Articles
18 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 11, No 1 (2017)"
:
18 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[KAJIAN HADITH TENTANG SALAM DALAM BUKU FIQIH LINTAS AGAMA (FLA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Syofrianisda, Syofrianisda]]>
<![CDATA[ UNIVERSUM Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Kediri ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i1.590
<![CDATA[The background of this study is based on hadith riwayah of Muslim through Abu Hurairah about the Prophet’s prohibition to start saying salam to Jewish and Christian people. “Don’t start to say salam to Jewish and Christian people. If you greet one of them on the street, urge him to the side”. This hadith is understood by some writers showing the hard, cruel and frightening side of Islam. Moreover, they reject and abandon the hadith’s validity. They argue that this hadith is not suitable with the Islamic foundation that stresses on peace. The writer is interested in discussing this problem since there is no in depth study on some writers’ understanding especially in greeting to non-muslim. Besides, Hartono Ahmad Jaiz has been criticized their idea through books Preventing the Dangerous of Liberal Islamic Network (JIL) and Inter Faith Fiqh (FLA). However, Hartono seems to focus on pluralism verses only. Meanwhile, in tradition of his understanding, he often comments more on hadith related to interfaith problem. Therefore, this thought is strongly possible to develop in the future. It is proved by the development of pluralism study recently.
Keywords: Hadith, salam, interfaith fiqh]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI ILMU ‘ILAL AL-HADĪTH ]]>
<![CDATA[Husain, Rahmin Talib]]>
<![CDATA[ UNIVERSUM Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Kediri ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i1.595
<![CDATA[‘Ilal al-hadīth study is a kind of study that investigates hadith and has strategic values in other hadith studies. This article investigates descriptively that aims at exploring and positioning ‘ilal al-hadīth study for developin hadith study in the future since there is minimum appreciation for hadith scholars in general toward the existence and the development of this study.
Key words: Hadith, ‘ilal al-hadīth, ṣahih, sanad, matan]]>
<![CDATA[PEMAHAMAN ḤADITH (Definisi, Aliran, dan Afilisasi) ]]>
<![CDATA[Hariono, Duwi]]>
<![CDATA[ UNIVERSUM Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Kediri ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i1.591
<![CDATA[The terms in hadith study is often ambiguous and difficult to differentiate. As the terms of hadith, sunah,
khabar, and atsar are often used at the same time. For hadith observers, it becomes serious problem and complicated since those terms have significant difference. Hence, the same usage of those terms cannot be accepted. One of the debatable issues in discussing hadith study is about disagreement in defining the term of hadith understanding. The hadith scholars mention it in three terms: fiqh al-ḥadith, fahm al-ḥadith dan naqd al-ḥadith. Each term has different perception related to its scope and limitation. One should be underlined that although those terms are different, the purposes are same namely hadith understanding activities. This article discusses the definition of fiqh al-ḥadith, fahm al-ḥadith dan naqd al-ḥadith and their sects and affiliation of hadith understanding.
Keywords: Fiqh al-ḥadith, fahm al-ḥadith, naqd al-ḥadith, sects, affiliation]]>
<![CDATA[TIPOLOGI KODIFIKASI HADITH DALAM KITAB TUḤFAT AL AṢRĀF BI MA’RIFAT AL-AṬRĀF ]]>
<![CDATA[Aniqoh, Aniqoh]]>
<![CDATA[ UNIVERSUM Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Kediri ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i1.592
<![CDATA[book Aṭrāf is one of the book that can be used to help in studying hadith, especially if muhaddith want to conduct takhrij al-hadith that can be used as dictionary in looking for sanad hadith. It is also the hadith book that is summarized by the author to mention the previous hadith and show the next lafal hadith. The basic
reason of the book written is to collect many hadith in kutūb al sittah and some of their Mulhaq easily that can be read appropriately based on the sequence of their various sanad in order to put them in one place. The author mentions previously some hadith having most widely tarjamah (meaning). As six riwayah is previously used than five riwayah; the five riwayah is used previously than the four riwayah and soon. The types of hadith book, Aṭrāf, have special thing besides their obstacles faced when they are used in takhrij hadith.
Keywords: KitabTuhfat, takhrij al-hadith,Hadith]]>
<![CDATA[KONSEP SAHABAT MENURUT MAḤFŪẒ AL-TARMASĪ (1842-1920 M) ]]>
<![CDATA[Anshori, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ UNIVERSUM Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Kediri ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i1.593
<![CDATA[This article tries to explore the concept of shahabat in a book Manhaj Żawīal-Naẓar written by Maḥfūẓ al- Tarmasī. This book is Sharḥ Naẓm Alfīyah al-Suyūṭī (died in 911 H) consisting of 980 stanzas, and is added 20 stanzas by al-Tarmasī, so the total is 1000 stanzas. One of the interesting point to be discussed in hadith study is the concept of shahabat, the first source of hadith. The validity of shahabat becomes polemic between Sunni and Shi’i, especially on the concept of shahabat justice. In the book, there is no new concept of shahabat’s justice in general. Al- Tarmasī only repeats the previous ulama’s explanations in his book. By following the majority of ulama, he states that all shahabat are ādil (fair), but the reality shows that not all of them are ādil (fair). This article has been proved it by quoting some sources. Modern Muslim scholars also ask about the concept of al-ṣaḥābah kulluhum udūl. In some literatures, it has been mentioned some shahabat’s attitudes that did not show the Islamic values. There are many examples of bad shahabat’s behavior, so it can be said that the concept of al-ṣaḥābah kulluhum udūl does not have to be understood that all shahabat are ādil (fair). The appropriate
meaning is that some of shahabat are ādil (fair) since “kullu” here is juz’iyah (some), not kulliyah (whole).
Keywords: ādil, Maḥfūẓ al-Tarmasī, Manhaj Żawīal-Naẓar, Sahabat]]>
<![CDATA[METODE KEṢAHĪHAN HADIS SUNNĪ VS METODE KEṢAHĪHAN HADIS SHĪ’AH ]]>
<![CDATA[Muttaqin, Khairul]]>
<![CDATA[ UNIVERSUM Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Kediri ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i1.594
<![CDATA[Recently, there are two groups that always contradict in terms of ideology and methodology, namely Sunni and Shi’ah. In hadith terminology, those groups have different views. The validity method of prophet’s hadith by sunni is really different with the validity method of prophet’s hadith by shi’ah. The method used in this study is library research in which the writer investigates works related to the difference of methodologies between Sunni and Shi’ah in determining the validity of hadith. In matan and sanad hadith criticisms, there is significant difference between the both groups. The different ways make the difference in the validity of hadith and madhhab fiqh.
Keywords: method, validity, Hadith, Sunni, Shi’ah]]>
<![CDATA[TIPOLOGI KODIFIKASI HADITH DALAM KITAB TUḤFAT AL AṢRĀF BI MA’RIFAT AL-AṬRĀF ]]>
<![CDATA[Aniqoh, Aniqoh]]>
<![CDATA[ UNIVERSUM : Jurnal KeIslaman dan Kebudayaan Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Kediri ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i1.592
<![CDATA[book Aá¹ÂrÄÂf is one of the book that can be used to help in studying hadith, especially if muhaddith want to conduct takhrij al-hadith that can be used as dictionary in looking for sanad hadith. It is also the hadith book that is summarized by the author to mention the previous hadith and show the next lafal hadith. The basic reason of the book written is to collect many hadith in kutÅ«b al sittah and some of their Mulhaq easily that can be read appropriately based on the sequence of their various sanad in order to put them in one place. The author mentions previously some hadith having most widely tarjamah (meaning). As six riwayah is previously used than five riwayah; the five riwayah is used previously than the four riwayah and soon. The types of hadith book, Aá¹ÂrÄÂf, have special thing besides their obstacles faced when they are used in takhrij hadith. Keywords: KitabTuhfat, takhrij al-hadith,Hadith]]>
<![CDATA[KONSEP SAHABAT MENURUT MAḤFŪẒ AL-TARMASĪ (1842-1920 M) ]]>
<![CDATA[Anshori, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ UNIVERSUM : Jurnal KeIslaman dan Kebudayaan Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Kediri ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i1.593
<![CDATA[This article tries to explore the concept of shahabat in a book Manhaj Å»awÄ«al-Naẓar written by Maḥfūẓ al- TarmasÄ«. This book is Sharḥ Naẓm AlfÄ«yah al-SuyÅ«á¹ÂÄ« (died in 911 H) consisting of 980 stanzas, and is added 20 stanzas by al-TarmasÄ«, so the total is 1000 stanzas. One of the interesting point to be discussed in hadith study is the concept of shahabat, the first source of hadith. The validity of shahabat becomes polemic between Sunni and Shi’i, especially on the concept of shahabat justice. In the book, there is no new concept of shahabat’s justice in general. Al- TarmasÄ« only repeats the previous ulama’s explanations in his book. By following the majority of ulama, he states that all shahabat are ÄÂdil (fair), but the reality shows that not all of them are ÄÂdil (fair). This article has been proved it by quoting some sources. Modern Muslim scholars also ask about the concept of al-á¹£aḥÄÂbah kulluhum udÅ«l. In some literatures, it has been mentioned some shahabat’s attitudes that did not show the Islamic values. There are many examples of bad shahabat’s behavior, so it can be said that the concept of al-á¹£aḥÄÂbah kulluhum udÅ«l does not have to be understood that all shahabat are ÄÂdil (fair). The appropriate meaning is that some of shahabat are ÄÂdil (fair) since “kullu†here is juz’iyah (some), not kulliyah (whole). Keywords: ÄÂdil, Maḥfūẓ al-TarmasÄ«, Manhaj Å»awÄ«al-Naẓar, Sahabat]]>
<![CDATA[METODE KEṢAHĪHAN HADIS SUNNĪ VS METODE KEṢAHĪHAN HADIS SHĪ’AH ]]>
<![CDATA[Muttaqin, Khairul]]>
<![CDATA[ UNIVERSUM : Jurnal KeIslaman dan Kebudayaan Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Kediri ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i1.594
<![CDATA[Recently, there are two groups that always contradict in terms of ideology and methodology, namely Sunni and Shi’ah. In hadith terminology, those groups have different views. The validity method of prophet’s hadith by sunni is really different with the validity method of prophet’s hadith by shi’ah. The method used in this study is library research in which the writer investigates works related to the difference of methodologies between Sunni and Shi’ah in determining the validity of hadith. In matan and sanad hadith criticisms, there is significant difference between the both groups. The different ways make the difference in the validity of hadith and madhhab fiqh. Keywords: method, validity, Hadith, Sunni, Shi’ah]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI ILMU ‘ILAL AL-HADĪTH ]]>
<![CDATA[Husain, Rahmin Talib]]>
<![CDATA[ UNIVERSUM : Jurnal KeIslaman dan Kebudayaan Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Kediri ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i1.595
<![CDATA[‘Ilal al-hadīth study is a kind of study that investigates hadith and has strategic values in other hadith studies. This article investigates descriptively that aims at exploring and positioning ‘ilal al-hadīth study for developin hadith study in the future since there is minimum appreciation for hadith scholars in general toward the existence and the development of this study. Key words: Hadith, ‘ilal al-hadīth, ṣahih, sanad, matan]]>
