cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Filsafat
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
Jurnal Filsafat is a scientific journal that first published in 1990, as a forum for scientific communication, development of thinking and research in philosophy. Jurnal Filsafat is published twice a year, in February and August with p-ISSN: 0853-1870, and e-ISSN: 2528-6811 The Editorial Team of Jurnal Filsafat accepts manuscript in the field of philosophy which has never been published in other media. Editorial Team has the right to edit the manuscript as far as not changing the substance of its contents. Jurnal Filsafat Address: Notonagoro Building, 2nd Floor, Faculty of Philosophy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta; Jl. Olahraga Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta, 55281; Email: jurnal-wisdom@ugm.ac.id; Website: jurnal.ugm.ac.id/wisdom; Phone: (0274) 515368 / (0274) 546 605.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 30, No 1 (2020)" : 6 Documents clear
Kurban Hewan dalam Upacara Yadnya: Membunuh atau Memuliakan? Asmarani, Ni Nyoman Oktaria
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 30, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (210.677 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.41794

Abstract

One of the worships performed by the Balinese Hindu community can be seen from the Yadnya ceremony. Yadnya itself means a sacrifice made sincerely to be offered to God, namely Ida Sang Hyang Widhi Wasa. In the process, Balinese Hindus used to use animals as sacrifices for the Yadnya ceremony. For animal welfare activists, the use of these animals is considered as something inappropriate because it means that animals are only meant to fulfill human needs. In fact, animals have the right to live, just like humans. Even so, there are actually many dimensions that can be seen from the use of animals in this Yadnya ceremony. This article will critically examine the culture of sacrificing animals in Yadnya and how animal welfare sees that culture. This objective will be elaborated through the answers to the questions: What is the rationale of Balinese Hindu community in using animals for Yadnya ceremony?; How are animals used in the Yadnya ceremony? and; How is animal sacrifice in various ceremonies seen by the perspective of animal welfare? The result of this bibliographical research shows that the use of animals as sacrifices in the Yadnya ceremony in Hinduism turned out to have a complex background. This treatment cannot simply be called killing animals because they contain values that are also believed to be able to respect the animal itself.
Dikotomi Moral dan Hukum sebagai Problem Epistemologis dalam Konstitusi Modern Muhtamar, Syafruddin; Ashri, Muhammad
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 30, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (699.43 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.42562

Abstract

This article discusses dichotomy between moral and legal consideration occuring in the modern constitutions that can be traced back in the thoughts of Thomas Aquinas and Niccolo Machiavelli. The analysis focuses on the epistemological aspects of this dichotomy that are rooted for long in the moral and legal concepts in the modern constitution.Through epistemological analysis, the authors conclude that the epistemic root of the dichotomy lie in the contrasting paradigm between supernatural law and modern positivism. While modern constitutionalism constructs moral concepts that presummes Divine truth, the legal concepts oriented to rational truth. These two concepts should be intergrated without dichotomy through the dictum 'moral exaltation in the primacy of the law' so that the law will be able to answer legal issues in the society.
Mitos Penciptaan pada Serat Purwakandha Brantakusuman dan Potensi Kajian Filsafatnya Sartini, Sartini; Luwiyanto, Luwiyanto
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 30, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.43718

Abstract

This article examines the creation myth in Serat Purwakandha Brantakusuman (SPB), how its characteristics are compared to myths in Indonesia and existing mythical theories, and explains philosophical themes that can be examined from these myths in order to give its theoretical contributions in existing mythical theories. It is a literature study by reviewing books texts, research reports, journals, and other sources. The analysis is done by interpretation, coherence-holistic, description, and analysis-synthesis. The theoretical framework used is the myth theory C A. Van Peursen and Clifford Geertz. The results of the study indicate that the myth of the creation of plants in SPB is based on the story of the death of Dewi Tisnawati who was banished to earth. The study of myths about the origin of plants is new because research examining myths related to agriculture and Dewi Sri, the influence of myths in life and human activities, forms of rituals and socio-cultural activities, and the relationship between myths and art, are more related to origin place. The myths in SPB and myths in Indonesia contribute to supporting myth concepts that have been described by great thinkers. The creation myth and other myths in the SPB can be subject to study from the perspective of the branches of philosophy and its conceptual substances can also be criticized philosophically
Meninjau Ulang Sustainable Development: Kajian Filosofis Atas Dilema Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup di Era Post Modern Muthmainnah, Lailiy; Mustansyir, Rizal; Tjahyadi, Sindung
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 30, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (251.83 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.49109

Abstract

This study is an attempt to re-question the base arguments forsustainable developmentproposal with regardto environmental management. This attempt is important considering intensive deploymemt of cost and benefit calculations in every environmental management policy, which rooted in the utilitarian philosophical tradition. This research runs in the area of political philosophyandemploys methodical components includingdescription, interpretation, critical analysis, and verstehen. The current research suggests that the emergence of sustainable development as a concept of environment management goes along with modernity with all issues that it brings. The proposal of sustainable developments can be categorized into constructive postmodernismapproach. The main purpose of this proposal is to create a condition of balance between the needs of the present generation and the adequacy of the needs of the future generations. However, the concept appears to raise a new concern considering the meaning of “sustainability”has become contestation with strong tendency to economicconsideration which reduces the calculation of cost-benefits into cash-value calculations. This reductionis tendency leads to a dilemma considering the aspiration of shiftinganthropocentrism to ecocentrismunderlying behind concept of sustainable development will ironically produce a new forms of anthropocentrism.
Analisis Etika Biomedis Terhadap Pasien Transgender dalam Mengakses Layanan Kesehatan di Yogyakarta Utami, Rona; Nugraha, Rizky Anandasigit; Yuliantoro, Moch Najib; Nugroho, Hastanti Widy
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 30, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (225.515 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.53016

Abstract

This research focuses on transgender patients discrimination in Yogyakarta in accessing healthcare services. There are two questions on this research: what is the obstacle faced by the transgender-patients in accessing healthcare services? How is the analysis of biomedical ethics seeing this issue? Theresults on this research are despite the facttheywere notbeing discriminated inthehospital, they did not getthe health insurance by the governmentbecause of the administrative issuewhichcan not accommodatetheir genderchoice. Therefore, this researchseeks to understand the barriers of transgender patients in accessing healthcareservices through the perspective of biomedical ethics ofTom L. Beauchamp and James Childress. The researcher concludes that thegeneral ruleon social benefitsappliedin society isstill limitedonlyto the specificgenders. Itis not in accordance with the two principles in biomedical ethics:the principle of justice states that the transgender who is physically harmedhasright to getsocial benefitsto remedy the effect of thedisadvantagesdue to theirnatural property and to have more equal chance of life;and the principle of autonomy states that an autonomous decision of the transgender people to choose their gender is related to the individual rightsalthough they have different view with others andas long as their action do not leave the disadvantage toothers,it must be respected as a moral obligation.
Philosophy, A Challenge To Post-Truth, Also in Indonesia Magnis-Suseno, Franz
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 30, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (491.059 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.53671

Abstract

This article insists that it is the task of philosophy to challenge untruth under the guise of truth. In the first part the author follows how philosophy changed from teachings of wisdom to critique of false truth claims: beginning with Eastern philosophy, with special consideration of Javanese wisdom, through Greek philosophy where philosophy comes into its own right, to M­edieval philosophy, until enlightenment clearly establishes philosophy as criticism. Hegel and Critical Philosophy are given special attention. In the second part the author stresses the importance of critical philosophy for Indonesia. He exemplifies this on three widely accepted untruths: untruth about what happened in Indonesia in 1965 and 1966, the claim that Pancasila is incompatible with liberal democracy, and the claim of religious extremism to present truth about religion. The article ends with appeal to defend our democratic freedoms without compromise.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 31, No 2 (2021) Vol 31, No 1 (2021) Vol 30, No 2 (2020) Vol 30, No 1 (2020) Vol 29, No 2 (2019) Vol 29, No 1 (2019) Vol 29, No 1 (2019) Vol 28, No 2 (2018) Vol 28, No 1 (2018) Vol 27, No 2 (2017) Vol 27, No 2 (2017) Vol 27, No 1 (2017) Vol 26, No 2 (2016) Vol 26, No 2 (2016) Vol 26, No 1 (2016) Vol 25, No 2 (2015) Vol 25, No 1 (2015) Vol 24, No 1 (2014) Vol 24, No 1 (2014) Vol 23, No 3 (2013) Vol 23, No 2 (2013) Vol 23, No 1 (2013) Vol 22, No 3 (2012) Vol 22, No 3 (2012) Vol 22, No 2 (2012) Vol 22, No 2 (2012) Vol 22, No 1 (2012) Vol 22, No 1 (2012) Vol 21, No 3 (2011) Vol 21, No 3 (2011) Vol 21, No 2 (2011) Vol 21, No 2 (2011) Vol 21, No 1 (2011) Vol 21, No 1 (2011) Vol 20, No 3 (2010) Vol 20, No 3 (2010) Vol 20, No 2 (2010) Vol 20, No 2 (2010) Vol 20, No 1 (2010) Vol 20, No 1 (2010) Vol 19, No 3 (2009) Vol 19, No 3 (2009) Vol 19, No 2 (2009) Vol 19, No 2 (2009) Vol 19, No 1 (2009) Vol 19, No 1 (2009) Vol 18, No 3 (2008) Vol 18, No 3 (2008) Vol 18, No 2 (2008) Vol 18, No 2 (2008) Vol 18, No 1 (2008) Vol 18, No 1 (2008) Vol 17, No 3 (2007) Vol 17, No 2 (2007) Vol 17, No 1 (2007) Vol 16, No 3 (2006) Vol 16, No 3 (2006) Vol 16, No 2 (2006) Vol 16, No 1 (2006) Vol 14, No 3 (2004) Vol 14, No 2 (2004) Vol 14, No 1 (2004) Vol 13, No 3 (2003) Vol 13, No 2 (2003) Vol 13, No 1 (2003) Vol 10, No 2 (2000) Jurnal Filsafat Seri 30 Oktober 1999 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 29 Juni 1999 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 28 Juli 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 28 Juli 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Edisi Khusus Agustus 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 26 Desember 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 26 Desember 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 25 Mei 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 25 Mei 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 24 Februari 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 24 Februari 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 23 November 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 23 November 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 22 Agustus 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 22 Agustus 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 21 Mei 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 21 Mei 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 20 Desember 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 20 Desember 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 19 Agustus 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 19 Agustus 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 18 Mei 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 18 Mei 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 17 Februari 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 17 Februari 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 16 November 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 16 November 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 15 Agustus 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 15 Agustus 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 14 Mei 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 14 Mei 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 13 Februari 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 13 Februari 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 12 November 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 11 Agustus 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 10 Mei 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 10 Mei 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 9 Februari 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 8 November 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 7 Agustus 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 6 Mei 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 5 Februari 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 5 Februari 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 4 November 1990 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 3 1990 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 1 1990 More Issue