cover
Contact Name
Andrian Saputra
Contact Email
andriansaputra@fkip.unila.ac.id
Phone
+6285768233166
Journal Mail Official
jpmipa@fkip.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
FKIP Universitas Lampung Jl. Prof. Dr. Ir. Sumantri Brojonegoro, Gedong Meneng, Kec. Rajabasa, Kota Bandar Lampung
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 14112531     EISSN : 26855488     DOI : http://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa
Core Subject : Education,
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA (JPMIPA) focused on mathematics education, science education, and the use of technology in the educational field. In more detail, the scope of interest are, but not limited to: STEM/STEAM Education Environmental and Sustainability Education Scientific Literacy Computer-based Education and Digital Competence Higher Order Thinking Skills Multicultural and Inclusive Education Attitude towards Mathematics and Science Learning Models, Methods, Strategies of Math & Science Learning Virtual and Blended Learning Teacher Education
Articles 1 Documents
Search results for "Exploring Students" : 1 Documents clear
Exploring Students' Metacognition in Numeracy Problem Solving: The Role of Reflective and Impulsive Cognitive Styles Hermin, Arwini Puspita; Pathuddin, Pathuddin; Lefrida, Rita; Alfisyahra, Alfisyahra
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 26, No 1 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jpmipa.v26i1.pp688-707

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the metacognition of grade IX students of SMP Negeri 19 Palu in solving numeracy problems based on reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. Metacognition in this study includes three aspects namely awareness, regulation, and evaluation observed at each stage of problem solving according to Polya's model. This descriptive qualitative research used Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT-2021), numeracy written test, think-aloud protocol, and in-depth interviews for data collection. In-depth study subjects consisted of two students, one each with reflective cognitive style and one with impulsive cognitive style. The results showed that at the stage of understanding the problem, reflective students showed high awareness and were able to organize their thoughts to understand the context of the problem in depth, while impulsive students tended to be faster in understanding the problem without in-depth analysis. At the stage of developing a plan, reflective students perform good regulation and evaluate the plan made, while impulsive students show awareness and regulation, but the evaluation of the plan is not always consistent. At the stage of implementing the plan, reflective students are able to evaluate the ongoing process, although this evaluation is more visible at the final stage, while impulsive students are less consistent in evaluation during the implementation of the plan, with evaluation only appearing at the final stage. Finally, at the looking back stage, reflective students showed a clear evaluation, although awareness and regulation were not significantly visible, while impulsive students only showed evaluation at the final stage without any deep reflection on the process that had been passed. Overall, reflective cognitive style tends to produce a more complete and in-depth metacognitive involvement in each stage of problem solving, while impulsive style shows a more limited and less consistent involvement in the evaluation aspect.      Keywords: metacognition, numeracy, cognitive style, reflective, impulsive.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 1