cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Putri Amalia Zubaedah
Contact Email
putri.amaliazubaedah@gmail.com
Phone
+6288220544759
Journal Mail Official
journal@mediamandalika.com
Editorial Address
Dusun Gunung Arba, Jango Kec. Janapria , Kab. Lombok Tengah, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat, 45613
Location
Kab. lombok tengah,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Law and Humanity Studies
Published by Penerbit Mandalika Indonesia
ISSN : 30324297     EISSN : 30326796     DOI : 10.59613
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Journal of Law and Humanity Studies accommodates all studies on social dynamics and changes related or associated with law. Therefore, the study of criminal and civil law normatively (dogmatic law science), philosophically (legal philosophy), empirically (sociology and legal anthropology), and especially through interdisciplinary (socio-legal) and comparative studies (comparison), is highly permissible. Among the subjects in the field of law that can be chosen are law and the constitution, Humanity Studies, natural resource law, government law, business and civil law, criminal law, law and society, law and religion, and international law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 25 Documents
 1   2   3 
The Indonesian Satpol-PP Model: Lessons for Local Governance and Public Order Enforcement in Decentralized States Pelengkahu, Muhamad; Palengkahu, Rizjal; Kasim, Fajri M
Journal of Law and Humanity Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies
Publisher : Penerbit Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/hh1pte54

Abstract

Decentralized governance often creates a gap between regulatory authority and enforcement capacity at the local level. This study examines the Indonesian Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja (Satpol-PP) as a model of subnational enforcement designed to address this challenge. This research employs a qualitative and comparative approach based on document analysis of legal frameworks, policy reports, and academic literature. It compares Satpol-PP with similar institutions in France, Germany, Canada, and the United States across key institutional dimensions. The findings show that Satpol-PP represents a hybrid civilian enforcement body operating under local government authority with administrative powers to enforce regional regulations and maintain public order. Compared to its international counterparts, Satpol-PP has a broader functional scope, strong political embeddedness, and a non-militarized character, though it faces challenges related to professionalism, legal clarity, and public legitimacy. Satpol-PP demonstrates that decentralized states can develop locally anchored, non-police enforcement mechanisms. While not universally replicable, its model offers valuable insights into institutional adaptability, civilian-based enforcement, and the importance of balancing local responsiveness with accountability and legal safeguards.
Comparative Analysis of the Criminal Justice System in Japan and Indonesia in the Perspective of the Principle of Restorative Justice Binti, Gerald Arnold; Sulastri, Indang; Januardy, Ivans
Journal of Law and Humanity Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies
Publisher : Penerbit Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/ndba5v52

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the application of restorative justice principles within the criminal justice systems of Japan and Indonesia. Employing a normative juridical method with a comparative, statutory, and conceptual approach, the study explores how each country integrates restorative practices into their legal frameworks. Japan applies restorative justice informally through culturally rooted mechanisms such as chōtei (community mediation), shazai (apology), and baishō (compensation), emphasizing social harmony without explicit codification. In contrast, Indonesia adopts a formal legal approach through various regulations, including Law No. 11 of 2012 and the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation No. 15 of 2020. However, the Indonesian implementation remains limited to juvenile and minor offenses. Despite the existence of sectoral rules, the country lacks a comprehensive legal framework for general and adult crimes, leading to a normative vacuum and inconsistent enforcement across regions. To address this, the study proposes the development of a dedicated restorative justice law applicable across all categories of crime. This paper contributes to the discourse on building a more humanistic and justice-oriented criminal law system by advocating a contextually relevant restorative approach.
The Implementation Gap in the Legal Validity of Marriage in Indonesia: A Socio-Legal Study of Baduy Customary Marriage RD I Mulyana Jaya Sumpena; Wahyuni Retnowulandari; Endang Pandamdari
Journal of Law and Humanity Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies
Publisher : Penerbit Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/1hv4ep71

Abstract

Legal pluralism in Indonesia has not yet been fully integrated into the implementation of national marriage law, particularly in relation to indigenous communities. This study examines the implementation gap between state legality and customary legitimacy within the Baduy indigenous community. Employing a qualitative socio-legal approach through literature review, normative analysis, and empirical understanding of customary practices, the study finds that the validity of marriage under national law is determined by compliance with religious requirements and administrative registration. In contrast, the Baduy community regards a marriage as valid through customary ceremonies and communal legitimacy as part of the living law. This divergence creates legal uncertainty and administrative exclusion, affecting civil registration, identity documentation, and access to public services. A comparative analysis involving the Ammatoa Kajang, Marapu, and Māori communities demonstrates that adaptive recognition mechanisms can facilitate the integration of customary law and state law. The study concludes that the Indonesian legal system remains predominantly legal-formalist and has not yet fully accommodated the realities of legal pluralism. Therefore, a more inclusive and responsive legal approach is required to integrate living law into the national legal system while ensuring equal legal protection for indigenous peoples.
Rekonstruksi Hukum Hak Cipta Karya Musik Artificial Intelligence di Indonesia Muhammad Lutfi Abdullatif
Journal of Law and Humanity Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies
Publisher : Penerbit Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/7sp9t998

Abstract

Perkembangan Artificial Intelligence (AI) telah membawa perubahan signifikan dalam industri kreatif, termasuk bidang musik. Teknologi AI saat ini mampu menghasilkan komposisi musik secara mandiri melalui pemanfaatan algoritma machine learning dan generative artificial intelligence. Kemampuan tersebut menimbulkan persoalan hukum terkait status kepemilikan hak cipta atas karya musik yang dihasilkan AI. Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta masih menempatkan manusia sebagai pencipta yang memperoleh perlindungan hukum atas karya intelektualnya. Di sisi lain, karya musik yang dihasilkan AI tidak selalu melibatkan kreativitas manusia secara langsung sehingga menimbulkan kekosongan hukum mengenai status pencipta dan pemegang hak cipta. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan hak cipta terhadap karya musik berbasis AI dalam hukum positif Indonesia, membandingkannya dengan pengaturan di beberapa negara, serta merumuskan model rekonstruksi hukum yang mampu memberikan kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum hak cipta Indonesia belum mengatur secara eksplisit mengenai karya musik yang dihasilkan AI sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan rekonstruksi hukum melalui pengaturan khusus yang mengakui peran manusia sebagai creative controller dalam proses penciptaan karya berbasis AI. Model tersebut diharapkan mampu menjawab tantangan perkembangan teknologi tanpa mengabaikan prinsip keadilan dan perlindungan hukum terhadap karya intelektual.
Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Era Artificial Intelligence: Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Hukum Indonesia Berbasis Prinsip Kemanusiaan Muhammad Arifin Tanjung
Journal of Law and Humanity Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies
Publisher : Penerbit Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/khbvpk68

Abstract

Perkembangan Artificial Intelligence (AI) telah membawa perubahan signifikan dalam berbagai aspek kehidupan manusia, termasuk sektor pemerintahan, ekonomi, pendidikan, kesehatan, keamanan, dan penegakan hukum. Di satu sisi, AI menawarkan berbagai manfaat berupa efisiensi, akurasi, dan produktivitas yang tinggi. Namun di sisi lain, penggunaan AI menimbulkan berbagai persoalan hukum dan hak asasi manusia, seperti diskriminasi algoritmik, pelanggaran privasi, pengawasan digital yang berlebihan, penyalahgunaan data pribadi, serta potensi pengambilan keputusan otomatis yang mengabaikan nilai-nilai kemanusiaan. Indonesia hingga saat ini belum memiliki regulasi khusus yang mengatur tata kelola AI secara komprehensif sehingga menimbulkan kekosongan hukum dalam perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis tantangan perlindungan HAM dalam era AI serta merumuskan model rekonstruksi kebijakan hukum Indonesia berbasis prinsip kemanusiaan. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan AI di Indonesia masih tersebar dalam berbagai regulasi sektoral dan belum mampu menjawab berbagai risiko pelanggaran HAM yang muncul akibat perkembangan teknologi AI. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan rekonstruksi kebijakan hukum yang menempatkan prinsip kemanusiaan, transparansi algoritma, akuntabilitas, keadilan, non-diskriminasi, dan perlindungan data pribadi sebagai fondasi utama tata kelola AI nasional. Model regulasi berbasis kemanusiaan diharapkan mampu menciptakan keseimbangan antara inovasi teknologi dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dalam masyarakat digital.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 25

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies