cover
Contact Name
Adam Mudinillah
Contact Email
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Phone
+6285379388533
Journal Mail Official
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jorong Kubang Kaciak Dusun Kubang Kaciak, Kelurahan Balai Tangah, Kecamatan Lintau Buo Utara, Kabupaten Tanah Datar, Provinsi Sumatera Barat, Kodepos 27293
Location
Kab. tanah datar,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Sharia Oikonomia Law Journal
ISSN : 29885191     EISSN : 29885205     DOI : 10.70177/solj
Core Subject :
The Sharia Oikonomia Law Journal explores various aspects of Sharia economic law and the evolving economic challenges. Its primary focus includes the impact of digital transformation on Islamic finance, such as fintech and blockchain, as well as the role of Sharia financial instruments (zakat, waqf, sukuk) in achieving sustainable development goals. The journal also addresses the harmonization of Sharia economic law with national legal systems, Islamic business ethics, and social finance in promoting economic inclusion. Furthermore, it examines the application of Sharia economic systems in emerging markets and the role of Sharia finance in crisis management. With an interdisciplinary perspective, Sharia Oikonomia Law Journal aims to be a leading reference for academics, practitioners, and policymakers in the field of Sharia economic law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 102 Documents
EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROTECTION AND DEFAULT DETERMINANTS IN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS: A CASE STUDY OF PT. DASH LEBANG PERKASA Zulfikar Andi Makmur; Sarjiyati Sarjiyati; Taufiq Yuli Purnama
Sharia Oikonomia Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/solj.v4i3.4098

Abstract

The construction industry plays a strategic role in national infrastructure development, yet service providers often face legal vulnerabilities due to imbalanced contractual relationships with project owners. This study aims to analyze the forms of legal protection afforded to construction service providers and to identify the determinants of default (wanprestasi) in construction work contracts, with PT. Dash Lebang Perkasa as the case study. Employing an empirical legal research design (normative-empirical), this study utilizes a statute approach and a conceptual approach, drawing on primary legal materials, secondary literature, and empirical field data spanning from 2019 to 2025. The findings reveal that legal protection operates through three interconnected dimensions: regulatory-substantive protection grounded in the Indonesian Civil Code and Law Number 2 of 2017 on Construction Services; contractual protection through meticulously drafted clauses on payment mechanisms, variation orders, force majeure, and retention funds; and procedural protection fortified by the company's legal transformation from a partnership (CV) to a Limited Liability Company (PT) in 2023. Meanwhile, default determinants are multi-causal, encompassing internal factors (time management, human resource limitations, insufficient capital buffers, and logistics weaknesses) and dominant external factors, particularly delayed milestone payments by project owners that paralyze operational cash flow. This study contributes to construction law literature by offering a comprehensive framework for equitable contractual risk management.
THE TRANSFORMATION OF CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL CODE: HARMONIZING CRIMINAL OFFENSES WITH HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION IN INDONESIA Ian Aji Hermawan
Sharia Oikonomia Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/solj.v4i3.4113

Abstract

This research analyzes the urgency of synchronizing the national criminal codification under Law Number 1 of 2023 with constitutional principles and human rights protection in Indonesia. Employing a normative legal method utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches, the study evaluates the vertical synchronization between new criminal norms and the 1945 Constitution. The findings reveal a significant constitutional paradox: the expansion of criminal offenses, particularly those protecting state dignity and formally recognizing living law, risks narrowing democratic spaces and undermining fundamental legal certainty. Specifically, the protection of public officials' dignity potentially distorts popular sovereignty, while the integration of unwritten customary law threatens the strict principle of legality. Consequently, this study concludes that constitutionalism must serve as the ultimate compass for criminal law enforcement to prevent authoritarian regression. It strongly recommends the urgent harmonization of derivative regulations, rigorous judicial oversight by the Constitutional Court, and enhanced constitutional literacy among law enforcement officials to prevent the abuse of state punitive power and safeguard civil liberties.

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 102