cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 369 Documents
 33   34   35   36   37 
ANALISIS PROSES BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA NON RUTIN DI KELAS VIII SMP ISLAMIC INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL PESANTREN SABILIL MUTTAQIEN (IIS PSM) MAGETAN DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN AWAL Alfa Lutfiananda, Immas Metika; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (222.739 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed at describing reflective thinking process of eight graders of SMP Islamic International School Pesantren Sabilil Muttaqien (IIS PSM) Magetan viewed from high, moderate, and low initial abilities of Mathematics in solving non routine mathematical problems. Initial abilities of Mathematics influenced problem solving skill of students. Problem solving skill should be developed not only to obtain the solution but also to make students think for explaining the reasons in every problem solving steps. Therefore, one way to develop that skill was by reflective thinking process. This study was qualitative descriptive research. Subjects of this study were eight students from VIII grade of SMP IIS PSM Magetan and represented each mathematics ability categories. Those subjects were determined by purposive sampling. For collecting data, this study used task-based and in-depth interview methods, then time triangulation was used to validate the collected data. Meanwhile, data analysis in this study was qualitative descriptive including data reduction, data display, and verification. The results of this study showed that students with high initial ability in Mathematics had reflective thinking process in four steps of problem solving (Polya), as follows: (a) understanding problem, retelling the problems, and identifying the information, (b) devising strategy, relating the given information and believing that it will find solution, (c) conducting strategy, explaining how to solve the problem based on plan clearly and reasonably, realizing some mistakes and revising it, and believing that those solution are the correct one, and (d) looking back, checking all problem solving steps and the solution based on the constraints or the given information, revising some parts, and giving alternative strategy or solution. In the other hand, students with moderate inital ability in Mathematics had reflective thinking process in three steps of problem solving, as follows: (a) understanding problem, retelling the problems, identify the information, (b) devising strategy, relating the given information for devising a plan by clear consideration, (c) conducting strategy, explaining how to solve the problem based on plan, realizing some mistakes and revising it, and believing that those solution are the correct one. Meanwhile, students with low initial ability in Mathematics only had reflective thinking process in understanding problem, that retelling the problems and identifying the given and asked information of the problems.Key words: reflective thinking, problem solving, non routine problems, inital ability in Mathematics
ANALISIS TINGKAT KEMAMPUAN BERFIKIR KREATIF PESERTA DIDIK DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR KELAS X MATEMATIKA ILMU ALAM (MIA) 4 SMA NEGERI 2 SRAGEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Iswanti, Partia; Riyadi, Riyadi; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (310.91 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to analyze the level of creative thinking abilities of students with  visual, auditorial and kinesthetic learning styles types in solving geometry problems. The level creative thinking abilities compared were the level 4 (very creative), the level 3 (creative), the level 2 (enough creative), the level 1 (less creative), the level 0 (not creative). This research was a qualitative research. The subject of this research was 6 students from the grade X MIA 4 of National High School 2 Sragen in Academic Year 2014/2015. The Subject of this research was selected used purposive sampling technique. Data collection was done by interview based task, the subject were asked to express verbally and write the answer what the subject thinks. The main instrument in this research was the researcher themselves, assisted by three instruments form of geometry problem solving test, interview guide and questionnaire learning styles. The validity of data used time triangulation. The results of this research were as follows. (1) The students with visual learning styles types was in creative thinking abilities on the level 3 (creative) and level 4 (very creative). The students with visual learning styles types was able to show creative thinking abilities on aspect of fluency, flexibility and novelty. (2) The students with auditorial learning styles types was creative thinking abilities on the level 3 (creative). The students with auditorial learning styles types was able to show creative thinking abilities on aspect of fluency and flexibility. (3) The students with kinesthetic learning styles types was creative thinking abilities on the level 2 (enough creative) and level 1 (less creative). The students with kinesthetic learning styles types was able to show creative thinking abilities on aspect of flexibility and fluency.Keywords: Level of Creative Thinking Abilities, Geometry Problem Solving, Learning Styles. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA Wicaksana, Hafid; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (497.411 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of thelearning models give a better achievement between PBL, DL, or classical with scientific approach, (2) which one has a better achievement between the student categorization, climbers, campers, or quitters, (3) at adversity quotient categorization, which one of the learning models give a better achievement between PBL, DL, or classical with scientific approach, and 4) at each the learning models, which one of the adversity quotient have a better achievement between student categorization, climbers, campers, or quitters. This was a quasi-experimental study. The research population were the seventh-grade students of all state junior high schools in Sukoharjo Regency in the academic year of 2014/2015. The data were analyzed through hypothesis testing using two-way ANOVA with unequal cells.Based on the analysis, the following conclusions are drawn. 1) The PBL model generates better learning outcomes than the DL model and the classical learning model using scientific approaches. The DL model generates better learning outcomes than the classical learning model using scientific approaches. 2) The students in the climber category have better learning outcomes than those in the camper category and the ones in the quitter category. The students in the camper category have better learning outcomes than those in the quitter category. 3) In the climber category, the students taught using the scientific PBL model have better learning outcomes in mathematics than those taught either using the scientific DL model or the classical learning model with scientific approaches. In the camper category, the students taught using the scientific PBL model have equal learning outcomes in mathematics to those taught using the scientific DL model but they have better learning outcomes than the students of the same category taught using the classical learning model with scientific approaches. 4) In relation to the PBL model using scientific approaches, the learning outcomes of the students in the climber category are better than those in the categories of campers and quitters. The students in the camper category have equal learning outcomes to those in the quitter category. In relation to the DL model using scientific approaches, the learning outcomes of the students in the climber category are equal to those in the camper category and better than those in the quitter categories.Keywords: Problem-Based Learning, Discovery Learning, Classical, Scientific Approaches, Adversity Quotient, Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) BERBASIS ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AFL) MELALUI PENILAIAN SEJAWAT PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KEPERCAYAAN DIRI SISWA TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII Anggreini, Dewi; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (251.611 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to find out in each category self confidence (high, medium, and low) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, GI AfL with a peer assessment, GI, or direct learning  model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design 3x3. Population of this research was all VIII graders of Junior High School of Surakarta Regency in the school year of 2015/2016. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The proposed hypothesis of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cell. The result of the research could be concluded as follows: in high and medium self confidence, GI based AfL with a peer assessment, GI, and direct learning model gave the same learning achievement; in low self confidence, GI based AfL with a peer assessment gave the same achievement as GI learning model, GI based AfL with a peer assessment and GI learning model gave better achievement than direct learning model; in GI based AfL with a peer assessment and GI, students with high, medium, and low self confidence had the same achievement; in direct learning model, students with high and medium self confidence had the same achievement, students with high and medium self confidence had better achievement than low self confidence.Keywords: GI Based AfL with a Peer Assessment, GI, Direct Learning, and Self Confidence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN THREE STEPS INTERVIEW (TSI) PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS Riyanto, Nandyar Fisthi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (515.907 KB)

Abstract

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the learning models TAI, TSI, and direct learning model on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the students logical mathematical intelligence. The type of this study was quasi experimental study with 3x3 factorial design. The population were the eighth-grade students of junior high schools in Boyolali Regency in the academic year of 2015/2016. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence test. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANAVA with unequal cell. Based on the hipothesis test, they were concluded that: (1) The mathematics learning achievement of TAI was better than TSI and direct learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of TSI was better than direct learning model. (2) The mathematics learning achievement of students with high logical mathematical intelligence were better than average and low logical mathematical intelligences. Students with average logical mathematical intelligence were better than low logical mathematical intelligences. (3) Students with high logical mathematical intelligence who were treated by TAI, TSI, and direct learning models had same mathematics learning  achievement; students with average logical mathematical intelligence who were treated by TAI was same of TSI and was better than direct learning model, TSI was better than direct learning model; students with low logical mathematical intelligence who were treated by TAI had better mathematics learning achievement than TSI and direct learning model, TSI students were better than direct learning model model. (4) In TAI learning model, the mathematics learning  achievement of high logical mathematical intelligence were better than the average and lower logical mathematical intelligence, the mathematics learning achievementof average has equal with low logical mathematical intelligence; in TSI learning model, students with high logical mathematical intelligence has equal of average logical mathematical intelligence, the mathematics learning achievements of high and average logical mathematical intelligence were better than the low logical mathematical intelligence; in direct learning model, students with high logical mathematical intelligence has better mathematics learning achievement than high and average of logical mathematical intelligence,  students with average logical mathematical intelligence has better mathematics learning achievement than low of logical mathematical intelligence.Keywords:Team Assisted Individualization, Three Steps Interview, Direct Learning Model, Logical Mathematical Intelligence, Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) BERBANTU MEDIA AUDIO-VISUAL DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT Wicaksono, Setiawan; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (336.811 KB)

Abstract

Abstract. The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the mathematical communication of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TGT type with audio-visual media, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, and the direct learning model. This research  was the quasi experimental. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Pati regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. The taken samples used technique stratified cluster random samples consisted of 283 students, consisted 3 class, namely 97 students in Experimental Class I, 94 students in Experimental Class II, and 92 students in Control Class. The instruments to gather the data were test of achievement in Mathematics on the learning material of Quadrangle, and test of mathematical communication. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: 1) The TGT type with audio-visual media results in a better learning achievement than the TGT type and the direct learning model, and the TGT provided a better learning achievement of direct learning model, 2) The students with the high mathematical communication was a better learning achievement than those with the moderate and low mathematical communication, while the students with moderate mathematical communication was the same learning achievement as those with the low mathematical communication, 3) a) In the students with the high mathematical communication, the TGT type with audio-visual media results in the same learning achievement as the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, the TGT type with audio-visual media or the TGT type results in a better learning achievement than  the  direct  learning  model,  3) b) the category of moderate and low mathematical communication, the TGT type with audio-visual media provided equal learning performance both with models the TGT type and direct learning model, 4) a) In the TGT type with audio-visual media, students who was a high mathematical communication was the same learning achievement as those with the moderate mathematical communication, the students with the moderate mathematical communication was the same learning achievement as those with the low mathematical communication, and students who with the high mathematical communication was a better learning achievement than those with the low mathematical communication, 4) b) In the TGT type, students with the high mathematical communication was a better learning achievement than those with the moderate or low mathematical communication, and students with the moderate mathematical communication was the same learning achievement as those with the low mathematical communication, 4) c) In the direct learning model, students with the high mathematical communication was the same learning achievement as those with the moderate or low mathematical communication.Keywords: TGT, audio-visual media, and mathematical communication
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATKA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK PADA POKOK BAHASAN DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN SPASIAL SISWA Tardi, Tardi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Iswahyudi, Gatut
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (362.183 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research was aimed at searching and finding: 1) the most effective mathematics learning model among TPS learning model with PMR, TPS learning model, and direct learning model, 2) the level of student?s spatial intelligence having the highest achievement among students with high, average, and low spatial intelligence, 3) the most effective learning model among TPS learning model with PMR, TPS learning model, and direct learning model towards student?s achievement on each level of spatial intelligence, and 4) the level of students having the highest achievement in every learning model. This was a quasy-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was students of grade X of state senior high school in Surakarta in 2013/2014. Stratified random sampling and cluster random sampling techniques were applied. The samples in this research were: 1) experiment group 1, consisting of 91 students; 2) experiment group 2, consisting of 90 students; 3) control group, consisting of 99. The data collecting instruments were student?s spatial intelligence test and achievement test in the form of multiple choices. Balance test with unbalanced one-way anova test, analysis prerequisite tests (normality test with Liliefors test and homogenity test with Bartlett test) and hipothesis test (unbalanced  two-way anova test) were conducted. It can be concluded that: 1) TPS model with PMR is more effective towards student?s achievement than TPS model and direct model, and TPS model is as effective as direct model towards student?s achievement; 2) students with high spatial intelligence gain higher achievement than those with average and low spatial intelligence, and students with average spatial intelligence gain higher achievement than those with low spatial intelligence; 3) to students with high and average spatial intelligence, TPS model with PMR, TPS model and direct model give the same achievement. For students with  low spatial intelligence, TPS model with PMR and TPS model give the same achievement, but TPS model with PMR gain higher achievement than those with direct model, and TPS model and direct model give the same achievement; and 4) dealing with TPS model with PMR, students with high and average spatial intelligence gain the same of achievement, but students with high spatial intelligence gain higher achievement than those with low spatial intelligence, and students with average and low spatial intelligence gain the same of achievement, while dealing with with TPS model, students with high and average spatial intelligence gain the same of achievement but students with high spatial intelligence gain higher than those with low spatial intelligence, while students with average spatial intelligence gain higher achievement than those with low spatial intelligence, and dealing with direct model, students with high spatial intelligence gain higher achievement than those with average and low spatial intelligence, but students with average and low spatial intelligence gain the same of achievement.Key Words: learning model, TPS, PMR, spatial intelligence 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) BERBANTUAN SOFTWARE CABRI 3D DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Putra, Fredi Ganda; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (294.698 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from the learning style of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TGT type by using Cabri 3D, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, and the direct learning model. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. Its population was all of the students in grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Metro City in academic year 2013/2014. The size of the sample was 278 students consisted of 90 in experimental class 1, 95 in experimental class 2, and 93 in control class. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test on the learning material of polyhedron and questionnaire of learning style. The data was analyzed by using two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of the TGT type by using Cabri 3D resulted in a better learning achievement than the cooperative learning model of the TGT type and the direct learning model, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type resulted in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. (2) The students with the visual learning style had the same learning achievement as those with the kinesthetic learning style, and both of the group had a better learning achievement than those with the auditory learning style. (3) In each category of the learning style, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type by using Cabri 3D resulted in a better learning achievement than the cooperative learning model of the TGT type and the direct learning model, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type resulted in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. (4) In each of the learning models, the students with the visual learning style had the same learning achievement as those with the kinesthetic learning style, and both of the group had a better learning achievement than those with the auditory learning style.Keywords: TGT , Cabri 3D, Learning Style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE BERBASIS ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN PONOROGOTAHUN 2013/2014 Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (310.787 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research was aimed to know in polyhedral concept: (1) which one give better achievement between TPS-AfL, TPS, or Direct Learning, (2) which one have better achievement between high, medium or low creativity students, (3) for each creativity levels, which one give better achievement between TPS-AfL, TPS, or Direct Learning, (4) for each learning model, which one have better achievement between high, medium or low creativity students. This was quasi-experimental research designed by factorial 3x3. The population was 8th grade students of SMPN even semester academic year 2013/2014 in Ponorogo regency. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. Total sample was 255 students, consisted of 79 students as TPS-AfL sampel, 89 students as TPS sampel, and 87 students as Direct Learning sampel. The data were collected by using documentation, questionnaire and test. The data of research were analyzed by using analysis of variance with unequal cells, then continued by using Scheefe? method. According to the data analysis, it can be concluded that in polyhedral concept: (1) students learnt using TPS-AfL and TPS, had better achievement than students learnt using Direct Learning, students learnt using TPS-AfL had better achievement than students learnt using TPS, (2) high creativity students had better achievement than those of medium and low creativity students, however medium and low creativity students had the same achievement, (3) for TPS-AfL and TPS learning, students with high, medium, and low creativity had the same achievement, for Direct Learning, high creativity students had the same achievement as medium creativity students, however medium creativity students had the same achievement as low creativity students, meanwhile high creativity students had better achievement than low creativity students, (4) for high and medium creativity students, TPS-AfL, TPS, and Direct Learning gave the same achievement, meanwhile for low creativity students, TPS-AfL gave better achievement than students TPS and Direct Learning, meanwhile, TPS and Direct Learning gave the same achievement.Keywords: TPS-AfL, TPS, Direct Learning, Creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN GUIDED NOTE TAKING (GNT) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI Se-KABUPATEN KLATEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Susilawati, Dyah; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (378.75 KB)

Abstract

 Abstrac: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from learning activities of the students. The learning models compared were the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) with Guided Note Taking (GNT) learning model, the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model, and conventional learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of state Junior Secondery  School of the Klaten regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. Instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement test and the learning activities questionnaire. The data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways ANOVA. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the  cooperative learning model of TAI and the conventional learning model, whereas cooperative learning model of TAI result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the learning model conventional. 2) The students with the high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as  the moderate learning activities. The students with the high and moderate learning activitiy have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with low learning activities. 3) In the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT and TAI, the students with the high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate activities and the students with high and moderate learning activities have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low learning activities. In the conventional learning model, the students with high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate learning activities, whereas the high and moderate learning activities have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low learning activities. 4) For the students with the high and moderate learning activities, the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the cooperative learning model of TAI and the conventional learning model. The student with the low learning activities, the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the cooperative learning model of TAI, whereas the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT and TAI result a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those the conventional learning model.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Guided Note Taking (GNT), conventional learning, Learning Activities, Learning Mathematics Achievement

Page 35 of 37 | Total Record : 369

 33   34   35   36   37 

Filter by Year

2013 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue