cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andri Putra Kesmawan
Contact Email
andriputrakesmawan@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
igpa@ugm.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 08529213     EISSN : 24774693     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Public Health Social Sciences
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publikasi), dengan nomor p-ISSN: 0852-9213, e-ISSN: 2477-4693, adalah jurnal multidisiplin berskala nasional yang mencakup berbagai pokok persoalan dalam kajian ilmu-ilmu administrasi publik. Secara khusus JKAP menaruh perhatian pada pokok-pokok persoalan tentang perkembangan ilmu kebijakan dan administrasi publik, administrasi pembangunan, otonomi daerah, birokrasi dan aparatur negara, desentralisasi, ilmu ekonomi dan studi pembangunan, manajemen publik, kebijakan dan pemerintahan, serta ilmu sosial lain mencakup ilmu kesehatan masyarakat, politik fiskal, dan perencanaan wilayah.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000" : 10 Documents clear
The Implementation of The Social Safety Net Program (SSN) In Sudagaran Village, Central Java Purwanto, Erwan Agus
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1131.559 KB)

Abstract

Krisis ekonomi yang melanda Indonesia sejak pertengahan tahun 1997 telah menimbulkan dampak yang serius terhadap berbagai aspek kehidupan masyarakat, baik ekonomi, sosial maupun politik. Akibat krisis tersebut menurut Biro Pusat Statistik ( BPS) lebih dari 13 juta pekerja menjadi penggangguran karena terkena PHK. Akan tetapi yang lebih mengkawatirkan lagi, sejak krisis ekonomi melanda Indonesia jumlah penduduk miskin di Indonesia mengalami kenaikan secara drastis dari hanya 27 juta pada tahun 1996 menjadi lebih dari 80 juta pada tahun 1998. Meningkatnya jumlah penduduk miskin tersebut kemudian menjadi pemicu munculnya berbagai problem sosial ekonomi yang lain yang lebih kompleks seperti anak putus sekolah, mall nutrisi, berkembangnya penyakit infeksi dan lain-lain. Untuk menyelamatkan bangsa Indonesia dari keterpurukan yang lebih parah (mencegah terjadinya the lost generation) maka Pemerintah Indonesia dengan bantuan IMF dan Bank Dunia kemudian meluncurkan program faring Pengaman Sosial (JPS) . Sayangnya, sebagaimana ditunjukkan dalam tulisan ini, implementasi program JPS ternyata belum berhasil rnencapai tujuan yang diharapkan. Studi kasus yang diangkat dalam tulisan ini pada akhirnya juga semakin memperkuat berbagai temuan serupa yang telah dilakukan oleh para peneliti sebelumnya yang mengungkapkan bahwa kelemahan instistusional yang ada pada pihak pelaksana, kurangnya informasi yang dimiliki oleh kelompok penerima, dan rendahnya dukungan masyarakat terhadap pelaksanaan program merupakan salah satu faktor penyebab kegagalan implementasi program JPS.
Analisis Biaya Manfaat Program Jaring Pengaman Sosial di Kabupaten Labuhan Batu Pancaningdyah, Esti
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1137.049 KB)

Abstract

This research is aimed at evaluating the program namely Local People Empowerment for Overcoming Economic Crisis Impact (Pemberdayaan Daerah dalam Mengatasi Dampak Krisis Ekonomi – PDM-DKE) which relates to the social safety net program in six villages of Labuhanbatu Regency. Two basic cast-benefit analysis are used — the Net Benefit (NB) and the Cost-Benefit Ratio (CBR) --- to evaluate the program for two target groups in Labuhanbatu. In the contrary to the objective of the program, it is indicated that quite a large portion of the fund (35.78%) was not used for empowering the smalls scales shops/stalls. The recipients from the poor people category was constitute only 19.18% of the total number, who gets about 10.97% of the total fund allocated. Using two scenarios for sensitivity analysis and 12 % per year for discounting, this research conclude that the PDM-DKE program is beneficial but the benefit was enjoyed more by no-low-income recipients. However, there might possibilities that the program create some non-quantifiable benefit. The following recommendation are put forward: 1) To ensure that the use of aid and the determination of the terget group are accordance with the original objective, there is a need for monitoring, supervision and guidance at every stage of the implementation up to the lowest level. 2) Allocation of the aid should be more selective in order to avoid deviations in the implementation. 3) Further research is necessary to investigate the implementation of the program in wider scope
Analisis Alternatif Kabijakan dalam Peningkatan Produksi Padi di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Martono, Budi
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (862.508 KB)

Abstract

Agriculture has been supporting economic development. Eventhough the effects of the 1997 drought in most parts of the country and tremendous dislocations caused by the crisis, the agriculture sector demonstrated tremendous resilience in coping with the economic crisis.. Based on the experienced, agriculture development policies could be done in order that agriculture sector to play a central role in the national economic recovery and repositioning agriculture as an engine ofeconomic growth and empowering farmers to articulated their aspiration and interest effectively. The problems identification showed that the causes of rice production decreasing for Yogyakarta Special Province were: (1) Paddy field contraction; (2) Productivity decreasing; (3) Low in educational back ground of the farmers ; (4) Decreasing to motivation of young generation to work in agriculture and (5) Land ownership constriction.
Birokrasi Menghadapi Perubahan Lingkungan Ratih, Dyah
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (511.752 KB)

Abstract

The availability of professional apparatur is expected to anticipate the very fast changing environment. The changing environment requires the capability of apparatus to grasp opportunities in order to optimize economic growth sustainably. However, professionalism can only be achieved if there is political will from the government to change the philosophy, value, structure and procedure of bureaucracy. In the case of tourism, new approaches are essential to develop the performance of tourism compatible with market. However, we still have to maintain socio-cultural aspects which are the main factor of tourism.
Evaluasi Kebijakan Harga Dasar Gabah: Studi Kasus Panen Raya Tahun 2000 Afandi, Andik
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1162.609 KB)

Abstract

Government gave its support to a price policy with a gabah floor price that was expected to stimulate rice pro-duction. But, during the great harvest 2000, the gabah price fell below the floor price in many paddy production centre. The resultof this research concluded that the gabah floor price is too low. Above all, the goveinment was not pick-aback and implementing the floor price policy seriously. Its prove that cheap food policy, the policy which consumer oriented, is continuing. If this "position" not to be changed, it is potentially provoke the paddy farmer not to produce rice more. Then, the food security can be worst at the next time. Because of the serious implication would be happen, the author recommend to push-up, as an adjust-ment, the level of gabah floor price, and then it must be guarranteed (by the government) as an urgen agenda.
Evaluasi Kebijakan Harga Dasar Gabah: Studi Kasus Panen Raya Tahun 2000 Andik Afandi
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1162.609 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8457

Abstract

Government gave its support to a price policy with a gabah floor price that was expected to stimulate rice pro-duction. But, during the 'great harvest' 2000, the gabah price fell below the floor price in many paddy production centre. The result'of this research concluded that the gabah floor price is too low. Above all, the goveinment was not pick-aback and implementing the floor price policy seriously. It's prove that 'cheap food policy', the policy which consumer oriented, is continuing. If this "position" not to be changed, it is potentially provoke the paddy farmer not to produce rice more. Then, the food security can be worst at the next time. Because of the serious implication would be happen, the author recommend to push-up, as an adjust-ment, the level of gabah floor price, and then it must be guarranteed (by the government) as an urgen agenda.
The Implementation of The Social Safety Net Program (SSN) In Sudagaran Village, Central Java Erwan Agus Purwanto
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1131.559 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8458

Abstract

Krisis ekonomi yang melanda Indonesia sejak pertengahan tahun 1997 telah menimbulkan dampak yang serius terhadap berbagai aspek kehidupan masyarakat, baik ekonomi, sosial maupun politik. Akibat krisis tersebut menurut Biro Pusat Statistik ( BPS) lebih dari 13 juta pekerja menjadi penggangguran karena terkena PHK. Akan tetapi yang lebih mengkawatirkan lagi, sejak krisis ekonomi melanda Indonesia jumlah penduduk miskin di Indonesia mengalami kenaikan secara drastis dari 'hanya' 27 juta pada tahun 1996 menjadi lebih dari 80 juta pada tahun 1998. Meningkatnya jumlah penduduk miskin tersebut kemudian menjadi pemicu munculnya berbagai problem sosial ekonomi yang lain yang lebih kompleks seperti anak putus sekolah, mall nutrisi, berkembangnya penyakit infeksi dan lain-lain. Untuk menyelamatkan bangsa Indonesia dari keterpurukan yang lebih parah (mencegah terjadinya the lost generation) maka Pemerintah Indonesia dengan bantuan IMF dan Bank Dunia kemudian meluncurkan program faring Pengaman Sosial (JPS) . Sayangnya, sebagaimana ditunjukkan dalam tulisan ini, implementasi program JPS ternyata belum berhasil rnencapai tujuan yang diharapkan. Studi kasus yang diangkat dalam tulisan ini pada akhirnya juga semakin memperkuat berbagai temuan serupa yang telah dilakukan oleh para peneliti sebelumnya yang mengungkapkan bahwa kelemahan instistusional yang ada pada pihak pelaksana, kurangnya informasi yang dimiliki oleh kelompok penerima, dan rendahnya dukungan masyarakat terhadap pelaksanaan program merupakan salah satu faktor penyebab kegagalan implementasi program JPS.
Analisis Biaya Manfaat Program Jaring Pengaman Sosial di Kabupaten Labuhan Batu Esti Pancaningdyah
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1137.049 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8459

Abstract

This research is aimed at evaluating the program namely Local People Empowerment for Overcoming Economic Crisis Impact (Pemberdayaan Daerah dalam Mengatasi Dampak Krisis Ekonomi – PDM-DKE) which relates to the social safety net program in six villages of Labuhanbatu Regency. Two basic cast-benefit analysis are used — the Net Benefit (NB) and the Cost-Benefit Ratio (CBR) --- to evaluate the program for two target groups in Labuhanbatu. In the contrary to the objective of the program, it is indicated that quite a large portion of the fund (35.78%) was not used for empowering the smalls scales shops/stalls. The recipients from the poor people category was constitute only 19.18% of the total number, who gets about 10.97% of the total fund allocated. Using two scenarios for sensitivity analysis and 12 % per year for discounting, this research conclude that the PDM-DKE program is beneficial but the benefit was enjoyed more by no-low-income recipients. However, there might possibilities that the program create some non-quantifiable benefit. The following recommendation are put forward: 1) To ensure that the use of aid and the determination of the terget group are accordance with the original objective, there is a need for monitoring, supervision and guidance at every stage of the implementation up to the lowest level. 2) Allocation of the aid should be more selective in order to avoid deviations in the implementation. 3) Further research is necessary to investigate the implementation of the program in wider scope
Analisis Alternatif Kabijakan dalam Peningkatan Produksi Padi di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Budi Martono
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (862.508 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8460

Abstract

Agriculture has been supporting economic development. Eventhough the effects of the 1997 drought in most parts of the country and tremendous dislocations caused by the crisis, the agriculture sector demonstrated tremendous resilience in coping with the economic crisis.. Based on the experienced, agriculture development policies could be done in order that agriculture sector to play a central role in the national economic recovery and repositioning agriculture as an engine ofeconomic growth and empowering farmers to articulated their aspiration and interest effectively. The problems identification showed that the causes of rice production decreasing for Yogyakarta Special Province were: (1) Paddy field contraction; (2) Productivity decreasing; (3) Low in educational back ground of the farmers ; (4) Decreasing to motivation of young generation to work in agriculture and (5) Land ownership constriction.
Birokrasi Menghadapi Perubahan Lingkungan Dyah Ratih
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (511.752 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8461

Abstract

The availability of professional apparatur is expected to anticipate the very fast changing environment. The changing environment requires the capability of apparatus to grasp opportunities in order to optimize economic growth sustainably. However, professionalism can only be achieved if there is political will from the government to change the philosophy, value, structure and procedure of bureaucracy. In the case of tourism, new approaches are essential to develop the performance of tourism compatible with market. However, we still have to maintain socio-cultural aspects which are the main factor of tourism.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2000 2000


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November Vol 29, No 1 (2025): May Vol 28, No 1 (2024): May 2024 Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November Vol 27, No 1 (2023): May Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May 2022 Vol 26, No 2 (2022): November Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May Vol 25, No 1 (2021): May, 2021 Vol 25, No 2 (2021): November Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November Vol 24, No 1 (2020): May Vol 23, No 2 (2019): November Vol 23, No 1 (2019): May Vol 22, No 2 (2018): November Vol 22, No 1 (2018): May Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November Vol 20, No 1 (2016): May 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2015 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2015 Vol 19, No 2 (2015): November Vol 19, No 1 (2015): May 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2014 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2014 Vol 18, No 2 (2014): November Vol 18, No 1 (2014): May 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 2, Tahun 2013 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 1, Tahun 2013 Vol 17, No 2 (2013): November Vol 17, No 1 (2013): May 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2012 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2012 Vol 16, No 2 (2012): November Vol 16, No 1 (2012): May 2011: JKAP VOLUME 15 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2011 Vol 15, No 1 (2011): May 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2010 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2010 Vol 14, No 2 (2010): November Vol 14, No 1 (2010): May 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2009 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2009 Vol 13, No 2 (2009): November Vol 13, No 1 (2009): May 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 Vol 12, No 2 (2008): November Vol 12, No 1 (2008): May 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 More Issue