cover
Contact Name
Ria Wulansarie
Contact Email
publications@perhaki.org
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
publications@perhaki.org
Editorial Address
COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA People’s Empowerment, Rights, Human Advocacy, and Legal Knowledge Initiative (PERHAKI) Division Editorial Office: Karanganyar 003/001, Pekutan, Mirit, Kab. Kebumen, Jawa Tengah
Location
Kab. kebumen,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31646859     DOI : https://doi.org/10.65815
Core Subject :
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements (e-ISSN: 3164-6859) is published by COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA, issued four times a year in January, April, July, and October, and was first published in 2024. It is a double anonymous peer-reviewed academic journal focusing on the relationship between communication, democracy, and political movements in Indonesia. The journal publishes scholarly works examining political discourse, media and communication, democratic processes, civil society, political participation, social and digital media, political mobilization, and social and political movements. It also welcomes interdisciplinary studies addressing the intersection of communication with culture, religion, politics, and governance, including issues related to media freedom, government influence, and digital communication. The journal encourages theoretical, empirical, and case-based studies that contribute to understanding the role of communication in shaping political discourse and democratic development. It publishes original research articles, review articles, and other scholarly works relevant to its scope. The journal applies an Open Access Policy, providing free and immediate access to published articles. Copyright is retained by the authors, and articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 55 Documents
The Impact of Traditional Media on Voter Behavior in Indonesia’s Democracy: A Comparative Analysis of Print, Television, and Radio Alya Nur Safitri
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/g561vd60

Abstract

This study provides a comparative analysis of the impact of traditional media—television, radio, and print—on voter behavior and political opinion formation within Indonesia’s democratic framework. While the global academic discourse has shifted heavily toward digital platforms, traditional media continues to command significant authority in Indonesia, particularly within rural and peri-urban demographics where the "digital divide" remains a structural reality. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research evaluates the distinct psychological and social effects of each medium. Television is analyzed as the dominant "agenda-setter," fostering national political imagery through high-frequency advertisements and talk shows. Radio is examined for its unique role in localized political consolidation and its accessibility in remote agricultural and maritime regions. Meanwhile, print media is assessed as a tool for elite discourse and in-depth policy deliberation among more literate, politically engaged rural segments. The findings indicate that while social media influences the speed of information, traditional media remains the primary source of "perceived legitimacy" for rural voters. The study highlights a "mediation effect," where information from national television is often re-interpreted through local social hierarchies and face-to-face communication. Furthermore, the research addresses how media conglomerates’ ownership affects the neutrality of political coverage. The paper concludes that traditional media acts as a stabilizing force for democratic continuity in rural Indonesia, suggesting that electoral success in the world’s largest archipelagic state still requires a sophisticated synergy between "old" and "new" media strategies.
Populism and Democracy: How Political Leaders Use Communication to Engage the Indonesian Masses Naila Azzahra Putri
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/dyym8934

Abstract

This study examines the rise of populist communication in Indonesia, focusing on how political leaders employ specific rhetorical and media strategies to mobilize the masses and challenge established democratic institutions. In the context of Indonesia’s diverse and fragmented electorate, populism has emerged as a potent political tool, often characterized by a "people vs. the elite" narrative that seeks to bypass traditional institutional checks and balances. Drawing on discourse analysis and political communication theory, the research identifies the key elements of the Indonesian populist repertoire: the use of emotive and colloquial language, the performance of blusukan (on-the-spot visits), and the strategic weaponization of social media. The paper analyzes how leaders leverage platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube to cultivate an aura of "authentic" proximity to the common citizen while simultaneously framing judicial or legislative oversight as obstacles to the "popular will." The findings suggest that the digital era has fundamentally altered populist dynamics; social media serves as a direct, unmediated channel that amplifies nationalistic and religious sentiments, often at the expense of deliberative democratic norms. Furthermore, the study explores the paradox of "democratic populism" in Indonesia—where populist tactics are used both to increase civic engagement and to delegitimize democratic opposition. The paper concludes that the normalization of populist rhetoric poses a significant challenge to the long-term stability of Indonesia’s democratic institutions, as it prioritizes charismatic authority over institutional proceduralism.
Censorship and Democracy in Indonesia: The Role of Communication Restrictions in Political Movements Zara Amalia Salsabila
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/16b69597

Abstract

This study investigates the complex relationship between communication restrictions and democratic health in Indonesia, focusing on the systemic use of censorship as a response to political mobilization. As Indonesia navigates a period of "democratic backsliding," the state has increasingly relied on both legal and technical instruments to manage political discourse and suppress dissent. Utilizing a qualitative framework based on legal policy analysis and case studies of mass mobilization (such as the 2019 post-election riots and the 2025 "Reformasi Dikorupsi" protests), this paper examines three primary modes of restriction: the application of the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, the implementation of targeted internet shutdowns, and the strategic moderation of social media content. The findings reveal that while the government justifies these measures as necessary for maintaining "public order" and curbing "hoaxes," they often function as tools of digital repression that create a "spiral of silence" among activists and journalists. The research further highlights the role of "Ministerial Regulation 5 (MR5)" in forcing platform compliance, effectively outsourcing censorship to private technology companies. The study argues that these restrictions do not merely silence individual voices but structurally undermine the "digital public sphere" by disrupting the flow of real-time information during critical political events. The paper concludes that the normalization of communication restrictions in Indonesia signals a shift toward a more illiberal democratic model, where the infrastructure of the internet is weaponized to preserve political stability at the expense of civil liberties. These insights provide a critical assessment of the tension between state security and freedom of expression in the world's third-largest democracy.
Women in Indonesian Political Movements: The Role of Gendered Communication in Shaping Political Change Maya Lestari; Nur Erika Putri
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/g13dat07

Abstract

This study examines the role of women in Indonesian political movements with a particular focus on how gendered communication strategies have been employed to challenge entrenched patriarchal norms and promote political change. Drawing on qualitative analysis of political speeches, activist narratives, media representations, and movement documents from the post-Reformasi era, the research explores how women activists strategically frame political messages to gain legitimacy, mobilize support, and influence democratic discourse. The findings demonstrate that women in Indonesian political movements utilize gendered communication not merely as a reflection of social constraints but as an active political resource. Through narratives emphasizing moral authority, social responsibility, and collective identity, women activists navigate cultural expectations while simultaneously redefining leadership and political participation. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of gender communication theory with political movement analysis in the Indonesian context, a dimension that has received limited scholarly attention. Unlike existing studies that primarily focus on women’s representation or policy outcomes, this research foregrounds communication as a central mechanism through which women negotiate power and enact change. By highlighting the communicative practices underlying women’s political engagement, the study offers a nuanced understanding of how gendered discourse shapes movement dynamics and democratic reform processes. The research contributes to the broader fields of political communication, gender studies, and Southeast Asian politics by providing empirical insights into the intersection of gender, culture, and political activism. It also offers practical implications for political actors and civil society organizations seeking to enhance inclusive participation and gender-sensitive communication strategies within democratic movements. Overall, the study underscores the importance of communication as both a site of constraint and a tool of transformation in women-led political mobilization in Indonesia.
Political Polarization and the Echo Chamber Effect: How Social Media Affects Democratic Dialogue in Indonesia Amara Shafa Maharani; Muhammad Riski; Agustinus Bambang Purnomo
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/55d8xy62

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of social media–driven echo chambers on political polarization and democratic dialogue in Indonesia. In recent years, the rapid expansion of digital platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and WhatsApp has transformed political communication, enabling citizens to access, share, and interpret political information in unprecedented ways. However, algorithmic filtering and homophilic online interactions have increasingly confined users to ideologically aligned networks, reinforcing selective exposure and intensifying political divisions. Using a mixed qualitative approach that combines discourse analysis of online political conversations with secondary data from national surveys and media reports, this study examines how echo chambers shape public discourse, political attitudes, and democratic engagement in Indonesia’s pluralistic society. The findings indicate that social media echo chambers contribute significantly to affective polarization by amplifying partisan narratives, delegitimizing opposing viewpoints, and fostering mistrust toward democratic institutions. Rather than facilitating deliberative dialogue, online political spaces often privilege emotionally charged content, misinformation, and identity-based framing, which weakens constructive debate and exacerbates social fragmentation. Nevertheless, the study also identifies moments where cross-cutting interactions emerge, particularly during critical political events, suggesting that echo chambers are influential but not entirely impermeable. The novelty of this research lies in its contextualized analysis of political polarization within Indonesia’s socio-cultural and democratic landscape, moving beyond Western-centric models of echo chambers. By situating social media dynamics within local political practices and communication norms, the study offers a more nuanced understanding of how digital polarization operates in emerging democracies. The research contributes to the fields of political communication and digital democracy by providing empirical insights into the mechanisms through which social media reshapes democratic dialogue. Additionally, it offers policy-relevant implications for promoting media literacy, platform accountability, and inclusive digital spaces to strengthen democratic resilience in Indonesia.
From Activism to Policy Change: The Role of Civil Society in Shaping Indonesia’s Environmental Political Movements Aurelia Putri Ramadhani
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/ja8ecm82

Abstract

This paper explores how civil society actors in Indonesia transform environmental activism into concrete policy influence within the framework of democratic environmental politics. As environmental degradation increasingly intersects with issues of governance, inequality, and public accountability, civil society organizations, grassroots movements, and youth collectives have become central to environmental political mobilization. Rather than focusing solely on protest actions or policy outcomes, this study examines the communicative processes through which environmental movements engage political institutions, negotiate legitimacy, and shape decision-making agendas. Using a qualitative research design, the study analyzes advocacy campaigns, public statements, digital activism, and policy engagement initiatives undertaken by environmental NGOs and youth-led movements across national and local contexts. The analysis demonstrates that civil society actors employ multi-layered communication strategies, including evidence-based advocacy, rights-based discourse, and emotionally resonant storytelling, to bridge the gap between public mobilization and formal policy arenas. These strategies allow activists to reframe environmental issues as democratic concerns, linking ecological sustainability to citizen participation, social justice, and state responsibility. The novelty of this research lies in its focus on the communicative transition from activism to policy engagement, highlighting how discourse and framing function as political tools in environmental movements. Unlike prior studies that emphasize institutional pathways or movement outcomes, this paper foregrounds communication as a dynamic mechanism that enables civil society to navigate power asymmetries and influence environmental governance. The study contributes to the literature on environmental politics and democratic participation by offering a context-sensitive account of how civil society shapes policy debates in Indonesia. Additionally, it provides insights for policymakers and activists seeking to strengthen participatory environmental governance through inclusive and strategic communication practices.
The Power of Memes: Political Communication and Satire in Indonesia’s Online Activism Hana Syafira; Indra Agus Kurniawan
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/e4actq21

Abstract

This paper examines the growing significance of memes, humor, and satire as instruments of political communication within Indonesia’s online activism. As social media platforms increasingly function as key arenas for political engagement, visual satire and humorous content have emerged as accessible and influential modes of political expression, particularly among younger and digitally connected citizens. This study investigates how memes operate not only as cultural artifacts but also as communicative tools that shape political narratives, mobilize participation, and contest dominant power structures in Indonesia’s democratic context. Employing qualitative digital discourse analysis, the research analyzes a curated corpus of political memes circulated on Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok during major political moments, including elections, policy debates, and social movements. The findings reveal that memes perform multiple political functions: they simplify complex political issues, foster collective identity, and lower barriers to political participation through humor and irony. At the same time, satire enables users to criticize political elites and institutions while navigating social and political sensitivities. However, the study also identifies ambivalent effects, as meme-based communication may encourage superficial engagement or reinforce polarization when satire is used to delegitimize opposing viewpoints. The novelty of this study lies in its systematic conceptualization of memes as a distinct form of political communication in Indonesia, integrating visual culture analysis with political communication theory. Unlike existing research that treats online satire as peripheral or anecdotal, this paper positions memes as central communicative actors in digital political movements within a non-Western democratic setting. The research contributes to scholarly debates on digital activism and democratic participation by demonstrating how humor and satire reshape modes of political engagement beyond conventional deliberative frameworks. It also provides practical insights for activists, educators, and policymakers seeking to understand the democratic potential and limitations of meme-based political communication in Indonesia’s evolving digital public sphere.
Media Literacy and Democracy in Indonesia: Addressing the Challenges of Fake News and Political Misinformation Lara Kinasih
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/78p7sk18

Abstract

The proliferation of fake news and political misinformation has emerged as a significant challenge to democratic processes in Indonesia, particularly in the context of rapid digital media expansion and increased online political engagement. While digital platforms enable broader participation, they also facilitate the spread of misleading information that undermines public trust and informed citizenship. This study aims to examine how media literacy initiatives in Indonesia address the challenges posed by fake news and political misinformation in order to promote critical and informed democratic engagement. Employing a qualitative research design, the study analyzes media literacy programs implemented by government institutions, civil society organizations, educational initiatives, and digital platforms through policy documents, training materials, and public campaign content. The findings indicate that effective media literacy initiatives emphasize critical thinking, source verification, and digital ethics, while adapting communication strategies to local socio-cultural contexts. These initiatives seek not only to reduce the circulation of misinformation but also to empower citizens to actively and responsibly participate in democratic discourse. However, the study also identifies limitations related to uneven program accessibility and the lack of systematic integration into formal civic education frameworks. The urgency of this research lies in the increasing vulnerability of Indonesia’s digital public sphere to misinformation and political manipulation. The study contributes to academic debates by positioning media literacy as a long-term democratic intervention rather than a reactive corrective mechanism. It concludes that strengthening collaborative, inclusive, and sustainable media literacy frameworks is essential for enhancing democratic resilience, and recommends closer cooperation among state actors, civil society, and educational institutions to support informed political participation in Indonesia.
Communication Strategies of Religious Movements in Indonesia: The Intersection of Faith, Politics, and Democracy Safa Nabila; Ahmad Zayyan Abdul Rahman
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/08pb3j85

Abstract

Religious movements play a significant role in shaping political discourse and democratic participation in Indonesia, where faith remains a central element of public life. As religious actors increasingly engage with political issues, communication becomes a crucial mechanism through which religious values, political interests, and democratic ideals intersect. This study examines how religious movements in Indonesia employ communication strategies—ranging from sermons and religious gatherings to social media engagement and public demonstrations—to influence political narratives and mobilize participation within the democratic sphere. Using a qualitative research approach, the study analyzes sermon texts, online religious content, movement statements, and media coverage of religiously motivated political actions. The findings reveal that religious movements strategically combine moral framing, identity-based narratives, and emotional appeals to legitimize political positions and encourage collective action. Digital platforms are used to extend the reach of religious messages, facilitate networked mobilization, and shape public opinion beyond traditional religious spaces. However, the study also finds that these communication practices generate ambivalent democratic effects: while they can enhance political participation and civic awareness, they may also contribute to polarization and the exclusion of dissenting perspectives. The urgency of this research lies in the growing visibility of religious actors in Indonesia’s political arena and the implications for democratic pluralism. This study contributes to scholarly discussions on political communication and religion by offering a context-sensitive analysis of how religious discourse operates as a political resource in a democratic setting. It concludes that understanding the communicative strategies of religious movements is essential for fostering inclusive democratic dialogue, and recommends the development of engagement frameworks that encourage pluralism, interfaith dialogue, and responsible religious communication within Indonesia’s democratic system.
The Role of Online Communities in Shaping Political Movements: A Case Study of #IndonesiaGue Nadira Zahra Sari
Indonesian Discourse on Communication, Democracy, and Political Movements Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/hy5kfs90

Abstract

The rise of online communities has significantly transformed political mobilization and participation in Indonesia, reshaping how citizens engage with political movements beyond traditional organizational structures. This study examines the role of online communities in shaping political movements through a case study of the #IndonesiaGue movement, a digitally driven initiative that mobilized social media users to advocate for political change and civic accountability. Employing a qualitative case study approach, the research analyzes social media content, online interactions, movement narratives, and media coverage related to #IndonesiaGue to explore how digital spaces facilitate collective identity formation and political engagement. The findings indicate that the #IndonesiaGue movement leveraged decentralized communication, participatory hashtags, and user-generated content to lower barriers to political involvement and enable rapid mobilization across diverse social groups. Online communities functioned as spaces for deliberation, symbolic resistance, and narrative contestation, allowing participants to express political grievances and aspirations outside formal political institutions. However, the study also identifies structural limitations, including fragmented leadership, short-lived engagement, and challenges in translating online activism into sustained offline political outcomes. The urgency of this research lies in the growing reliance on digital platforms as arenas of political participation in Indonesia’s evolving democracy. This study contributes to political communication and digital activism scholarship by providing an empirically grounded analysis of how online communities operate as political actors within networked movements. It concludes that while digital spaces expand opportunities for democratic participation, their effectiveness depends on the capacity of online communities to sustain engagement and connect digital mobilization with broader political processes.