cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Arena Hukum
Published by Universitas Brawijaya
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)" : 10 Documents clear
ISU KESEHATAN DALAM SENGKETA IMPOR DAGING AYAM ANTARA INDONESIA-BRAZIL DI WTO Siswanto, Ari
Arena Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.2

Abstract

AbstractThis paper discusses the issue of human health protection as one of the exceptions of GATT obligations, considering the elements in Article XX (b) of GATT are still general in nature and thus have the potential to bring different interpretation. Focusing on the elements of "necessary to protect human life or health" and "arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination", this paper seeks to explore the various meanings of Article XX (b) GATT, including its implementation in an in concreto dispute, namely Indonesia's dispute with Brazil over chicken meat import policy. The result shows that the element of "necessary to protect human life or health" will be deemed if the state can demonstrate the existence of health risks, adopt necessary policies that mitigate such risks, and there is no other policy alternative more friendly to international trade available. In relation to the more subjective element of "arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination", the principle of good faith has not yet given a place in the consideration of this element.AbstrakTulisan ini membahas isu perlindungan kesehatan manusia sebagai salah satu pengecualian dari kewajiban-kewajiban GATT, mengingat bahwa unsur-unsur dalam Artikel XX(b) GATT masih bersifat umum dan berpeluang memunculkan perbedaan penafsiran. Berfokus pada unsur “necessary to protect human life or health” dan “arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination”, tulisan ini menelusuri berbagai pemaknaan terhadap Artikel XX(b) GATT, termasuk implementasinya dalam sengketa in concreto, yakni sengketa Indonesia melawan Brazil terkait kebijakan impor daging ayam. Hasilnya, unsur “necessary to protect human life or health” dianggap terpenuhi kalau negara itu bisa menunjukkan keberadaan risiko kesehatan, mengambil kebijakan yang mampu mengurangi risiko tersebut dan memang harus diambil, serta tidak tersedia alternatif kebijakan lain yang lebih ramah terhadap perdagangan internasional. Terkait unsur “arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination” yang lebih subjektif, terungkap prinsip itikad baik belum mendapat tempat di dalam pertimbangan atas unsur ini.
IDEALISME CONSTITUENDUM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR Benediktus Hestu Cipto Handoyo
Arena Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.1

Abstract

AbstractJudicial review is one of the authorities of the Constitutional Court most often exercised. This research examines the background of the establishment of Constitutional Court in Indonesia and the ideal construction of the constituendum for the Constitutional Court in implementing the judicial review. This normative research uses regulatory and conceptual approach. The results showes first, the authority to judicial review should be placed in one institution, namely the Constitutional Court, since the continental tradion of laws and regulations is systematic, hyrarchial and pyramidal in nature. Second, the Consttutional Court’s decisions that are often ignored by the law forming institutions have resulted in the Law annulled by the Court not immediately followed up with the issuance of a replacement law. Third, judicial review should not be limited to the statute being reviewed, because the statute concerned are, more likely, related to the other statutes. And fourth, the Constitutional Court’s decisions should be regarded as constitutional jurisprudence and become  referrences for the theory of constitution in general. AbstrakSalah satu wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) yang paling sering dilaksanakan dalam keseharian adalah Pengujian UU terhadap UUD. Penelitian ini menganalisa latar belakang kemunculan MK di Indonesia serta bagaimana konstruksi ideal Constituendum bagi MK dalam melaksanakan pengujian tersebut. Penelitian normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasilnya pertama, pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan seharusnya diletakkan dalam satu lembaga, yakni MK sebab tradisi continental peraturan perundang-undangan bersifat sistemik hirarkhis piramidal. Kedua, putusan MK yang sering tidak diindahkan oleh lembaga pembentuk UU mengakibatkan UU yang telah dibatalkan oleh MK tidak segera ditindak lanjuti dengan penerbitan UU pengganti. Ketiga, pengujian UU terhadap UUD seharusnya tidak hanya berhenti pada pengujian terhadap UU yang dimohonkan, karena UU tersebut dapat berhubungan dengan UU lain. Keempat, putusan MK seharusnya menjadi constitutions jurispridence dan menjadi rujukan teori konstitusi pada umumnya.
PENERAPAN ASAS - ASAS HUKUM ADAT DALAM PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR YANG BERKEADILAN Tahegga Primananda Alfath; Ihwan Nul Padli
Arena Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.8

Abstract

Infrastructure Development is one of Indonesia's visions in 2045. However, Infrastructure development has only occurred in some areas, and implementation often occurs in disputes between authorities and indigenous peoples, especially indigenous peoples ulayat rights. The object of ulayat rights is land of the indigenous peoples where its existence is still recognized in Indonesia based on article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. The research method used statue approach and conseptual approach. This study aims To find out and analyze the existence of indigenous peoples ulayat rights and To know and analyze infrastructure development in Indonesia in accordance with the principles of indigenous peoples, Infrastructure development has the concept of development with the principles of togetherness, based on justice. The State guarantees that infrastructure development in Indonesia is accordance with the principles of indigenous peoples and the principles of indigenous peoples law including the principle of mutual cooperation, the principle of social function in the community, the principle of agreement or consensus and the principle of representation embodied in Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution and Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution.
PUTUSAN KPPU SEBAGAI DASAR DALAM GUGATAN KELOMPOK (CLASS ACTION) ATAS PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KONSUMEN AKIBAT PELANGGARAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT Sukarmi Sukarmi
Arena Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.6

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims analyze the KPPU's decision as the basis for class action in court in demanding compensation for violations of unfair business competition, and the juridical obstacles in examining group claims based on the KPPU's decision. This is normative legal research using statutory and case approach. The results shows that the KPPU's decision can be used as the basis for a class action lawsuit in court in the context of demanding compensation for consumer losses caused by violations of business competition as long as the KPPU's deliberations and decisions include preliminary evidence of public (consumer) loss and meet the general requirements for a class action lawsuit. The juridical obstacles really depend on the level of understanding of the judges and also the documents and / or case files from the KPPU as evidence of consideration of consumer losses. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis putusan KPPU sebagai dasar gugatan kelompok (class action) di pengadilan dalam menuntut ganti rugi akibat pelanggaran persaingan usaha tidak sehat, serta hambatan yuridis dalam pemeriksaan gugatan perwakilan kelompok yang didasarkan pada putusan KPPU. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan KPPU dapat dijadikan dasar gugatan class action di Pengadilan dalam rangka menuntut ganti rugi atas kerugian konsumen yang disebabkan oleh pelanggaran persaingan usaha sepanjang dalam pertimbangan dan putusan KPPU mencantumkan adanya bukti awal adanya kerugian masyarakat (konsumen secara luas)  dan memenuhi persyaratan umum untuk dilakukan gugatan perwakilan (class action). Hambatan yuridis yang dialami pengadilan tentunya sangat bergantung pada tingkat pemahaman hakim dan juga dokumen dan/atau berkas perkara dari KPPU sebagai bukti adanya pertimbangan terhadap kerugian konsumen.
REKONSEPTUALISASI JALUR KHUSUS DALAM RANCANGAN KUHAP SEBAGAI BENTUK REFORMASI SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA Ladito R Bagaskoro
Arena Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.10

Abstract

AbstractThe significant increase in the pile of case files between 2016 and 2019 led to the need for concepts or methods that can create judicial efficiency. In the spirit of reforming the Criminal Procedure Code, the drafting team of the Criminal Procedure Code tries to include procedures aimed at shortening and expediting procedural procedures through the existence of a special pathway in Indonesian criminal procedural law in the future, which is inspired by the concept of plea-bargaining in the United States and Britain. This normative research uses conceptual and comparative law. The result shows that a special line was given to the defendant who admitted to the criminal act charged making the trial hearing shorter. Second, there are several fundamental differences between the special lines in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code and plea bargaining in the United States, especially in the agreement between the defendant or legal adviser and the public prosecutor, the process for confessing the accused, the criminal acts included, and the position of the judge in their respective processes.AbstrakPeningkatan tumpukan berkas perkara yang cukup signifikan antara tahun 2016 hingga 2019 menyebabkan perlunya konsep atau metode yang dapat menciptakan efisiensi peradilan. Dengan semangat reformasi KUHAP, tim perumus KUHAP mencoba mencantumkan prosedur-prosedur yang bertujuan untuk mempersingkat dan mempercepat prosedur beracara melalui jalur khusus dalam hukum acara pidana Indonesia ke depan yang terinspirasi dari konsep plea bargaining di Amerika Serikat dan Inggris. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan perbandingan hukum. Hasilnya adalah jalur khusus diberikan kepada terdakwa yang mengakui tindak pidana yang didakwakan sehingga sidang pemeriksaan acara menjad singkat. Kedua, terdapat beberapa perbedaan mendasar antara jalur khusus dalam Rancangan KUHAP dengan plea barganing di Amerika Serikat, khususnya pada kesepakatan antara terdakwa atau penasehat hukum dengan penuntut umum, proses dalam pengakuan terdakwa, tindak pidana yang termasuk, dan posisi hakim dalam proses masing-masing.
AUTENTIKASI PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI TANAH YANG ANTIDATIR Riky Rustam
Arena Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.7

Abstract

AbstractThis research aims to analyze the problem of the authentication of the antidatir sale and purchase land binding agreement where the deed is in violation of Law on the Notary Position. In analyzing the authentication of the antidatir sale and purchase land binding agreement, this normative research uses statute and conceptual approach by gathering data through librarian research. The results of this research concludes that the antidatir deed has violated the formal requirements of an authentic deed, starting from the failure to fulfill the obligations of a notary based on article 15 and 16 of the Amendment of Notary Position Law, not fulfilling the principles of good faith in making deeds and not fulfilling the nature of formal proof of authentic deed. Therefore, the antidatir PPJB is null and void.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengemukakan permasalahan mengenai autentikasi perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah yang antidatir dimana akta ini dibuat dengan melanggar ketentuan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Dalam meneliti autentikasi perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah yang antidatir, penelitian normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual, serta mengumpulan data secara studi pustaka (library research) yang dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa akta antidatir yang dibuat telah melanggar syarat formal suatu akta autentik, mulai dari tidak terpenuhinya kewajiban Notaris berdasarkan Pasal 15 dan Pasal 16 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Perubahan, tidak memenuhi tata cara pembuatan akta autentik, tidak memenuhi asas iktikad baik dalam pembuatan akta, dan tidak memenuhi sifat pembuktian formal akta autentik. Oleh karena itu, PPJB Antidatir menjadi batal demi hukum.
HUKUM DAN POLITIK DI CHINA (KAJIAN RELASI KEKUASAAN PARTAI TERHADAP PROFESI HUKUM) Isharyanto Isharyanto
Arena Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.5

Abstract

AbstractThis article discusses the legal and political issues in the People's Republic of China by examining interactions between the legal profession which have a profound but undisputed impact on daily law enforcement and broader state-community relations. This doctrinal research uses conceptual approach. The results shows that since the late 1970s, China has experienced significant political, economic, social and cultural changes. The legal system had restoration but retained the character of state hostility towards this entity. Courts, prosecutors and the police are government apparatus controlled by the party as the highest authority in formulating and control policy. The lawyer's profession has been privatized, but with the lack in the legal education system, issues of attorney's capacity have surfaced. Lawyers are permitted to join professional associations, but party control remains strong. Critical and active lawyers are likely to have a wide-ranging impact in the future on the existence of judges, prosecutors and police, even including the party's authoritarians themselves. AbstrakTulisan ini membahas masalah hukum dan politik di Republik Rakyat China dengan menguji interaksi di antara profesi hukum yang memiliki dampak mendalam namun belum tergarap pada penegakan hukum sehari-hari dan hubungan negara-masyarakat yang lebih luas. Penelitian doktrinal ini menggunakan pendekatan konseptual. Hasilnya, sejak akhir 1970-an, China telah mengalami perubahan politik, ekonomi, sosial, dan budaya secara signifikan. Hukum mengalami restorasi tetapi mempertahankan watak permusuhan negara terhadap entitas ini. Pengadilan, kejaksaan, dan kepolisian merupakan aparatur pemerintah yang dikendalikan partai sebagai otoritas tertinggi perumus dan pengawas kebijakan. Profesi pengacara telah diprivitisasi, namun dengan kesenjangan sistem pendidikan hukum, persoalan kapasitas pengacara mengemuka. Pengacara diperbolehkan bergabung dalam perhimpunan profesi, namun kendali partai tetap kuat. Pengacara yang kritis dan aktif akan memberikan dampak luas di masa depan terhadap keberadaan para hakim, jaksa, dan polisi, bahkan termasuk kepada otoritarian partai itu sendiri.
ANALISA YURIDIS PENYIMPANGAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM PADA KONFLIK LAHAN DI PROVINSI JAWA TIMUR Teddy Minahasa Putra
Arena Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.3

Abstract

AbstractThis paper examines the deviations of law enforcement in land conflicts in East Java based on the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No.38/Pra.Pe /2015.PN.Sby (case of Notary Nora Maria Lidwina, SH). This empirical or socio legal research uses a case study approach. The results show that irregularities in law enforcement in land conflicts by public service providers and law enforcement officials are generally based on corrupt behavior and violations of ethical codes, such as abuse of power, maladministration, case brokers, accepting bribes from certain parties, violence, intervening in cases, and other human rights violations. Mitigation efforts are improving the law enforcement officers isntitutions; improving the judicial administration and justice management systems; imposing strict sanctions; conducting supervision; conducting a transparent service and treatment; socializing anti-corruption movement; and creating an anti-corruption culture and excellent public services. Abstrak Tulisan ini mengkaji penyimpangan penegakan hukum pada konflik lahan di Provinsi Jawa Timur berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No.38/Pra.Per/2015.PN.Sby (kasus Notaris Nora Maria Lidwina, SH). Penelitian empiris atau sosio legal ini menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa penyimpangan penegakan hukum pada konflik lahan oleh pegawai pemberi layanan publik maupun aparat penegak hukum umumnya didasari oleh perilaku korupsi dan pelanggaran kode etik, seperti penyalahgunaan kekuasaan, maladministrasi, makelar kasus, menerima suap dari pihak tertentu, kekerasan, mengintervensi kasus, serta pelanggaran hak asasi manusia lainnya. Upaya penanggulangannya adalah memperbaiki institusi aparat penegak hukum; memperbaiki sistem administrasi yudisial dan manajemen peradilan; memberikan sanksi tegas; melakukan pengawasan; pelayanan dan penanganan yang transparan; sosialisasi gerakan anti korupsi; serta menciptakan budaya anti korupsi dan pelayanan publik yang prima. 
REKONSEPTUALISASI REKRUITMEN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU YANG BERINTEGRITAS Muhammad Anwar Tanjung; Retno Saraswati; Lita Tyesta A.L.W
Arena Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.9

Abstract

AbstractThis research aims to reconceptualize the recruitment of election organizers based on Law Number 10 of 2017 concerning General Elections to realize an election organizer with integrity. This normative juridical research uses conceptual and statute approach. The results shows that the reconceptualization of the recruitment of election organizers to realize election organizers with integrity can be carried out by reconceptualizing of the process of requirements for candidates election organizer in provincial and district, selection teams and test models.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan rekonseptualisasi rekruitmen penyelenggara pemilu berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum untuk mewujudkan penyelenggara pemilu yang berintegritas. Penelitian yuridis normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan konsep dan perundang-undangan. Hasilnya adalah rekonseptualisasi rekruitmen penyelenggara pemilu untuk mewujudkan penyelenggara pemilu yang berintegritas dapat dilakukan dengan rekonseptualisasi proses persyaratan calon anggota KPU provinsi dan kabupaten/Kota, tim seleksi dan model tes.   
PENGELOLAAN PERIKANAN BERBASIS HUKUM ADAT MELALUI MODEL CO-MANAGEMENT Josef M Monteiro
Arena Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.4

Abstract

AbstractThis research examines the Lamaholot customary law as an idea or unwritten customary idea but contain ethics and morals, in the form of a belief system, rituals, abstinence, and sanctions, which are then accommodated into a co-model management. This research becomes important to assist the top law enforcement fisheries management violations committed by traditional fishermen in the district East Flores and Lembata Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province. This empirical legal research uses a statutory approach, the concept of legal anthropology with a socio-legal perspective, and cases. The results shows the number of cases of violations of fisheries management by traditional fishermen still high in the last few years. This proves that law enforcement has not been effective both from the structure, legal substance and culture. To overcome this, it is necessary to re-institutionalize customary law through a co-management model, namely the local government and law enforcement agencies forming a partnership model with customary stakeholders or functionaries to function re-belief systems, rituals, customary sanctions and mechanisms in the enforcement process law against traditional fishermen who exploit fishery resources illegally. AbstrakPenelitian ini mengkaji hukum adat Lamaholot sebagai ide atau gagasan adat yang tidak tertulis tetapi mengandung etika dan moral berupa sistem kepercayaan, ritual, pantangan, dan sanksi, yang selanjutnya diakomodir ke dalam sebuah model co-management. Penelitian ini penting dilakukan untuk membantu penegakan hukum atas pelanggaran pengelolaan perikanan yang dilakukan oleh nelayan tradisional di Kabupaten Flores Timur dan Kabupaten Lembata, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Penelitian hukum empiris ini menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konsep antropologi hukum dengan perspektif sosio-legal, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan beberapa tahun terakhir jumlah kasus pelanggaran pengelolaan perikanan oleh nelayan tradisional masih tinggi. Hal ini membuktikan penegakan hukumnya belum efektif baik dari struktur, substansi dan budaya hukum. Untuk mengatasinya perlu pelembagaan kembali hukum adat melalui model co-management dimana pemerintah daerah dan lembaga penegak hukum membentuk model kemitraan dengan pemangku atau fungsionaris adat untuk memfungsikan kembali sistem kepercayaan, ritual, sanksi adat dan mekanisme dalam proses penegakan hukum terhadap nelayan tradisional yang memanfaatkan sumber daya perikanan secara ilegal

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 18 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 17 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 15 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 14 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021) Vol 13, No 3 (2020) Vol. 13 No. 3 (2020) Vol 13, No 2 (2020) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020) Vol 13, No 1 (2020) Vol. 12 No. 3 (2019) Vol 12, No 3 (2019) Vol 12, No 2 (2019) Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019) Vol 12, No 1 (2019) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019) Vol 11, No 3 (2018) Vol. 11 No. 3 (2018) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018) Vol 11, No 2 (2018) Vol 11, No 2 (2018) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2018) Vol 11, No 1 (2018) Vol 11, No 1 (2018) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2017) Vol 10, No 3 (2017) Vol 10, No 2 (2017) Vol 10, No 2 (2017) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2017) Vol 10, No 1 (2017) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2017) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2016) Vol 9, No 3 (2016) Vol 9, No 2 (2016) Vol 9, No 2 (2016) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2016) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2015) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2015) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2015) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2014) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2014) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2014) Vol 7, No 2 (2013) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2013) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2013) Vol 6, No 2 (2013) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2013) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2012) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2012) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2012) Vol. 4 No. 8 (2011) More Issue