cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Andi Septiadi
Contact Email
septiadi.andi90@gmail.com
Phone
+6282176562270
Journal Mail Official
septiadi.andi90@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan A.H Nasution No.105, Cibiru, Kota Bandung
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Khazanah Hukum
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27159698     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15575
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Khazanah Hukum is an international journal published three times a year by the Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati. This journal discusses aspects of law in the Indonesian context and the context of globalization. The languages used in this journal are Indonesian and English. Khazanah Hukum facilitates the publication of manuscripts and scientific articles related to Legal Sciences through a rigorous review process. We welcome and invite all scientific communities, lecturers, researchers, practitioners, and students to publish scientific articles here. This journal is an open-access journal. Khazanah Hukum was indexed by Scopus. Main Topics Consumer Protection Law Laws for Social Workers Marriage Law Customary Law Child Protection Law
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 142 Documents
 11   12   13   14   15 
Consumer Protection and Legal Uncertainty in Ride-Hailing Pick-Up Practices in Bandung Difa Kusumadewi; Ridwan Sutriadi; Sonny Yuliar; Ibnu Syabri
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Khazanah Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v8i2.54312

Abstract

Consumer protection challenges in ride-hailing services emerge during the pick-up stage, where passengers are exposed to spatial uncertainty, unsafe waiting environments, and unclear accountability among platforms, drivers, and local authorities. Although ride-hailing services have been formally legalized in Indonesia, legal recognition alone does not automatically ensure consumer protection during the pick-up stage, particularly in relation to passenger safety, spatial certainty, and legal accountability. Passengers are frequently directed to informal, prohibited, or potentially unsafe public spaces, raising concerns regarding safety, legal responsibility, and the right to clear and reliable service information. To address these concerns, this research examines how transportation regulations, platform systems, and spatial conditions shape ride-hailing pick-up practices in Bandung, Indonesia. Using a qualitative case study approach, this study combines regulatory analysis, field observations, and in-depth interview with drivers and passengers. The analysis was guided by the Staging Mobilities framework and material semiotics approach to understand how mobility practices are negotiated in everyday urban settings. The findings then show that the drivers and passengers continuously negotiate pick-up locations by adapting to traffic conditions, spatial constraints, and platform instructions. They often prioritizing practicality and accessibility over formal compliance. These negotiations frequently occur in legally ambiguous situations and potentially unsafe spaces, including roadside and no stopping areas. The findings indicate that consumers already rely on platforms before the ride formally begins, yet legal accountability for passenger safety among platforms, drivers, and local authorities remains unclear.
Digital Transformation and Regulatory Approaches in Capital Markets: A Comparative Legal Study of Indonesia and Malaysia Eni Dasuki Suhardini; Deshinta Arrova Dewi; Dani Durahman; Cecep Soleh Kurniawan; Panji Adam Agus Putra
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Khazanah Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v8i2.54293

Abstract

This study aims to compare the regulatory frameworks governing fintech innovation, blockchain and digital assets, and investor data protection in the capital markets of Indonesia and Malaysia. It employs normative legal research using statute, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The analysis is based on primary legal materials, including legislation, regulatory guidelines, supervisory instruments, and official policy documents, as well as secondary legal materials, including academic literature and policy reports. The collected materials are examined through descriptive and comparative legal analysis. The findings demonstrate that Indonesia and Malaysia pursue broadly similar regulatory objectives through licensing, governance requirements, supervisory mechanisms, risk management, and investor protection. However, the two jurisdictions differ significantly in their institutional architecture. Indonesia adopts an integrated financial-sector regulatory approach under the Financial Services Authority, whereas Malaysia applies a more specialised capital-market supervisory model through the Securities Commission Malaysia. These institutional differences influence regulatory coherence, supervisory coordination, legal certainty, and regulators' capacity to address technology-specific risks. The findings imply that Indonesia should strengthen inter-institutional coordination and technology-specific supervisory standards, while both jurisdictions should ensure that innovation policies remain closely connected with cybersecurity, operational resilience, and investor protection. The originality of this study lies in integrating fintech regulation, digital asset governance, and investor data protection within a single comparative legal framework focused on regulatory coherence and institutional design.

Page 15 of 15 | Total Record : 142

 11   12   13   14   15 

Filter by Year

2020 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Khazanah Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Khazanah Hukum Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): Khazanah Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Khazanah Hukum Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Khazanah Hukum Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): Khazanah Hukum Vol 6, No 3 December (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Khazanah Hukum Vol 6, No 2 August (2024) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Khazanah Hukum Vol 6, No 1 April (2024) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Khazanah Hukum Vol 5, No 3 December (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Khazanah Hukum Vol 5, No 2 August (2023) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Khazanah Hukum Vol 5, No 1 April (2023) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Khazanah Hukum Vol 4, No 3 November (2022) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Khazanah Hukum Vol 4, No 2 August (2022) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Khazanah Hukum Vol.4 No.1 April (2022) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021): Khazanah Hukum Vol 3, No 3 November (2021) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Khazanah Hukum Vol 3, No 2 August (2021) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Khazanah Hukum Vol 3, No 1 April (2021) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020): Khazanah Hukum Vol 2, No 3 November (2020) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Khazanah Hukum Vol 2, No 2 August (2020) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Khazanah Hukum Vol 2, No 1 April (2020) More Issue