision-making involving political infrastructure and superstructure. IJPPP develops political and public policy studies from theoretical and practical perspectives. Therefore, the management of IJPPP involves many parties, including academics, practitioners, politicians, and activists who work in the fields of politics and public policy. IJPPP was founded and managed by CV. Surya Buana, a company engaged in the field of public consultants and oriented towards the study of political government thought and practice. IJPPP is managed using the Open Journal System (OJS), which can guarantee good journal governance and is in accordance with scientific standards at both the national and international levels. IJPPP is published in collaboration with Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (UMM) and the Asosiasi Ilmu Pemerintahan Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah (AIPPTM).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "vol. 3 no. 2 (2026): june (on process)" : 4 Documents clear
The Capacity of Barangays in Participatory Rural-Urban Planning and Localizing the SDGs: Evidence from Kolambugan, Lanao del Norte, Philippines Christian Jeiel Partosa; Jack B Isolana; Maria Pia M Sison; Perla P Palomares
Internasional Journal of Politics and Public Policy Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June (On Process)
Publisher : Konsultan Surya Buanan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70214/q26gpd49

Abstract

Barangay Local Government Units (BLGUs) play a vital role in localizing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at the grassroots level. This study looks into the capacity of selected barangays in the Municipality of Kolambugan, Lanao del Norte namely Baybay, Libertad and Poblacion, in the realms of participatory rural-urban planning and SDG awareness. Using a mixed-methods research design, data were gathered through surveys, focus-group discussions, and document review and focused on local planning practices, the participation of the stakeholders and SDG awareness. Results show that the level of community involvement is strong as Libertad (4.23) possesses a high sense of involvement, Poblacion (3.90) expresses a significant involvement, and Baybay (3.30) exhibits an adequate level of involvement. However, there are limited levels of awareness of SDGs, with Barangay Poblacion reporting moderate awareness (2.79) while Libertad (2.48) and Baybay (2.45) exhibiting low levels of awareness. The findings highlight the need to implement policy interventions aimed at capacity-building efforts, institutional support or reinforcement, and quality improvement in technical assistance with simultaneous promotion of non-discriminatory involvement of marginalized sectors towards the more effective integration of Sustainable Development Goals into the development planning at barangay levels.
The Political Strategy of The Indonesian Solidarity Party (PSI) In Ende Regency To Win The Most Votes In The 2024 Legislative Elections Ilham Saputra Sukalumba; Muhammad Ardi Firdiansyah
Internasional Journal of Politics and Public Policy Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June (On Process)
Publisher : Konsultan Surya Buanan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70214/a83b1432

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the success of the Indonesian Solidarity Party (PSI) in gaining the most votes in the 2024 Legislative Election in Ende Regency. The background of this research is that PSI Ende has succeeded in defeating several major political parties. This research method uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive research type. Data collection was carried out through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results show that the PSI Ende Regency during the 2024 Legislative Election widely used a push political marketing strategy. This is seen in how the PSI Ende Party emphasized that each legislative candidate frequently goes down to the community through door-to-door, community dialogue, distributing party stickers and brochures, and active involvement of legislative candidates to establish communication with voters. To assist its legislative candidates, the PSI Ende Party also built a command center or post in each electoral district. The implementation of the pull political marketing strategy is a supporting strategy to the previous strategy because the PSI Ende Party only uses one mass media for campaigning, namely Facebook. Meanwhile, for the past political marketing strategy, the PSI Ende party does not use it much because the party's position is made as an open and plural party that does not consider ethnicity, race, or religion.
Dynamics of Actors and Stakeholders in the Formation of Public Policy Arguments: A Review through the Narrative Policy Framework and the Advocacy Coalition Framework Ridho Marnas
Internasional Journal of Politics and Public Policy Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June (On Process)
Publisher : Konsultan Surya Buanan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70214/44evmr66

Abstract

The formulation of public policy is a dynamic process shaped by interactions among policy actors and stakeholders who possess different interests, resources, and levels of influence. However, previous studies have largely examined policy actors, stakeholder participation, policy narratives, and advocacy coalitions separately, leaving limited understanding of how these dimensions interact in shaping policy arguments. This study aims to analyze the influence of actors and stakeholders on the formation of public policy arguments through an integrative review using the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) and the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). The research employed a qualitative approach using a systematic literature review. Data were collected from 35 scientific journal articles and 8 academic books published between 2020 and 2026, obtained from Google Scholar, Scopus, SINTA, and GARUDA. The data were analyzed using thematic content analysis by identifying patterns related to policy actors, stakeholder roles, policy narratives, and advocacy coalitions. The findings reveal that formal actors, including government institutions and bureaucracies, dominate policy argumentation through institutional authority, while informal actors such as academics, media, civil society organizations, and interest groups contribute by producing evidence, shaping public opinion, and conducting advocacy. The Narrative Policy Framework demonstrates that policy actors strategically construct narratives through settings, characters, plots, and moral messages to legitimize policy preferences and mobilize public support. Meanwhile, the Advocacy Coalition Framework explains that actors sharing similar policy core beliefs establish advocacy coalitions to strengthen collective arguments and influence policy outcomes. The study concludes that public policy arguments emerge from the interaction of actor power, stakeholder interests, narrative construction, and advocacy coalition dynamics. Integrating NPF and ACF provides a more comprehensive analytical framework for understanding policy argumentation and offers valuable insights for developing more inclusive and evidence-based policymaking.
The Winning Strategy of dr. Christian Widodo and Serena Francis (CS'an): An Analysis of Public Perception in the 2024 Kupang City Regional Election Muhammad Saleh; Ahmad Atang; Siti Syahidah Nurani; Syarifuddin Darajad; Wahid Hasyim Tra Beni
Internasional Journal of Politics and Public Policy Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June (On Process)
Publisher : Konsultan Surya Buanan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70214/hwp15a18

Abstract

The 2024 regional head election (Pilkada) in Kupang City represents a significant political event reflecting the dynamics of local democracy within a socially, culturally, and educationally diverse society. The victory of the CS'an candidate pair (dr. Christian Widodo and Serena Francis) is noteworthy because the pair secured broad support across community groups despite not originating from the conventional political elite or the city's dominant ethnic group. This study aims to identify and describe the winning strategy employed by the CS'an pair and to analyze public perception of their victory. A descriptive qualitative approach was used, with data collected through in-depth interviews, field observation, and documentary study involving eleven key informants, including the elected candidates, the winning team, supporting political party officials, community and religious leaders, women's and youth representatives, first-time voters, and academics. Data were analyzed descriptively-thematically through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, using Rational Choice Theory (Weber, Coleman, Downs, and Ritzer) as the primary analytical framework. The findings indicate that the CS'an pair's winning strategy was built through strengthening personal candidate image, consolidating the supporting political parties and winning team, inclusive two-way political communication, and a community-based approach sensitive to socio-cultural diversity. Public perception of the CS'an pair was generally positive and legitimizing; the public viewed both candidates as figures of integrity who were close to the people and capable of bringing hope for change. The study concludes that the CS'an victory resulted from a synergy between planned political strategy and positive public perception, and that Kupang City voters' choices reflected rational considerations more than mere emotional mobilization.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June (On Process) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): January Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June (On Process) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): June Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): January