Articles
17 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 5 No 1 (2020)"
:
17 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Sanksi Terhadap Penerima Fidusia Yang Tidak Menghapuskan Jaminan Fidusia Elektronik ]]>
<![CDATA[I Putu Budi Arta Yama]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Udiana]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p12
<![CDATA[The purpose of carrying out the elimination of related fiduciary guarantees so that objects that are used as fiduciary collateral objects with the debt fiduciary debt paid off, then the object can be re-registered the same fiduciary guarantee. In the regulations regarding Fiduciary Guarantees namely Law Number 42 of 1999 does not regulate sanctions against parties who are given the mandate by statutory regulations to abolish fiduciary guarantees. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the sanctions against those appointed by the laws and regulations that do not abolish electronic fiduciary guarantees and who can eliminate electronic fiduciary guarantees. This study applies a method which is normative legal research and the approach is the statutory approach. The result of this research is that the sanction given is civil sanction, in the form of a claim for compensation which refers to the provisions of Article 1365 of the Civil Code and the party that can carry out the removal of fiduciary guarantees ie is a fiduciary recipient either through his power of attorney or representative, the attorney referred to is a Notary Public.]]>
<![CDATA[PERSEKUTUAN KOMANDITER SEBAGAI SUBJEK PEMEGANG HAK GUNA BANGUNAN BERDASARKAN SURAT EDARAN MENTERI ATR/BPN NOMOR 2/SE-HT.02.01/VI/2019 ]]>
<![CDATA[Cokorda Istri Brahmi Putri Biya]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewa Gde Rudy]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p02
<![CDATA[This research is based on Circular Letter 2/SE- HT.02.01/VI/2019, dated June 28, 2019 concerning the Granting of Building Use Rights for the Military Alliance (commanditaire vennootschap). This circular is a guideline for implementing the granting of HGB to the temporary Limited partnership companies (CV) when referring to Article 35 paragraph (1) of the Agrarian Law that Building Rights can only be owned by Indonesian Citizens and Legal Entities established under Indonesian law and domiciled in Indonesia, as also described in Article 19 Implementing Regulations, namely Government Regulation Number 40 of 1996 concerning Land Use Rights, Building Use Rights and Land Use Rights. Circular Number 2/SE-HT.02.01/VI/2019, dated June 28, 2019 concerning the granting of Building Rights for the Limited partnership companies(CV), cause a conflicts of legal norms between laws and regulations of one degree or another or between laws and regulations in a hierarchical manner. Furthermore is the arising of legal uncertainty from the description above, the problems that can be raised in this study are: What is the legal position of the Limited partnership companies (CV) according to the legal provisions in Indonesia and whether the Limited partnership companies (CV) can be used as the subject of the Right to Use. This research uses the Normative legal research method by using a type of approach in the form of a statutory approach and an analytical conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used in this study include primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The results of this study indicate that the legal status of limited partnership (CV) in Indonesian law is that Limited partnership companies(CV) is not a legal entity but only as a business entity. This can be assessed based on the characteristics of the legal entity that is the separation of assets of the state-owned companies with the assets of business entities, so that the state-owned companies are only responsible for the limited assets owned. Meanwhile, in CV, all active (complementary) and passive (limited partnership) companies may be held liable for losses suffered by CV, as Article 21 of the Code of Business Lawthat said CV companies has jointly responsible and jointly responsible (CV) cannot be the]]>
<![CDATA[AKIBAT HUKUM PELANGGARAN KEWAJIBAN MENGGUNAKAN BAHASA INDONESIA DALAM PERJANJIAN DENGAN PIHAK ASING ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Made Ayu Pasek Dwilaksmi]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p08
<![CDATA[Indonesian is the national language as regulated in Act Number 24 of 2009. Therefore Indonesian language must be used for formal matters, one of which is in the context of the formulation of the agreement. In fact, in Indonesia there are agreements that use foreign languages, especially agreements involving foreign citizens in it. The purpose of writing this journal is to find out and analyze the arrangements regarding foreign language agreements in Indonesia and the legal consequences of violating the obligation to use the national language of Indonesia in agreements with foreign parties. This journal is doctrinal (normative) which uses a statutory and conceptual approach. Legal materials consist of primary and secondary legal materials which are then analyzed qualitatively. The conclusions that can be obtained in this journal include: (1) Arrangements regarding foreign language Act Number 24 of 2009 which basically stipulates that an agreement must use Indonesian language and must also use a foreign language rather than a foreign party. it originates; (2) Violation of the obligation to use Indonesian in an agreement with a foreign party is not regulated in Act Number 24 of 2009. However, if it is guided by the theory of interpretation of the legislation, namely a systematic interpretation, that the agreement that does not use Indonesian is a prohibited cause as referred to in Article 1320 and Article 1337 of the Civil Code. Therefore, the objective conditions in the agreement were not fulfilled and the agreement was considered null and void.]]>
<![CDATA[A Kewenangan Notaris dalam Mensertifikasi Transaksi yang Dilakukan Secara Elektronik (Cyber Notary) ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Kadek Ayu Ena Widiasih]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p13
<![CDATA[Berdasarkan Penjelasan Pasal 15 ayat (3) UUJNP notaris memiliki kewenangan mensertifikasi transaksi yang dilakukan secara elektronik (Cyber Notary). Dari Penjelasan Pasal 15 ayat (3) UUJNP, tidak terdapat pemahaman lebih lanjut mengenai kewenangan mensertifikasi yang dimiliki oleh notaris, tidak terdapatnya penjelasan mengenai maksud kata mensertifikasi tersebut menimbulkan kekaburan norma hukum. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kewenangan melakukan sertifikasi yang dimiliki notaris. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan Notaris dalam mensertifikasi transaksi yang dilakukan secara elektronik sama dengan kewenangan Notaris dalam ketentuan Pasal 15 ayat (2) huruf a UUJNP atau yang dapat juga disebut dengan kewenangan untuk melakukan legalisasi, yaitu memberikan wewenang kepada Notaris untuk memastikan tanda tangan yang ada pada sertifikat elektronik tersebut adalah benar tanda tangan dari para pihak, memastikan kebenaran status dan identitas dari para pihak, serta memastikan tanggal pada sertifikat elektronik tersebut.]]>
<![CDATA[A Peran Notaris Dalam Mendukung Investasi Di Era Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Putu Mirayanthi Utami]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p03
<![CDATA[Indonesia is one of the ASEAN members who agreed to implement the ACIA which focuses on investment, as the result of the implementation of the AEC. With the expectation of increasing foreign investment activities between ASEAN member countries and becoming one of the investment destinations in the world. It is proven that Indonesia still the choice of foreign investors. In order to support interests of foreign investors in conducting their business, so the role of the Notary public in investment activities needed through written proof. This study aims to analyse and provide an understanding of the role of the Notary in supporting investment in Indonesia when the AEC is implemented. This research using normative juridical methods. The study results show that the role of the Notary through direct investment is authorized to make authentic deeds based on Company Law. Furthermore, the authority of the Notary is regulated in Notary Law and Notary Law Amandement such as: providing legal counselling, services and legalizing public documents that will be used in Indonesia or needed for investment abroad. The implication of AEC it would be awared by the Notary. Therefore as a profession in a field of law, the have a to provide a social services by mastering in English and knowledge able in investment of law accordance with hierarchy of legislation and increasing competence following Notary Law and Notary Law Amandement, Notary Ethics Code, and Bylaws I.N.I. so that they can compete professionally. Indonesia merupakan salah satu anggota ASEAN yang menyetujui direalisasikannya ACIA yang berfokus pada investasi, sebagai implikasi diberlakukannya MEA. Dengan harapan dapat meningkatkan kegiatan investasi asing antara negara-negara anggota ASEAN dan menjadi salah satu tujuan investasi di dunia. Terbukti Indonesia masih menjadi pilihan investor asing. Guna menunjang kepentingan investor dalam menjalankan usahanya, maka peranan Notaris dalam kegiatan investasi sangat dibutuhkan melalui pembuktian tertulis. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa dan memberikan pemahaman peranan Notaris dalam mendukung investasi di Indonesia saat MEA diberlakukan. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa peran Notaris melalui investasi langsung yaitu berwenang membuat akta otentik yang dilandasi dengan Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas. Selain itu, kewenangan Notaris diatur dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris dan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Perubahan seperti: memberikan penyuluhan hukum, pelayanan dan melegalisasi dokumen publik yang akan digunakan di Indonesia atau diperlukan untuk investasi di luar negeri. Implikasi diberlakukannya MEA juga harus disadari oleh Notaris. Maka sebagai profesi hukum dalam memberikan pelayanan kepada masyarakat haruslah berbekal penguasaan Bahasa Inggris, penguasaan mengenai hukum investasi sesuai dengan hirarki perundang-undangan dan peningkatan kompetensi sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris dan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Perubahan, Kode Etik Notaris, dan Anggaran Rumah Tangga I.N.I sehingga mampu bersaing secara profesionalitas.]]>
<![CDATA[Jabatan Notaris Dalam Era Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Genesia Hardina Memah]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p16
<![CDATA[The purpose of this research is to find the influences of the development on technology information and communication on the administrative and the material (substantive) aspect to a notary, wherein this research normative legal methodology is conducted with the results as follow there is a positive administrative influence of technology information and communication such as the use of e-government in the communication of notary or candidate of a notary with government and the increased office effectiveness. However, there is also a negative influence such as the ease of publication and self-promotion; thus, the Indonesia Notary Association need to always give direction through a regular meeting. The impact of technology information and communication on the administrative aspect is that it could result on clash between the Law of Notary with other law that already regulate the utilization of technology information and communication where from the theory point of view, the concept of lex specialis derogat legi generali can be used while from the practical perspective, it is preferable to have memorandum of understanding between the Indonesian Notary Association with the Indonesian Nasional Police (Polri).]]>
<![CDATA[Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Yang Dipailitkan ]]>
<![CDATA[Luh Putu Ari tiarna dewi]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p09
<![CDATA[Abstract The right of encumbrance is one kind of guarantees that the debtor can promise to the creditor. In fulfillment of achievements not close possible constraints experienced by debtor. A debtor can be declared bankrupt and may result in a loss of management rights to his/her assets. This raises the limitation of the execution rights of separatist creditors as stipulated in article 56 paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act governing the suspension of the right to execute the warranty object. So it can be assumed that there is a conflict of norms between article 14 of the encumbrance right and article 55 paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act with section article 56 paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act. The focus of the problem of research is how to execute the right to comply with the act of Liability and the Bankruptcy Act? And is it fair for the holders of the rights and other creditors in the case of bankruptcy? The purpose of this study is to know how the right to execute the rights in accordance with the Encumbrance Rights and Bankruptcy Act and to know the justice of the debt collectors as the rightsholders with other creditors. The type of research is normative research. Conclusion is the Bankruptcy Act due to the nature of lex specialist on the execution of the guarantee in the case of bankruptcy and stay to protect all interests of the creditors recognized in a bankruptcy case. Keywords: execution, encumbrance right, bankcrupty. Abstrak Hak Tanggungan merupakan salah satu jaminan kebendaan yang dapat dijanjikan oleh debitor kepada kreditor. Dalam pemenuhan prestasi tidak menutup kemungkinan adanya kendala-kendala yang dialami oleh debitor. Seorang debitor dapat dinyatakan pailit dan dapat berakibat hilangnya hak kepengurusan atas harta kekayaannya yang pastinya berdampak terhadap Hak Tanggungannya. Hal ini menimbulkan pembatasan hak eksekusi kreditor separatis sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 56 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Kepailitan yang mengatur penangguhan hak eksekusi obyek jaminan. Sehingga dapat diasumsikan adanya konflik norma antara pasal 14 Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan dan pasal 55 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Kepailitan dengan pasal 56 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Kepailitan. Sehingga yang menjadi fokus permasalahan penelitian adalah bagaimana eksekusi hak tanggungan sesuai Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan? Dan apakah hal tersebut adil bagi si pemegang hak tanggungan dan kreditor lainnya dalam perkara kepailitan? Adapun tujuan pendalaman studi ini adalah untuk menyelami bagaimana eksekusi hak tanggungan sesuai Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan mengetahui keadilan bagi penagih utang selaku pemegang hak tanggungan dengan kreditor lainnya dengan melihat kerangka konsep adanya penangguhan hak. Jenis penelitian ini ialah penelitian normatif. Kesimpulan adalah eksekusi dijalankan sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Kepailitan dikarenakan sifatnya lex specialis atas eksekusi jaminan dalam perkara kepailitan dan adanya penangguhan hak untuk melindungi seluruh kepentingan para kreditor yang diakui dalam perkara kepailitan. Kata Kunci: Eksekusi, Hak Tanggungan, Pailit.]]>
<![CDATA[MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PELANGGARAN HAK CIPTA MELALUI ARBITRASE ]]>
<![CDATA[I Made Dwi Dimas Mahendrayana]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p14
<![CDATA[A copyright violation occurs when someone makes an announcement or reproduction of a work without permission from the creator or copyright holder. If this happens, the creator or copyright holder can bring his dispute to be resolved through alternative dispute resolution or arbitration. However, the Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright does not regulate the mechanism for resolving copyright disputes through arbitration. The purpose of this study is to determine the mechanism for resolving disputes over copyright infringement through arbitration and the mechanism for canceling decisions on resolving disputes over copyright infringement through arbitration. This research uses normative legal research. From the results of the study, the initial stage of the mechanism of resolving disputes over copyright infringement through arbitration begins with the submission of the request for arbitration. Furthermore, the applicant makes a claim letter and proceed with the selection and appointment of the arbitrator. Then the arbitration examination. The final stage of the trial in arbitration is the submission of the award to the parties, and continued with the implementation of the arbitration award. An arbitration award can be requested to be canceled. The mechanism for cancellation of a national arbitration award begins by registering an arbitration award for cancellation at the Registrar's Office of the District Court. Then the court will examine the facts about whether or not the reasons stated by the applicant to cancel the arbitration award. If no, the application is rejected, but if the facts are found, the court is only authorized to cancel part of the arbitration award.]]>
<![CDATA[A PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK AKIBAT PERJANJIAN NOMINEE DALAM PERSPEKTIF ADR ]]>
<![CDATA[DEDY ARYA DIRAWAN]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p04
<![CDATA[Indonesia sebagai Negara kepulauan yang kekayaan alamnya telah diakui oleh dunia Internasional sangat menarik minat banyak wisatawan (warga negara asing). Berbagai macam tujuan orang asing itu pada saat melakukan kegiatannya di Indonesia, mendorong keinginan orang asing untuk mempunyai tempat tinggal di Indonesia. Orang asing yang memilih untuk bertempat tinggal di Indonesia dapat menimbulkan dampak positif bagi perkembangan perekonomian di Indonesia salah satunya dengan melakukan investasi di Indonesia. Adapun tujuan yang diharapkan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana penyelesaian konflik akibat perjanjian nominee dalam perspektif Alternatif Dispute Resolution disebut (ADR) dan Untuk memahami bagaimana kekuatan hukum penyelesaian konflik akibat perjanjian nominee melalui mediasi bagi para pihak yang bersengketa. Penelitian ini mengenai penyelesaian sengketa hak milik atas tanah akibat perjanjian nominee antara Warga Negara Indonesia dengan Warga Negara Asing melalui mediasi dalam perspektif ADR. Jenis penelitian yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian adalah menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif yaitu lebih mengacu pada norma-norma hukum yang terdapat di dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, peraturan pemerintah, UUPA, Pasal 58 UU No 48 Tahun 2009, dan UU No. 30 Tahun 1999. Penyelesaian konflik akibat perjanjian nominee dalam perspektif ADR memberikan kesempatan bagi kedua belah pihak untuk menyelesaikan sengketanya secara damai. Kesepakatan tersebut didaftarkan ke pengadilan negeri, terakhir pelaksanaan akta perdamaian yang dilaksanakan oleh kedua belah pihak dengan itikad baik. Hasil isi kesepakatan yang sudah didaftarkan ke Pengadilan Negeri memiliki kekuatan hukum eksekutorial. Akta perdamaian seperti putusan biasa yakni dapat diminta eksekusi jika suatu saat nanti salah satu pihak tidak mentaatinya, tidak dapat dibanding dan bersifat final mengikat kedua belah pihak.]]>
<![CDATA[Hak Guna Bangunan Untuk Investasi dalam Bidang Pariwisata ]]>
<![CDATA[Ida Ayu Putu Larashati]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p17
<![CDATA[The role of the National Land Law in development is not yet perfect, but in reality the National Land Law has also succeeded in supporting development activities in all fields in the supply and management or utilization of the required land and legal certainty in its control and management or use. This study aims to examine building rights for investment in tourism. The method used is a normative research method due to legal uncertainty in the regulation of building rights as a form of tourism investment. The development of the tourism industry has an impact on various aspects of people's lives, both from the planned tourism industry and the unplanned implementation of the tourism industry.The impact of the planned implementation of the tourism industry development can be optimally anticipated. The principles of carrying out investments by using building rights as the basis for their rights can help the development of tourism because the holders of land titles do not lose ownership of their land. The structuring of sustainable tourism development is a development that has economic, socio-cultural and environmental dimensions so that it has justice not only for future generations. In this construction, tourism must be seen as a system that includes various components that interact with and influence each other. Therefore, it is needed a synergy of policies governing the implementation of tourism with a multisectoral and multidisciplinary approach to service integration, and the synergy of the government and the community in the use of land with Building Use Rights for tourism purposes]]>
