cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rafael Ardian Fahrezi
Contact Email
indexsasi@apji.org
Phone
+6288215137076
Journal Mail Official
indexsasi@apji.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Watunganten 1 No 1-6, Batursari, Mranggen Kab. Demak Jawa Tengah 59567
Location
Kab. demak,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Published by International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers
ISSN : 29864445     EISSN : 29863287     DOI : 10.59581
Core Subject :
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik dengan e-ISSN : 2986-3287, p-ISSN : 2986-4445 adalah jurnal yang ditujukan untuk publikasi artikel ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers. Jurnal ini memuat kajian-kajian di bidang ilmu hukum dan Sosial Politik baik secara teoritik maupun empirik. Fokus jurnal ini tentang kajian-kajian hukum perdata, hukum pidana, hukum tata negara, hukum internasional, hukum acara dan hukum adat, politik dan ilmu sosial. Jurnal ini terbit 1 tahun 4 kali (Februari, Mei, Agustus dan November).
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 268 Documents
 23   24   25   26   27 
Keadilan Restoratif di Persimpangan Jalan : Analisis Implementasi dan Masa Depan dalam Sistem Pidana Kita Sebastian Yordan Pa; Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini; Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Februari : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v4i1.6015

Abstract

This article explores the concept and implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia, an approach currently at a crucial crossroads within the criminal justice system. Rather than solely focusing on punishment, restorative justice offers a path towards repairing relationships between victims, offenders, and the community, seeking solutions oriented around conflict resolution. Through comprehensive analysis, this paper identifies the philosophical foundations and regulations supporting the adoption of restorative justice, while dissecting the dynamics of its application across various levels of legal processes in Indonesia. However, this noble endeavor is not without its challenges, ranging from institutional resistance and uneven understanding to harmonization with the conventional criminal law framework. Behind every case lies a human story yearning for more substantive justice. Therefore, this article argues that the success of restorative justice does not merely lie in its legal umbrella, but in our ability to understand and embrace the human dimension in every dispute resolution process. Consequently, this paper recommends adaptive and collaborative strategies to strengthen the role of restorative justice, ensuring it can guide our criminal justice system towards a more just and dignified future for all parties.
Analisis Dampak Konflik Lahan terhadap Masyarakat Adat Sihaporas dalam Perspektif Ekologi Politik: Studi Kasus PT Toba Pulp Lestari di Kecamatan Pematang Sidamanik Yenita Ekasanti Sidabalok; Muliono Muliono; Galank Pratama
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Februari : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v4i1.6025

Abstract

Land conflict between the Sihaporas indigenous community and PT Toba Pulp Lestari (TPL) remains an ongoing agrarian issue that directly affects the community’s livelihoods. The inclusion of the company’s concession within the customary territory has changed patterns of land control and use that were previously managed collectively across generations. This situation restricts access to agricultural land and forests, reduces sources of income, and creates social tensions and confrontations. This study aims to analyze the impacts of land conflict on the Sihaporas indigenous community and to examine the conflict through a political ecology perspective with a focus on power relations among actors. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The findings show that the conflict affects economic, social, and cultural aspects of the community and reflects unequal power relations between indigenous peoples, corporations, and the state in controlling agrarian resources.
Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Diversi pada Anak Berhadapan Hukum dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan: Studi Kasus Surabaya Children Crisis Center Ali Fuad Hasyim
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): November: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v3i4.6031

Abstract

This research discusses the effectiveness of the implementation of diversion for children in conflict with the law in the crime of aggravated theft, with a case study at the Surabaya Children Crisis Center (SCCC). The background of the research is based on the importance of protecting children's rights in the criminal justice sistem, in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice Sistem (UU SPPA), which prioritizes restorative justice and the principle of diversion to avoid the negative impact of formal punishment on children. This research uses empirical juridical method with descriptive analysis approach, examining primary data from interviews with legal counsel at SCCC as well as secondary data from related legal literature. The results show that diversion at SCCC has been implemented according to procedures at various stages of the legal process, from investigation, investigation, to trial. However, the implementation still faces obstacles such as the lack of understanding of law enforcement officials, limited human resources at legal aid institutions, and challenges in mediation between offenders and victims. In conclusion, although the implementation of diversion in SCCC is quite effective in protecting children's rights and preventing social stigma, the implementation of diversion in SCCC is not yet effective.
Reformasi Hukum Keluarga dan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia Robby Awaluddin Jamil
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Februari : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v4i1.6040

Abstract

The reform of family law in Indonesia represents an essential response to social developments and the growing demand for constitutional protection of citizens’ rights. Family law, primarily governed by Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, has long been criticized for not fully reflecting substantive justice, particularly for vulnerable groups such as children born outside marriage, persons with mental disabilities, and couples facing complex marital relations. In this context, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia (Mahkamah Konstitusi) plays a crucial role as the guardian of the Constitution by promoting progressive reforms through its landmark decisions. This study examines the implications of five significant Constitutional Court rulings: Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 concerning the legal recognition of children born out of wedlock; Decision No. 93/PUU-XX/2022 addressing guardianship and the rights of persons with mental disabilities; Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 allowing post-nuptial agreements; and Decisions No. 68/PUU-XII/2014 and No. 24/PUU-XX/2022 regarding interfaith marriage. These rulings demonstrate a paradigm shift from a rigid legalistic approach toward a constitutional framework grounded in human rights, equality, and substantive justice. Furthermore, notaries hold a strategic position as public officials authorized to draft authentic deeds, serving as a bridge between constitutional values and legal practice. Notaries are not merely administrative actors but are responsible for ensuring that legal documents align with positive law and provide legal certainty and protection for individuals. Therefore, the reform of Indonesian family law should not remain solely at the normative level of Constitutional Court rulings but must be effectively implemented in daily legal practice.
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia Febby Widiaryani
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Mei : Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v4i2.6134

Abstract

The Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA) in Indonesia is a manifestation of special protection for children in conflict with the law, prioritizing the principles of restorative justice and diversion. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the SPPA based on Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and to identify the legal challenges that arise in its practice. The research method used is normative legal with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that although the regulations mandate diversion efforts as a top priority in resolving juvenile cases, there are still obstacles in its implementation, both in terms of the readiness of law enforcement officials, limited supporting facilities, and the perception of the community, which still tends to expect a retributive (punitive) approach. In addition, the protection of children's rights during the judicial process is often not optimally fulfilled. This analysis concludes that strengthening inter-agency coordination and increasing law enforcement officials' understanding of restorative justice are key to the effectiveness of this system. Further regulatory harmonization and strengthening the role of the Correctional Center in overseeing the diversion process are needed to ensure that the best interests of the child remain the top priority at every stage of the judicial process
Analisis Regresi Linier Tingkat Pengangguran di Indonesia Periode 2024–2025 Budi Abdullah; Reysya Yusdianingsih; Nandita Saskya; Muhammad Muarif; Juliana Handayani br. Simatupang; Jumadi Jumadi; Muhammad Risky
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Mei : Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v4i2.6164

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the unemployment rate in Indonesia during the 2024–2025 period using a linear regression approach based on data from the National Labor Force Survey (Sakernas). The variables used include the labor force, employed population, labor force participation rate (LFPR), and open unemployment rate (OUR). The results show that the labor force increased from 149.38 million in February 2024 to 155.27 million in November 2025, followed by an increase in employed population from 142.18 million to 147.91 million in the same period. Meanwhile, the open unemployment rate decreased from 4.76 percent in February 2025 to 4.74 percent in November 2025. The analysis indicates that the increase in labor force accompanied by higher employment absorption contributes to reducing unemployment, although the decline remains relatively small. Overall, the regression results show that labor market dynamics are influenced by the interaction between labor force growth and the economy’s capacity to absorb labor.
Rekonstruksi Kedudukan Ahli Waris Anak Angkat: Mengisi Kekosongan Norma Hukum Waris Nasional Berbasis Keadilan Substantif I Dewa Ketut Wahyu Dwikarna; Komang Febrinayanti Dantes
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Mei : Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v4i2.6187

Abstract

This study examines the legal uncertainty regarding the status of adopted children as heirs within Indonesia’s pluralistic national inheritance legal system. The Civil Inheritance Law (KUH Perdata), Islamic Inheritance Law (KHI), and Customary Inheritance Law each regulate adopted children differently and incompletely, thereby creating a legal vacuum. that harms adopted children socially and emotionally. This study aims to analyze the weaknesses of these three legal systems and formulate a reconstruction of the status of adopted children based on substantive justice. Using a normative approach and the theories of legal reconstruction, substantive justice, and legal certainty, this study finds that reconstruction can be achieved through strengthening the mandatory will (wasiat wajibah), revising Article 209 of the KHI, and codifying and unifying national inheritance law through an Omnibus Law model. The parameters of justice used include the best interests of the child, public welfare, and non-discrimination. In conclusion, the reconstruction of the status of adopted children as heirs is urgently needed to fill the gaps in national inheritance law in a just manner.
Mengorbankan Korban di Altar Yurisdiksi: Kritik terhadap Overlapping Regulasi Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Berbasis Elektronik di Indonesia Made Bagas Rafa Raditya Prabawa; Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Mei : Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v4i2.6188

Abstract

Regulatory overlap between the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Pornography Law, and the Sexual Violence Crimes Law in the handling of online gender-based violence (KBGO) in Indonesia creates a conflict of norms that results in double victimization. This normative legal study aims to identify the concrete forms of victim sacrifice resulting from overlapping regulations and to critique the inability of conflict-resolution mechanisms to address these conflicts through the principle of lex specialis systematica from a substantive justice perspective. The findings reveal four forms of victim sacrifice: victim criminalization, the length of the judicial process, inconsistencies in court rulings, and the failure to fulfill the right to restitution and the right to be forgotten. This study also concludes that the lex specialis systematis principle is inadequate because its dogmatic approach disregards the interests of victims, requires time and expertise that ordinary victims lack, and is not consistently applied in courts. This study recommends a paradigm shift from a dogmatic approach to a victim-centered approach.

Page 27 of 27 | Total Record : 268

 23   24   25   26   27 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Mei : Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Februari : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): November: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Agustus: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Mei: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Februari: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): November: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Agustus: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Mei: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Februari: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): November: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Agustus: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Mei: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Februari: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik More Issue