cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
aljamiah@uin-suka.ac.id
Phone
+62274-558186
Journal Mail Official
aljamiah@uin-suka.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung Wahab Hasbullah UIN Sunan Kalijaga Jln. Marsda Adisucipto No 1
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies
ISSN : 0126012X     EISSN : 2338557X     DOI : 10.14421
Al-Jamiah invites scholars, researchers, and students to contribute the result of their studies and researches in the areas related to Islam, Muslim society, and other religions which covers textual and fieldwork investigation with various perspectives of law, philosophy, mysticism, history, art, theology, sociology, anthropology, political science and others.
Articles 13 Documents
Search results for , issue "No 63 (1999)" : 13 Documents clear
Hubungan Antara Konsep Baik dan Buruk Dalam Ilmu Kalam Dengan Konsep Maslahat Dalam Hukum Islam Fathurrahman Djamil
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies No 63 (1999)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2022.3763.63-76

Abstract

There is a hypothesis that a theological school belongs to a Muslim influences his or her thought in uṣūl al-fiqh (foundation of "Islamic jurisprudence). This paper will focus on Mu'tazila and Asy'ariya. Mu'tazila concept on 'aql or Reason is clear that reason can distinguish between good and bad. This concept is a result of their interest in philosophy that may influence their thought. Therefore, the Mu'tazilite believe in the ability of reason in understanding everything and it brings them to a statement "reason before law", which means reason should stay before the"syara" or law. For this reason, they agree that before the existence of law, a reasonful person can distinguish between good and bad. One of Mu'tazila principles is adala (God justice), that one of its interpretations is that God does not wish the bad. As a result, Mu'tazila believe that. God created all things based on purpose and wisdom. From this point, there seems to be a relation between their teachings and their theories on " uṣūl al-fiqh” When there is a conflict between naṣ and reason, they take reason before naṣ. Furthermore, they believe that God created the creatures on the basis of purpose, and so what happens to His legislation. This concept has a direct influence to the concept of maṣlaha that becomes illa in legislation. Different from Mu'tazila, Ahl al-sunnah wal-Jamā'a sees that good and bad cannot be understood by reason itself. In addition they say that God created all creatures not on the basis of purpose, and also God desires good and bad. These principles relate to their theories on uṣūl al-fiqh; e.q. when a conflict between naṣ and reason emerges, they give priority to nap. They neglect maṣlaha in their canonical thought. Even though, the hypothesis of the relation between theological unrestrictedly. That happens to Al-Juwayni and al-Razi who were Asy'arites but had different thoughts in uṣūl al-fiqh. 
The Image of The Prophet In The Contemporary Western Scholarship: A Study of W. M. Watt’s and M.Cook’s Thought Fatimah Husein
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies No 63 (1999)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2022.3763.151-166

Abstract

Salah satu sumber penting untuk memahami Islam adalah figur Nabi Muhammad SAW, dan ia telah menjadi obyek kajian dalam studi keislaman, termasuk di kalangan Orientalis. Seperti biasa, kaiian ilmiah terhadap satu persoalan tidak selalu melahirkan pandangan yang sama, dan hal ini juga Nampak pada kajian Orientalis tentang figure Muhanunad yang menjadi focus telaah makalah berikut. Secara garis besar pandangan mereka terbagi menjadi dua kubu; pertama seperti terlihat pada karya-karya W.  Montgomery Watt dan kedua tergambar pada karya-karya Michael Cook. Dari satu sisi. Keduanya dapat dikatakan menggunakan pendekatan yang sama, yakni non-normative atau empeical approach; namun dari sisi lain keduanya dapat dikatakan berbeda karena ternyata keduanya memilih model empirical yang berbeda: Watt menganut irenic dan phenomenological approach yang sangat menghargai data-data tertulis warisan Islam; sedangkan Cook menggunakan a source-critical approach yang Pada dasarnya amat meragukan data-data tertulis warisan Islam dan lebih memilih data-data yang berasal dari non-muslim dan juga data arkeologi. Perbedaan pendekatan ini membawa pada kesimpulan yang berbeda pula, jika tidak dikatakan bertentangan. Watt cenderung melahirkan kesan (image) positif tentang Muhamrnad dan hampir sejalan dengan pandangan umum kalangan Muslim. Sebaliknya, Cook cenderung melahirkan image negatif tentang Muhammad terutama tentang hubungannya dengan masyarakat Yahudi pada saat itu. Artikel berikut menjadi sangat menarik karena mengkaji sejauh mana kelebihan dan kekurangan dari masing-masing pendekatan yang digunakan sekaligus mengkritisi penggunaan pendekatan tesebut terhadap data-data tentang Muhammad dan hubungannya dengan Yahudi (non-Muslim). Pada akhimya makalah berikut menyarankan, bahwa untuk mendapatkan gambaran yang lebih jelas dan obyektif tentang figur Muhammad di kalangan Orientalis masih diperlukan penelitian lebih lanjut. 
The Study of Islamic Law In Indonesian Islamic University (The case of the Kulliyat al-Sharī’ah of the State Institute of Islamic Studies [IAIN] Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, Indonesia) M. Atho Mudzhar
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies No 63 (1999)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2022.3763.1-11

Abstract

Kajian Hukum Islam di Indonesia telah dimulai sejak masuknya Islam ke kepulauan nusantara pada abad ke-13, meskipun demikian, baru pada abad ke 17 atau 18 kajian itu mencapai momentum skriptural. Pada waktu itu, Kajian hukum Islam banyak dilakukan secara tradisional di pesantren-pesantren Kebanyakan literatur hukum Islam yang dipelajari tertulis dalam bahasa Arab, yang bercorak Syafi’i, tetapi juga ada beberapa literatur berbahasa jawa seperti kitab Al-Majma Karya Saleh Darat Semarang. Dalam artikel ini, penulis mengkaji perkembangan kajian hukum Islam di Fakultas Syari'ah IAIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. Penulis menemukan pengaruh kuat seorang ulama ternama, Hasbi Ash shiddiqi, dalam membangun Fiqh Indonesia, inilah yang disebut Ibrahim Hosen sebagai Fiqh madzhab Indonesia. Penulis juga menemukan peranan yang begitu besar yang dimainkan oleh Fakultas Syari'ah dalam mengembangkan kajian hukum Islam di Indonesia. 

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13


Filter by Year

1999 1999


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 63, No 1 (2025) Vol 62, No 2 (2024) Vol 62, No 1 (2024) Vol 61, No 2 (2023) Vol 61, No 1 (2023) Vol 60, No 2 (2022) Vol 60, No 1 (2022) Vol 59, No 2 (2021) Vol 59, No 1 (2021) Vol 58, No 2 (2020) Vol 58, No 1 (2020) Vol 57, No 2 (2019) Vol 57, No 1 (2019) Vol 56, No 2 (2018) Vol 56, No 1 (2018) Vol 56, No 1 (2018) Vol 55, No 2 (2017) Vol 55, No 2 (2017) Vol 55, No 1 (2017) Vol 55, No 1 (2017) Vol 54, No 2 (2016) Vol 54, No 2 (2016) Vol 54, No 1 (2016) Vol 54, No 1 (2016) Vol 53, No 2 (2015) Vol 53, No 2 (2015) Vol 53, No 1 (2015) Vol 53, No 1 (2015) Vol 52, No 2 (2014) Vol 52, No 2 (2014) Vol 52, No 1 (2014) Vol 52, No 1 (2014) Vol 51, No 2 (2013) Vol 51, No 2 (2013) Vol 51, No 1 (2013) Vol 51, No 1 (2013) Vol 50, No 2 (2012) Vol 50, No 2 (2012) Vol 50, No 1 (2012) Vol 50, No 1 (2012) Vol 49, No 2 (2011) Vol 49, No 2 (2011) Vol 49, No 1 (2011) Vol 49, No 1 (2011) Vol 48, No 2 (2010) Vol 48, No 2 (2010) Vol 48, No 1 (2010) Vol 48, No 1 (2010) Vol 47, No 2 (2009) Vol 47, No 2 (2009) Vol 47, No 1 (2009) Vol 47, No 1 (2009) Vol 46, No 2 (2008) Vol 46, No 2 (2008) Vol 46, No 1 (2008) Vol 46, No 1 (2008) Vol 45, No 2 (2007) Vol 45, No 2 (2007) Vol 45, No 1 (2007) Vol 45, No 1 (2007) Vol 44, No 2 (2006) Vol 44, No 2 (2006) Vol 44, No 1 (2006) Vol 44, No 1 (2006) Vol 43, No 2 (2005) Vol 43, No 2 (2005) Vol 43, No 1 (2005) Vol 43, No 1 (2005) Vol 42, No 2 (2004) Vol 42, No 2 (2004) Vol 42, No 1 (2004) Vol 42, No 1 (2004) Vol 41, No 2 (2003) Vol 41, No 1 (2003) Vol 41, No 1 (2003) Vol 40, No 2 (2002) Vol 40, No 1 (2002) Vol 39, No 2 (2001) Vol 39, No 1 (2001) Vol 38, No 2 (2000) Vol 38, No 1 (2000) No 64 (1999) No 63 (1999) No 62 (1998) No 61 (1998) No 60 (1997) No 59 (1996) No 58 (1995) No 57 (1994) No 56 (1994) No 55 (1994) No 54 (1994) No 53 (1993) No 52 (1993) No 51 (1993) No 50 (1992) No 49 (1992) No 48 (1992) No 47 (1991) No 46 (1991) No 45 (1991) No 44 (1991) No 43 (1990) No 42 (1990) No 41 (1990) No 40 (1990) No 39 (1989) No 38 (1989) No 37 (1989) No 36 (1988) No 35 (1987) No 34 (1986) No 33 (1985) No 32 (1984) No 31 (1984) No 30 (1983) No 29 (1983) No 28 (1982) No 27 (1982) No 26 (1981) No 25 (1981) No 24 (1980) No 23 (1980) No 22 (1980) No 21 (1979) No 20 (1978) No 19 (1978) No 18 (1978) No 17 (1977) No 16 (1977) No 14 (1976) No 12 (1976) No 11 (1975) No 10 (1975) No 9 (1975) More Issue