cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agus Chalid
Contact Email
gulid.p@gmail.com
Phone
+6285220013654
Journal Mail Official
gmhc.unisba@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Hariangbanga No. 2, Tamansari, Bandung 40116
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Global Medical and Health Communication
Published by Universitas Islam Bandung
ISSN : 23019123     EISSN : 24605441     DOI : https://doi.org/10.29313/gmhc
Core Subject : Health, Science,
Dentistry Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Nursing Public Health
Global Medical and Health Communication is a journal that publishes research articles on medical and health published every 4 (four) months (April, August, and December). Articles are original research that needs to be disseminated and written in English. Subjects suitable for publication include but are not limited to the following fields of anesthesiology and intensive care, biochemistry, biomolecular, cardiovascular, child health, dentistry, dermatology and venerology, endocrinology, environmental health, epidemiology, geriatric, hematology, histology, histopathology, immunology, internal medicine, nursing sciences, midwifery, nutrition, nutrition and metabolism, obstetrics and gynecology, occupational health, oncology, ophthalmology, oral biology, orthopedics and traumatology, otorhinolaryngology, pharmacology, pharmacy, preventive medicine, public health, pulmonology, radiology, and reproductive health.
Arjuna Subject : Kedokteran - Epidemilogi
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 8, No 3 (2020)" : 13 Documents clear
The Differences in Maternal Compliance in Completing Basic Immunization between Two Groups Ita Susanti; Dewi Marhaeni Diah Herawati; Eddy Fadlyana; Herry Herman; Kusnandi Rusmil; Firman Fuad Wirakusumah
Global Medical & Health Communication (GMHC) Vol 8, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (66.936 KB) | DOI: 10.29313/gmhc.v8i3.3280

Abstract

Immunization programs are implemented in Indonesia since 1956. Although the government has established a complete basic immunization program for infants aged 0–12 months, there are still more than 1.4 million child deaths in the world each year due to various infectious diseases. The diseases can be prevented by immunization. Low basic immunization coverage in infants is related to parental non-compliance in fulfilling primary immunization. The purpose of this study was to measure the differences in maternal compliance in completing basic immunization in two groups. Samples are a group of mothers provided with Maternal Child Health (MCH) book and special booklet, and another group provided with MCH book only. This study used a quasi-experiment design with quantitative methods with a sample of 76 respondents chosen by simple random sampling—this research conducted in August–October 2017 in Pir Batee Puteh Health Center, West Woyla district. The results indicate that there were differences in maternal compliance in completing basic immunization in mothers with MCH book and special booklet to mothers with only MCH book. Immunization health education interventions based on the MCH book and special booklet can improve the mother's compliance in completing the baby's basic immunization. PERBEDAAN KEPATUHAN IBU DALAM MELENGKAPI IMUNISASI DASAR ANTARA DUA KELOMPOKProgram imunisasi mulai dilaksanakan di Indonesia sejak tahun 1956. Meskipun pemerintah telah menetapkan program imunisasi dasar lengkap pada bayi usia 0–12 bulan, masih terdapat lebih dari 1,4 juta kematian anak di dunia setiap tahun karena berbagai penyakit menular yang pada dasarnya dapat dicegah dengan imunisasi. Cakupan imunisasi dasar yang rendah pada bayi berkaitan dengan ketidakpatuhan orangtua dalam memenuhi kelengkapan imunisasi dasar. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengukur perbedaan kepatuhan ibu dalam memenuhi kelengkapan imunisasi dasar pada dua kelompok. Sampel adalah kelompok ibu yang diberikan buku Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak (KIA) dan booklet, serta kelompok ibu yang diberikan buku KIA saja. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain quasy-experiment dan metode kuantitatif dengan sampel 76 responden yang dipilih secara simple random sampling. Penelitian dilakukan pada Agustus–Oktober 2017 di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Pir Batee Puteh, Kecamatan Woyla Barat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan kepatuhan ibu dalam memenuhi kelengkapan imunisasi dasar pada ibu yang diberikan buku KIA dan booklet dengan ibu yang hanya diberikan buku KIA. Intervensi pendidikan kesehatan imunisasi berdasar atas buku KIA dan booklet dapat meningkatkan pengetahuan dan kesadaran ibu tentang pentingnya imunisasi pada bayi sehingga meningkatkan kepatuhan ibu dalam melengkapi imunisasi bayinya.
Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica L.) Ethanol Extract on Sepsis Mice Model Body Weight and Sepsis Score Mirasari Putri; Neni Anggraeni; Raden Aliya Tresna M. D.; Ghaliby Ardhia Ramli; Mia Kusmiati; Yuke Andriane; Eka Hendryanny; Abdul Hadi Hassan; Meta Maulida Damayanti; Nugraha Sutadipura; Mas Rizky A. A. Syamsunarno
Global Medical & Health Communication (GMHC) Vol 8, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/gmhc.v8i3.6604

Abstract

Sepsis causes damage for cells, behavioral phenotype regression, and will end in most patients' death. The ethanol extract of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica L.)  acts as an antioxidant. This study aimed to observe the effect of giving ECGR to body weight (BW) and the sepsis score of the sepsis mice model by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induction. This study was an in vivo study with a randomized post-test controlled group design at the Animal Laboratory of Universitas Padjadjaran, 2018. We used 4 (four) groups of male mice (Mus musculus) DDY strains. Group 1 as a control, group 2: LPS 10 μL/kgBW, group 3, and 4: LPS+ECGR (90 mg/kgBW, and a dose of 115 mg/kgBW, respectively). This treatment was performed for two weeks. Every three days, we measured their body weight. After two weeks, group 2, group 3, and 4 were injected with LPS for 8 hours to induce sepsis. Next, we measured body weight and sepsis score using murine sepsis score (MSS). Then statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test. The results showed no differences in body weight were found in the treatment groups (3 and 4) compared with control, suggesting no effect of ECGR in decreasing mice body weight. The sepsis score was more than 21 in groups treated with LPS (2, 3, and 4), suggesting LPS can induce sepsis. There was a slight decrease in scores in-group 3 and 4 compared with group 2. This study concludes that the treatment of ECGR caused no harm to body weight and slightly decreased sepsis score in the sepsis mice model. EKSTRAK ETANOL ALANG-ALANG (IMPERATA CYLINDRICA L.) TERHADAP BOBOT BADAN DAN SKOR SEPSIS MENCIT MODEL SEPSISSepsis menyebabkan kerusakan sel, regresi fenotipe perilaku, dan akan berakhir kematian pada sebagian besar pasien. Ekstrak etanol akar alang-alang (Imperata cylindrica L.) (ECGR) berperan sebagai antioksidan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui pengaruh pemberian ECGR terhadap bobot badan (BB) dan skor sepsis pada mencit model sepsis yang diinduksi lipopolisakarida (LPS). Penelitian ini adalah penelitian in vivo dengan desain randomized post-test controlled group di Laboratoium Hewan Universitas Padjadjaran tahun 2018. Kami menggunakan 4 (empat) kelompok mencit jantan (Mus musculus) strain DDY. Kelompok 1 sebagai kontrol, kelompok 2 diinduksi LPS 10 μL/kgBB, kelompok 3 dan 4 diinduksi LPS+ECGR (dosis 90 mg/kgBB dan 115 mg/kgBB masing-masing). Perlakuan ini dilakukan selama 2 minggu. Setiap tiga hari dilakukan pengukuran bobot badan mencit. Setelah dua minggu, kelompok 2, kelompok 3, dan kelompok 4 diinjeksi LPS selama 8 jam untuk menginduksi sepsis. Selanjutnya, diukur bobot badan dan skor sepsis menggunakan murine sepsis score (MSS). Analisis statistik menggunakan ANOVA dan Uji Kruskal-Wallis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbedaan bobot badan pada kelompok perlakuan (3 dan 4) dibanding dengan kelompok kontrol yang menunjukkan ECGR tidak berpengaruh dalam menurunkan bobot badan mencit. Skor sepsis lebih dari 21 pada kelompok yang diinduksi LPS (2, 3, dan 4) menunjukkan LPS dapat menyebabkan sepsis. Terdapat sedikit penurunan skor pada kelompok 3 dan 4 dibanding dengan kelompok 2. Simpulan penelitian ini, pengobatan ECGR tidak membahayakan bobot badan dan mengakibatkan sedikit penurunan skor sepsis pada mencit model sepsis.
The Influence of Gestational Age and Birth Weight on Neonatal Mortality Wedi Iskandar; Yeni Andayani; Lia Marlia; Burhan Burhan; Aris Primadi
Global Medical & Health Communication (GMHC) Vol 8, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1287.403 KB) | DOI: 10.29313/gmhc.v8i3.6718

Abstract

Prematurity and low birth weight are some of the causes of neonatal death and significant health problem. This study aimed to determine the influence of gestational age and birth weight on neonatal mortality at the Al Islam Hospital Bandung in 2015–2019. It was a case-control retrospective observational analysis using medical records of the Al Islam Bandung Hospital from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. The inclusion criteria for infants were born alive. Exclusion criteria had severe congenital abnormalities and gestational age <26 weeks. The chi-square test evaluated the univariate comparison test of risk factors between 2 groups. Multiple logistic regression to assess neonatal mortality's predictive factors and the percentage contribution of the influence was calculated (Nagelkerke’s R2 analysis). The number of infants enrolled in 2015–2019 was 6,791 neonates, and who died was 56 neonates (0.82%). In premature infants and low birth weight there was a very significant relationship with neonatal mortality, respectively p=0.000 (p<0.05) OR=30.397 (CI=16.506–55.976), and p=0.000 (p<0.05) OR=41.206 (CI=18.611–91.233). In the multiple logistic regression test, p=0.000 (p<0.05), with a Nagelkerke’s R2 value of 0.344 or 34.4%. This presence that gestational age and birth weight significantly affects neonatal mortality, either partially or simultaneously. The percentage contribution of the influence of gestational age and birth weight to neonatal mortality was 34.4%. PENGARUH USIA GESTASI DAN BERAT BADAN LAHIR TERHADAP KEMATIAN NEONATUSPrematuritas dan berat badan lahir rendah merupakan beberapa penyebab kematian neonatus dan masalah kesehatan yang signifikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui pengaruh usia gestasi dan berat badan lahir terhadap kematian neonatus di RS Al Islam Bandung tahun 2015–2019. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian observasional retrospektif kasus kontrol menggunakan data rekam medis RS Al Islam Bandung periode 1 Januari 2015 hingga 31 Desember 2019. Kriteria inklusi bayi lahir hidup. Kriteria eksklusi bayi dengan kelainan kongenital berat dan usia gestasi <26 minggu. Uji chi-square mengevaluasi perbandingan univariat faktor risiko antara 2 grup. Regresi logistik multipel untuk mengevaluasi faktor prediktif kematian neonatus dan persentase kontribusi pengaruh dihitung (Analisis R2 Nagelkerke). Jumlah bayi yang dirawat tahun 2015–2019 sebanyak 6.791 dan yang meninggal sebanyak 56 (0,82%). Pada bayi lahir prematur dan berat badan lahir rendah terdapat hubungan sangat bermakna terhadap kematian neonatus, berturut-turut p=0,000 (p<0,05) OR=30,397 (CI=16,506–55,976) dan p=0,000 (p<0,05) OR=41,206 (CI=18,611–91,233). Pada uji regresi logistik multipel, p=0,000 (p<0,05) dengan nilai R2 Nagelkerke sebesar 0,344 atau 34,4%. Usia gestasi dan berat badan lahir berpengaruh bermakna terhadap kematian neonatus, baik secara parsial maupun simultan. Persentase sumbangan pengaruh usia gestasi dan berat badan lahir terhadap kematian neonatus sebesar 34,4%.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 1 (2025) Vol 12, No 3 (2024) Vol 12, No 2 (2024) Vol 12, No 1 (2024) Vol 11, No 3 (2023) Vol 11, No 2 (2023) Vol 11, No 1 (2023) Vol 10, No 3 (2022) Vol 10, No 2 (2022) Vol 10, No 1 (2022) Vol 9, No 3 (2021) Vol 9, No 2 (2021) Vol 9, No 1 (2021) Vol 8, No 3 (2020) Vol 8, No 2 (2020) Vol 8, No 1 (2020) Vol 7, No 3 (2019) Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2019) Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 3 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 2 (2016) Vol 4, No 1 (2016) Vol 3, No 2 (2015) Vol 3, No 2 (2015) Vol 3, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 1 (2015) Vol 2, No 2 (2014) Vol 2, No 2 (2014) Vol 2, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 1 (2014) Vol 1, No 2 (2013) Vol 1, No 2 (2013) Vol 1, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 1 (2013) More Issue