cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andri Putra Kesmawan
Contact Email
andriputrakesmawan@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
igpa@ugm.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 08529213     EISSN : 24774693     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Public Health Social Sciences
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publikasi), dengan nomor p-ISSN: 0852-9213, e-ISSN: 2477-4693, adalah jurnal multidisiplin berskala nasional yang mencakup berbagai pokok persoalan dalam kajian ilmu-ilmu administrasi publik. Secara khusus JKAP menaruh perhatian pada pokok-pokok persoalan tentang perkembangan ilmu kebijakan dan administrasi publik, administrasi pembangunan, otonomi daerah, birokrasi dan aparatur negara, desentralisasi, ilmu ekonomi dan studi pembangunan, manajemen publik, kebijakan dan pemerintahan, serta ilmu sosial lain mencakup ilmu kesehatan masyarakat, politik fiskal, dan perencanaan wilayah.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue " 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004" : 5 Documents clear
Reposisi Lembaga Perpajakan Subarsono, AG
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (454.495 KB)

Abstract

Tax is one of the most crucial areas of government, especially in promoting national revenue and regulating the national economy. According to the current sociopolitical context, the effective use of tax is expected to overcome economic crisis and to reduce the local governments financial burden in implementing local autonomy. Based on empirical data, tax ratio in Indonesia is still lower than other neighboring countries, such as: Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand. Therefore Indonesia urgently needs to reform its tax organization (Direktorat Jendral Pajak). Besides that, the position of tax organization under the Department of Finance is improper due to the differingfunctions of the tax organization and the Department of Finance. The Department of Finance formulates national budget and maintains public asset while the tax organization collects money and ensures citizen compliance. This article argues about the importance of reforming the tax organization becoming a national tax agency directly under the President and thus having more autonomy and power, as well as a reduction of political intervention from other departments.
What is Good Governance? World Bank and The Power of Normalization Wahyudi, Agus
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (502.395 KB)

Abstract

Tulisan ini memberikan penilaian kritis alas konsep Bank Dunia tentang Good Governance (Kepemerintahan yang Balk) dengan melibat konsep ini melalui pendekatan Foucauldian, yaitu bukan hanya sebagai fenomena pengetahuan tetapi jugs sebagai fenomena kekuasaan,yaitu kekuasaan untuk normalisasi. Penelaahan atas asal mula dan evolusi konsep ini menyarankan bahwa keberadaan konsep ini tidaklab netral dan bebas kepentingan dan karena itu sebenarnyajuga tidak selalu universal atau dapat diterapkan dalam semua keadaan. Pengenian Good Governance yang didefinisikan sebagai kebijaksaan ekonomi yang baik dan pembangunan kelembagaan yang kuat, pada alehirnya telab memperkuat pola-pola hegemoni dan kelembagaan global dan menghasilkan dominasi atau hegemonisasi dari pengetahuan Bank Dunia (atau sebenarnyajuga ekonomi internasionalyang lain scperti IMF) terhadap bentuk pengetahuanyang lain, dengan akibal bahwa model alternatif pembangunanyang lain akan terpinggirkan atau sama sekalipunah.
Pokok-Pokok Pikiran Perbaikan Sistem Manajemen SDM PNS di Indonesia Keban, Yeremias T
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the recentyears, as the result of reformation movement, there is an increaringpressure on the government side to reform their bureaucrats to fulfil the demand of the general public: to get better public services. To realise the publics demand, therefore, Indonesian government should reform their human resources management rystem in order to realise the creation of accountable, transparent, and responsive civil servant in Indonesia. To do so, in this article the author suggests that Indonesian government should adopt good governanceprincipks in managing their employees. How the adoption should be done has been described in greater detail through out this article.
Citizens Charter dan Reformasi Birokrasi Triantoro, Bambang Wicaksono
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (326.861 KB)

Abstract

Participative, accountable, and travarentpublic service, which honors the rights and the dignity of the citizens, is one among other objectives to be realized by Indonesian bureaucrary as the consequence of the implementation of the autonomy polity. It means that Indonesia bureaucracy should implement new approach, which accommodates new values in providing public services to their costumers, as it is guided by goodgovernance principes. Citizens Charter is one among other strategies which can be utilized to realize participative, accountable and travarentpublic services. This article is aimed to describe the pilot pr eject of the implementation of the Citizens Charter, which was sponsored by Population and Policy Studies Center Gadjah Mada University, in three municipalities, namely: Yogyakarta, Blitar, and Ambarawa. By describing the three cases, the author would like to show that the implementation of Citizens Charter was successfully improved the quality of public services.
Revitalisasi Studi Implementasi Kebijakan Publik Purwanto, Erwan Agus
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the recentyears, the implementation study is facing a difficult time since its emergence for several deracks ago. This challenging, as a matter of fact, is caused by of various factors. Among of these factors, only to mention several of them, are.-first, the emergence of new public administration (NPM) in the 1990s. Some scholars argued that NPM souk/ be utilized to remedy iheprohlems of implementation, which mainly is seen as the probkm of administrative and management. This development subsequently raises a critical question to the implementation stuch, whether this study should be continued or not. Second, the declining of the domination of the government as the sole agent which is responsible to implement the government polity as the consequence of the need for democratisation. The second development gives new pressure to the government to invite more active role of the civil society and private sectors, not only to implement the government polity, but also to set up policy agenda and to formulatepoliry. The involvement of various organisations in implementing government policies means that the administrative and management approaches to understand the problems of implementation are not relevant any longer. After discussing all of these problems, this article then argues that the implementation study should renew its approach if this study still wants to maintain its existence. To do so, this article suggests that the scholars who carryout research on this theme should understand the problems of implementation not only as administrative and management as such, but also as political problem as well. This means that the problems of implementation should be understood also as the dynamic of the relationships among the stakeholders who have interest to a certain kind of policy within the policy cycle.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2004 2004


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November Vol 29, No 1 (2025): May Vol 28, No 1 (2024): May 2024 Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November Vol 27, No 1 (2023): May Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May 2022 Vol 26, No 2 (2022): November Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May Vol 25, No 1 (2021): May, 2021 Vol 25, No 2 (2021): November Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November Vol 24, No 1 (2020): May Vol 23, No 2 (2019): November Vol 23, No 1 (2019): May Vol 22, No 2 (2018): November Vol 22, No 1 (2018): May Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November Vol 20, No 1 (2016): May 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2015 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2015 Vol 19, No 2 (2015): November Vol 19, No 1 (2015): May 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2014 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2014 Vol 18, No 2 (2014): November Vol 18, No 1 (2014): May 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 2, Tahun 2013 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 1, Tahun 2013 Vol 17, No 2 (2013): November Vol 17, No 1 (2013): May 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2012 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2012 Vol 16, No 2 (2012): November Vol 16, No 1 (2012): May 2011: JKAP VOLUME 15 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2011 Vol 15, No 1 (2011): May 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2010 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2010 Vol 14, No 2 (2010): November Vol 14, No 1 (2010): May 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2009 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2009 Vol 13, No 2 (2009): November Vol 13, No 1 (2009): May 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 Vol 12, No 2 (2008): November Vol 12, No 1 (2008): May 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 More Issue