cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Arif Rahman Hakim
Contact Email
arifelsiradj90@gmail.com
Phone
+6281367595355
Journal Mail Official
linguists@iainbengkulu.ac.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Publikasi - Lembaga Penelitian & Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM) UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu Jl.Raden Fatah, Pagar Dewa Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Location
Kota bengkulu,
Bengkulu
INDONESIA
LINGUISTS : JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE TEACHING
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
ISSN : 23552069     EISSN : 26565765     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v9i2.
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Social,
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
The aim of this Journal is to promote a principled approach to research on language and language-related concerns by encouraging enquiry into relationship between theoretical and practical studies. The journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current analysis in: Second and foreign language teaching and learning; Literature and teaching; Language in education; Language planning and Language testing; Curriculum design and development for Second/ Foreign Language; Discourse analysis; Translation; and Linguistics; ELT in Muslim Communities
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Bahasa dan Linguistik
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December" : 10 Documents clear
IMPROVING READING ABILITY THROUGH GROUP WORK ACTIVITIES OF THE THIRD YEARS STUDENTS AT SMP NEGERI 13 KOTA BENGKULU IN ACADEMIC YEAR 1996 / 1997 Zarawin, Zarawin
Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/ling.v2i2.110

Abstract

This study deals with the use of group work activities in order to improve reading readingability of the third years student at SMP Negeri 13 Kota Bengkulu academic year 1996 /1997. The main purpose of the study was to find out 1) the student achievement in readingability through group work activities. 2) whether or not group work activities technique iseffective in improving reading ability.The population of this study was four classes of the third year students. From the four classesthe writer took two classes of 25 students were taken randomly so the sample consist of 50student. In doing his research the writer did the experiment, the writer divided the samplestudents into the groups. Group A ( experimental Group ) and group B ( control group )both of these group were given pre – test and post test . the post test was given after theteaching experiment. In analyzing data the writer used t – test to compare before and aftertreatment.The result of this study showed that there was a progress made by goup A ( experimentalgroup ) with the gain t = 5.34 while group B ( control group ) got 1.67 the value of t –table of df=24 was 1.74. since the value of the gained t was higher than the value of t –table this means that thr group work activities can be proved effectively.Beside that, the writer also found that there was a significant difference between group A( experimental group ) and group B ( control group ). The value of gained t was 4.02 whilethe value of t – table of df = 24 is 2.06. it means that 4.02 > 2.06 so the second hypothesisis retained.
TEACHERS’ CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’ PRONUNCIATION AT THE DAFFODILS ENGLISH COURSE KAMPUNG INGGRIS PARE INDONESIA Haryanto, Endang
Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/ling.v2i2.115

Abstract

Pronunciation is a micro skill of any languages. However, pronunciation is overlooked in the teaching and learning English, and it is not explicitly taught but it is taught in spoken activity in speaking by giving correction on pronunciation errors made they students or corrective feedback. It is one of key in teaching English for EFL learners.This study is aim at describing teachers’ corrective feedback strategies used by the teachers, the timing of corrective feedbacks and their influences on students’ psychological performance during speaking activity at the Daffodils English course . The research design of this research is a case study and the samples of this study were five experience teachers of The Daffodils English Course who are aware of giving corrective feedback on students’ pronunciation. The result of data analysis indicated that there were four types of corrective feedback strategies used by the samples (by the teachers) which involved recast strategies was 58%, metalinguistic was 28.03%, clarification request was 11.21% and elicitation and elicitation was 1.86%. In addition, from total of data, it indicated that the samples gave corrective feedback in two different times that involved immediate and delayed correction. It indicated that 28.03% total of data was immediate correction, and 71.96% data indicated the use of delayed correction.
IMPROVING STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE SPEAKING COMPETENCE BY USING CUE CARDS AT THE GRADE VIII 2 OF PUBLIC JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 03 BENGKULU CITY Ariati, Ruri
Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/ling.v2i2.97

Abstract

This is a classroom action research that was carried out by implementing cue cards as the teaching media in class VIII 2 of Public Junior High School 03 Bengkulu city. This research was focused on whether the cue cards could improve students’ descriptive speaking competence and to determine the factors involved. This research was implemented to 36 students (19 female and 17 male) registered in this class. The progress was measured by several tests and some supporting data such as observation checklist, field note, and interview. The result of the research indicates that the improvement of subjects who were able to pass the target score (score ≥ 60) from 0% of students in pre test into 16% of students in post test in cycle 1 and finally becomes 36% of students in cycle 2. However, the factors those influence in improving students’ descriptive speaking competence are the students’ English proficiency, thinking ability of students, and students’ attitude and behavior along the treatment
THE EFFECT OF SONGS TO THE STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXT WRITING QUANTITY (An Experiment at the Second Semester Class A of English Education Students Unib) Nurandini, Risma
Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/ling.v2i2.111

Abstract

This study tries to find whether or not song can improve the students’ recount text writingquantity. This quantity means the total of word that was used in a text. The population of theresearch was the second semester English Education students Unib class A that was 38students. The class was divided into two groups (group 1 and group 2). The sample was thegroup 1 as the experimental group and the group 2 as the comparison for the experimentalgroup. The instrument was a writing text. The pre-test was done to find the quality of bothgroups. In the pre test result, it was found that Tcount was 0,36 while Ttable is 2,093. Its meanwas there is no significant difference between the groups. By this result, any group could bedecided which one as control group or experimental group. After the treatments were done onexperimental group and the conventional method on control group, the post-test could be done.Based on the analysis of the post-test, the Tcount (4,85) was higher that Ttable (2,093). It couldbe concluded that the experiment was successful because of song can improve the student’srecount text writing quantity
IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT BY USING PICTURE SERIES AT THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 03 SINDANG KELINGI Andayani, Tuti
Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/ling.v2i2.116

Abstract

In this collaborative Classroom Action Research (CAR), the researcher tries to analyze andovercome the problem of writing narrative text facing by the eightgrade students of JuniorHigh School. Many students have problem in writing narrative text, especially in getting theidea and composing the idea itself. The formulation problem of this research was‘Can PictureSeries improve the students’ ability in writing narrative text?’ In order to prove it, theresearcher did the classroom action research which is divided into two cycles. Every cycle wasdivided into four stages, including (1) planning, (2) implementing, (3) observing, and (4)reflecting. The research is focus to students’ ability in writing narrative text by getting ideafrom a series of pictures and developing the idea with the guidance from the pictures. Thesamples involved in this research were 20 students from class VIIIC of SMP Negeri 03SindangKelingi, Curup, RejangLebong, academic year 2014/2015. The data were got from thestudents’ achievement in the cycle I and cycle II. The data was analyzed by using quantitativeanalysis data technique. From the analysis, the writer founded that in the cycle I, students gainthe average score 61,35 and in the cycle II the average score was 73,56. There was an increaseof students’ ability in writing narrative text by using picture series
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARD ENGLISH TEACHER PERSONAL QUALITIES AT SEKOLAH MENENGAH UMUM NEGERI IN BENGKULU MUNICIPALITY Handayani, Sri
Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/ling.v2i2.98

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the students’ perception toward English teacher personal qualities at SMUN in Bengkulu Municipality. The population involved all of the SMUN students in Bengkulu municipality, which totally was 5384 students. The sample was 10% of the population that was 539 students, which selected by using stratified random sampling technique. The instrument of this study was a questionnaire, which contains English teacher qualities included in five parts, they were teacher appearance, teaching preparation, teacher’s competence, classroom management and evaluation. This research concluded that the most important qualities viewed by SMUN students in the case of teacher appearance were friendly teacher; who do not make the students feel afraid, and teachers with high discipline. While, in the case of teaching preparation, they expected the teachers should  master the teaching materials well, and who suggest their students to study the materials that will be discussed before English classes take place. Furthermore, in the case of teachers’ competence, they hoped the teachers explain the teaching materials clearly, able to speak English very well, and inspire the students’ motivation. In the case of classroom management, they wanted the teachers who are able to make their course interesting, show the same interests in all their students, and  require them to speak English (to the best of their ability) during English classes. At last, in the case of evaluation, they expected the teachers explain their evaluation procedure in the first meeting, and always administer planned tests  not sudden tests
THE FORMS OF CLASSROOM INTERACTION FOUND IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM AT SMA NEGERI IN BENGKULU (A Comparative Study between Favorite and Un-Favorite Schools in Bengkulu) Pistarman, Pistarman
Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/ling.v2i2.112

Abstract

The problems of this research are: how is the interaction done by the teacher and students inEnglish classroom in SMA Negeri in Bengkulu?and what are the differences (if any) of theinteraction process found in favorite SMA an un-favorite SMA in Bengkulu? the purpose of thisresearch is: to describe the interaction between teacher and students and to describes thedifferences between the interaction. The forms of classroom interaction were taken fromMalcolm, 1997 and Roestiyah, 1994. They accepting feeling, complement and encouragement,accepting or uses ideas of students, asking the studentsabout the procedure or content of study,lecturing, giving direction to the students, criticizing or justifying authority, students response,students initiative, answering question, silence and confusion, one way interaction, multi wayinteraction.The design of this research was descriptive method; descriptive method is a survey orobservation that describes the situation as being observed. The population of this research isEnglish teachers and the second year students of senior high school in favorite and in unfavoriteschools. They are SMAN 2 Bengkulu, with 190 students in 8 classes and SMAN 6Bengkulu, with 150 students in 6 classes. The sample of this research is used randomlysampling, from SMAN 2 Bengkulu is an English teacher and 42 students and from SMAN 6Bengkulu is an English teacher and 44 students.The result of this study shown that, the forms of interaction that dominant used by the teacherand students interaction in the classroom at SMAN 2 Bengkulu and SMAN 6 Bengkulu. Thoseare teacher asking question 64 times (19,16%) and 33 times (15,94%) the teacher ask tostudents about procedure and content of study. Students answer question 57 times (17,06%)and 27 times (13,04%), two way interaction 55 times (16,47%) and 29 times (14,01%), howeverthere is form of interaction that dominant used in SMAN 6 Bengkulu but it is not dominant usedin SMAN 2 Bengkulu. It is lecturing 18 times (8,69%) the significant differences between SMAN2 and SMAN 6 Bengkulu interaction, can see from the result in frequency, at SMAN 2 Bengkuluhigher than SMAN 6 Bengkulu, it is caused at SMAN 6 Bengkulu students and teacherinteraction done slowly or teaching and learning process done slowly. Sometimes the teacherand students discuss about something that is not relationship with material being taught.
DEVELOPING SUPPLEMENTARY TEACHING SPEAKING MATERIALS BASED ON COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHINGFOR SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AT AN-NUR ISLAMIC BOARDING SCHOOL OF MALANG, EAST JAVA, INDONESIA Efrizal, Dedi
Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/ling.v2i2.99

Abstract

Almost of second year students of senior high school at An-Nur Islamic boarding school of Malang, East Java, encountered many problems in speaking activity. The main problem was there were not appropriate teaching English speaking materials that give big portion and opportunity for the students to speak actively and freely in order to support teaching and learning process of English speaking. Concerning these problems, a set of supplementary teaching English speaking materials for the students based Communicative Language Teaching needed to be developed. In this research, the researcher employed the procedures: conducting need assessment, developing supplementary materials, conducting expert validation, revising the materials, trying out the materials, and revising the materials. The researcher collected the data by using questionnaires, interview, analyzing the syllabus, and note field. The product of this research is seven units of supplementary teaching English speaking materials for second year students of senior high school at An-Nur Islamic boarding school of Malang, East Java.
USING SHORT STORY TO IMPROVE STUDENT’S READING COMPREHENSION (A Study at the Second Year Student of SMPN 2 Kota Bengkulu ) Frimasary, Amelia Eka
Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/ling.v2i2.113

Abstract

The title of this research is Using Short Story to Improve Students' Reading ComprehensionAt the Second Year Students Of SMPN 2 Kota Bengkulu. The objective of this research wasto know the differences in students score and also to know whether the students interest wasimproved or not, after did a treatment using short story and handbook. The instrument of theseresearch was questionnaire. The result from short story was satisfactory. The mean score frompre-test was 45.1 for experimental class and 45.25 for control class. The differences both ofclass was 0.15 point. While the result of post-test was 55.9 for the experimental class and 51.8for the control class. The differences in both classes was 4.1. tt can be concluded that theexperiment was succesful. The explanation above shows that the differences in improvingstudents' score and interest by giving the treatment, and the differences score between twoclasses are significant. It means that reading activity by using short story could improvestudents reading comprehension in class I of SMPN 2 Kota Bengkulu.
IMPLEMENTATION DEBATING TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING SPEAKING (Descriptive Study of Student At Twelve Level of SMAN1 Curup ) Warnidah, Nining
Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/ling.v2i2.114

Abstract

This research described the implementation of the debate technique in teaching speaking ofSMAN 1 Curup and analysis how debate technique can be applied for speaking class and itcan be a good way to make students’ speaking more better as their skill of languange masteryin English. The debating activity of this class is a kind of debate that different with australianor parlementary style where of Parlementary style the student present in each group contain 3members and when they present the debating activity there are 2 groups. The group ofAffirmative which agree to the motion given and the Negative group which dissagree to themotion. While on Australian style the each group has two members and in delivering activitythere are 4 group of its presentation. Two groups for Affirmative group and two group fornegative group.The observation have three steps the firsly,t to get data who students that has ability in speakingwell they will be the main group. The main group contain of 6-7 students of each class and theywill be an opposite group for other group of the class. It is about 5 group will present of theclass with the opposite team for the students who has ability well in speaking. Theobservervations had been done directly in the class, it need 4-6 weeks of each class. Secondly,they present their debating with the motion given with the turn and motion that given lotteryrandomly.Next, after the debating held of each class the observer give another activity by asking them topresent speaking individually, and there is good result, their speaking performance increaseto be better than of the first activity before debating

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 11, No 2 (2025): December (In Press) Vol 11, No 1 (2025): July Vol 10, No 2 (2024): December Vol 10, No 1 (2024): July Vol 9, No 2 (2023): December Vol 9, No 1 (2023): July Vol 8, No 2 (2022): December Vol 8, No 1 (2022): July Vol 7, No 2 (2021): December Vol 7, No 1 (2021): July Vol 6, No 2 (2020): December Vol 6, No 1 (2020): July Vol 5, No 2 (2019): December Vol 5, No 1 (2019): July Vol 4, No 2 (2018): December Vol 4, No 1 (2018): July Vol 3, No 1 (2016): July Vol 2, No 2 (2015): December Vol 2, No 1 (2015): July More Issue