Jurnal Pengkajian Penelitian Syariah dan Ilmu Hukum
INKLUSIF: Jurnal Pengkajian Penelitian Syariah dan Ilmu Hukum is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal that publishes scholarly research in Islamic law and legal science through interdisciplinary, contextual, and contemporary approaches. The journal provides an academic forum for the development of legal thought, legal reform, and practical legal analysis within Indonesian Muslim society and global contexts. The journal bridges classical and contemporary legal studies by welcoming normative, doctrinal, empirical, comparative, and socio-legal research. Its focus encompasses Islamic law, national legal systems, and contemporary legal issues arising from social, political, economic, technological, and environmental developments. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to: Islamic Law and Its Contemporary Application Studies on Islamic criminal law, civil law, family law, economic law, Islamic constitutional thought, fatwas, religious courts, legal pluralism, and the application of Islamic law in Indonesia and other Muslim societies. Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Reform Research on criminal policy, law enforcement, corruption, restorative justice, victim protection, sentencing, penal reform, cybercrime, and contemporary challenges in criminal justice. Civil, Economic, and Business Law Studies on contracts, property, commercial transactions, consumer protection, Islamic finance, halal industry, waqf, zakat governance, MSMEs, corporate responsibility, and economic legal development. Constitutional, Administrative, International, and Human Rights Law Research on constitutionalism, governance, public administration, judicial review, state institutions, international legal norms, human rights, and the relationship between national and global legal orders. Medical, Environmental, Customary, and Contemporary Legal Issues Studies on health law, bioethics, patient rights, environmental justice, climate-related legal issues, customary law, indigenous rights, technology and law, artificial intelligence, data protection, legal ethics, and access to justice. Through interdisciplinary and practice-oriented research, INKLUSIF seeks to strengthen Islamic legal scholarship and legal science by promoting justice, inclusivity, legal certainty, public welfare, and sustainable governance.
Articles
166 Documents
<![CDATA[The Existence of Cancellation of Grant in Religious Courts: A Legal Analysis and Maqashid Sharia of The Decision Number 6481/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.IM ]]>
<![CDATA[Yusuf Agung Purnama]]>;
<![CDATA[Slamet Firdaus]]>
<![CDATA[ INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i2.22321
<![CDATA[Grants are given to others with no hope of existence, reward, or whatever, and are done willingly, without counter-performance from the party that gives. The giver still lives. Grants cannot be cancelled except for the grant parent to child matter, as mentioned in the hadith of the Prophet, KUHPER, and the Compilation of Islamic Law. The purpose of this study is to analyse the juridical aspects of Islamic Law, Positive Law and Maqashid Syariah above the judge’s decision in the case number 6481/Pdt.G/2021/PA.IM regarding the case cancellation grant. The research method used by the author, which involves descriptive research , is one of the forms of research that includes qualitative research. The data used in the study are qualitative. Qualitative data, namely data presented in verbal form, is not in a numerical form. Among others, search and collect data with classification, including primary data and secondary data. In research, the author uses interviews, documentation and observation for data collection. The results of the research from the judge’s considerations in deciding case number 6481/PDT.G/2021/PA.IM regarding the case cancellation grant, the panel of judges’ opinion is that the lawsuit plaintiff must state No cannot be accepted. This is in accordance with Circular Letter Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018, letter A, number 4. In the formulation of the law of the religious chamber that the lawsuit whose object of dispute is still a debt guarantee and the judge does not use other legal considerations, in fact the judge in deciding a case should be based on the law and/or statutory regulations related to the lawsuit, such as Article 212 of the KHI which allows parents to withdraw their gifts and Article 1688 of the Civil Code.]]>
<![CDATA[The Existence of Cancellation of Grant in Religious Courts: A Legal Analysis and Maqashid Sharia of The Decision Number 6481/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.IM ]]>
<![CDATA[Yusuf Agung Purnama]]>;
<![CDATA[Slamet Firdaus]]>
<![CDATA[ INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i2.22321
<![CDATA[Grants are given to others with no hope of existence, reward, or whatever, and are done willingly, without counter-performance from the party that gives. The giver still lives. Grants cannot be cancelled except for the grant parent to child matter, as mentioned in the hadith of the Prophet, KUHPER, and the Compilation of Islamic Law. The purpose of this study is to analyse the juridical aspects of Islamic Law, Positive Law and Maqashid Syariah above the judge’s decision in the case number 6481/Pdt.G/2021/PA.IM regarding the case cancellation grant. The research method used by the author, which involves descriptive research , is one of the forms of research that includes qualitative research. The data used in the study are qualitative. Qualitative data, namely data presented in verbal form, is not in a numerical form. Among others, search and collect data with classification, including primary data and secondary data. In research, the author uses interviews, documentation and observation for data collection. The results of the research from the judge’s considerations in deciding case number 6481/PDT.G/2021/PA.IM regarding the case cancellation grant, the panel of judges’ opinion is that the lawsuit plaintiff must state No cannot be accepted. This is in accordance with Circular Letter Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018, letter A, number 4. In the formulation of the law of the religious chamber that the lawsuit whose object of dispute is still a debt guarantee and the judge does not use other legal considerations, in fact the judge in deciding a case should be based on the law and/or statutory regulations related to the lawsuit, such as Article 212 of the KHI which allows parents to withdraw their gifts and Article 1688 of the Civil Code.]]>
<![CDATA[The Comparative Analysis of the Legal Implications of Hadhanah in Decision Number 2562/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Sbr and Decision Number 0037/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Bitg in the Perspective of Maqaṣid al-Syari’ah ]]>
<![CDATA[Ishak Lubis]]>;
<![CDATA[Abdul Aziz Aziz]]>
<![CDATA[ INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i2.22335
<![CDATA[This study examines the differences in the determination of custody rights in the Sumber Religious Court decision No. 2562/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Sbr and the decision of the Bitung Religious Court Number 0037/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Bitg, even though both refer to the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The divergence arises due to variations in trial facts, the child’s psychological condition, and the religious beliefs of the parties involved. Therefore, an analysis from the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah is essential to ensure that custody rulings not only adhere to normative provisions but also safeguard the child’s welfare. The main objectives of this research are to analyse the application of custody law in both cases and to compare them within the framework of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah. The research problems addressed are: (1) How was custody law applied in the Sumber and Bitung Religious Court decisions? and (2) How do these decisions differ when examined through the lens of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah? Using a normative juridical method with comparative and case study approaches, data were collected from legislation, Islamic legal scholarship, and official court rulings. Findings reveal that the Sumber Court prioritised maternal attachment and piety, while the Bitung Court prioritised protection of faith by granting custody to the father.]]>
<![CDATA[The Comparative Analysis of the Legal Implications of Hadhanah in Decision Number 2562/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Sbr and Decision Number 0037/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Bitg in the Perspective of Maqaṣid al-Syari’ah ]]>
<![CDATA[Ishak Lubis]]>;
<![CDATA[Abdul Aziz Aziz]]>
<![CDATA[ INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i2.22335
<![CDATA[This study examines the differences in the determination of custody rights in the Sumber Religious Court decision No. 2562/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Sbr and the decision of the Bitung Religious Court Number 0037/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Bitg, even though both refer to the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The divergence arises due to variations in trial facts, the child’s psychological condition, and the religious beliefs of the parties involved. Therefore, an analysis from the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah is essential to ensure that custody rulings not only adhere to normative provisions but also safeguard the child’s welfare. The main objectives of this research are to analyse the application of custody law in both cases and to compare them within the framework of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah. The research problems addressed are: (1) How was custody law applied in the Sumber and Bitung Religious Court decisions? and (2) How do these decisions differ when examined through the lens of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah? Using a normative juridical method with comparative and case study approaches, data were collected from legislation, Islamic legal scholarship, and official court rulings. Findings reveal that the Sumber Court prioritised maternal attachment and piety, while the Bitung Court prioritised protection of faith by granting custody to the father.]]>
<![CDATA[Early Marriage in Hadith and Law: Analysis of Aisha’s Marriage and Legal Age Provisions ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Waliyuddin Yusuf]]>;
<![CDATA[Imron Rosyadi]]>
<![CDATA[ INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i2.22375
<![CDATA[The phenomenon of early marriage remains a complex social and legal issue in Indonesia, illustrating the ongoing gap between religious texts, legal regulations, and social realities. This research departs from debates surrounding the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad’s marriage to ‘Aisha ra., which is often used as a religious justification for child marriage practices. The study aims to critically analyse the hadith through a socio-historical approach and the framework of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, while assessing its conformity with Indonesian positive law. This research employs normative legal research with a qualitative perspective, relying on literature analysis of hadiths contained in Kutub al-Sittah, the views of classical Islamic jurists (fuqahā’), and national legal policies, particularly Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning the minimum marriage age. The findings reveal that classical scholars generally permitted marriage to al-ṣaghīrah based on specific historical and social contexts. However, contemporary scholars emphasise the need for contextual and purposive interpretation to ensure the protection of children from physical, psychological, and social harm. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, this study highlights maṣlaḥah and harm prevention as fundamental legal principles. From a positive legal standpoint, setting the marriage age at 19 reflects harmonisation between Islamic law and child protection norms.]]>
<![CDATA[Early Marriage in Hadith and Law: Analysis of Aisha’s Marriage and Legal Age Provisions ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Waliyuddin Yusuf]]>;
<![CDATA[Imron Rosyadi]]>
<![CDATA[ INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i2.22375
<![CDATA[The phenomenon of early marriage remains a complex social and legal issue in Indonesia, illustrating the ongoing gap between religious texts, legal regulations, and social realities. This research departs from debates surrounding the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad’s marriage to ‘Aisha ra., which is often used as a religious justification for child marriage practices. The study aims to critically analyse the hadith through a socio-historical approach and the framework of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, while assessing its conformity with Indonesian positive law. This research employs normative legal research with a qualitative perspective, relying on literature analysis of hadiths contained in Kutub al-Sittah, the views of classical Islamic jurists (fuqahā’), and national legal policies, particularly Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning the minimum marriage age. The findings reveal that classical scholars generally permitted marriage to al-ṣaghīrah based on specific historical and social contexts. However, contemporary scholars emphasise the need for contextual and purposive interpretation to ensure the protection of children from physical, psychological, and social harm. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, this study highlights maṣlaḥah and harm prevention as fundamental legal principles. From a positive legal standpoint, setting the marriage age at 19 reflects harmonisation between Islamic law and child protection norms.]]>
<![CDATA[Islamic Legal Review of Waqf Land Ownership Transfer under Indonesian Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Siti Chadijah]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rifqi Rifai]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Abdul Zalil]]>
<![CDATA[ INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i2.22381
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyse the Islamic legal position on the transfer of ownership of waqf land and evaluate its conformity with the Indonesian waqf regulatory framework. Using a normative-juridical method, the research examines classical and contemporary fiqh references, Law No. 41 of 2004, Government Regulation No. 42 of 2006, and relevant legal documents to construct a systematic interpretation of the rules governing waqf property. The analysis identifies the legal basis for the prohibition of transferring waqf assets and assesses the coherence between sharia norms and national regulation. The results reveal that Islamic jurisprudence categorically upholds the permanence of waqf property, while practices at the administrative level remain vulnerable to irregularities, particularly in certification and oversight procedures. Weak institutional verification allows waqf assets to be at risk of being transferred or re-registered contrary to their legal status. This study contributes an evaluative framework for aligning Islamic legal principles with positive law and proposes policy improvements, including stronger cross-institutional verification and enhanced supervisory mechanisms to prevent unauthorised transfers of waqf assets.]]>
<![CDATA[Islamic Legal Review of Waqf Land Ownership Transfer under Indonesian Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Siti Chadijah]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rifqi Rifai]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Abdul Zalil]]>
<![CDATA[ INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i2.22381
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyse the Islamic legal position on the transfer of ownership of waqf land and evaluate its conformity with the Indonesian waqf regulatory framework. Using a normative-juridical method, the research examines classical and contemporary fiqh references, Law No. 41 of 2004, Government Regulation No. 42 of 2006, and relevant legal documents to construct a systematic interpretation of the rules governing waqf property. The analysis identifies the legal basis for the prohibition of transferring waqf assets and assesses the coherence between sharia norms and national regulation. The results reveal that Islamic jurisprudence categorically upholds the permanence of waqf property, while practices at the administrative level remain vulnerable to irregularities, particularly in certification and oversight procedures. Weak institutional verification allows waqf assets to be at risk of being transferred or re-registered contrary to their legal status. This study contributes an evaluative framework for aligning Islamic legal principles with positive law and proposes policy improvements, including stronger cross-institutional verification and enhanced supervisory mechanisms to prevent unauthorised transfers of waqf assets.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementation of Digital-Based Inheritance Distribution in Islamic Law: A Maqaṣid al-Syari'ah Perspective ]]>
<![CDATA[Marbujang Marbujang]]>;
<![CDATA[Putrado Herlianysah]]>;
<![CDATA[Suweknyo Suweknyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Handika Utama Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Yerry Anro Foza]]>
<![CDATA[ INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i2.22702
<![CDATA[The study seeks to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a digital inheritance distribution system while maintaining the essential principles of fiqh al-mawārīts and the overarching aims of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah. Using a qualitative–descriptive approach grounded in library research, the analysis draws upon classical and contemporary Islamic legal sources, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE). The findings demonstrate that digital tools can significantly improve the efficiency, precision, and transparency of determining the rightful shares of heirs. Sharia-oriented algorithms not only ensure accuracy in calculations but also reinforce procedural integrity and legal accountability. Viewed through the lens of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, digitalization supports the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the protection of intellect (ḥifẓ al-‘aql) by minimizing human error and reducing opportunities for data manipulation. The study further reveals that the UU ITE’s acknowledgment of digital documents as legitimate evidence provides a firm legal basis for their implementation within religious judicial institutions. On the social front, the adoption of digital systems enhances public confidence in the fairness of Islamic legal processes and reduces the likelihood of family disputes. Ultimately, this research makes meaningful contributions to the development of Islamic legal technology and highlights potential future integrations, such as AI and blockchain, to support advanced inheritance management.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementation of Digital-Based Inheritance Distribution in Islamic Law: A Maqaṣid al-Syari'ah Perspective ]]>
<![CDATA[Marbujang Marbujang]]>;
<![CDATA[Putrado Herlianysah]]>;
<![CDATA[Suweknyo Suweknyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Handika Utama Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Yerry Anro Foza]]>
<![CDATA[ INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i2.22702
<![CDATA[The study seeks to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a digital inheritance distribution system while maintaining the essential principles of fiqh al-mawārīts and the overarching aims of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah. Using a qualitative–descriptive approach grounded in library research, the analysis draws upon classical and contemporary Islamic legal sources, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE). The findings demonstrate that digital tools can significantly improve the efficiency, precision, and transparency of determining the rightful shares of heirs. Sharia-oriented algorithms not only ensure accuracy in calculations but also reinforce procedural integrity and legal accountability. Viewed through the lens of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, digitalization supports the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the protection of intellect (ḥifẓ al-‘aql) by minimizing human error and reducing opportunities for data manipulation. The study further reveals that the UU ITE’s acknowledgment of digital documents as legitimate evidence provides a firm legal basis for their implementation within religious judicial institutions. On the social front, the adoption of digital systems enhances public confidence in the fairness of Islamic legal processes and reduces the likelihood of family disputes. Ultimately, this research makes meaningful contributions to the development of Islamic legal technology and highlights potential future integrations, such as AI and blockchain, to support advanced inheritance management.]]>
