cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika" : 10 Documents clear
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) BERBANTUAN SOFTWARE CABRI 3D DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Putra, Fredi Ganda; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (294.698 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from the learning style of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TGT type by using Cabri 3D, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, and the direct learning model. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. Its population was all of the students in grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Metro City in academic year 2013/2014. The size of the sample was 278 students consisted of 90 in experimental class 1, 95 in experimental class 2, and 93 in control class. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test on the learning material of polyhedron and questionnaire of learning style. The data was analyzed by using two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of the TGT type by using Cabri 3D resulted in a better learning achievement than the cooperative learning model of the TGT type and the direct learning model, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type resulted in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. (2) The students with the visual learning style had the same learning achievement as those with the kinesthetic learning style, and both of the group had a better learning achievement than those with the auditory learning style. (3) In each category of the learning style, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type by using Cabri 3D resulted in a better learning achievement than the cooperative learning model of the TGT type and the direct learning model, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type resulted in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. (4) In each of the learning models, the students with the visual learning style had the same learning achievement as those with the kinesthetic learning style, and both of the group had a better learning achievement than those with the auditory learning style.Keywords: TGT , Cabri 3D, Learning Style.
STRATEGI GURU DALAM MEMBELAJARKAN MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI LINGKARAN KEPADA ANAK TUNAGRAHITA (Studi Kasus pada Siswa Kelas VIII SLB Muhammadiyah Cepu) Utami, Anita Dewi; Sujadi, Imam; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (196.504 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study was to describe teacher?s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle to intellectual disability students in SLB Muhammadiyah Cepu. The subject of this  study was classroom mathematics teacher and all students of eighth grade of SLB Muhammadiyah Cepu. The data of this study was teacher?s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle taken from the result of recording transcription of teaching and learning process through two observations. The data validity technique used in this study was member check, a process of data checking taken by the researcher from the subject of the study to examine the possibilities of different assumptions. The result reveal that in opening activity (pre-activity) and closing activity (post-activity), teacher implemented movement and rhythm strategy by asking the students to sing circle song. While in the main activity, teacher?s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle was dealing with conceptual knowledge by implementing  Bruner?s learning theory at enactive stage, it is by introducing the concept of the form of circle with some learning media to students. Then, the teacher?s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle which deals with procedural knowledge was by implementating guided discovery model, it is by guiding the students to do activity to count the circle?s  circumference by using thread. But, because of the limitation of the mentally handicapped students? intellectuality, the guided discovery model which was implemented by the teacher was firstly by giving some examples to the students, then asking the students to practice to find the circle?s circumference from the length of the thread by the students themselves.Keywords: teacher?s strategy, conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, mathematics teaching learning, student with intellectual disability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN JIGSAW II PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Ahmad, Ahmad; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (342.727 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning model of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw II learning model, and the direct learning model results in a better learning achievement, (2) which students among the students with the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities have a better learning achievement, (3) in each of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw II learning model, and the direct learning which students among the students with the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities have a better learning achievement, and (4) in each of the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities  which learning model of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw II learning model, and the direct learning model results in a better learning achievement. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of . Its population was all of the students of State Junior Secondary Schools of Karanganyar regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consisted of 285 students, and they were divided into three classes, namely: 96 in Experimental Class I, 95 in Experimental Class II, and 94 in Control Class.  The data of the research were gathered through test of spatial ability and test of learning achievement in Mathematics. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the GI type results in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model, but results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the Jigsaw II learning model, and the Jigsaw II learning model results in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. 2). The students with the high spatial ability and those with the moderate spatial ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low spatial ability, but the students with the high spatial ability have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate spatial ability. (3) in each of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw II learning model, and the direct learning, students with the high spatial ability have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate spatial ability, and both the students with the high spatial ability and those with the moderate spatial ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low spatial ability. 4) in each of the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities,  the Cooperative learning model of the GI type and the Jigsaw II learning model result in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model, but the cooperative learning model of the GI type results in the same good learning achievement as the Jigsaw II learning model.Keywords: Group Investigation (GI), Jigsaw II, learning achievement, and spatial ability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NESTED DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII MTs PONOROGO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Rivia J, Hefin Dwi; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (261.041 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to know: (1) which one gave students a better learning achievement, Nested learning model and Think Pair Share with Contextual, or Direct Instruction, (2) which one has better learning achievement in mathematics, students who have the level of low anxiety, medium one, or high one. (3) which level of anxiety in learning mathematics gave better learning achievements using Nested learning model and Think Pair Share with Contextual approach, or Direct Instruction, (4) which learning model (Nested and Think Pair Share with Contextual approach, or Direct Instruction) gave better learning achievement in mathematics toward students with high, medium or low anxiety. It was a quasi-experimental study using two independent variables (model of learning and the anxiety of learning mathematics) and one dependent variable (learning achievement of mathematics). The instruments used to collect the data were documentation, testing, and questionnaires. Two-way ANOVA with unequal cell was used to analyze the data. The sample-taking was done using Stratified Cluster Random Sampling. The results of the research were: (1) the learning achievement in Nested learning model is better than learning achievement in Think Pair Share learning model and Direct Instruction, the learning achievement in Think Pair Share learning model is better than Direct Instruction one, (2) students with low anxiety have better learning achievement in mathematics than students with medium and high anxiety, and the ones having medium anxiety have better learning achievement in mathematics than the ones with high anxiety, (3) in Nested, Think Pair Share, and Direct Instruction learning model, the learning achievement in mathematics toward low anxiety students is better than medium and high anxiety students and medium anxiety students learning is better than high anxiety, and (4) in low, medium, and high anxiety students, the learning achievement in Nested learning model is better than Think Pair Share model and Direct Instruction, Think Pair Share model is better than Direct Instruction one.Keywords: Nested, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, Anxiety. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN PROBLEM POSING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWAKELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Rini, Juwita; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (314.494 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the reasoning ability of the students. The learning models compared were the problem based learning model, the problem posing learning model, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Banyumas regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were the students of State Junior Secondary School 4 of Purwokerto, State Junior Secondary School 2 of Sokaraja, and State Junior Secondary School 2 of Baturraden. They were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in Mathematics and test of reasoning abilities. The data were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The problem-based learning model results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the problem posing learning model but results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model, and the problem posing learning model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high reasoning ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate and low reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate reasoning ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low reasoning ability.      3) In the students with the high reasoning ability, the problem-based learning results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the problem posing model but results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model, and the problem posing model results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the direct learning model. In the students with the moderate and low reasoning abilities, the problem-based learning, the problem posing learning model, and the direct learning model result in the same learning achievement in Mathematics. 4) In the problem-based learning, the students with the high reasoning ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate an low reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate reasoning ability have the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the low reasoning ability. In the problem posing learning model, the students with the high reasoning ability have the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate reasoning ability, but the students both with the high and moderate reasoning abilities have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low reasoning ability. In the direct learning model, the students with the high, moderate, and low reasoning abilities have the same learning achievement in Mathematics.Key words: Problem Based Learning, Problem Posing, and Reasoning ability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA PROBLEM POSING DENGAN TEKNIK LEARNING CELL PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA PADA SISWA SMP KELAS VIII DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Supriyanti, Supriyanti; Budiyono, Budiyono; Iswahyudi, Gatut
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (283.458 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research was aimed at searching and finding: 1) the most effective mathematics learning model among three models, including problem posing model with learning cell technique, problem posing model without learning cell technique, and direct learning model, 2) more effective student?s cognitive style of field independent and field dependent, 3) more effective student?s cognitive style of field independent and field dependent on each model, and 4) the most effective mathematical learning model among three models, including problem posing model with learning cell technique, problem posing model without learning cell technique, and direct learning model on each student?s cognitive style. This type of the research was a quasy-experimental research. The population was all students of grade VIII of state junior high school in Sukoharjo regency in 2013/2014. The size of the samples was 302 students consisted of 102 students in the first experimental group, 101 students in the second experimental group, and 99 students in control group. The data instruments used were documents of student?s early achievement, cognitive style questionnaire, and mathematics achievement test. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Problem posing mathematics learning model with learning cell technique is more effective than problem posing model without learning cell technique; problem posing mathematics learning model with learning cell technique is more effective than direct learning model; and problem posing learning model without learning cell technique is more effective than direct learning model, (2) Students having field independent cognitive style have greater achievement than those having field dependent cognitive style, (3) Dealing with problem posing model with learning cell technique, students having field independent cognitive style and field dependent cognitive style have the same achievement; dealing with problem posing learning model without learning cell technique, students having field independent cognitive style have greater achievement than those having field dependent cognitive style; and dealing with direct learning model, students having field independent cognitive style have greater achievement than those having field dependent cognitive style, and (4) To students having field independent cognitive style, problem posing model with learning cell technique, problem posing model without learning cell technique, and direct learning model give the same student?s achievement; to students having field dependent cognitive style, problem posing model with learning cell technique gives higher student?s achievement than problem posing model without learning cell technique and direct learning model, and problem posing  model without learning cell technique gives higher student?s achievement than direct learning model.Key Words: problem posing, learning cell, cognitive style, achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) BERBANTUAN WINPLOT DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) PADA MATERI APLIKASI TURUNAN FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA Wawan, Wawan; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Iswahyudi, Gatut
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (394.001 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the reasoning abilities of the students. The models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Winplot-assisted STAD, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, and the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 × 3. Its population was all of the students in grade XI of Senior Secondary Schools of Purworejo in academic year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 235 students consisted of 80 students in the first experimental class, 77 students in the second experimental class and 78 students in the control class. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in mathematics and test of mathematical reasoning ability. The data was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of the Winplot-assisted STAD type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of the TAI type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (2) The students with the high mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the moderate and low mathematical reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the low mathematical reasoning ability. (3) In each mathematical reasoning ability category, the cooperative learning model of the Winplot-assisted STAD type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of the TAI type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (4) In each learning model, the students with the high mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the moderate and low mathematical reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the low mathematical reasoning ability.Keywords: STAD, Winplot, TAI, direct learning, mathematical reasoning, and learning achievement in mathematics.   
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING (RT) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMA/MA NEGERIDI KABUPATEN KETAPANG PROVINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT Haryadi, Rahman; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (326.21 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this study were to investigate:  (1) which learning model produces students? better mathematics learning achievement, Reciprocal Teaching (RT), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), or conventional learning model; (2) which students? have better mathematics learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low learning creativity; (3) viewed from learning models, which students? have better mathematich learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low learning cretivity; (4) viewed from their creativity level, which learning model produces better mathematich learning achievement RT, PBL, or conventional model. This study was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial designs. The population was the students of XI class, State SMA/MA in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan Province in year academic 2013/2014. The samples were taken through stratified cluster random sampling technique. The entire samples were 312 students comprising 101 students for the first experimental group, 108 students for the second experimental group and 103 students for control group. The data were collected through the mathematical achievement tests and the learning creativity questionnaires. The hypothesis testing employed  unbalanced two ways of ANOVA. The results of the study are as follows. (1)  RT produced students? better mathematics learning achievement than PBL and conventional models; PBL produced the same mathematical achievement as conventional model. (2) The students with high learning creativity had better mathematics learning achievement than those with medium and low learning creativity; the students with medium creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity. (3) Treated with RT, the students with high creativity learning  had better mathematics learning achievement than those with medium and low creativity; the students with medium creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity; treated with PBL, the students with high, medium, and low learning creativity had the same achievement; treated with conventional model, students with  high  creativity  had the same achievement as those with medium; the students with high creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity; the students with medium creativity had the same achievement as those with low creativity; (4) Viewed from their high learning creativity, students treated with RT had better mathematics learning achievement than those treated with PBL and conventional  model; those treated with PBL had the same achievement as those treated with conventional model. Viewed from their medium learning creativity, students treated with RT had better mathematics learning achievement than those treated with PBL and conventional model; those treated with PBL had the same achievement as those treated with conventional model. Viewed from their low learning creativity, students treated with RT, PBL and conventional had the same  mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: RT, PBL, learning creativity, the mathematical achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MATEMATIS LOGIS SISWA Susandi, Ardi Dwi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (274.303 KB)

Abstract

Abstyact:The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the mathematical logical quotient of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type, the Cooperative Learning Model of the GI type, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research.  Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Cirebon regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 364 students. They were grouped into three classes, namely: 123 in Experimental Class 1, 117 in Experimental Class 2, and 124 in Control Class. The instruments to gather the data were test of achievement in Mathematics on the learning material of Quadrangle, and test of mathematical logical quotient. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the TSTS type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the GI type and the direct learning model, the cooperative learning model of the GI type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high mathematical logical quotient have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate mathematical logical quotient and those with the low mathematical logical quotient, the students with the moderate mathematical logical quotient have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low mathematical logical quotient. 3) There was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the mathematical logical quotient on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students.Keywords:TSTS, GI, and mathematical logical quotient.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Pratiwi, Fitri Apriyani; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (290.95 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning model toward learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the spatial ability. The learning models of this research were cooperative learning model of the TAI type with AfL, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Karanganyar. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consisted of 284 students. The instruments used to gather the data were test of learning achievement in Mathematics and test of spatial ability. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) the students instructed TAI with AfL had a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed TAI and those instructed with the direct learning model. Furthermore, the students instructed with TAI had the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the direct learning model. 2) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high spatial ability was better than that of the students with the moderate spatial ability and that of the students with the low spatial ability. In addition, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the moderate spatial ability was better than that of the students with the low spatial ability. 3) In each learning model of the TAI with AfL, TAI, and the direct learning model, the students with the high spatial ability had a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate spatial ability and those with the low spatial ability. Moreover, the students with the moderate spatial ability had a better learning achievement in Mathematicsthan those with the low spatial ability. 4) In each of the students with the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities, TAI with AfL results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than TAI and the direct learning model. Furthermore, TAI results in the same learning achievement in Mathematics as the direct learning model.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and spatial ability                

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2014 2014


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue