cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Bakhrul Huda
Contact Email
bakhrul.huda@uinsa.ac.id
Phone
+6281331303883
Journal Mail Official
bakhrul.huda@uinsa.ac.id
Editorial Address
https://jurnalpps.uinsa.ac.id/index.php/jibec/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Journal of Integrative Sustainability and Ethics
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31634958     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15642/jibec
Core Subject :
Journal of Integrative Sustainability and Ethics (JIBEC) is an academic journal that focuses on publishing both field research and literature studies exploring issues of sustainable economics through the lens of Islamic ethics and values. The journal aims to serve as a scholarly platform that integrates modern sustainability principles with the framework of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah—the preservation of religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn), life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), intellect (ḥifẓ al-‘aql), lineage (ḥifẓ al-nasl), and wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl). Thus, JIBEC highlights not only the material and ecological dimensions of economics but also emphasizes moral, spiritual, and social foundations as essential components of sustainability. The journal’s focus includes both theoretical and empirical studies related to Islamic economic ethics, maqāṣid-based sustainable development, social and green economic innovation, Islamic finance oriented toward universal welfare (rahmatan lil ‘ālamīn), and public policies that balance economic growth with the preservation of human values. JIBEC encourages interdisciplinary contributions that integrate approaches from economics, fiqh mu‘āmalah, Islamic ethics, and development sociology to construct a new, inclusive, and justice-oriented paradigm of sustainable economics.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Integrating Maqasid al-Shari’ah into Sustainable CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility): Lessons from the SAKA Bakti Pesantren Program Juliasari, Diar Eka; Halim, Abdul
Journal of Integrative Sustainability and Ethics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Master and Doctoral Program in Islamic Economics, Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University, Surabaya Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jibec.2026.2.1.1-14

Abstract

Most Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) implementations in Indonesia remain confined to short-term philanthropic activities, failing to comprehensively integrate Islamic ethical values. This study examines the implementation of sustainable CSR through the SAKA Bakti Pesantren program, utilizing a Maqasid al-Shari’ah framework to evaluate its social, economic, and educational empowerment outcomes within Islamic boarding school (pesantren) environments. Employing a qualitative descriptive method, data were gathered through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation of the CSR initiative executed by PGN Saka in Gresik Regency, East Java. The findings reveal that the SAKA Bakti Pesantren program successfully operationalizes the five core pillars of Maqasid al-Shari’ah: safeguarding faith (hifz al-din), life (hifz al-nafs), intellect (hifz al-‘aql), lineage (hifz al-nasl), and wealth (hifz al-mal). The initiative systematically enhances human resource capacity through skills training and professional certifications while fostering institutional economic independence via sustainable cooperative development. This study underscores that embedding Maqasid al-Shari’ah into CSR models establishes long-term social welfare (maslahah), reinforces corporate social legitimacy, and offers a distinct Islamic economic framework that contributes significantly to the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Free Nutritious Meals as a Constitutional Right: An Ethical and Maqashid Shariah Perspective in Indonesia Putri , Rizki Amalia; Musfiqoh, Siti
Journal of Integrative Sustainability and Ethics Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Master and Doctoral Program in Islamic Economics, Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University, Surabaya Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jibec.2025.1.2.156-165

Abstract

Abstrak: Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) menjadi salah satu kebijakan strategis pemerintah dalam meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia dan mengatasi persoalan ketimpangan gizi di Indonesia. Namun, implementasi kebijakan ini masih memunculkan perdebatan mengenai posisinya, apakah sebagai bentuk amal sosial (charity) atau sebagai hak konstitusional warga negara (right). Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kebijakan MBG melalui perspektif etika keadilan John Rawls dan maqashid syariah. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan normatif-konseptual melalui studi literatur terhadap regulasi, teori keadilan, serta prinsip-prinsip maqashid syariah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan MBG lebih tepat diposisikan sebagai hak konstitusional daripada sekadar bentuk bantuan sosial. Dalam perspektif Rawls, negara berkewajiban menjamin distribusi kesejahteraan secara adil bagi kelompok rentan, terutama anak-anak dan masyarakat miskin. Sementara itu, dalam maqashid syariah, pemenuhan gizi berkaitan dengan perlindungan jiwa (hifz al-nafs) dan keturunan (hifz al-nasl) sebagai bagian dari tujuan utama syariat. Penempatan MBG sebagai hak konstitusional memiliki implikasi terhadap pentingnya tata kelola kebijakan yang transparan, berkelanjutan, dan berbasis keadilan sosial. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa kebijakan pangan bergizi tidak hanya berorientasi pada aspek kesejahteraan, tetapi juga merupakan bentuk tanggung jawab negara dalam memenuhi hak dasar warga negara.   Abstract: The Free Nutritious Meal Program (Makan Bergizi Gratis/MBG) has become one of the Indonesian government’s strategic policies to improve the quality of human resources and address nutritional inequality. However, its implementation has generated debate regarding whether the policy should be positioned as a form of social charity or as a constitutional right of citizens. This study aims to analyze the MBG policy through the perspectives of John Rawls’ theory of justice and maqashid sharia. This research employs a qualitative method with a normative-conceptual approach through literature review of regulations, theories of justice, and principles of maqashid sharia. The findings indicate that the MBG policy is more appropriately positioned as a constitutional right rather than merely a social assistance program. From Rawls’ perspective, the state is obligated to ensure fair distribution of welfare for vulnerable groups, particularly children and low-income communities. Meanwhile, within the framework of maqashid sharia, nutritional fulfillment is closely related to the protection of life (hifz al-nafs) and the protection of future generations (hifz al-nasl) as fundamental objectives of Islamic law. Positioning MBG as a constitutional right has implications for the importance of transparent, sustainable, and socially just policy governance. This study emphasizes that nutritious food policies are not only welfare-oriented programs, but also represent the state’s responsibility to fulfill the basic rights of its citizens.
Contractual Justice and Regulatory Pragmatism: A Comparative Analysis of IMBT (Indonesia) and AITAB (Malaysia) in Islamic Asset Financing Mubarok, Wafiq; bin Ariffin, Mohd Faizal Noor
Journal of Integrative Sustainability and Ethics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Master and Doctoral Program in Islamic Economics, Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University, Surabaya Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jibec.2026.2.1.15-37

Abstract

The rapid expansion of Islamic finance in Southeast Asia has positioned Ijarah Muntahiyah bi al-Tamlik (IMBT) in Indonesia and Al-Ijarah Thumma al-Bay' (AITAB) in Malaysia as the predominant asset financing models in their respective jurisdictions, yet their structural and jurisprudential divergences remain insufficiently explored in comparative literature. This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of IMBT and AITAB, examining their contractual structures, legal foundations, operational realities, and alignment with maqasid al-shariah. Employing a mixed-method approach that integrates doctrinal-normative analysis of DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 27/2002 and SAC-BNM Shariah Resolutions, comparative legal evaluation, and maqasid-based assessment, the study examines how each model balances consumer protection and institutional efficiency within its specific socio-legal ecosystem. The findings reveal fundamental differences in contractual architecture: IMBT mandates a strict separation between lease and ownership transfer contracts, permits transfer through sale or gift (hibah), and treats the promise of transfer as non-binding, thereby offering greater consumer flexibility and risk protection. Conversely, AITAB integrates the sale agreement as a pre-committed and automatically executed promise upon lease maturity, operating within Malaysia's Hire Purchase Act 1967 framework, prioritizing legal enforceability and operational efficiency, often at the expense of equitable consumer risk allocation. From the maqasid al-shariah perspective, IMBT demonstrates superior alignment with principles of justice, transparency, and wealth protection, while AITAB raises normative concerns regarding risk imbalance and consumer vulnerability. The study concludes that both models are valid within their respective frameworks, yet recommends regulatory refinements, particularly for AITAB, to enhance consumer welfare, and advocates for cross-jurisdictional harmonization to support an integrated ASEAN Islamic financial market.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): June Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): December Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): June