cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 369 Documents
 33   34   35   36   37 
EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY DENGAN TUTOR SEBAYA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI BANGUN DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK PESERTA DIDIK KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KEBUMEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Miftachudin, Miftachudin; Budiyono, Budiyono; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (242.268 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement of quadrangle viewed from the multiple inellegences of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning models of the TSTS type with peer tutor, the cooperative learning models of the TSTS type, and the direct learning models. The kind of research is quasi-experimental research with factorial design 3x3. Population of this research is all students of State Junior High Schools in Kebumen. The sample of this research is 288 students which is 95 students in Experiment I class, 96 students in Experiment II class, and 97 students in controlled class. The hypothesis test uses two ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The result of the research shows that: (1) TSTS learning model by peer tutor shows the higher achievement of students than cooperative learning model of TSTS. The cooperative learning model of TSTS results as good as the direct learning model, and TSTS learning model by peer tutor results higher achievement than the direct learning one, (2) students with logic-mathematic linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence have the same achievement among them, (3) at TSTS learning model by peer tutor, TSTS learning model, and direct learning model, students with logic-mathematic, linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence have the same result, (4) at students with logic-mathematic, linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence, TSTS learning model by peer tutor results higher achievement than TSTS cooperative learning model; TSTS cooperative learning model results as good as the result of direct learning model; and TSTS learning model by peer tutor results higher achievement than the direct learning model.Keywords: TSTS learning model by peer tutor, Two Stay Two Stray, achievement, intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS (TGT) DENGAN METODE DISCOVERY PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN ROKAN HULU TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Nurrahmawati, Nurrahmawati; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (330.564 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose  of this study are to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the spatial intelligence of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TGT type with discovery method, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, and the direct instruction  model. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The study population was all grade VIII students of Junior High School in Rokan Hulu Regency. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and spatial intelligence test. Based on the hypothesis, the results could be concluded as follows.  (1) Students who were treated with the Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) cooperative learning model with discovery method had better learning achievement than students treated by TGT models and direct instruction model. In addition, students who were treated with the TGT model gave the same achievement with students treated by direct instruction model. (2) Students with high spatial intelligence had better learning achievement than the students with middle and low spatial intelligence. In addition, students who had middle spatial intelligence have better learning achievement than students who had low spatial intelligence. (3) In the spatial intelligence category of high, middle and low, the students? learning achievement treated Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) cooperative learning model with discovery method was better than the students treated by TGT and direct instruction models. In addition, students treated by TGT model gave the same learning achievement with students treated by direct instruction model. (4) In the Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) cooperative learning model with discovery method, TGT model and direct instruction model, the students who had high spatial intelligence had better learning achievement than middle and low spatial intelligence. In addition, the students who had middle spatial intelligence had better learning achievement than students who had low spatial intelligence.Keywords: Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Disccovery  Method,  Spatial Intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) BERBANTUAN WINPLOT DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) PADA MATERI APLIKASI TURUNAN FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA Wawan, Wawan; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Iswahyudi, Gatut
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (394.001 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the reasoning abilities of the students. The models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Winplot-assisted STAD, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, and the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 × 3. Its population was all of the students in grade XI of Senior Secondary Schools of Purworejo in academic year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 235 students consisted of 80 students in the first experimental class, 77 students in the second experimental class and 78 students in the control class. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in mathematics and test of mathematical reasoning ability. The data was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of the Winplot-assisted STAD type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of the TAI type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (2) The students with the high mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the moderate and low mathematical reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the low mathematical reasoning ability. (3) In each mathematical reasoning ability category, the cooperative learning model of the Winplot-assisted STAD type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of the TAI type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (4) In each learning model, the students with the high mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the moderate and low mathematical reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the low mathematical reasoning ability.Keywords: STAD, Winplot, TAI, direct learning, mathematical reasoning, and learning achievement in mathematics.   
PROFIL PROSES BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 3 SURAKARTA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH POKOK BAHASAN SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL (SPLDV) DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK DAN GENDER Ambarawati, Mika; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (335.101 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to describe the profile of critical thinking process of the students in grade VIII of State Junior Secondary School 3 of Surakarta in solving the problems on linear equation of two variables (LETV) viewed from the multiple intelligence and gender. This research used the descriptive research method with the qualitative explorative approach. The subjects of the research were taken by using the purposive sampling technique. The subjects of the research were four students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary School 3 of Surakarta, one male student and female student with linguistic intelligence, and one male student and one female student with mathematical-logical intelligence. The instruments used to gather the data of the research were multiple intelligence questionnaire, worksheet for mathematical problem-solving, and interview guidelines. The data were collected through questionnaire and task-based interview on the learning material of LETV. They were validated by using the time triangulation and the reference fulfillment. The data were analyzed using a Miles and Huberman?s concept, that was data reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The male  and female students with linguistic intelligence had a good ability to capture information and may communicate it effectively both written and orally. The critical thinking can be realized through four phases. However,  the male in the recognition phase, they encounters a difficulty i.e. the question they mentions is less complete.  In addition, in thinking about alternatives, they are only able to mention one problem-solving alternative, namely: mixed alternative. 2) The male and female students with mathematical-logical intelligence are able to think logically. They are able to do categorization, classification, conclusion drawing over a problem. The  critical thinking can be realized through four phases. However, in the recognition phase, they encounters a difficulty i.e. the question they mentions is less complete.  In addition, in thinking about alternatives, they are only able to mention two problem-solving alternatives, namely: mixed alternative and substitution alternative.Keywords: profile of the process of critical thinking, problem solving, multiple intelligence, and gender.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING (RT) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMA/MA NEGERIDI KABUPATEN KETAPANG PROVINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT Haryadi, Rahman; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (326.21 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this study were to investigate:  (1) which learning model produces students? better mathematics learning achievement, Reciprocal Teaching (RT), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), or conventional learning model; (2) which students? have better mathematics learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low learning creativity; (3) viewed from learning models, which students? have better mathematich learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low learning cretivity; (4) viewed from their creativity level, which learning model produces better mathematich learning achievement RT, PBL, or conventional model. This study was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial designs. The population was the students of XI class, State SMA/MA in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan Province in year academic 2013/2014. The samples were taken through stratified cluster random sampling technique. The entire samples were 312 students comprising 101 students for the first experimental group, 108 students for the second experimental group and 103 students for control group. The data were collected through the mathematical achievement tests and the learning creativity questionnaires. The hypothesis testing employed  unbalanced two ways of ANOVA. The results of the study are as follows. (1)  RT produced students? better mathematics learning achievement than PBL and conventional models; PBL produced the same mathematical achievement as conventional model. (2) The students with high learning creativity had better mathematics learning achievement than those with medium and low learning creativity; the students with medium creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity. (3) Treated with RT, the students with high creativity learning  had better mathematics learning achievement than those with medium and low creativity; the students with medium creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity; treated with PBL, the students with high, medium, and low learning creativity had the same achievement; treated with conventional model, students with  high  creativity  had the same achievement as those with medium; the students with high creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity; the students with medium creativity had the same achievement as those with low creativity; (4) Viewed from their high learning creativity, students treated with RT had better mathematics learning achievement than those treated with PBL and conventional  model; those treated with PBL had the same achievement as those treated with conventional model. Viewed from their medium learning creativity, students treated with RT had better mathematics learning achievement than those treated with PBL and conventional model; those treated with PBL had the same achievement as those treated with conventional model. Viewed from their low learning creativity, students treated with RT, PBL and conventional had the same  mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: RT, PBL, learning creativity, the mathematical achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MATEMATIS LOGIS SISWA Susandi, Ardi Dwi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (274.303 KB)

Abstract

Abstyact:The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the mathematical logical quotient of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type, the Cooperative Learning Model of the GI type, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research.  Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Cirebon regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 364 students. They were grouped into three classes, namely: 123 in Experimental Class 1, 117 in Experimental Class 2, and 124 in Control Class. The instruments to gather the data were test of achievement in Mathematics on the learning material of Quadrangle, and test of mathematical logical quotient. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the TSTS type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the GI type and the direct learning model, the cooperative learning model of the GI type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high mathematical logical quotient have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate mathematical logical quotient and those with the low mathematical logical quotient, the students with the moderate mathematical logical quotient have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low mathematical logical quotient. 3) There was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the mathematical logical quotient on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students.Keywords:TSTS, GI, and mathematical logical quotient.
ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PERSAMAAN KUADRAT BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI SOLOPADA KELAS X SMA NEGERI 1 PLUS DI KABUPATEN NABIRE – PAPUA Manibuy, Ronald; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (359.8 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to describe the position of errors, kind of errors and factor that caused students? errors in answering quadratic equation questions based on SOLO taxonomy on the X grade students of SMA with high, moderate and low mathematics ability. This research was a descriptive qualitative. This research was carried out on the X grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Plus Nabire ? Papua. The written data were taken from the result of mathematics ability test and first problem solving test (M1: linear/quadratic pattern) and the second problem (M2: functional concept), the oral forms data were taken from the result of interview which were conducted to the subject of the research to get valid data 1 and valid data 2. Afterwards, the valid data were analyzed to find out the constant level of consistency achievement of SOLO level, in order to meet reliable data from the chosen research subjects 2 students with high mathematics ability, 3 students with moderate mathematics ability and 2 students with low mathematics ability. The valid and reliable data were used to analyze students? errors based on SOLO taxonomy. The result of the research showed that: (a) the students with high mathematics ability were reached unistructural?relational level, (b) the students with moderate mathematics ability were reached unistructural?multistructural level, (c) the students with low mathematics ability were almost reached unistructural level. Errors made by the research subjects: (1) all of students conducted the same errors in answering the mathematics model of the quadratic equation questions, they did not provide the answer correctly and they did not understand the concept of the questions properly, (2) kinds of errors including: (a) misconception, not comprehending about quadratic concept, this error existed in all mathematics ability levels. Whereas errors on the concept of variable, which is used to form the mathematics quadratic equation, was conducted by moderate and low level subject; (b) error on the principle, the application of the mathematics rules and formulas incorrectly in answering the quadratic equation questions, was conducted by high, moderate and low levels; (c) operational error was often conducted by low, moderate and high deals with the operational of algebra, especially on the calculation of negative integer operation, (3) the factors that caused errors for the research subjects of high, moderate and low levels were low comprehension on mathematics? concept, principle and operation.  Keywords: errors analysis, quadratic equation, SOLO taxonomy
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Pratiwi, Fitri Apriyani; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (290.95 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning model toward learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the spatial ability. The learning models of this research were cooperative learning model of the TAI type with AfL, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Karanganyar. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consisted of 284 students. The instruments used to gather the data were test of learning achievement in Mathematics and test of spatial ability. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) the students instructed TAI with AfL had a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed TAI and those instructed with the direct learning model. Furthermore, the students instructed with TAI had the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the direct learning model. 2) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high spatial ability was better than that of the students with the moderate spatial ability and that of the students with the low spatial ability. In addition, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the moderate spatial ability was better than that of the students with the low spatial ability. 3) In each learning model of the TAI with AfL, TAI, and the direct learning model, the students with the high spatial ability had a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate spatial ability and those with the low spatial ability. Moreover, the students with the moderate spatial ability had a better learning achievement in Mathematicsthan those with the low spatial ability. 4) In each of the students with the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities, TAI with AfL results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than TAI and the direct learning model. Furthermore, TAI results in the same learning achievement in Mathematics as the direct learning model.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and spatial ability                
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK PESERTA DIDIK Widyawati, Santi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Iswahyudi, Gatut
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (205.679 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning model of the TSTS model, the NHT model, and the direct learning model resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics; (2) which students of the students with mathematical-logical, interpersonal, and linguistic intelligence had a better learning achievement in mathematics; (3) in each category of the multiple intelligences, which learning model of the TSTS model, the NHT model, and the direct learning model resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics; and (4) in each learning model, which students of the students with mathematical-logical, interpersonal and linguistic intelligence had a better learning achievement in mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of Junior Secondary Schools of Metro City. The size of the samples was 269 students. They were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in mathematics and questionnaire of multiple intelligences. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) The TSTS model resulted in a better learning achievement than the NHT model and direct model, and the NHT model resulted in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. 2) The students with mathematical-logical intelligence had a better learning achievement than those with interpersonal and linguistic intelligences, and the students with interpersonal intelligence had a better learning achievement than those with linguistic intelligence. 3) In the students with mathematical-logical intelligence, the TSTS model resulted in a better learning achievement than the cooperative learning model of the NHT model, the TSTS model and the NHT model resulted in the same learning achievement as the direct learning model. In the students with interpersonal intelligence, the TSTS model resulted in the same learning achievement as the NHT and direct learning models, and the NHT model resulted in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. In the students with linguistic intelligence, the TSTS and the NHT model sresulted in the same learning achievement as the direct learning model. 4) In the TSTS model, the students with mathematical-logical intelligence had the same learning achievement as those with interpersonal intelligence but had a better learning achievement than those with linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence had the same learning achievement those with linguistic intelligence. In the NHT model, the students with mathematical-logical, interpersonal, and linguistic intelligences had the same learning achievement. In the direct learning model, the students with mathematical-logical intelligence had a better learning achievement than those with interpersonal and linguistic intelligences, and the students with interpersonal intelligence had the same learning achievement as those with linguistic intelligence. Keywords: TSTS, NHT, multiple intelligences.

Page 37 of 37 | Total Record : 369

 33   34   35   36   37 

Filter by Year

2013 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue