cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Junaidi
Contact Email
jurnalconsensus@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalconsensus@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Kol. H. Animan Achad (d/h Jln. Sukabangun II) KM. 6.5 Lr. Suka Pandai No. 1610. Palembang, Indonesia.
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29622395     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46839/consensus
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Diterbitkan oleh Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda (STIHPADA) Palembang berisikan tulisan ilmiah, hasil pembahasan penelitian, pembahasan buku dan pendapat yang mendukung. Artikel Hukum yang dipublikasikan pada jurnal ini merupakan hasil karya ilmiah mahasiswa dan dosen yang telah memenuhi Pedoman Penulisan bagi Penulis (Author Guidelines) yang telah ditentukan oleh Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Semua artikel yang dikirimkan oleh penulis dan dipublikasikan dalam jurnal ini ditelaah melalui peer revie process. Jadwal penerbitan setahun 4 (empat) kali pada bulan Februari, Mei, Agustus, dan November. Tulisan yang dikirim harus berpedoman pada metode penulisan ilmiah dan petunjuk penulisan sebagai terlampir. Isi konten tulisan tanggung jawab sepenuhnya penulis. Redaksi tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap isi konten tulisan.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 3 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)" : 3 Documents clear
Upaya Penanggulangan Kasus Catcalling Di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi Liza Deshaini; M. Tedi Setia Darma; Ferdie Agusaputra; Nova Rendi; Apriliadi
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Catcalling in higher education is a problem that disrupts the comfort and safety of the academic community, especially for women. This study aims to analyze efforts to overcome catcalling through a normative approach by examining applicable regulations, campus policies, and the role of educational institutions in creating a safe environment. The research method used is normative legal research with the approach of legislation and literature study. The results show that catcalling prevention requires a combination of strict policies, education about sexual harassment, and active involvement of all campus elements in creating a culture of mutual respect. With a clear reporting mechanism and strict sanctions, it is hoped that catcalling cases can be minimized so as to create a safer and more inclusive campus environment.
Kekuatan Mengikat Dari Keputusan Arbitrase Dihubungkan Dengan Sifat Final & Binding Erleni; Meidya Wulandari; Oktariani; Ocky Yogananta; Fery Arifandi
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Contemporary business actors often use arbitration, a method of resolving disputes outside of court. Arbitrase di Indonesia diatur oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif. More and more cases are being registered with the Indonesian National Arbitration Board. Arbitrasi semakin penting dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis nasional dan internasional karena banyaknya kontrak bisnis atau perdagangan yang mencakup klausul arbitrase. Arbitration awards are final and binding, because arbitration follows the principle of final and binding. The decision immediately has permanent legal force from the moment it is pronounced because the arbitration decision is final and binding. Therefore, no further legal recourse can be taken against that decision. Article 70 provides the disputing parties with the opportunity to raise objections, while Article 60 states that the arbitration decision is final and has permanent legal force.
Problematika Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Ditinjau Dari Prespektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Keadilan Sosial Rico Martin
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Draft Law on Asset Seizure has been the focus of attention in the context of corruption eradication in Indonesia. However, the implementation of this bill raises several implications for human rights (HR) and social justice that need to be seriously considered. This research aims to analyze the implications of the Asset Seizure Bill for HR and social justice in the context of corruption eradication in Indonesia. Through a critical analysis approach, this study explores the positive and negative impacts of the Asset Seizure Bill on HR, including the right to privacy, freedom of speech, and the right to justice In accordance with Article 28G paragraph (1) and Article 28H paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Additionally, this research also discusses the implications of the bill for social justice, including fair asset distribution and protection for vulnerable groups. The results of this study provide insights into the complexity of implementing the Asset Seizure Bill and the importance of ensuring that corruption eradication efforts do not violate HR principles and social justice According to Article 36 paragraph (2) of Human Rights Law No. 39 of 1999.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 3

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022)