cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Adam Mudinillah
Contact Email
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Phone
+6285379388533
Journal Mail Official
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jorong Kubang Kaciak Dusun Kubang Kaciak, Kelurahan Balai Tangah, Kecamatan Lintau Buo Utara, Kabupaten Tanah Datar, Provinsi Sumatera Barat, Kodepos 27293.
Location
Kab. tanah datar,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae
Published by Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi
ISSN : 30482291     EISSN : 30481929     DOI : 10.70177/politicae
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed integrative review articles, special thematic issues, reflections or comments on previous research or new research directions, interviews, replications, and intervention articles - all pertaining to the research fields of Social Science and Political Science research. All publications provide breadth of coverage appropriate to a wide readership in Social Science and Political Science research depth to inform specialists in that area. We feel that the rapidly growing Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae community is looking for a journal with this profile that we can achieve together. Submitted papers must be written in English for initial review stage by editors and further review process by minimum two international reviewers.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 88 Documents
 5   6   7   8   9 
SOCIAL JUSTICE IN URBAN DEVELOPMENT: A SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY OF FORCED EVICTIONS AND COMMUNITY RESISTANCE IN JAKARTA Maria Lindström; Johan Nilsson; Ingrid Olsson
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v2i6.3146

Abstract

The rapid urbanization of Jakarta has led to increasing cases of forced evictions as part of urban development projects, often resulting in significant social and economic displacement for marginalized communities. Despite legal frameworks aimed at protecting the rights of these residents, forced evictions remain a persistent issue, raising concerns about social justice and inequality in urban planning. This research aims to explore the sociological dimensions of forced evictions in Jakarta, focusing on the experiences of displaced communities and their forms of resistance. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study combines qualitative interviews with affected residents and key stakeholders, along with an analysis of official documents and reports from NGOs. The findings reveal that forced evictions are often justified by development agendas that prioritize economic growth over the rights of local residents, exacerbating social inequalities. Furthermore, community resistance takes diverse forms, including legal battles, protests, and informal negotiations with local authorities. This study concludes that urban development in Jakarta often neglects the principles of social justice, with significant implications for the future of inclusive urban planning. It calls for more equitable development policies that prioritize the rights of displaced communities and ensure their participation in the decision-making process.
THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS (CSOS) IN ADVOCATING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN CASES OF INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION Sarah Taylor; Thomas Mitchell; Zoe Johnson
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v2i6.3147

Abstract

Environmental justice has become a central issue in the global discourse on sustainability, particularly in the context of industrial pollution. Civil society organizations (CSOs) play a pivotal role in advocating for the rights of affected communities, ensuring that the voices of marginalized populations are heard. Despite their significant contributions, the effectiveness of CSOs in promoting environmental justice remains underexplored. This research investigates the role of CSOs in advocating for environmental justice, specifically in cases of industrial pollution, examining their strategies, challenges, and impact on policy change. The study employs a qualitative research design, utilizing in-depth interviews with key stakeholders from selected CSOs, community members, and policymakers. It also involves case study analysis of prominent instances of industrial pollution and CSO involvement in both mitigating the effects and demanding accountability. The findings reveal that CSOs significantly contribute to raising awareness, mobilizing communities, and holding industries accountable for environmental damage. However, challenges such as limited resources, political opposition, and legal barriers hinder their advocacy efforts. The study concludes that while CSOs play a crucial role in environmental justice advocacy, their success is contingent upon strengthening partnerships, increasing access to resources, and fostering greater political will for environmental protection.
SOCIAL MEDIA AND POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: AN ANALYSIS OF YOUTH ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE AND OFFLINE ACTIVISM Claire Camilleri; David Zammit; Caroline Borg
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v3i1.3158

Abstract

Indonesia’s decentralization and regional autonomy reforms, implemented in the early 2000s, aimed to enhance local governance and improve public services. However, these reforms have led to varying outcomes across Indonesia's provinces, with significant disparities in the quality and accessibility of public services. This study investigates how decentralization has influenced public service delivery and governance challenges in different regions, highlighting the uneven impacts of these reforms. This research aims to analyze the disparities in public service delivery across Indonesian provinces and the governance challenges resulting from the decentralization process. The study seeks to understand the factors contributing to these disparities and their implications for regional development and equity in public service provision. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative data analysis from national and regional reports with qualitative interviews with local government officials and community leaders. The study examines key indicators of public service performance, such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, across various provinces. The study reveals significant disparities in public service delivery, with wealthier and more urbanized provinces exhibiting better outcomes. Meanwhile, poorer and more remote regions face challenges in governance capacity and resource allocation, leading to uneven public service provision. The decentralization process in Indonesia has had mixed results, with regional autonomy contributing to greater governance flexibility but also deepening disparities in public service quality. Further reforms are necessary to address these inequities and strengthen local governance capabilities.
GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES IN THE AGE OF SOCIAL MEDIA POLITICS Sudarti Sudarti; Kaito Tanaka; Riko Kobayashi
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v3i2.3774

Abstract

Government communication strategies have undergone significant transformation with the advent of social media, changing how governments interact with their citizens. In an era where social media has become a primary platform for political discourse, governments are adopting new communication approaches to foster engagement, transparency, and public participation. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of government communication strategies on social media, comparing their impact in both democratic and authoritarian regimes. The research examines how different governments utilize social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to convey messages, interact with the public, and influence political behavior. A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing content analysis and expert interviews across four countries: the United States, Brazil, the United Kingdom, and China. The findings indicate that democratic governments engage more successfully with the public through transparent, interactive posts, fostering higher levels of trust and participation. In contrast, authoritarian governments utilize social media primarily as a tool for broadcasting state-controlled messages with minimal public engagement. The study concludes that government communication strategies should prioritize transparency and interactivity to enhance public engagement and trust in democratic societies, while authoritarian regimes may benefit from adopting more participatory approaches to improve public communication.
PUBLIC HEALTH GOVERNANCE AND SOCIAL TRUST: LESSONS FROM GLOBAL HEALTH CRISES Sarah Zielda Najib; Nurul Hidayati; Teguh Setiawan Wibowo; Roya Zahir
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v3i2.4151

Abstract

Public health governance has become a critical determinant of societal resilience as recent global health crises have demonstrated that effective emergency responses depend not only on healthcare capacity but also on institutional legitimacy, transparent decision-making, and public trust. Persistent variation in policy compliance and crisis outcomes across countries has intensified interest in understanding how governance quality influences collective behavioral responses during public health emergencies. This study aimed to examine the relationship between public health governance, institutional transparency, social trust, and community resilience across diverse national contexts. A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was employed involving 3,600 respondents from twelve countries representing different governance systems and public health capacities. Quantitative data were collected using validated measures of governance effectiveness, institutional trust, policy compliance, communication credibility, healthcare preparedness, and community resilience, and analyzed through multilevel modeling, structural equation modeling, mediation analysis, and hierarchical regression. Qualitative evidence was obtained through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, policy document analysis, and institutional case studies, followed by thematic interpretation. Findings revealed that governance effectiveness significantly strengthened institutional trust, while transparent communication and information credibility enhanced policy compliance, vaccination acceptance, and community resilience. Community resilience further reinforced the positive relationship between institutional trust and behavioral compliance during health emergencies. Results indicate that sustainable public health governance requires coordinated institutional leadership, evidence-based communication, transparent policymaking, and meaningful public engagement. The proposed governance framework offers practical guidance for strengthening institutional resilience and social trust during future global health crises.
HEALTH INEQUALITY AND SOCIAL DETERMINANTS: SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY wijaya wijaya; Hassan Ali; Nurul Huda
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v3i2.4184

Abstract

Health inequality remains a persistent global challenge, influenced significantly by social determinants such as income, education, and access to healthcare. Sociological perspectives emphasize that these disparities are not merely the result of individual behaviors but are deeply embedded within social structures and systems. This research explores the impact of social determinants on health inequality and examines how public health policies address these factors. The study aims to assess how sociological insights can inform public health policies aimed at reducing health disparities, particularly in marginalized communities. A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing document analysis, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions across various socio-economic groups. The findings indicate that socio-economic status and education are the most significant determinants of health outcomes, with individuals from lower-income and less-educated backgrounds facing higher rates of chronic diseases. Additionally, public health policies that integrate these social determinants have been more effective in addressing health inequalities than those focused solely on healthcare access. The study concludes that addressing the root causes of health disparities through sociologically informed policy frameworks is essential for reducing inequality and promoting more equitable health outcomes.
THE POLITICS OF PUBLIC HEALTH DATA: A STUDY ON DATA GOVERNANCE, PRIVACY, AND SECURITY DURING HEALTH CRISES Sarah Zielda Najib; Nurul Hidayati; Teguh Setiawan Wibowo; Rania Khatib
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v3i3.3151

Abstract

Public health crises such as pandemics intensify the political significance of health data, exposing tensions between the need for rapid data sharing, the protection of individual privacy, and the assurance of data security. Governments increasingly rely on large-scale data collection and digital surveillance to inform policy responses, yet these practices often raise ethical, legal, and political concerns. This study aims to analyze how data governance frameworks shape the management of public health data during health crises, with particular attention to the balance between public interest, privacy rights, and data security. The research employs a qualitative research design based on document analysis and comparative policy review, examining national regulations, emergency health policies, and international guidelines related to health data governance. The findings indicate that data governance during health crises is strongly influenced by political priorities, institutional capacity, and levels of public trust. Weak regulatory clarity and limited oversight mechanisms tend to exacerbate privacy risks and public resistance, while transparent governance models and robust security protocols enhance data legitimacy and compliance. The study concludes that effective public health data governance requires an integrated approach that aligns legal safeguards, ethical principles, and technological security with crisis-driven decision-making. Strengthening accountability and transparency is essential to ensuring that public health objectives do not undermine fundamental rights during emergencies.
BUSINESS AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: A STUDY OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPPS) IN INDONESIAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT Erlita Khrisinta Dewi; Ahmed Al Fahad; Fatimah Al Rashid
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v3i2.3152

Abstract

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) have become an increasingly popular model for financing and developing infrastructure in many developing countries, including Indonesia. Given the significant infrastructure gaps in the country, particularly in transportation, energy, and urban development, PPPs offer a promising solution for mobilizing private investment and expertise while maintaining public accountability. This study investigates the role of PPPs in Indonesia’s infrastructure development, analyzing their effectiveness, challenges, and prospects for future growth. The research aims to assess how PPPs are implemented, their impact on project efficiency, and their contribution to Indonesia’s economic development. A qualitative research approach is used, employing case studies, interviews with key stakeholders, and a review of relevant policy documents. The findings reveal that while PPPs have contributed to accelerated infrastructure development, challenges such as regulatory inconsistencies, financial risks, and lack of transparency continue to hinder their success. However, with proper governance structures, risk-sharing mechanisms, and improved public-private collaboration, PPPs hold substantial potential for future infrastructure projects in Indonesia. The study concludes that PPPs, when effectively implemented, can significantly support sustainable development and economic growth in Indonesia.

Page 9 of 9 | Total Record : 88

 5   6   7   8   9 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024) More Issue