cover
Contact Name
Saifuddin Zuhri Qudsy
Contact Email
saifuddinzuhri@yahoo.com
Phone
+6281804192371
Journal Mail Official
johs.asilha@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia (ASILHA) Jl. Pasekan, Stan RT 05 RW 44 Maguwoharjo Kec. Depok, Kab. Sleman, DI Yogyakarta
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Journal of Hadith Studies
ISSN : 25984810     EISSN : 25984802     DOI : https://doi.org/10.32506/johs
The journal receives articles from researchers who have new and progressive issues on scholarly study of all aspects of Hadith and Hadith Sciences related, but not limited, to Islamic teachings resources, Islamic thoughts, philosophy, geography, history, law, political science, economics, education, culture, anthropology, sociology, literature, Islamic propagation (dakwa), communication, psychology, science and technology, international relations, environmental and developmental issues, as well as ethical questions related to Hadith and Hadith Sciences research available all around the world. The journal also covers contemporary Hadith and Hadith Sciences issues emerging in the world. We invite and appreciate writers who write any Bahasa, English, or Arabic scientific work in the form of both research report and significant opinion on Hadith and Hadith Sciences and issues mentioned above. Any work published in this journal does not represent this journal editorial board opinion and perspective, but merely its writer findings and thought. For this reason, it is essential that the writer is fully responsible for whatever he or she wrote.
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Hadith Studies" : 5 Documents clear
Transformasi Ideologi dan Kritik Rasional terhadap Hadis Mut’ah: Studi Hermeneutis Interpretasi Sayyīd Ḥusain Al-Mūsawī Reza, Raja Fahrul
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v5i2-02

Abstract

This study aims to explore Ḥusain Al-Mūsawī's Interpretation of the Mut'ah Hadiths in his book Lillāhi Thumma Lī Al-Tārīkh: Kashfu Al-Asrāri Wa Tabri'atu Al-A'immati Al-Athār and how the Context of Ḥusain Al-Mūsawī's Ideological Shift Affects His Interpretation of the Mut'ah Marriage Hadiths. This discussion is interesting because nikah mut'ah, which is doctrinally considered valid in the Shi'a tradition, was sharply criticized by a scholar of ahl al-Bait, who was previously part of the Shi'a scholar himself. As an insider-turned-internal critic, Al-Mūsawī displays a deep intellectual and spiritual struggle, reflecting the tension between tradition and rationality. This study uses a qualitative method with Gadamer's hermeneutic analysis knife to understand the involvement of historical context in the interpretation of texts. This study found that Ḥusain Al-Mūsawī's interpretation of the nikah mut'ah hadith underwent significant changes as a result of his ideological shift from the Shi'a school to a more rational and contextual approach. Al-Mūsawī considers that the hadiths that support mut'ah, even though they are found in the books of Shi'a mu'tabar, are no longer worthy of argument because they are full of distortions of meaning, contrary to the Qur'an, common sense, and modern social values. In addition, he also considered his historical awareness and life experiences in reading the hadith texts. The transformation of Sayyid Husain al-Musawi's thought shows how pre-understanding and historical experience can reshape the meaning of religious texts. His criticism of mut'ah and other Shi'a doctrines is not merely an emotional reaction, but an intellectual reflection rooted in moral and scientific responsibility. This study opens up space for a more critical and inclusive cross-sectarian dialogue.
Lanskap Pemikiran Hadis di Amerika: Gagasan Jonathan A.C Brown tentang Kritik Matan Tumewu, Noufal P.; Ismail, Padli
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v5i2-04

Abstract

This paper attempts to review the landscape of hadith development in America and focuses on one of the ideas that examines the study of hadith text criticism by Jonathan A.C Brown in his article The Rules Matn Criticism: There Are No Rules. Exploring how Brown criticizes hadith text studies which in his view have received less attention from scholars and Islamic researchers, the results of this review show that the criticism presented by Brown leads to the absence of methodologically determined criteria for matan criticism. He proves this by giving examples of several scholars who reject hadiths that are considered flawed in terms of matan, but at other times take hadiths that according to Brown have the same flaws. This uncertainty is what makes Brown assume that scholars and researchers pay less attention to matan studies compared to sanad studies which are considered more important in determining the quality of a hadith. This review uses a library research type of research by looking at Brown's ideas through several of his statements related to hadith studies.
Metodologi Pemahaman Hadis Abad XXI: Tradisi dan Inovasi dalam Studi Hadis Kawasan Wagola, Zulkifli
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v5i2-05

Abstract

The transmission of hadith understanding in Indonesia is often perceived as rigid and authoritative. However, beneath this perception lies a complex methodological dynamic. The interplay between religious authority, local traditions, and global thought provides a space for critical engagement. This study aims to identify and analyze the methodological approaches applied in hadith studies in 21st-century Indonesia and propose future directions for methodological development. Two key issues are addressed: first, how contextual approaches are applied in the methodology of hadith interpretation by Indonesian scholars in the 21st century; and second, what criteria are employed by hadith experts in evaluating narrations within a modern context. This research adopts a qualitative approach through a library-based study. Data analysis includes literature review, textual analysis of hadith and relevant scholarly works, interpretation within socio-historical contexts, and formulation of conclusions and recommendations based on the findings. The study reveals that early scholars such as al-Raniri and al-Maqassari, along with modern figures like Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail, Kamaruddin Amin, and Tengku Muhammad Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy, highlight the significance of flexibility and critical analysis in hadith comprehension. Moreover, scholars such as Ali Mustafa Ya’qub and Kamaruddin Amin emphasize the synergy between tradition and innovation, which fosters a more inclusive understanding of hadith in the Indonesian context. The findings of this research are expected to enrich the academic discourse in hadith studies by illustrating how contextual approaches and modern criteria for hadith criticism can be adapted to address contemporary challenges.
Framing Hadis Larangan Menggambar Makhluk Hidup: Analisis Komparatif Media Muslim.or.id dan SuaraMuhammadiyah.id Syarif, Aghis Ramadhan
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v5i2-03

Abstract

The digital era has intensified differences in understanding hadiths, especially through online Islamic media which serve as arenas for articulating religious discourse. This study explores how media framing mechanisms contribute to the accentuation of divergent interpretations, focusing on the hadith prohibiting the depiction of living beings (Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī No. 5495). Two Islamic media platforms—Muslim.or.id and SuaraMuhammadiyah.id—are examined to reveal contrasting approaches to this hadith. While Muslim.or.id frames the hadith as a strict prohibition aligned with Salafi textualism, SuaraMuhammadiyah.id presents a more contextual and interpretative stance reflective of Muhammadiyah's rationalist tradition. This research addresses three core questions: (1) How do these media platforms frame the understanding of the hadith? (2) What are the comparative framing strategies employed by each? (3) How do these differences relate to their respective ideological and institutional identities? William A. Gamson’s framing theory—specifically the concept of media packages encompassing central ideas, reasoning devices, and framing devices—this study utilizes qualitative content analysis of two key articles. It finds that media framing is not a neutral act of dissemination but a deliberate ideological representation aiming to influence perceptions and religious authority in a fragmented digital landscape. The framing of hadiths in these media not only reflects theological preferences but also serves as a strategic tool in discursive power struggles within contemporary Islam. Ultimately, this research underscores the need to view digital religious narratives as part of broader ideological formations, mediated and amplified by the dynamics of new media.
Tinjauan Ulang Living Hadis dan Living Sunnah: Pemaknaan dan Eksistensi Nuzuliyah, Wilda Rahmatin
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v5i2-01

Abstract

This article aims to review the meaning of living hadith and living sunnah as explained by M. Khairil Anwar in the article "Living Hadith" and the article "Living Sunnah: Method of Understanding the Living Sunnah" written by Romdloni. By using library research, this article intends to use both articles as primary sources. The results show that in his article, Anwar does not emphasize the difference in meaning between living hadith and living sunnah, only that Anwar slightly mentions that the study of living hadith began to attract attention after a seminar was held with the theme, "Living Qur'an: Al-Qur'an as a Socio-Cultural Phenomenon", which was organized by FKMTHI (Indonesian Hadith Interpretation Student Communication Forum) at UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta on March 13-15, 2005. Romdloni defines living sunnah as a study that is closer to the matan area, an area that is still relatively new in the discourse of Islamic studies.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5