cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian
Published by Kementerian Pertanian
ISSN : 08541078     EISSN : 25410814     DOI : -
Core Subject : Science, Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Library & Information Science
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian diterbitkan oleh Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian dengan frekuensi terbit 2 kali per tahun. Jurnal ini memuat hasil penelitian atau tinjauan/kajian tentang aktivitas pustakawan/perpustakaan dan ilmuwan informasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian menerima tulisan pustakawan dan pemerhati perpustakaan/informasi bidang pertanian. Penerbitan jurnal diharapkan dapat meningkatkan pengetahuan dan wawasan pustakawan dalam bidang keahliannya.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012" : 10 Documents clear
ANALISIS KEPUASAN PENGGUNA LAYANAN REFERENSI MELALUI E-MAIL DI PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS SURABAYA ., Lasi; Setiawan, Eko
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012
Publisher : Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi memberikan peluang kepadapustakawan layanan referensi untuk meningkatkan kinerja layananperpustakaan. Penelitian kepuasaan pengguna layanan referensi telahdilakukan pada bulan Juli-Desember 2010 untuk mengetahui tingkatkepuasan pengguna terhadap layanan referensi melalui e-mail.Penelitian dilaksanakan dengan metode survei. Pengumpulan datadilakukan dengan menggunakan kuesioner yang dikirim ke responden,yaitu sivitas akademika Universitas Surabaya (UBAYA), melalui emailpustaka@ubaya.ac.id. Hasil pengkajian menunjukkan bahwalayanan referensi melalui e-mail di perpustakaan UBAYA telah berjalandengan efektif. Hal ini ditunjukkan oleh tingkat kepuasan penggunayang tinggi (91,6%) dilihat dari waktu respons, kualitas respons,kemudahan akses, pengetahuan pustakawan, dan kualitas petunjuk/informasi. Sebanyak 90,3% responden menyatakan puas terhadapwaktu respons yang tidak lebih dari 3 hari. Respons yang diperolehpengguna dari layanan referensi melalui e-mail sangat bermanfaatdalam memenuhi kebutuhan informasi pengguna secara cepat. Halini menunjukkan bahwa pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalamlayanan referensi memberikan peluang kepada pustakawan untukmerespons lebih cepat permintaan pengguna dalam memenuhikebutuhan informasi, sehingga memengaruhi tingkat kepuasanpengguna terhadap kualitas layanan referensi melalui e-mail.Penggunaan e-mail juga lebih efektif untuk memperoleh umpan balikdari pengguna dalam rangka meningkatkan kualitas layanan referensimelalui e-mail. The development of information technology provides an opportunityfor reference services librarian to enhance library servicesperformance. The reference services librarians of Surabaya University(UBAYA) carried out a survey in July to December 2010 on userswho had used the services. The purpose of the study was to determinethe users satisfaction on reference services via e-mail in fulfillingtheir information needs. A survey method was applied in the studyand used questionnaire which were distributed to UBAYA’s civitasacademica as respondents via e-mail pustaka@ubaya.ac.id. The resultshowed that reference services via e-mail in UBAYA’s library hadbeen effective, indicated by time of response, quality of response,accessibility, librarian knowledge, and quality of instruction. As muchas 90.3% respondents were satisfied on time of response of less than3 days. The response obtained by users from the reference service viae-mail was highly useful in fulfilling users’ information need fast.This indicated that the use of information technology in referenceservices enabled librarian to give quick response to meet user’s need,and it reflected on users’ satisfaction of the quality of reference servicevia e-mail. The use of e-mail was an effective method to obtainfeedback from users to improve the performance of reference servicevia e-mail.
Produktivitas Publikasi Peneliti Badan Litbang Pertanian Rufaidah, Vivit wardah
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012
Publisher : Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The study aimed to determine publication productivity of agriculturalresearchers through AGRIS and CARIS databases and otherpublications. The study was conducted in June-August 2008 inIndonesian Center for Agricultural Library and TechnologyDissemination (ICALTD) using document analysis and survey usingquestionnaires distributed to respondents. The subject was publicationproductivity of researchers originated from research proposals ofIndonesian Agency for Agricultural and Research Development(IAARD), while the object of research was the research proposaldocuments on CARIS databases in 2004-2006. Publicationproductivity was measured based on the number of articles andtypes of publications that have been written in the year 2005-2008related to research implemented by agricultural researchers duringthe period of 2004-2006. The results showed that the publicationproductivity for the year 2004-2006 ranged from 0.22 to 0.93 articleper researcher per year. Agricultural researchers wrote article onaverage of 0.58 article per year. The highest publication productivitywas achieved by researchers of agricultural mechanization (0.93),followed by researchers of food crops (0.92), whereas the lowestpublication productivity was from researchers of biotechnology(0.22).
PUSH PULL STRATEGY DALAM MEMASARKAN LAYANAN PERPUSTAKAAN BALAI PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Rushendi, .; Muhajan, Zakiah
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012
Publisher : Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Suatu kajian telah dilakukan untuk mengukur strategi push and pulldalam pemasaran informasi yang dihasilkan oleh Perpustakaan BalaiPenelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat (Balittro) yang ditempatkandalam blog selama tahun 2008-2011. Pengukuran secara kualitatifterhadap komentar pengguna mengenai produk informasi dan blogdilakukan terhadap tiga komponen, yaitu behavioural data, outcomedan experience yang dikembangkan oleh Avinash Kaushik. Jumlahproduk yang di-posting dan akses ke produk informasi dalam blogdihitung sebagai data kuantitatif. Data kualitatif dan kuantitatifselanjutnya dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil analisis menunjukkanbahwa dari 46 produk yang di-posting diperoleh 136 komentar denganjumlah akses 1.036.111. Sebanyak 99 komentar merupakan permintaanartikel dari produk yang ditawarkan, yang dalam kajian inidigunakan istilah pull, 10 komentar merupakan pertanyaan umumseperti penelusuran informasi, dan 27 komentar lainnya bernadapositif dan mendukung upaya pustakawan dalam memasarkaninformasi dan memperluas layanan jasa perpustakaan secara virtual.Jumlah keteraksesan informasi yang tinggi tidak berbanding lurusdengan kebutuhan aktual informasi pemustaka. Hal ini ditunjukkanoleh jumlah akses tertinggi 1.018.119 (98,26%) pada 30 produkBibliografi Khusus Tanaman Obat dan Rempah dengan 30 (30,30%)permintaan artikel, dibandingkan dengan 5.041 (0,49%) akses kesatu produk informasi bibit dengan 65 (65,6%) permintaan artikeldari 99 permintaan artikel untuk semua produk yang disediakan dalamblog. A study to measure push-pull strategy in marketing the informationproducts of Indonesian Spice and Medicinal Crops Research Institute(ISMCRI) Library posted in blog for the year 2008 to 2011 wasconducted. A workable means of measuring success with social mediadeveloped by Avinash Kaushik, in which focus on three components,namely behavioural data, outcome and experience, were used toqualitatively interpret and select number of comments forwarded bythe users of the blog. The number of access to the blog, which wasknown as hits also counted as quantitative data. The qualitative dataand the quantitative ones were analyzed descriptively. The resultsshowed that of 46 information products pushed through the channelof blog had yielded 136 users’ comments. Ninety-nine comments ofwhich were in the forms of article’s requests of the products, in thisstudy termed as pull, 10 comments were common queries or generalquestions of literature searches from the users to librarian and 27comments were supportive and positive tones from users and librarianson the efforts made by the librarian of ISMCRI to market theinformation products and extend the library service virtually. Thehighest number of hits was not directly proportional with the numbersof article requests or actual information needs of the users. In thisstudy, it reflected on the highest number of access (hits) (1.018.119 or98.26%) of 30 products of Bibliografi Khusus Tanaman Rempah danObat, but lower article requests to the products (30 or 30.30%)compared to the lower number of access to one product of seedinformation (5.041 or 0.49%) and the highest number of articlerequests to the information (65 or 65.66%) of the 99 total articlerequests of the whole products provided in the blog.
PRODUKTIVITAS PUBLIKASI PENELITI BALAI PENELITIAN TANAMAN KACANG-KACANGAN DAN UMBI-UMBIAN Sutardji, .
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012
Publisher : Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pengkajian bertujuan untuk mengetahui produktivitas karya tulis ilmiah(KTI) peneliti Balai Penelitian Tanaman Kacang-kacangan dan Umbiumbian(Balitkabi) selama tiga tahun. Pengkajian dilakukan padabulan November-Desember 2011 dengan pendekatan bibliometrik.Subjek kajian adalah produktivitas peneliti, sedangkan objek kajianadalah KTI (artikel) yang dihasilkan peneliti Balitkabi yangdipublikasikan pada jurnal, buletin atau prosiding seminar tahun2008-2010 yang diterbitkan oleh Balitkabi, Pusat Penelitian danPengembangan Tanaman Pangan (Puslitbangtan) atau Badan LitbangPertanian. Produktivitas peneliti ditentukan berdasarkan nama penulispertama. Jumlah artikel peneliti Balitkabi yang dipublikasikan padajurnal, buletin, dan prosiding seminar tahun 2008-2010 mencapai160 judul dengan jumlah penulis/peneliti 54 orang. Hasil kajianmenunjukkan bahwa produktivitas publikasi peneliti Balitkabi tahun2008-2010 berkisar antara 0,76-1,13 artikel/peneliti/tahun. PenelitiBalitkabi rata-rata menerbitkan 0,99 artikel/tahun. Peneliti yangpaling produktif adalah peneliti senior (Peneliti Utama) dengandelapan artikel. The study aimed to evaluate the productivity of researchers atIndonesian Legumes and Tuber Crops Research Institute (ILETRI)to publish articles in the journals and proceedings during threeconsecutive years. The study was conducted from November toDecember 2011 by using bibliometric approach. Subject studiedwas researchers productivity, with the object studied was scientificarticles published in the journals, bulletin, and proceedings in theyear 2008-2010, published by ILETRI, Indonesian Center for FoodCrops Research and Development (ICFORD) and/or IndonesianAgency for Agricultural Research and Development (IAARD).Publication productivity was based on the name of researcher asfirst author. The total of articles published was 160 titles from 54researchers. The results showed that the publication productivity ofresearchers of ILETRI for the 2008-2010 (three years) ranged from0.76 to 1.13 articles/researcher/year. Researchers of ILETRI publishedarticle on average of 0.99 articles per year. The most productiveresearcher was senior researcher with eight articles.
KETERSEDIAAN SUMBER INFORMASI TEKNOLOGI PERTANIAN DI BEBERAPA KABUPATEN DI JAWA Andriaty, Etty; Setyorini, Endang
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012
Publisher : Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penerapan inovasi teknologi oleh petani ditentukan oleh beberapafaktor, yaitu potensi individu untuk menerapkan inovasi, ketersediaansumber informasi, proses diseminasi, dan karakteristik inovasi.Penelitian dilakukan untuk menganalisis ketersediaan sumberinformasi teknologi pertanian dalam rangka memenuhi kebutuhaninformasi petani. Penelitian dilaksanakan melalui survei pada bulanJuli-Agustus 2011 di Kabupaten Banjarnegara, Magelang, Malang,dan Pacitan terhadap 160 petani sebagai responden. Hasil penelitianmenunjukkan bahwa informasi teknologi pertanian yang tersediamasih terbatas pada informasi tentang varietas unggul, pemupukan,alat dan mesin pertanian, serta cara pembuatan dan pemberian pakan.Untuk memenuhi kebutuhan akan informasi pertanian, sebagian besarresponden (74%) menyatakan bahwa kelembagaan komunikasitersedia hingga sangat tersedia di lokasi. Penyuluh merupakan sumberutama petani dalam memperoleh informasi pertanian. Persepsiresponden terhadap pertemuan dengan penyuluh formal (daripemerintah) sangat baik (90%). Sebanyak 66,88% respondenmenyatakan tersedia media pertemuan dengan penyuluh swadaya/nonformal, seperti kontak tani dan petugas dari perusahaan pestisidaatau benih. Media pertemuan dengan kelompok-kelompok produktifjuga tersedia hingga sangat tersedia, begitu pula kelompok sosialkeagamaan. Hampir semua responden (95%) mempersepsikanmemiliki telepon, terutama telepon genggam. Demikian pula radio/televisi, 85,01% responden mempersepsikannya tersedia hinggasangat tersedia. Namun, untuk sarana akses informasi seperti warnetdan perpustakaan desa, sebagian besar responden mempersepsikannyatidak tersedia, yaitu masing-masing 75,63% dan 73,75%. Separuhresponden menganggap komputer tidak tersedia. Media cetak darilembaga penelitian/pengkajian masih kurang tersedia. Media cetakyang tersedia di lokasi penelitian adalah tabloid Sinar Tani dan koranlokal. The adoption of agricultural technology innovation by farmers isdetermined by potential person to adopt the technology, availabilityof information source, dissemination process and characteristic ofinnovation. A study was conducted to identify the availability oftechnology information source to fulfill the information need of thefarmers. The study was conducted using survey method in July-August2011 at Banjarnegara, Magelang, Malang, and Pacitan Districtsand 160 farmers as respondents. The results showed that agriculturaltechnology information available in research locations had beenlimited to information on superior varieties, fertilizers, agriculturalmachinery, and feed processing. To meet the information needs ofagricultural technology, most respondents (74%) stated thatcommunication institutions were available in the locations. Extensionworker was a major source of farmers in obtaining agriculturalinformation. Farmers’ perceptions of formal meetings with theextension worker (of government) were very good (90%). As much as66.88% of respondents stated that the meetings with a counselor ofnon-formal organization such as pesticide or seed companies wereavailable. Almost all respondents (95%) perceived to have telephone,especially handphones. Similarly, 85.01% of respondents perceivedthat radio/television/VCD were available, but computers, internet cafe,and library were limited. Printed material from research instituteswas still limited. Printed media available for farmers in researchlocations were Sinar Tani and local newspaper.
PRODUKTIVITAS PUBLIKASI PENELITI BALAI PENELITIAN TANAMAN KACANG-KACANGAN DAN UMBI-UMBIAN . Sutardji
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012
Publisher : Pusat Perpustakaan dan Penyebaran Teknologi Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/jpp.v21n1.2012.p%p

Abstract

Pengkajian bertujuan untuk mengetahui produktivitas karya tulis ilmiah(KTI) peneliti Balai Penelitian Tanaman Kacang-kacangan dan Umbiumbian(Balitkabi) selama tiga tahun. Pengkajian dilakukan padabulan November-Desember 2011 dengan pendekatan bibliometrik.Subjek kajian adalah produktivitas peneliti, sedangkan objek kajianadalah KTI (artikel) yang dihasilkan peneliti Balitkabi yangdipublikasikan pada jurnal, buletin atau prosiding seminar tahun2008-2010 yang diterbitkan oleh Balitkabi, Pusat Penelitian danPengembangan Tanaman Pangan (Puslitbangtan) atau Badan LitbangPertanian. Produktivitas peneliti ditentukan berdasarkan nama penulispertama. Jumlah artikel peneliti Balitkabi yang dipublikasikan padajurnal, buletin, dan prosiding seminar tahun 2008-2010 mencapai160 judul dengan jumlah penulis/peneliti 54 orang. Hasil kajianmenunjukkan bahwa produktivitas publikasi peneliti Balitkabi tahun2008-2010 berkisar antara 0,76-1,13 artikel/peneliti/tahun. PenelitiBalitkabi rata-rata menerbitkan 0,99 artikel/tahun. Peneliti yangpaling produktif adalah peneliti senior (Peneliti Utama) dengandelapan artikel. The study aimed to evaluate the productivity of researchers atIndonesian Legumes and Tuber Crops Research Institute (ILETRI)to publish articles in the journals and proceedings during threeconsecutive years. The study was conducted from November toDecember 2011 by using bibliometric approach. Subject studiedwas researchers productivity, with the object studied was scientificarticles published in the journals, bulletin, and proceedings in theyear 2008-2010, published by ILETRI, Indonesian Center for FoodCrops Research and Development (ICFORD) and/or IndonesianAgency for Agricultural Research and Development (IAARD).Publication productivity was based on the name of researcher asfirst author. The total of articles published was 160 titles from 54researchers. The results showed that the publication productivity ofresearchers of ILETRI for the 2008-2010 (three years) ranged from0.76 to 1.13 articles/researcher/year. Researchers of ILETRI publishedarticle on average of 0.99 articles per year. The most productiveresearcher was senior researcher with eight articles.
KETERSEDIAAN SUMBER INFORMASI TEKNOLOGI PERTANIAN DI BEBERAPA KABUPATEN DI JAWA Etty Andriaty; Endang Setyorini
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012
Publisher : Pusat Perpustakaan dan Penyebaran Teknologi Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/jpp.v21n1.2012.p%p

Abstract

Penerapan inovasi teknologi oleh petani ditentukan oleh beberapafaktor, yaitu potensi individu untuk menerapkan inovasi, ketersediaansumber informasi, proses diseminasi, dan karakteristik inovasi.Penelitian dilakukan untuk menganalisis ketersediaan sumberinformasi teknologi pertanian dalam rangka memenuhi kebutuhaninformasi petani. Penelitian dilaksanakan melalui survei pada bulanJuli-Agustus 2011 di Kabupaten Banjarnegara, Magelang, Malang,dan Pacitan terhadap 160 petani sebagai responden. Hasil penelitianmenunjukkan bahwa informasi teknologi pertanian yang tersediamasih terbatas pada informasi tentang varietas unggul, pemupukan,alat dan mesin pertanian, serta cara pembuatan dan pemberian pakan.Untuk memenuhi kebutuhan akan informasi pertanian, sebagian besarresponden (74%) menyatakan bahwa kelembagaan komunikasitersedia hingga sangat tersedia di lokasi. Penyuluh merupakan sumberutama petani dalam memperoleh informasi pertanian. Persepsiresponden terhadap pertemuan dengan penyuluh formal (daripemerintah) sangat baik (90%). Sebanyak 66,88% respondenmenyatakan tersedia media pertemuan dengan penyuluh swadaya/nonformal, seperti kontak tani dan petugas dari perusahaan pestisidaatau benih. Media pertemuan dengan kelompok-kelompok produktifjuga tersedia hingga sangat tersedia, begitu pula kelompok sosialkeagamaan. Hampir semua responden (95%) mempersepsikanmemiliki telepon, terutama telepon genggam. Demikian pula radio/televisi, 85,01% responden mempersepsikannya tersedia hinggasangat tersedia. Namun, untuk sarana akses informasi seperti warnetdan perpustakaan desa, sebagian besar responden mempersepsikannyatidak tersedia, yaitu masing-masing 75,63% dan 73,75%. Separuhresponden menganggap komputer tidak tersedia. Media cetak darilembaga penelitian/pengkajian masih kurang tersedia. Media cetakyang tersedia di lokasi penelitian adalah tabloid Sinar Tani dan koranlokal. The adoption of agricultural technology innovation by farmers isdetermined by potential person to adopt the technology, availabilityof information source, dissemination process and characteristic ofinnovation. A study was conducted to identify the availability oftechnology information source to fulfill the information need of thefarmers. The study was conducted using survey method in July-August2011 at Banjarnegara, Magelang, Malang, and Pacitan Districtsand 160 farmers as respondents. The results showed that agriculturaltechnology information available in research locations had beenlimited to information on superior varieties, fertilizers, agriculturalmachinery, and feed processing. To meet the information needs ofagricultural technology, most respondents (74%) stated thatcommunication institutions were available in the locations. Extensionworker was a major source of farmers in obtaining agriculturalinformation. Farmers’ perceptions of formal meetings with theextension worker (of government) were very good (90%). As much as66.88% of respondents stated that the meetings with a counselor ofnon-formal organization such as pesticide or seed companies wereavailable. Almost all respondents (95%) perceived to have telephone,especially handphones. Similarly, 85.01% of respondents perceivedthat radio/television/VCD were available, but computers, internet cafe,and library were limited. Printed material from research instituteswas still limited. Printed media available for farmers in researchlocations were Sinar Tani and local newspaper.
ANALISIS KEPUASAN PENGGUNA LAYANAN REFERENSI MELALUI E-MAIL DI PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS SURABAYA Lasi .; Eko Setiawan
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012
Publisher : Pusat Perpustakaan dan Penyebaran Teknologi Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/jpp.v21n1.2012.p%p

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi memberikan peluang kepadapustakawan layanan referensi untuk meningkatkan kinerja layananperpustakaan. Penelitian kepuasaan pengguna layanan referensi telahdilakukan pada bulan Juli-Desember 2010 untuk mengetahui tingkatkepuasan pengguna terhadap layanan referensi melalui e-mail.Penelitian dilaksanakan dengan metode survei. Pengumpulan datadilakukan dengan menggunakan kuesioner yang dikirim ke responden,yaitu sivitas akademika Universitas Surabaya (UBAYA), melalui emailpustaka@ubaya.ac.id. Hasil pengkajian menunjukkan bahwalayanan referensi melalui e-mail di perpustakaan UBAYA telah berjalandengan efektif. Hal ini ditunjukkan oleh tingkat kepuasan penggunayang tinggi (91,6%) dilihat dari waktu respons, kualitas respons,kemudahan akses, pengetahuan pustakawan, dan kualitas petunjuk/informasi. Sebanyak 90,3% responden menyatakan puas terhadapwaktu respons yang tidak lebih dari 3 hari. Respons yang diperolehpengguna dari layanan referensi melalui e-mail sangat bermanfaatdalam memenuhi kebutuhan informasi pengguna secara cepat. Halini menunjukkan bahwa pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalamlayanan referensi memberikan peluang kepada pustakawan untukmerespons lebih cepat permintaan pengguna dalam memenuhikebutuhan informasi, sehingga memengaruhi tingkat kepuasanpengguna terhadap kualitas layanan referensi melalui e-mail.Penggunaan e-mail juga lebih efektif untuk memperoleh umpan balikdari pengguna dalam rangka meningkatkan kualitas layanan referensimelalui e-mail. The development of information technology provides an opportunityfor reference services librarian to enhance library servicesperformance. The reference services librarians of Surabaya University(UBAYA) carried out a survey in July to December 2010 on userswho had used the services. The purpose of the study was to determinethe users' satisfaction on reference services via e-mail in fulfillingtheir information needs. A survey method was applied in the studyand used questionnaire which were distributed to UBAYA’s civitasacademica as respondents via e-mail pustaka@ubaya.ac.id. The resultshowed that reference services via e-mail in UBAYA’s library hadbeen effective, indicated by time of response, quality of response,accessibility, librarian knowledge, and quality of instruction. As muchas 90.3% respondents were satisfied on time of response of less than3 days. The response obtained by users from the reference service viae-mail was highly useful in fulfilling users’ information need fast.This indicated that the use of information technology in referenceservices enabled librarian to give quick response to meet user’s need,and it reflected on users’ satisfaction of the quality of reference servicevia e-mail. The use of e-mail was an effective method to obtainfeedback from users to improve the performance of reference servicevia e-mail.
PUSH PULL STRATEGY DALAM MEMASARKAN LAYANAN PERPUSTAKAAN BALAI PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT . Rushendi; Zakiah Muhajan
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012
Publisher : Pusat Perpustakaan dan Penyebaran Teknologi Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/jpp.v21n1.2012.p%p

Abstract

Suatu kajian telah dilakukan untuk mengukur strategi push and pulldalam pemasaran informasi yang dihasilkan oleh Perpustakaan BalaiPenelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat (Balittro) yang ditempatkandalam blog selama tahun 2008-2011. Pengukuran secara kualitatifterhadap komentar pengguna mengenai produk informasi dan blogdilakukan terhadap tiga komponen, yaitu behavioural data, outcomedan experience yang dikembangkan oleh Avinash Kaushik. Jumlahproduk yang di-posting dan akses ke produk informasi dalam blogdihitung sebagai data kuantitatif. Data kualitatif dan kuantitatifselanjutnya dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil analisis menunjukkanbahwa dari 46 produk yang di-posting diperoleh 136 komentar denganjumlah akses 1.036.111. Sebanyak 99 komentar merupakan permintaanartikel dari produk yang ditawarkan, yang dalam kajian inidigunakan istilah pull, 10 komentar merupakan pertanyaan umumseperti penelusuran informasi, dan 27 komentar lainnya bernadapositif dan mendukung upaya pustakawan dalam memasarkaninformasi dan memperluas layanan jasa perpustakaan secara virtual.Jumlah keteraksesan informasi yang tinggi tidak berbanding lurusdengan kebutuhan aktual informasi pemustaka. Hal ini ditunjukkanoleh jumlah akses tertinggi 1.018.119 (98,26%) pada 30 produkBibliografi Khusus Tanaman Obat dan Rempah dengan 30 (30,30%)permintaan artikel, dibandingkan dengan 5.041 (0,49%) akses kesatu produk informasi bibit dengan 65 (65,6%) permintaan artikeldari 99 permintaan artikel untuk semua produk yang disediakan dalamblog. A study to measure push-pull strategy in marketing the informationproducts of Indonesian Spice and Medicinal Crops Research Institute(ISMCRI) Library posted in blog for the year 2008 to 2011 wasconducted. A workable means of measuring success with social mediadeveloped by Avinash Kaushik, in which focus on three components,namely behavioural data, outcome and experience, were used toqualitatively interpret and select number of comments forwarded bythe users of the blog. The number of access to the blog, which wasknown as hits also counted as quantitative data. The qualitative dataand the quantitative ones were analyzed descriptively. The resultsshowed that of 46 information products pushed through the channelof blog had yielded 136 users’ comments. Ninety-nine comments ofwhich were in the forms of article’s requests of the products, in thisstudy termed as pull, 10 comments were common queries or generalquestions of literature searches from the users to librarian and 27comments were supportive and positive tones from users and librarianson the efforts made by the librarian of ISMCRI to market theinformation products and extend the library service virtually. Thehighest number of hits was not directly proportional with the numbersof article requests or actual information needs of the users. In thisstudy, it reflected on the highest number of access (hits) (1.018.119 or98.26%) of 30 products of Bibliografi Khusus Tanaman Rempah danObat, but lower article requests to the products (30 or 30.30%)compared to the lower number of access to one product of seedinformation (5.041 or 0.49%) and the highest number of articlerequests to the information (65 or 65.66%) of the 99 total articlerequests of the whole products provided in the blog.
Produktivitas Publikasi Peneliti Badan Litbang Pertanian Vivit wardah Rufaidah
Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012
Publisher : Pusat Perpustakaan dan Penyebaran Teknologi Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/jpp.v21n1.2012.p%p

Abstract

The study aimed to determine publication productivity of agriculturalresearchers through AGRIS and CARIS databases and otherpublications. The study was conducted in June-August 2008 inIndonesian Center for Agricultural Library and TechnologyDissemination (ICALTD) using document analysis and survey usingquestionnaires distributed to respondents. The subject was publicationproductivity of researchers originated from research proposals ofIndonesian Agency for Agricultural and Research Development(IAARD), while the object of research was the research proposaldocuments on CARIS databases in 2004-2006. Publicationproductivity was measured based on the number of articles andtypes of publications that have been written in the year 2005-2008related to research implemented by agricultural researchers duringthe period of 2004-2006. The results showed that the publicationproductivity for the year 2004-2006 ranged from 0.22 to 0.93 articleper researcher per year. Agricultural researchers wrote article onaverage of 0.58 article per year. The highest publication productivitywas achieved by researchers of agricultural mechanization (0.93),followed by researchers of food crops (0.92), whereas the lowestpublication productivity was from researchers of biotechnology(0.22).

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2012 2012


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 29, No 2 (2020): Desember 2020 Vol 29, No 1 (2020): Juni 2020 Vol 28, No 2 (2019): Desember 2019 Vol 28, No 1 (2019): Juni 2019 Vol 27, No 2 (2018): Desember 2018 Vol 27, No 1 (2018): Juni 2018 Vol 26, No 2 (2017): Desember 2017 Vol 26, No 1 (2017): Juni 2017 Vol 25, No 2 (2016): Oktober 2016 Vol 25, No 1 (2016): April 2016 Vol 24, No 2 (2015): Oktober 2015 Vol 24, No 1 (2015): April 2015 Vol 23, No 2 (2014): october 2014 Vol 23, No 1 (2014): April 2014 Vol 23, No 1 (2014): April 2014 Vol 22, No 2 (2013): Oktober 2013 Vol 22, No 2 (2013): Oktober 2013 Vol 22, No 1 (2013): April 2013 Vol 22, No 1 (2013): April 2013 Vol 21, No 2 (2012): Oktober 2012 Vol 21, No 2 (2012): Oktober 2012 Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012 Vol 21, No 1 (2012): April 2012 More Issue