cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. bantul,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies
ISSN : 25990551     EISSN : 25990586     DOI : 10.18196/aijis
Core Subject : Education,
Jurnal Afkaruna is an Indonesian bilingual journal published by the Faculty of Islamic Studies, Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta. The journal publishes empirically grounded and multidisciplinary work on Islam and its related issues, spanning the history, Quranic studies, Exegesis, tradition, education, dakwah, politics, sufism, philosophy, Islamic manuscripts, Islamic economics and finance, social movements, ritual and philanthropy. Afkaruna aims to promote excellent scholarship or articles on Islam that present original findings, new ideas or concepts that result from contemporary research projects in Islamic studies, area studies (especially Southeast Asia and the Middle East), social sciences, and the humanities.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 21 No. 2: December 2025" : 12 Documents clear
The Dynamics of Marriage Registration Implementation in the Multiethnic Muslim Community in Pekanbaru City, Riau Cisilia Maiyori; Muhammad Ahalla Tsauro
Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 21 No. 2: December 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Studi Islam dan Peradaban, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/afkaruna.v21i2.29323

Abstract

This study analyzes the dynamics of marriage registration implementation in Pekanbaru City through a juridical-sociological approach. The main focus of the research is to examine the implementation of marriage registration regulations, identify inhibiting factors, and formulate an effective model of approach. The findings reveal that the ambivalence of Article 2 of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage creates legal uncertainty, where society tends to perceive marriage registration merely as an administrative formality rather than as a requirement for the legal validity of marriage in the eyes of the state. The study further reveals the significant impact of unregistered marriages, particularly on the legal protection of women and children. Empirical data show that 45% of divorce cases cannot be formally processed due to the absence of a marriage certificate, while 35% of children from unregistered marriages face difficulties obtaining complete birth certificates. At the implementation level, there is a notable geographical disparity, with the highest compliance rate in Pekanbaru Kota (85%) and the lowest in Rumbai Pesisir (68%). The main inhibiting factors include regulatory, socio-cultural, economic, bureaucratic, and infrastructural aspects. The complexity of procedures, limited digital infrastructure (only 45% of Religious Affairs Offices possess adequate facilities for the SIMKAH system), and weak coordination between Religious Affairs Offices and the Civil Registry Office (with data integration only at 65%) further exacerbate the situation. This study recommends a holistic approach encompassing regulatory reform, infrastructure equalization, bureaucratic simplification, and intensive public outreach through multi-stakeholder collaboration to enhance the effectiveness of marriage registration in Pekanbaru City.
Does The Legacy of Colonialism Define Islamism? Analyzing Hallaq’s Critique of Islamic Political Modernity Ahmad, Danyal; Manzoor Ahmed Kalwar; Khan, Hafiza Sana Rehman; Kalwar, Bashir Ahmed
Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 21 No. 2: December 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Studi Islam dan Peradaban, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/afkaruna.v21i2.29424

Abstract

This paper critically examines Wael Hallaq’s argument that contemporary Islamist movements are structurally shaped by colonial modernity and that the modern Islamic state is a hybrid formation rooted in Western political epistemologies rather than an extension of classical Islamic governance. While compelling, these framing risks underemphasize the heterogeneity, agency, and adaptive capacities of Muslim reformist actors. Using Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis and a decolonial framework, the study interrogates the ideological and epistemic assumptions underlying Hallaq’s “impossibility thesis.” The textual analysis shows that his lexical, modal, and metaphorical choices construct a narrative of structural closure that minimizes reformist creativity, while the discursive-practice analysis reveals how his arguments circulate within Western academic paradigms that can unintentionally reinforce epistemic hierarchies. The socio-ideological analysis demonstrates that, although Hallaq exposes the colonial genealogy of the modern state, his emphasis on rupture sometimes obscures how Islamist movements creatively reinterpret shūrā (consultation), maṣlaḥah (public interest), and khilāfah (caliphate), within contemporary political contexts. The findings argue for a more nuanced account of Islamic political agency and situate Islamism within broader debates on decolonial praxis, epistemic plurality, and emerging frameworks such as Islamic multiple modernities, ethical-political subjectivity, and multi-scalar engagements with state power.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12