cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Badrun Taman
Contact Email
badrun.taman@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id
Phone
+6287889934136
Journal Mail Official
badrun.taman@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id
Editorial Address
Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, Jalan raden Fatah Kelurahan Pagar Dewa Kecematan Selebar Kota Bengkulu
Location
Kota bengkulu,
Bengkulu
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
ISSN : 23555173     EISSN : 26569477     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v13i1
Core Subject :
Focus and Scope FOCUS This journal aims to disseminate scholarly works related to research and discussions in the field of Contextualized Islamic Law, contributing to an enhanced understanding of Islamic law. Through the publication of articles and research reports, it seeks to advance knowledge and enrich the discourse on Islamic law. SCOPE Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani welcomes research contributions from scholars, academics, and practitioners. Specifically, the journal invites papers addressing the following general topics: Contextualized Islamic Family Law Contextualized Islamic Criminal Law Contextualized Islamic Economic Law Contextualized Islamic Politics Contextualized Islamic Judicial System Contextualized Legal Aid in Islam Contextualized Islamic Jurisprudence
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 312 Documents
 28   29   30   31   32 
From Religious Moderation to Ecotheology: Assessing Institutional Readiness in Indonesian Islamic Universities through a Contextualized Islamic Law Analysis Ashadi Cahyadi; Adisel Adisel; Ihsan Rahmat; M. Zikri; Hashim Balas
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 13, No 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v13i1.10204

Abstract

This study examines the conditions, institutional responses, and readiness of Rumah Moderasi Beragama (Religious Moderation Houses, RMB) in Indonesian Islamic higher education to adopt the ecotheology policy mandated by the Ministry of Religious Affairs for 2025–2029. This constitutes the first empirical study establishing a nexus between ecotheological policy and organizational readiness. Using a qualitative doctrinal-empirical approach, data were collected from seven RMBs and the Ministry’s Religious Moderation Working Group through observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis. Findings reveal that institutional responses remain predominantly symbolic or ambiguous, lacking operational plans, structural support, and resource allocation. The mean readiness score was below 46% of ideal capacity, with heatmap analysis exposing deficiencies in competence, collective efficacy, and funding. Applying a contextualized Islamic law framework — integrating fiqh al-bi’ah, fiqh moderat, ushul fiqh, and qawāʿid fiqhiyyah — this study finds that the observed institutional decoupling constitutes simultaneously an organizational failure and a normative gap in Islamic environmental jurisprudence. This study recommends policy interventions through ecotheology unit establishment, capacity building, resource mobilization, and cross-sector collaboration. This study makes three original contributions. First, it provides the first empirical mapping of RMB institutional readiness for ecotheology adoption, filling a gap at the intersection of Islamic higher education governance and environmental religious policy. Second, it introduces a multi-dimensional readiness heatmap instrument grounded in organizational change theory, offering a replicable diagnostic tool for Islamic institutional policy research. Third, it advances a contextualized Islamic law framework — integrating fiqh al-bi’ah, fiqh moderat (wasathiyyah), ushul fiqh, and qawāʿid fiqhiyyah — as an analytical lens for evaluating ecotheology policy adoption in Indonesian Islamic institutions, bridging the gap between Islamic jurisprudential norms and institutional governance realities.
Protecting the Civil and Political Rights of Vulnerable Groups in General Elections: A Comparative Study of Indonesia, Türkiye, and Brazil from a Contextualized Islamic Law Perspective Maharani Nurdin; Muhammad Fauzan; Abdul Azis Nasihuddin; Tedi Sudrajat; Athari Farhani
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 13, No 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v13i1.10050

Abstract

This article examines the legal policies governing the protection of civil and political rights for vulnerable groups in general elections, using Indonesia, Türkiye, and Brazil as comparative case studies. The research focuses on how national legal frameworks ensure equal political participation for persons with disabilities, minority groups, and marginalized communities, while also exploring their alignment with Islamic legal principles. Methodologically, this study employs comparative legal analysis supported by normative–philosophical approaches that contextualize Islamic law (fiqh siyasah) within contemporary democratic practices. The findings show that Indonesia integrates constitutional guarantees with ethical foundations derived from Pancasila and Islamic values, yet implementation gaps remain in accessibility and equal representation. Türkiye operates under a secular legal structure with limited formal references to Islam, but societal norms grounded in Islamic culture influence political inclusion in practice. Brazil provides a contrasting non-Muslim context where strong constitutional mechanisms protect civil and political rights, offering best-practice insights for procedural equality, although challenges persist for racial and indigenous minorities. From an Islamic law perspective, political rights for vulnerable groups are rooted in the principles of justice (al-‘adl), equality (al-musawah), and protection of public interest (maslahah). These principles affirm that safeguarding electoral participation is not only a constitutional mandate but also a moral–religious obligation in Muslim-majority societies. The study concludes that harmonizing positive law with contextualized Islamic values can strengthen legal legitimacy, enhance social justice, and improve inclusive democratic governance in diverse political systems.

Page 32 of 32 | Total Record : 312

 28   29   30   31   32 

Filter by Year

2014 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 1 (2026): January-June Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October Vol 12, No 1 (2025): April Vol 11, No 2 (2024): October Vol 11, No 1 (2024): April Vol 10, No 2 (2023): October Vol 10, No 1 (2023): April Vol 9, No 2 (2022): October Vol 9, No 1 (2022): April Vol 8, No 2 (2021): October Vol 8, No 1 (2021): April Vol 7, No 2 (2020): October Vol 7, No 1 (2020): April Vol 6, No 2 (2019): October Vol 6, No 1 (2019): April Vol 5, No 2 (2018): October Vol 5, No 1 (2018): April Vol 4, No 2 (2017): October Vol 4, No 1 (2017): April Vol 3, No 2 (2016): October Vol 3, No 1 (2016): April Vol 2, No 1 (2015): April Vol 1, No 2 (2014): October Vol 1, No 1 (2014): April More Issue