cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Made Warka
Contact Email
rosalindael@untag-sby.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhmk@untag-sby.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Semolowaru 45 Surabaya Jawa Timur
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Mimbar Keadilan
Published by Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
ISSN : 08538964     EISSN : 26542919     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Mimbar Keadilan is published by the Law Faculty Laboratory of Law Faculty, University of August 17, 1945, Surabaya. First published in 1996 and up to now there are as many as two editions per year. This journal gives readers access to download journal entries in pdf file format. Mimbar Keadilan is created as a means of communication and dissemination for researchers to publish research articles or conceptual articles. The Mimbar Keadilan only accepts articles related to the topic of law except business law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 262 Documents
 23   24   25   26   27 
Redesigning the Authority of Autonomous Region in Geothermal Management: a Constitutional Justice Perspective Hadi, Syofyan
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Februari 2026 (In Press)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v19i1.132755

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the authority of autonomous regions in geothermal management and to find a fair redesign of the division of geothermal management authority to autonomous regions. This study is a legal study with a statute, conceptual, and case approach. The primary and secondary legal materials that have been collected are then analysed normatively. The results of the study found that through the principle of the broadest possible autonomy, the central government decentralizes some concurrent government affairs to autonomous regions. One of the concurrent affairs is geothermal affairs. However, Law No. 23 of 2014 regulates the centralization of geothermal permit issuance, so that it only becomes the authority of the Central Government. In fact, this centralization is strengthened by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 11/PUU-XIV/2016. In fact, this causes injustice to autonomous regions. After all, it is contrary to Article 18 paragraph (2) and paragraph (5) and Article 18A paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and is inconsistent with Law No. 23 of 2014 because it only uses the principle of national strategic interests. Therefore, as an effort to provide justice for the regions, the regulation needs to be redesigned by dividing the authority to grant geothermal permits among the regions. The division of authority is carried out using the principles of accountability, externality, and efficiency by considering the location/place of the geothermal permit, users, and benefits/negative impacts of granting geothermal permits, as well as efficiency in the implementation of granting geothermal permits.
Legal Analysis of WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism Application in US 19% Tariff Case Against Indonesia for Trade Justice Wendra, Muhammad; Sutrisno, Andri
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Februari 2026 (In Press)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v19i1.132951

Abstract

This research stems from the reciprocal and protectionist policy of increased import tariffs by the United States, which disrupts free trade that has been functioning properly and creates injustice in international trade. Especially toward Indonesia, which was also affected by this policy, where the 19% reciprocal agreement with the United States still resulted in violations of international law, as determined by the WTO. Regarding this, this study aims to provide a legal analysis of the importance of the potential application of WTO dispute resolution to the United States' 19% tariff policy in its reciprocal agreement with Indonesia in order to achieve justice in the international trading system. This research uses a normative legal research method by examining international regulations (protocols) implemented by the WTO to ensure dispute resolution and the conduct of international trade processes. The results of this study indicate that the 19% import tariff policy by the United States thru its reciprocal agreement with Indonesia still violates import tariffs, the principle of good faith, and international trade monopolies. Therefore, Indonesia has the potential to resolve the dispute at the WTO by challenging the 19% tariff policy. This research recommends that a country, particularly Indonesia in this case, pursue formal dispute resolution within the WTO, including retaliation, as well as diplomatic approaches to find common ground (a win-win solution) for both parties.

Page 27 of 27 | Total Record : 262

 23   24   25   26   27 

Filter by Year

2014 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Februari 2026 (In Press) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025 Vol. 18 No. 1 (2025): Februari 2025 Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): Agustus 2024 Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024): Februari 2024 Vol 16 No 2 (2023): Agustus 2023 Vol 16 No 1 (2023): Februari 2023 Vol 15 No 2 (2022): Agustus 2022 Vol 15 No 1 (2022): Februari 2022 Vol 14 No 2 (2021): Agustus 2021 Vol 14 No 1 (2021): Februari 2021 Vol 13, No 2 (2020): Agustus 2020 Vol 13 No 2 (2020): Agustus 2020 Vol 13 No 1 (2020): Februari 2020 Vol 12 No 2 (2019): Agustus 2019 Vol 12 No 1 (2019): Februari 2019 Vol 14 No 28 (2018): Agustus 2018 Februari 2018 Februari 2018 Agustus 2017 Februari 2017 Februari 2017 Agustus 2017 Januari - Juni 2016 Januari-Juni 2016 Juli - November 2016 Jurnal Mimbar Keadilan Januari-Juni 2015 Juli - November 2015 Jurnal Mimbar Keadilan Juli-Nopember 2015 Jurnal Mimbar Keadilan Januari-Juni 2014 Jurnal Mimbar Keadilan Mei-Nopember 2014 More Issue