cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dermiyati
Contact Email
dermiyati.1963@fp.unila.ac.id
Phone
+62721781822
Journal Mail Official
j.tnhtrop@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Jl. Sumantri Brojonegoro No. 1, Bandarlampung 35145, Indonesia
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Journal of Tropical Soils
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 0852257X     EISSN : 20866682     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.v25i1
Core Subject : Agriculture, Social,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Environmental Science
Journal of Tropical Soils (JTS) publishes all aspects in the original research of soil science (soil physic and soil conservation, soil mineralogy, soil chemistry and soil fertility, soil biology and soil biochemical, soil genesis and classification, land survey and land evaluation, land development and management environmental), and related subjects in which using soil from tropical areas.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Lingkungan (semua ketegori) - Konservasi Alam dan Lahan
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 19, No 1: January 2014" : 7 Documents clear
Potency of Agroindustrial Wastewaters for Increasing Dissolution of Phosphate Rock Fertilizers Ainin Niswati; Sri Yusnaini; . Sarno
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol 19, No 1: January 2014
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2014.v19i1.43-51

Abstract

Agroindustrial wastewaters were considered not maximum used in Lampung Province since it has acidic properties that can be used as an acid solvent. This study aimed was to explore the most potential agroindustrial wastewaters in dissolving phosphate rock by acidulation in the laboratory scale. The experimen were arranged by factorial i.e. first factor were phosphate rock origin (Sukabumi, west Java and Selagailingga, central Lampung) and second factor was kinds of solvent (agroindustrial wastewaters of pineapple, tapioca, tofu industry, and palm oil as well as a conventional acid solvent such as HCl, H2SO4, and CH3COOH).  The incubation process were 0, 1, 2, and 3 month. The results showed that agroindustrial wastewaters that have highest potency for solubizing phosphate rock was industrial tofu wastewaters and followed by industrial wastewaters of tapioca, palm oil, and pineapple. Both the conventional  acid  and  agroindustrial  wastewaters    solvent  have  a  big  potency  for  solubilize  phosphate  rock, however, its highest soluble P-value was not match with the ISO criteria for phosphate fertilizers Quality I (SNI) because it has not reached the solubility of 80% of its total P2O5, but has been qualified as a fertilizer both the quality phosphate A, B, and C (SNI).Keywords: Acidulation, agroindustrial wastewater, P fertilizer, phosphate rock [How to Cite: Ainin N, S Yusnaini and Sarno. 2014. Potency of Agroindustrial Wastewaters to Increase the Dissolution of Phosphate Rock Fertilizers. J Trop Soils 19: 43-51. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2014.19.1.43]    
Phosphorus Fertilization Under Different Land Preparation Methods and Performance of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) in Rainforest Zone of Southern Nigeria Joseph Sunday Ogeh; Rukeme Orakpogbake Oyibo
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol 19, No 1: January 2014
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2014.v19i1.1-7

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on an Arenic paleudult in the rainforest zone of Southern Nigeria to determine the response of an improved variety of peanut (Arachis hypogea L. var. Samnut 23) to phosphorus, under different land preparation methods. Selected land preparation methods were “slash and burn” (SB) and “slash and mulch” (SM), and the phosphate fertilizer rates were 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 kg P ha-1.  The experiment was laid out as a randomized complete by block design. Each land preparation was divided into plots. Macro- and micro nutrient contents of peanut plants were determined, and the growth and yield components were also assessed. Results showed that the pre planting soil analysis for the SB management had a pH of 5.77, N (1.8 gkg-1), P (2.05 mgkg-1) and K (0.11cmol (+) kg-1), while that of the SM had a pH of 5.95, N (0.9 g kg-1), P (0.86 mg kg-1) and K (0.07cmol(+)kg-1).  Plant height was not significantly different (pd” 0.05) in the land preparation methods, but leaf area was significantly different. However, plant height and leaf area responded better under the SB treatment with 90 kg P ha-1 rate of phosphorus fertilizer than the SM treatment under the same rate. Fresh pod weight of 908.6kg ha-1 and dry pod weight of 558.0kg ha-1 was obtained at 60 kg P ha-1 under the SB treatment and was significantly different from all other treatments including the SM. Significant differences were also observed in the nutrient concentrations of leaves and roots. Highest leaf phosphorus content (3.502 mg kg-1) was recorded at 90kg P ha-1 in the SM treatment while the highest nutrient content of P in the roots (0.272 mg kg-1) was recorded at 30 kg P ha-1 also in the SM treatment. However, the SB treatment recorded the highest peanut seed pods / shell at 60 kg P ha-1. Generally, phosphorus fertilization under the SB management practice gave better results than the SM management practice.Keywords: groundnut, land preparation, phosphorus fertilization, Slash and burn, slash and mulch    [How to Cite: Joseph SO and RO Oyibo. 2014. Phosphorus Fertilization Under Different Land Preparation Methods and Performance of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) in Rainforest Zone of Southern Nigeria. J Trop Soils 19(1): 1-7. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2014.19.1.1]  
Identification and Evaluation of Potential Land Resources to Support the Development of Agricultural Commodities for Food Crops Zone Nurdiyanto Agung Prasetya; . Hikmatullah; . Asisah; Muhamad Buce Saleh; Suria Darma Tarigan
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol 19, No 1: January 2014
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2014.v19i1.53-61

Abstract

To support the goverment purpose to reach the food security, a land use study is needed. The aim of the research was  to provide  an  information  of  characteristics of  land  resources through the identification  and evaluation  of potential landresources and that suitable for food crops in Mamuju District South Sulawesi. The research method used landscape approach to mapping land units as the basis for preparing the soil map unit/DEM compared with field data survey. A case study was done in Mamuju District, West Sulawesi the results showed that the land in Mamuju for paddy covering was suitable enough of 115,250 ha and 54,883 ha of marginal fit, while for dryland crops were 106 978 ha was quite suitable and appropriate marginal was 82,592 ha. However, for cocoa fit enough land was 153,397 ha and corresponding marginal was 485,743 ha. Biophysical constraints were the erosion of land use/steep slopes, drainage, seasonal flooding, toxicity and nutrient retention. Direction of land use for agriculture in Mamuju for Rice crop area was 49,345 ha (6.23%), food crops rice and dry land was 10,680 ha (1.35%), dryland crops/crops was 101,785 ha (12.85%), perennial/Cocoa was 90,488 ha  (11.42%), and conservation land was 532,245 ha (67.18%).Keywords : Cland crops, land identification, soil evaluation [How to Cite: Nurdiyanto AP, Hikmatullah, Asisah, MB Saleh, and SD Tarigan. 2014. Identification and Evaluation of Potential Land Resources to Support the Development of Agricultural Commodities for Food Crops Zone. J Trop Soils 19: 53-61. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2014.19.1.53]   
Effect Application of Sea Sand, Coconut and Banana Coir on the Growth and Yield of Rice Planted at Ustic Endoaquert Soil . Nurdin
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol 19, No 1: January 2014
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2014.v19i1.17-24

Abstract

The research was aimed to study effect application of sea sand (SS), coconut coir (CC) and banana coir (BC) on the growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) planted at Ustic Endoaquert soil. The pot experiment was carried out using a factorial design with 3 factors. The first factor was SS consisted of three levels i.e.: 0%, 25%, and 50%. The second and third factors were CC and BC, each consisted of three levels i.e.: 0, 10, and 20 Mg ha-1. Application of SS and BC significantly increased leaf length where the highest increasing  percentage  was  16.47%  which  was  achieved  at  25%  SS  application.  Their  effect  on  leaf numbers and tiller numbers were relatively not similar pattern where leaf number only increased about 65.52% by BC application, while tiller numbers only increased about 10.77% by SS application. Furthermore, the application of CC and BC significantly increased panicle numbers to 29.53% and 29.05%, respectively compared to control. All ameliorants significantly increased panicle numbers, but the best was CC with the increasing up to 46.49% at 20 Mg ha-1 CC compared to SS or BC application. However, only coconut coir significantly increased the rice grain numbers.Keywords: Banana coir, coconut coir, rice plant, sea sand, vertisol [How to Cite: Nurdin. 2014. Effect Application of Sea Sand, Coconut and Banana Coir on the Growth and Yield of Rice Planted at Ustic Endoaquert Soil. J Trop Soils 19: 17-24. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2014.19.1.17] 
Influence of SP-36 and Phosphate Rock on Changes in Soil Available P, Leaf P Content, and Growth of Physic Nut (Jatropha curcas L.) in an Ultisol Achmad Arivin Rivaie
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol 19, No 1: January 2014
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2014.v19i1.9-15

Abstract

A study was carried out to determine the effects of rates and types of P fertilizer (SP-36 and Phosphate Rock) on the growth of physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.), leaf P content, and soil available P in an Ultisol in a glasshouse. The treatments consisted of four rates of P (0, 50, 100 and 150 mg P2O5 kg-1 soil) given in two different types of P fertilizer, namely SP-36 (total P2O5 = 36%) and Phosphate Rock (total P2O5 = 28%, particle size distribution = 75%<0.25 mm, 85%<0.50 mm, 90%<1.00 mm). Treatments were arranged in a Completely Randomized Design with three replications. The results showed that at the rates of 50 and 100 kg P2O5 ha-1, there was no difference in soil available P due to the application of SP-36 and Phosphate Rock, indicating that both types of P fertilizer had the same dissolution values after 8 months of P fertilizer application. At the rate of 50 kg P2O5 ha-1, the application of SP-36 and Phosphate Rock gave the same leaf P content. This could indicate that up to the first 8 months, the addition of the cheaper Phosphate Rock and the SP-36 to the soil had similar effectiveness. The response of tree biomass to P fertilization followed a quadratic pattern, in which for the application of Phosphate Rock, the P optimum rate was achieved at the rate which was lower than that for the application of SP-36. This suggests that the application of Phosphate Rock to physic nut trees was more efficient and effective compared to the application of SP-36.Keywords: Leaf P, phosphate Rock, physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.), soil available P, [How to Cite: Achmad AR. 2014. Influence of SP-36 and Phosphate Rock on Changes in Soil Available P, Leaf P Content, and Growth of Physic Nut (Jatropha curcas L.) in an Ultisol. J Trop Soils 19: 9-15. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2014.19.1.9]   
Use of Ameliorants to Increase Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) in Peat Soils of West Kalimantan Suswati, Denah; Sunarminto, Bambang Hendro; Shiddieq, Dja’far; Indradewa, Didik
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol 19, No 1: January 2014
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2014.v19i1.35-41

Abstract

Peatland in Indonesia has a potential for maize cultivation, but it has constraints that low of soil pH and of nutrient availability. Use of ameliorants from coastal sediment and salted fish waste was an alternative to improve peatlands productivity and maize yields. Objective of the study was to examine effects of coastal sediment and salted fish waste on growth and yield of maize at three kinds of soil of peatlands of Kubu Raya, West Kalimantan. This research was conducted  in  field  using  Inter-area analysis  design.  The  first  factor  was  combination  of  each ameliorants  which consisted of 5 levels, namely: 1) treatment under farmer custom at the sites (control); 2) coastal sediment of 20 Mg ha-1 + 0.75 Mg of salted fish waste ha-1; 3) coastal sediment of 40 Mg ha-1 + 1.5 Mg of salted fish waste ha-1, 4) coastal sediment of 60 Mg ha-1 + 2.25 Mg of salted fish waste  ha-1. The second factor was soil types which consisted of three levels, namely: Typic Haplohemists, Typic Sulfisaprists and Typic Haplosaprists. Each treatment was repeated 5 times. The results showed that combination of 40 Mg ha-1 of coastal sediment and 1.5 Mg ha-1 of salted fish waste was the best combination for all soil type. It increased plant height (33% - 44%), shoot dry weight (74% - 75%), number of seeds per cob (31% -110%), weight of 100 seeds (58% -71%) and dry grain weight per plant (136 % -160 %) at each soil. The highest yield was found in soil of Typic Haplosaprists (219.54 g), followed by Typic Sulfisaprists (210.72 g) and Typic Haplohemists (208.82 g).Keywords: Coastal sediment, maize, peat soils, salted fish waste [How to Cite: Denah S, BH Sunarminto, D Shiddieq and D Indradewa. 2014. Use of Ameliorants to Increase Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) in Peat Soils of West Kalimantan. J Trop Soils 19: 35-41. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2014.19.1.35]    
Efficiency Test of IRRI Fertilizing Recommendations on Rainfed Low Land Rice Field in West Kalimantan Muhammad Hatta; Mahyuddin Syam; Dwi Purnamawati Widiastuti
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol 19, No 1: January 2014
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2014.v19i1.25-33

Abstract

Fertilizing recommendation for lowland rice field in West Kalimantan is still in national scale and tends to be excessive. It is less relevant due to various factors such as the test method competence, the carrying capacity  of  the  land,  and  the  diverse  condition  of  rice  field  agro-ecosystem.  Site-specific  nutrient management (SSNM) is an approach for rice fertilizing on paddy plot based on science, history of land fertilization,  and  nutrient  sources  surrounding  the  area  which  can  affect  soil  fertility  level  and  soil conservation.This study was aimed to examine fertilizing efficiency of N, P, and K and the increased productivity of rice by utilizing software (website) of the IRRI. The study was conducted in farmers fields in two villages, i.e. Anjongan and Pak Bulu, Pontianak Regency, West Kalimantan. The results showed that the SSNM fertilization on rice increased yields by the average of 0.62 t ha-1 (13.47%) per growing season. The efficiency of SSNM fertilization was on the average of 22.05% N, 48.25% P2O5, and 31.50% K2O. The additional profits obtained from the SSNM recommendation was on the average of IDR 1,886,317 per ha pergrowing season compared to the profits from the FFP (farmer fertilizer practice).Keywords: Fertilizing efficiency, low land, rice, site specific fertilization [How to Cite: Muhammad H, M Syam and DP Widiastuti. 2014. Efficiency Test of IRRI Fertilizing Recommendations on Rainfed Low Land Rice Field in West Kalimantan. J Trop Soils 19: 25-33. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2014.19.1.25]   

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2014 2014


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 30, No 3: September 2025 (in Progress) Vol. 30 No. 3: September 2025 (in Progress) Vol. 30 No. 2: May 2025 Vol 30, No 2: May 2025 Vol 30, No 1: January 2025 Vol. 30 No. 1: January 2025 Vol 29, No 3: September 2024 Vol. 29 No. 3: September 2024 Vol. 29 No. 2: May 2024 Vol 29, No 2: May 2024 Vol 29, No 1: January 2024 Vol. 29 No. 1: January 2024 Vol. 28 No. 3: September 2023 Vol 28, No 3: September 2023 Vol 28, No 2: May 2023 Vol. 28 No. 2: May 2023 Vol. 28 No. 1: January 2023 Vol 28, No 1: January 2023 Vol. 27 No. 3: September 2022 Vol 27, No 3: September 2022 Vol 27, No 2: May 2022 Vol. 27 No. 2: May 2022 Vol. 27 No. 1: January 2022 Vol 27, No 1: January 2022 Vol 26, No 3: September 2021 Vol. 26 No. 3: September 2021 Vol 26, No 2: May 2021 Vol. 26 No. 2: May 2021 Vol. 26 No. 1: January 2021 Vol 26, No 1: January 2021 Vol. 25 No. 3: September 2020 Vol 25, No 3: September 2020 Vol. 25 No. 2: May 2020 Vol 25, No 2: May 2020 Vol. 25 No. 1: January 2020 Vol 25, No 1: January 2020 Vol 24, No 3: September 2019 Vol. 24 No. 3: September 2019 Vol 24, No 2: May 2019 Vol. 24 No. 2: May 2019 Vol 24, No 1: January 2019 Vol. 24 No. 1: January 2019 Vol 23, No 3: September 2018 Vol. 23 No. 3: September 2018 Vol 23, No 2: May 2018 Vol. 23 No. 2: May 2018 Vol 23, No 1: January 2018 Vol. 23 No. 1: January 2018 Vol. 22 No. 3: September 2017 Vol 22, No 3: September 2017 Vol. 22 No. 2: May 2017 Vol 22, No 2: May 2017 Vol. 22 No. 1: January 2017 Vol 22, No 1: January 2017 Vol. 21 No. 3: September 2016 Vol 21, No 3: September 2016 Vol. 21 No. 2: May 2016 Vol 21, No 2: May 2016 Vol 21, No 1: January 2016 Vol. 21 No. 1: January 2016 Vol. 20 No. 3: September 2015 Vol 20, No 3: September 2015 Vol 20, No 2: May 2015 Vol. 20 No. 2: May 2015 Vol 20, No 1: January 2015 Vol. 20 No. 1: January 2015 Vol. 19 No. 3: September 2014 Vol 19, No 3: September 2014 Vol 19, No 2: May 2014 Vol. 19 No. 2: May 2014 Vol. 19 No. 1: January 2014 Vol 19, No 1: January 2014 Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013 Vol 18, No 3: September 2013 Vol 18, No 2: May 2013 Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013 Vol. 18 No. 1: January 2013 Vol 18, No 1: January 2013 Vol. 17 No. 3: September 2012 Vol 17, No 3: September 2012 Vol 17, No 2: May 2012 Vol. 17 No. 2: May 2012 Vol. 17 No. 1: Januari 2012 Vol 17, No 1: Januari 2012 Vol. 16 No. 3: September 2011 Vol 16, No 3: September 2011 Vol. 16 No. 2: May 2011 Vol 16, No 2: May 2011 Vol. 16 No. 1: January 2011 Vol 16, No 1: January 2011 Vol. 15 No. 3: September 2010 Vol 15, No 3: September 2010 Vol. 15 No. 2: May 2010 Vol 15, No 2: May 2010 Vol 15, No 1: January 2010 Vol. 15 No. 1: January 2010 Vol 14, No 3: September 2009 Vol. 14 No. 3: September 2009 Vol 14, No 2: May 2009 Vol. 14 No. 2: May 2009 Vol 14, No 1: January 2009 Vol. 14 No. 1: January 2009 Vol. 13 No. 3: September 2008 Vol 13, No 3: September 2008 Vol. 13 No. 2: May 2008 Vol 13, No 2: May 2008 Vol. 13 No. 1: January 2008 Vol 13, No 1: January 2008 More Issue