cover
Contact Name
Abdul Kadir Jaelani
Contact Email
indonesiacontrariusinstitute@contrariusactus.com
Phone
+6287738904981
Journal Mail Official
jaelaniabdulkadir@staff.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jln. Ir. Sutami, No. 36A, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57126- Phone 0271-642595, Surakarta, JAWA TENGAH, 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
ISSN : 31239366     EISSN : 31239358     DOI : https://doi.org/10.53955/cslsj.v1i1
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice is an Proceedings Open Access publication series dedicated to archiving conference proceedings in all areas related to Law, Crime, Environment, Energy, Education, Economic, Tourism and Social Justice. The Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice covers the regulatory issues related to sustainable development across global, regional, national, and local levels. The journal covers a broad spectrum of topics, including but not limited to, poverty, hunger, healthcare, education, gender equality, water management, energy sustainability, economic growth, and legal justice. Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice offers a wide range of services from the organization of the submission of conference proceedings to the worldwide dissemination of the conference papers. It provides an efficient archiving solution, ensuring maximum exposure and wide indexing of scientific conference proceedings. Proceedings are published under the scientific responsibility of the conference editors.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 58 Documents
Harmonization of Universality and Cultural Relativism in International Law
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i1.36

Abstract

International conferences on civilization and human rights (HAM) have played a strategic role in the development of modern international law, particularly in harmonizing the tension between the principle of the universality of human rights and cultural relativism. Since the 1993 Vienna Declaration, these international forums have reaffirmed the universal nature of human rights while recognizing cultural diversity as a contextual factor in their implementation. The conferences' outcomes, while often in the form of soft law, have had significant normative implications: strengthening customary international norms, providing interpretive guidance for human rights treaty bodies, expanding the agenda of new rights such as the right to development and the environment, and reconstructing the concept of state sovereignty into a responsibility to protect. On the other hand, challenges remain, including ambiguity in the formulation of declarations, gaps in implementation, and the risk of states misusing cultural relativism to justify repressive practices. Overall, however, international conferences function as normative engines that maintain the dynamics of international law, ensuring it remains responsive, inclusive, and aligned with the demands of global civilization. Thus, the conferences' normative implications not only strengthen universal standards but also enrich the diversity of sources of international law, while ensuring a balance between basic human rights principles and diverse socio-cultural.
Functional Erosion of Law and the Genesis of Moral Vacuum: An Analysis of Causality in Aquinas' Lex Naturalis Perspective on Threats to Civilization
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i1.37

Abstract

This article discusses the functional erosion of law, which has shifted from being a protector of justice (regula iuris) to an instrument of power (instrumentum regni) through rigid formalism. This dysfunction erodes substantive justice, creates a moral vacuum in society, and results in ethical degradation, weakened communal responsibility, and a loss of public trust. This article uses normative legal research, specifically tracing the direct causal relationship between the weakening of legal effectiveness and public moral decay, a correlation that is rarely discussed comprehensively in the literature. Through a deconstruction of the crisis of legal legitimacy within the framework of Thomas Aquinas, this article identifies that contemporary legal problems stem from the disconnection of lex humana (positive law) from lex naturalis (natural law) and lex aeterna (eternal law). Law that ignores Aquinas' morality is degraded into lex iniusta (unjust law), losing its validity and moral binding force. The novelty of this article lies in its systematic emphasis on the causal mechanism between the loss of the instrumental power of law and the moral collapse of society. As a solution, this article emphasizes the urgency of restoring the teleological function of law as a guardian of morality and a pillar of civilization. This requires the re-integration of the principle of lex naturalis into the substance and implementation of positive law, making law a moral orthodoxy based on substantive justice and bonum commune. Implementation strategies include the internalization of morality in legislation, the strengthening of legal ethics education, the reconstitution of the legitimacy of legal institutions through accountability and transparency, and the stimulation of morality-based public participation. The revitalization of lex humana as a guardian of morality is a philosophical and practical imperative, requiring collective synergy to revive the moral consciousness of society so that the law authentically reflects universal justice
Reconstruction of Standard Agreement Ethics in Bank Credit Agreements: Integration of Human Rights and Local Wisdom of Bali
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i1.38

Abstract

Standard agreements in the banking world often create an imbalance in the position between banks and customers, thereby potentially ignoring the values of justice and humanity. This research aims to analyze the application of standard agreements in bank credit agreements from a Human Rights (HAM) perspective, a s well as offering a reconstruction of the ethics of standard agreements by integrating local Balinese wisdom values. The method used is a juridical-normative approach with a conceptual and reflective character. The results of the study show that standard agreement practices that are too rigid can lead to violations of hu man rights principles, especially the right to equality and justice in contracts. Balinese local wisdom value s such as Tri Hita Karana, Tat Twam Asi, Segilik- Seguluk, and Paras-Paros Sarpanaya can be the basis for reconstructing banking ethics that are humanist, inclusive, and socially just.
Educational Institutions and Muslim Harmony: Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama‘ah View
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i1.39

Abstract

This study explored how educational institutions can help sustain harmony amongst the Muslim community according to the Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama‘ah (ASWJ) perspective. Formal and informal educational institutions serve as the main agents that shape the faith (ʿaqīdah), thought and character of the Muslim generation, while ensuring that Islamic values grounded in the ASWJ framework continue to be inherited, practiced and strengthened amongst the community. This qualitative study employed document analysis, library research, classical texts and contemporary literary works that emphasize the ʿaqīdah concept and its relationship with ASWJ theology. Findings indicate that educational institutions function as the primary medium for strengthening ʿaqīdah and building a harmonious society based on the ASWJ manhaj (doctrine), as well as serving as a platform for the inculcation of Wasatiyyah (moderation) and tolerance values that are fundamental to social harmony. Educational institutions also act as an effective defence mechanism against the influence of deviant ideologies and doctrines that could threaten the stability and unity of the Muslim community. It can be concluded that educational institutions grounded in the ASWJ doctrine play a crucial role in sustaining a harmonious Muslim society by strengthening doctrinal coherence, promoting social stability, and contributing to the long-term development of cohesive and resilient Muslim communities.
Leveraging TikTok for Digital Daʿwah: Assessing Its Influence on Anti-Vaping Norms Among Malaysian University Students
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i1.40

Abstract

Amidst the escalating global health crisis of e-cigarette consumption, this study critically examines the intersection of religious digital outreach and health-seeking behavior s among university students. While conventional public health campaigns often struggle to resonate with tech-savvy demographics, this research investigates the potency of "Digital Daʿwah" on TikTok as a transformative medium for fostering anti-vaping attitudes. Utilizing a robust quantitative framework, a survey was administered to 300 undergraduate students across Malaysian public universities, yielding 278 valid responses for rigorous analysis. The research instrument was meticulously designed to interrogate the complex nexus between theological literacy—specifically the Islamic fatwa on vaping—health risk perception, and digital consumption patterns on short-form video platforms. Empirical findings, analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics, underscore a profound cognitive dissonance within the youth demographic. Despite a near-universal recognition of vaping’s health hazards (95.3%) and its haram(prohibited) status (89.9%), experimentation remains high at 40.3%, with a stark prevalence among male students (56.3%) compared to females (18.6%; p < 0.001). However, the data reveals a pivotal shift in receptivity; students demonstrate a significant preference for the creative, informal, and "humanized" delivery of religious messaging on TikTok (M=4.15) over traditional, didactic pedagogical methods. Interestingly, no significant gender disparity was found in the acceptance of these digital interventions (p=0.514), suggesting a universal appeal of "edutainment" styles for behavior al change. By conceptualizing digital daʿwah as a sophisticated form of health communication, this study offers a novel theoretical contribution to the international discourse on social media and preventive medicine. It provides a scalable framework for global health authorities and religious stakeholders to leverage algorithmic media aesthetics in mediating health-conscious norms within multicultural societies. Ultimately, the research underscores that in the digital era, the efficacy of religious messaging is predicated not only on theological accuracy but on its strategic alignment with the sociocultural rhythms and visual language of social media platforms.
Legal Inequality in Determining Child Custody Rights After Divorce: A Gender-Based Normative Analysis
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i1.41

Abstract

This study examines legal inequality in determining child custody (hadhanah) after divorce in Indonesia. Although the Marriage Law, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and the Child Protection Law provide a normative framework, court practices remain inconsistent and often gender-biased, disadvantaging mothers as primary caregivers. Using a normative–empirical socio-legal approach, this research analyzes statutory regulations, Supreme Court jurisprudence, and twelve child custody decisions from Religious Courts obtained from the Supreme Court Decision Directory. No data from general courts or NGOs were used. The findings reveal three main problems: the absence of clear technical standards in custody regulations, inconsistent judicial reasoning that prioritizes fathers’ economic capacity over caregiving history, and weak enforcement of child support and post-verdict monitoring. These conditions result in limited implementation of the “best interests of the child” principle and perpetuate structural gender inequality. The study recommends legal and institutional reforms, including clearer judicial guidelines, gender-sensitive training for judges, mandatory psychosocial assessments, and stronger enforcement mechanisms for child support to ensure substantive justice for children and mothers
Uncovering the Meaning of Judicial Power as a Legal Goal in The Maqasid Syari’ah Perspective
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i1.42

Abstract

The meaning of judicial power as a discourse in every discussion is always linked to the natural law theory pioneered by Thomas Aquinas. However, this natural law theory, which emphasizes the discourse of judges as representatives of God from a practical perspective, needs to be elaborated to foster understanding in legal practice. The appreciation of carrying out this task is very important, because the word judge (hakim, Indonesian) is taken from the word Al Hakiim (Arabic), one of the 99 names of Allah in Asmaul Husna which means the Most Wise. This study, therefore, presents the idea of Maqashid Syariah which contains the meaning of wisdom as a methodology in implementing the concept of judicial power. This research uses normative legal research methods with a hermeneutical approach. This research resulted in the conclusion that the responsibility of implementing the concept of judicial power for a judge in order to produce just laws requires the participation of conscience as a fatwa provider regarding what is right and wrong, in addition to reason. The Maqasid Syariah approach in the context of interpreting judicial power in this research recommends that it is important for policy makers to take steps that are in line with efforts to maintain the mind, religion, soul, lineage and assets of judges in order to maintain their independence in carrying out their duties.
The Role of Appreciation of Ethics and Civilization in Fostering Social Cohesion among Malaysian Higher Education Students
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i1.43

Abstract

Malaysia’s higher education institutions face both challenges and opportunities arising from cultural diversity. The Appreciation of Ethics and Civilization, a compulsory university course, was introduced to promote tolerance and a shared national identity; however, its impact on social cohesion is often limited by weak integration with students’ everyday experiences. This study examines the role of the Appreciation of Ethics and Civilization course in fostering social cohesion among Malaysian university students. Using a qualitative approach, the study analyses primary data comprising course syllabus, students’ assignments, and course feedback. The role of Appreciation of Ethics and Civilization is examined through three interrelated dimensions: knowledge acquisition of ethics and civilization, interracial bonding through learning activities, and student acceptance of the course. Findings show that these dimensions mutually reinforce one another, enhancing students’ appreciation of cultural diversity and national unity. The study highlights Appreciation of Ethics and Civilisation's potential as a catalyst for social cohesion, offering practical implications for promoting harmony in Malaysia’s plural society. The study also demonstrates to worldwide communities how ethics education when aligned with relational and experiential learning can promote social cohesion in multicultural societies.
ChatGPT and Kahoot Quizzes for Enhancing Student Engagement in Ethics Education
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i1.44

Abstract

In an increasingly digitalised higher education landscape, pedagogical innovation is essential to sustain student engagement and learning effectiveness. This study examines the integration of generative artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, into the teaching of a core university course, Ethics and Civilization (MPU3132), through interactive quizzes conducted via the Kahoot platform. The study explores how ChatGPT-supported quiz activities enhance student engagement, interaction, and higher-order thinking in ethics-related learning contexts. Findings indicate that the incorporation of ChatGPT significantly improves student participation, conceptual understanding of ethical and civilisational issues, and knowledge retention. The use of gamified quizzes further fosters intrinsic motivation and healthy competition, contributing to an active and student-centred learning environment. Importantly, this study contributes to the growing body of literature on AI-assisted pedagogy by demonstrating how generative AI can be meaningfully embedded within formative assessment practices to support sustainable education. The proposed approach offers a scalable and adaptable instructional model for ethics and humanities courses, aligning with global educational sustainability goals and the evolving demands of digital learning ecosystems.
Empowering Asnāf Character through Islamic Microfinance in Malaysia
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i1.46

Abstract

This conceptual study examines how Islamic microfinance can empower the character of asnāf entrepreneurs and thereby enhance dignified wellbeing in Malaysia. In this context, character empowerment is treated as a foundational determinant of asnāf entrepreneurs’ capacity to navigate contemporary business and life challenges. A qualitative approach is used to explore in depth the influence of Islamic microfinance on character formation, employing document analysis for data collection and content analysis for synthesis. Findings converge on three religion-anchored pillars that link financing to character development. First, spiritual cultivation strengthens tawhid and right intention so that entrepreneurship is not viewed through a purely financial lens. Second, eligibility assessment and disbursement methods are aligned with the maqāṣid, particularly hifẓ al-dīn and hifẓ al-māl, which encourage ethical conduct. Third, etiquette al-tijarah underpins work discipline, including the digitalization of business records with shariah screening to avoid gharar and tadlis. The study recommends harmonizing fatwa guidance for productive zakat instruments, instituting structured monitoring SOPs, and adopting impact indicators that include work ethics. Integrating Islamic microfinance with character empowerment is expected to strengthen the competitiveness of asnāf entrepreneurs and contribute to inclusive socioeconomic growth in Malaysia.